Search

Background: The adoption of robotic platforms in upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery is expanding rapidly. The absence of centralised guidance and governance in adoption of new surgical technologies may lead to an increased risk of patient harm., Methods: Surgeon stakeholders participated in a Delphi consensus process following a national open-invitation in-person meeting on the adoption of robotic upper GI surgery. Consensus agreement was deemed met if >80% agreement was achieved., Results: Following two rounds of Delphi voting, 25 statements were agreed on covering the training process, governance and good practice for surgeons' adoption in upper GI surgery. One statement failed to achieve consensus., Conclusions: These recommendations are intended to support surgeons, patients and health systems in the adoption of robotics in upper GI surgery.

Background: The 2024 GI Surgery Summit brought together Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (SSAT), Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO), and Society of University Surgeons (SUS) members to assess the current state of gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. This report reviews the key discussions and recommendations after the dedicated plenary session that addressed challenges in providing high-quality, accessible GI surgery for all patients., Methods: The Summit took place from January 14 to 16. During the plenary session "Defining the role and impact of specialty surgeons in ensuring high-quality, accessible abdominal surgery," leaders, rising leaders, and members of SSAT, SSO, and SUS met and discussed challenges in providing high-quality, accessible GI surgery., Results: Actionable recommendations to address the challenges in providing high-quality, accessible GI surgical care were made, including engaging communities and patients, building alliances across hospitals and surgeons, and establishing standards of GI surgical care., Conclusion: Surgeons, hospital systems, and surgical societies can improve healthcare access and outcomes for all GI surgical patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: One of the topics that show differences of opinion in the scientific field of nutrition is the recommendation by clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) of an immunomodulatory diet with arginine, nucleotides and omega-3 for individuals diagnosed with cancer undergoing major surgery. The quality of the recommendations is directly related to credibility, transparency and rigour in their development, but also to the quality of the studies published and available for inclusion in the recommendation, such as systematic reviews (SRs) and randomised clinical trials. The aim of this study is to evaluate the methodological quality of the recommendation of perioperative immunomodulatory supplementation for individuals with gastrointestinal and head and neck cancer, the CPGs, and the studies that support the recommendations., Methods and Analysis: We will conduct a systematic search for CPGs. Recommendations for nutritional supplementation with immunomodulatory substrates for individuals undergoing major oncological surgery will be analysed using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation-Recommendations Excellence tool. CPGs will be analysed using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II tool. The SRs cited in the recommendations will be analysed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews II tool and additional questions regarding heterogeneity in reviews. The clinical trials cited in the SRs and in the guideline recommendations (when applicable) will be analysed according to questions regarding heterogeneity in trials. The results will be presented in tables or charts using descriptive analyses., Ethics and Dissemination: The results of this study will be disseminated through relevant conferences and peer-reviewed journals., Protocol Registration Number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/X2GYT., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Laparoscopy is considered the best surgical approach for Crohn's Disease (CD), and strictureplasty a reliable alternative to intestinal resection. Nevertheless, their association has never been evaluated., Aim: To investigate feasibility and safety of conventional (SP) and non-conventional (NCSP) strictureplasties, using laparoscopy, for complicated CD., Methods: Starting January 2008, a prospective cohort study was performed, in consecutive, unselected patients, undergoing primary surgery for CD (Group-A). The residential database (CD-CARD) was used for the retrospective extraction of control patients (Group-B). Univariate and multi-variate analysis of pre-operative characteristics, intra-operative findings, morbidity, and intra-abdominal septic complications (IASCs) was performed., Results: Between January 2008 and December 2019, 331 patients received 162 SPs, 138 NCSPs, and 373 resections (Group-A). From the CD-CARD, 227 control patients received 159 SPs, 117 NCSPs, and 271 resections (Group-B) (ns). Preoperatively, Group-A presented batter nutritional status and received more biological therapies, Group-B more steroids. Group-A presented less abdominal abscesses, planned ostomies, minor complications, shorter operating time and hospitalization than Group-B, but similar major complications, IASCs and anastomotic leaks. IASCs were related to older age, elevated inflammatory indices, and preoperative treatment with high-risk drugs., Conclusions: SP and NCSP are feasible by laparoscopy, with low morbidity rate, confirming the advantages of both minimally invasive and conservative surgery., (Copyright © 2021 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Postoperative complications impact on early and long-term patients' outcome. Appropriate perioperative fluid management is pivotal in this context; however, the most effective perioperative fluid management is still unclear. The enhanced recovery after surgery pathways recommend a perioperative zero-balance, whereas recent findings suggest a more liberal approach could be beneficial. We conducted this trial to address the impact of restrictive vs. liberal fluid approaches on overall postoperative complications and mortality., Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We performed a systematic literature search using MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid) and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical trials register databases, published from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2019. We included RCTs enrolling adult patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery and comparing the use of restrictive/liberal approaches enrolling at least 15 patients in each subgroup. Studies involving cardiac, non-elective surgery, paediatric or obstetric surgeries were excluded., Results: After full-text examination, the metanalysis finally included 18 studies and 5567 patients randomised to restrictive (2786 patients; 50.0%) or liberal approaches (2780 patients; 50.0%). We found no difference in the occurrence of severe postoperative complications between restrictive and liberal subgroups [risk difference (95% CI) = 0.009 (- 0.02; 0.04); p value = 0.62; I 2 (95% CI) = 38.6% (0-66.9%)]. This result was confirmed also in the subgroup of five studies having a low overall risk of bias. The liberal approach was associated with lower overall renal major events, as compared to the restrictive [risk difference (95% CI) = 0.06 (0.02-0.09); p value  = 0.001]. We found no difference in either early (p value  = 0.33) or late (p value  = 0.22) postoperative mortality between restrictive and liberal subgroups CONCLUSIONS: In major abdominal elective surgery perioperative, the choice between liberal or restrictive approach did not affect overall major postoperative complications or mortality. In a subgroup analysis, a liberal as compared to a restrictive perioperative fluid policy was associated with lower overall complication renal major events, as compared to the restrictive., Trial Registration: CRD42020218059; Registration: February 2020, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=218059 .

Introduction: Multiple intestinal atresia (MIA) is a rare cause of neonatal intestinal obstruction. To provide an overview of the current prenatal, surgical, and nutritional management of MIA, we report our experience and a literature review of papers published after 1990., Methods: All cases of isolated MIA (non-hereditary, not associated with apple-peel syndrome or gastroschisis) treated at our institution between 2005 and 2016 were reviewed and compared with cases found in the literature., Results: Seven patients were prenatally suspected of having intestinal obstruction and were postnatally diagnosed with MIA, with a mean 1.7 (1-2) resections-anastomoses (RA) and 6 (1-10) strictureplasties performed, resulting in a mean resected bowel length of 15.1cm (15-25 cm). Median time to full oral feed was 46 days (14-626 days). All patients were alive and none had orality disorder after a mean follow-up of 3.1 years (0.2-8.1 years). Three surgical strategies were found in the literature review: multiple RA (68%, 34/50) including Santulli's technique in four of 34 (12%) and anastomoses over a transanastomotic tube (32%, 16/50), with a 98% survival rate, and short-bowel syndrome for only two patients., Conclusion: Bowel-sparing surgery and appropriate medical management are key to ensuring a favorable nutritional and gastrointestinal outcome and a good prognosis. Prenatal assessment and standardization of the surgical course of treatment remain challenging., (Copyright © 2021 French Society of Pediatrics. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Randomised trials have shown an Enhanced Recovery Program (ERP) can shorten stay after colorectal surgery. Previous research has focused on patient compliance neglecting the role of care providers. National data on implementation and adherence to standardised care are lacking. We examined care organisation and delivery including the ERP, and correlated this with clinical outcomes., Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to surgeons and nurses in August-October 2015. All English National Health Service Trusts providing elective colorectal surgery were invited. Responses frequencies and variation were examined. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify underlying features of care. Standardised factor scores were correlated with elective clinical outcomes of length of stay, mortality and readmission rates from 2013-15., Results: 218/600 (36.3%) postal responses were received from 84/90 (93.3%) Trusts that agreed to participate. Combined with email responses, 301 surveys were analysed. 281/301 (93.4%) agreed or strongly agreed that they had a standardised, ERP-based care protocol. However, 182/301 (60.5%) indicated all consultants managed post-operative oral intake similarly. After factor analysis, higher hospital average ERP-based care standardisation and clinician adherence score were significantly correlated with reduced length of stay, as well as higher ratings of teamwork and support for complication management., Conclusions: Standardised, ERP-based care was near universal, but clinician adherence varied markedly. Units reporting higher levels of clinician adherence achieved the lowest length of stay. Having a protocol is not enough. Careful implementation and adherence by all of the team is vital to achieve the best results.

Background: The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative links payments for service beneficiaries during an episode of care (limited to 90 days from index surgery discharge)., Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify drivers of costs/payments for the major bowel Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative., Design: Discharges from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files of hospitals participating in the major bowel bundle of the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative were analyzed., Settings: The study was conducted at 4 tertiary care centers., Patients: All patients in diagnostic related groups of 329, 330, or 331 treated at eligible facilities between September 1, 2012, and September 30, 2014, were included., Main Outcome Measures: We calculated all costs/payments for the bundled period, that is, 3 days before surgery, the index hospitalization including surgery, and the 90-day postoperative period. We then determined costs for laparoscopic versus open procedures using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, procedure codes for each of the diagnostic related groups, as well as in aggregate. Last, we calculated differential impact of cost drivers on overall total episode costs., Results: In the cohort of hospitals participating in the major bowel Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative, open procedures ($45,073) cost 1.6 times more than laparoscopic. For the lowest complexity diagnostic related group (331), performance of the procedure with open techniques was the largest total episode cost driver, because use of postdischarge services remained low. In the highest complexity diagnostic related group (329), readmission costs, skilled nursing facilities costs, and home health services costs were the greatest cost drivers after hospital services., Limitations: The analyses are limited by the retrospective nature of the study., Conclusions: These results indicate that efforts to safely perform open procedures with laparoscopic techniques would be most effective in reducing costs for lower complexity diagnostic related groups, whereas efforts to impact readmission and postdischarge service use would be most impactful for the higher complexity diagnostic related groups. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B420. ¿CUÁLES SON LOS FACTORES DETERMINANTES DE LOS COSTOS DE LA INICIATIVA DE MEJORA DE LA ATENCIÓN DE PAGOS COMBINADOS PARA EL INTESTINO MAYOR?: La iniciativa de pagos combinados para la mejora de la atención (BPCI) vincula los pagos para los beneficiarios del servicio durante un episodio de atención (limitado a 90 días desde el alta hospitalaria de la cirugía índice).Identificar los factores determinantes de los costos / pagos de la iniciativa BPCI intestinal mayor.Análisis de altas de los Archivos Analíticos Estándar de Medicare de los hospitales que participan en el paquete intestinal principal de la iniciativa BPCI.Todos los pacientes en Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico (GRD) de 329, 330 o 331 tratados en instalaciones elegibles desde el 1 de Septiembre de 2012 hasta el 30 de Septiembre de 2014.Calculamos todos los costos / pagos para el período combinado, es decir, tres días antes de la cirugía, el índice de hospitalización incluida la cirugía y el período posoperatorio de 90 días. Luego, determinamos los costos de los procedimientos laparoscópicos versus abiertos utilizando códigos de procedimiento ICD-9 para cada uno de los GRD, así como en conjunto. Por último, calculamos el impacto diferencial de los generadores de costos sobre los costos totales del episodio.En la cohorte de hospitales que participan en la iniciativa BPCI del intestino principal, los procedimientos abiertos ($ 45.073) cuestan 1,6 veces más que los laparoscópicos. Para el GRD de menor complejidad (331), la realización del procedimiento con técnicas abiertas fue el mayor factor de costo total del episodio, ya que la utilización de los servicios posteriores al alta se mantuvo baja. En el GRD de mayor complejidad (329), los costos de readmisión, los costos de las instalaciones de enfermería especializada y los costos de los servicios de salud en el hogar fueron los mayores factores de costo después de los servicios hospitalarios.Los análisis están limitados por la naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio.Estos resultados indican que los esfuerzos para realizar procedimientos abiertos de manera segura con técnicas laparoscópicas serían más efectivos para reducir los costos de los GRD de menor complejidad, mientras que los esfuerzos para impactar la readmisión y la utilización del servicio posterior al alta serían más impactantes para los GRD de mayor complejidad. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B420.

Background: Lymph node (LN) harvest in colorectal cancer resections is a well-recognised prognostic factor for disease staging and determining survival, particularly for node-negative (N0) diseases. Extralevator abdominoperineal excisions (ELAPE) aim to prevent "waisting" that occurs during conventional abdominoperineal resections (APR) for low rectal cancers, and reducing circumferential resection margin (CRM) infiltration rate. Our study investigates whether ELAPE may also improve the quality of LN harvests, addressing gaps in the literature., Methods: This retrospective observational study reviewed 2 sets of 30 consecutive APRs before and after the adoption of ELAPE in our unit. The primary outcomes are the total LN counts and rates of meeting the standard of 12-minimum, particularly for those with node-negative disease. The secondary outcomes are the CRM involvement rates. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, laparoscopic or open surgery and the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were accounted for in our analyses., Results: Median LN counts were slightly higher in the ELAPE group (16.5 vs. 15). Specimens failing the minimum 12-LN requirements were almost significantly fewer in the ELAPE group (OR 0.456, P = 0.085). Among node-negative rectal cancers, significantly fewer resections failed the 12-LN standard in the ELAPE group than APR group (OR 0.211, P = 0.044). ELAPE led to a near-significant decrease in CRM involvement (OR 0.365, P = 0.088). These improvements were persistently observed after taking into account baselines and potential confounders in regression analyses., Conclusion: ELAPE provides higher quality of LN harvests that meet the 12-minimal requirements than conventional APR, particularly in node-negative rectal cancers. The superiority is independent of potential confounding factors, and may implicate better clinical outcomes.

Background and Objective: The impact of surgical indication on compliance with enhanced recovery program (ERP) and on outcomes has never been assessed. This study aims to assess the impact of surgical indication (malignant vs benign) on postoperative outcomes and ERP compliance., Methods: A multicenter nationwide database was analyzed. Patients who underwent colorectal surgery for benign disease and those who underwent colorectal surgery for cancer were compared. Inclusion criteria were elective colorectal resection with anastomosis. ERP components, postoperative morbidity, and hospital length of hospital stay data were collected., Results: Among the 6472 patients registered in the database between October 2012 and June 2018, 4528 patients were included; 2647 in the malignant group and 1881 in the benign group. The ERP compliance over 70% was not different between groups. Postoperative morbidity rate was higher in the malignant group (22.5% vs 19.3%; P = .009) but not confirmed in multivariate analysis. Patients in the malignant group were more often readmitted after discharge, 6.6% vs 4.6% (P = .004). The mean LOS was 6.3 ± 5.0 days in the malignant group and 5.4 ± 4.7 days in the benign group (P < .001)., Conclusions: Indication for colorectal surgery did not significantly influence peri-operative management and postoperative major complications, in patients managed within an enhanced recovery program., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) have been used to improve patient outcomes and resource utilization after surgery. These evidence-based interventions include patient education, standardized anesthesia protocols, and limited fasting, but their use among pediatric populations is lagging. We aimed to determine baseline recovery practices within pediatric surgery departments participating in an ERP implementation trial for elective inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) operations., Methods: To measure baseline ERP adherence, we administered a survey to a staff surgeon in each of the 18 participating sites. The survey assessed demographics of each department and utilization of 21 recovery elements during patient encounter phases. Mixed-methods analysis was used to evaluate predictors and barriers to ERP element implementation., Results: The assessment revealed an average of 6.3 ERP elements being practiced at each site. The most commonly practiced elements were using minimally invasive techniques (100%), avoiding intraabdominal drains (89%), and ileus prophylaxis (72%). The preoperative phase had the most elements with no adherence including patient education, optimizing medical comorbidities, and avoiding prolonged fasting. There was no association with number of elements utilized and total number of surgeons in the department, annual IBD surgery volume, and hospital size. Lack of buy-in from colleagues, electronic medical record adaptation, and resources for data collection and analysis were identified barriers., Conclusions: Higher intervention utilization for IBD surgery was associated with elements surgeons directly control such as use of laparoscopy and avoiding drains. Elements requiring system-level changes had lower use. The study characterizes the scope of ERP utilization and the need for effective tools to improve adoption., Level of Evidence: Level III., Type of Study: Mixed-methods survey., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rectal prolapse is relatively uncommon in male patients. The aim of this study was to compare males and females who underwent rectal prolapse surgery., Study Design: Retrospective analysis of the ACS NSQIP public use file., Results: Among 12,220 patients, 978 (8%) were male and 11,242 (92%) were female. Males were younger, 56 (38-73) vs. 71 (58-83) years, less often white (83% vs. 71%), had lower ASA scores, and underwent more laparoscopic (33% vs. 27%), more open (33% vs. 29%), and less perineal (33% vs 44%) procedures (all p < 0.05). Morbidity (9.9% vs. 10.0%), reoperation (3.4% vs. 3.1%), and readmission (5.7% vs. 6.0%) were not different for males and females. In subgroup analysis by surgical procedure type, there remained no outcome differences. Propensity matched analysis revealed no difference in the use of laparoscopic, open, or perineal procedures., Conclusions: Males with rectal prolapse are younger, have a different racial distribution, a lower surgical risk profile, and undergo different surgical procedures than females, which appears to be driven by patient age and surgical risk assessment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Jon Vogel, Luiz Lobato, Brandon Chapman, Michael Bronsert, Elisa Birnbaum, and Robert Meguid report no financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To illustrate the construction of statistical control charts and show their potential application to analysis of outcomes in children's surgery., Patients and Methods: Two datasets recording outcomes following esophageal atresia repair and intestinal resection for Crohn's disease maintained by the author were used to construct four types of charts. The effects of altering the target signal, the alarm signal and the limits are illustrated. The dilemmas in choice of target rate are described. Simulated data illustrate the advantages over hypothesis testing., Results: The charts show the author's institutional leak rate for esophageal atresia repair may be within acceptable limits, but that this is dependent on the target set. The desirable target is contentious. The leak rate for anastomoses following intestinal resection for Crohn's disease leak is also within acceptable limits when compared to published experience, but may be deteriorating. The charts are able to detect deteriorating levels of performance well before hypothesis testing would suggest a systematic problem with outcomes., Conclusions: Statistical process control charts can provide surgeons with early warning of systematic poor performance. They are robust to volume-outcome influences, since the outcome is tested sequentially after each procedure or patient. They have application in a specialty with low frequencies of operations such as children's surgery., Type of Study: Diagnostic test., Level of Evidence: Level II., (Crown Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Conventionally, the Thiersch operation has typically involved blind positioning of the sling, and sling tension is subjectively based on a rule-of-thumb estimate. The aim of this study was to describe standardized methods for performing the Thiersch operation., Methods: Seventeen patients with fecal incontinence underwent the calibrated method of the Thiersch procedure. As an encircling sling, a 6-mm-wide silastic tube was used. Through 4 minimal perianal skin incisions, the sling was placed proximal to the anal skin 3 cm from the anal verge and 4 cm in depth. The circumference of the sling was 10 cm in length. Results were assessed by clinical responses and by comparing pre- and postoperative Wexner scores. The data were collected retrospectively., Results: The median follow-up period was 9 months (range 6-19). In 16 out of 17 fecal incontinence patients (94.1%), the median Wexner incontinence score was 0 (range 0-3) postoperatively. Localized sepsis developed in three cases (17.7%, 3/17), which were controlled with drainage and antibiotics. Fecal impaction occurred in one case (5.9%, 1/17). There was no removal or breakage of the inserted sling., Conclusions: The elasticity of the silastic tube reduced the incidence of sling breakage. According to the standardized method, the sling was placed external to the external anal sphincter muscle and at the junction of the external anal sphincter muscle and puborectalis muscle. Fecal incontinence was controlled effectively, and the incidence of fecal impaction was negligible. High reproducibility was observed with this method.

Background: Studies demonstrated that operating room personnel are exposed to anesthetic gases such as sevoflurane (SEVO). Measuring the gas burden is essential to assess the exposure objectively. Air pollution measurements and the biological monitoring of urinary SEVO and its metabolite hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) are possible approaches. Calculating the mass of inhaled SEVO is an alternative, but its predictive power has not been evaluated. We investigated the SEVO burdens of abdominal surgeons and hypothesized that inhaled mass calculations would be better suited than pollution measurements in their breathing zones (25 cm around nose and mouth) to estimate urinary SEVO and HFIP concentrations. The effects of potentially influencing factors were considered., Methods: SEVO pollution was continuously measured by photoacoustic gas monitoring. Urinary SEVO and HFIP samples, which were collected before and after surgery, were analyzed by a blinded environmental toxicologist using the headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method. The mass of inhaled SEVO was calculated according to the formula mVA = cVA·(Equation is included in full-text article.)·t·ρ VA aer. (mVA: inhaled mass; cVA: volume concentration; (Equation is included in full-text article.): respiratory minute volume; t: exposure time; and ρ VA aer.: gaseous density of SEVO). A linear multilevel mixed model was used for data analysis and comparisons of the different approaches., Results: Eight surgeons performed 22 pancreatic resections. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) SEVO pollution was 0.32 ppm (0.09 ppm). Urinary SEVO concentrations were below the detection limit in all samples, whereas HFIP was detectable in 82% of the preoperative samples in a mean (SD) concentration of 8.53 µg·L (15.53 µg·L; median: 2.11 µg·L, interquartile range [IQR]: 4.58 µg·L) and in all postoperative samples (25.42 µg·L [21.39 µg·L]). The mean (SD) inhaled SEVO mass was 5.67 mg (2.55 mg). The postoperative HFIP concentrations correlated linearly to the SEVO concentrations in the surgeons' breathing zones (β = 216.89; P < .001) and to the calculated masses of inhaled SEVO (β = 4.17; P = .018). The surgeon's body mass index (BMI), age, and the frequency of surgeries within the last 24 hours before study entry did not influence the relation between HFIP concentration and air pollution or inhaled mass, respectively., Conclusions: The biological SEVO burden, expressed as urinary HFIP concentration, can be estimated by monitoring SEVO pollution in the personnel's individual breathing zone. Urinary SEVO was not an appropriate biomarker in this setting.

Background: There is significant variation in rectal cancer outcomes in the USA, and reported outcomes have been inferior to those in other countries. In recognition of this fact, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) recently launched the Commission on Cancer (CoC) National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC) in an effort to further optimize rectal cancer care. Large surgical databases will play an important role in tracking surgical and oncologic outcomes. Our study sought to explore the trends in surgical outcomes over the decade prior to the NAPRC using a large national database., Methods: The ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2017 was used to select colorectal cancer cases which were divided into abdominal-colonic (AC) and pelvic-rectal (PR) cohorts based upon the operation performed. Outcomes of interest were occurrence of any major surgical complication, mortality within 30 days of procedure, and postoperative length of stay (LOS). Chi-square and two sample t-tests were used to evaluate association between various risk factors and outcomes. Modified Poisson regression was used to compare and estimate the unadjusted and adjusted effect of procedure type on the outcomes. STATA 15.1 was used for analysis and statistical significance was set at 0.05., Results: A total of 34,159 patients were analyzed. AC cases constituted 50.7% of the overall cohort. The two groups were relatively similar in demographic distribution, but the PR patients had higher rates of hypoalbuminemia and were sicker (ASA class 3 or greater). Rates of non-sphincter preserving operations ranged from 30 to 34%. Higher complication rates in the PR cohort were mainly infectious and surgical site complications, while rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism were similar between the two cohorts. On bivariate analysis, rates of mortality were similar between the two groups (AC: 1.02% vs PR: 0.91%, p = 0.395), while PR patients were found to be 1.36 times (95% CI: 1.32-1.41) more likely to have major complications and 1.40 times (95% CI: 1.35-1.44) more likely to have an extended LOS as compared to the AC patients. After multivariable analysis, PR patients continued to have a higher likelihood of major complications (IRR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.25-1.36) and extended LOS (IRR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.33-1.43). 10-year trends showed a significant reduction in the percentage of patients with prolonged lengths of hospitalization as well as a reduction of nearly 20% in the mean LOS, but without improvement in morbidity or mortality., Conclusions: Patients undergoing PR operations were more likely to have had major complications than were patients who underwent AC procedures; unfortunately no improvement in the rate of these complications or in mortality occurred. Perhaps the significant reduction in LOS is due in part to an increased prevalence of minimally invasive surgery and/or enhanced recovery protocols. Data were found to be lacking within NSQIP for several important variables including key oncologic data, stratification by surgical volume, and patient geographic location. We anticipate that the NAPRC should help improve PR surgical and oncologic outcomes including decreasing morbidity and mortality rates during the next decade., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare no relevant financial disclosures., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS ® ) Society guidelines integrate evidence-based practices into multimodal care pathways that have improved outcomes in multiple adult surgical specialties. There are currently no pediatric ERAS ® Society guidelines. We created an ERAS ® guideline designed to enhance quality of care in neonatal intestinal resection surgery., Methods: A multidisciplinary guideline generation group defined the scope, population, and guideline topics. Systematic reviews were supplemented by targeted searching and expert identification to identify 3514 publications that were screened to develop and support recommendations. Final recommendations were determined through consensus and were assessed for evidence quality and recommendation strength. Parental input was attained throughout the process., Results: Final recommendations ranged from communication strategies to antibiotic use. Topics with poor-quality and conflicting evidence were eliminated. Several recommendations were combined. The quality of supporting evidence was variable. Seventeen final recommendations are included in the proposed guideline., Discussion: We have developed a comprehensive, evidence-based ERAS guideline for neonates undergoing intestinal resection surgery. This guideline, and its creation process, provides a foundation for future ERAS guideline development and can ultimately lead to improved perioperative care across a variety of pediatric surgical specialties.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 is currently of global concern. Cancer patients are advised to stay at home in case of potential infection, which may cause delays of routine diagnosis and necessary treatment. How colorectal surgeons should manage this during the epidemic remains a big challenge. The objective of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of routine colorectal surgery during coronavirus disease 2019 and to offer some Chinese recommendations to colorectal surgeons throughout the world., Methods: A total of 166 patients receiving colorectal surgery from 20 December 2019 to 20 March 2020 at Department of General Surgery in Chinese General Hospital of People's Liberation Army were enrolled, and further divided into two groups based on before or after admission date of 20 January 2020. Clinicopathologic data such as hospital stay and economic data such as total costs were collected and analysed retrospectively., Results: Longer hospital stay, higher proportion of non-local patients and more hospitalization cost were found in the post-20 January group (special-time group) (P < 0.001; P < 0.05; P < 0.05, respectively). Apart from this, no difference existed with regard to baseline demographical data such as age, sex and height, as well as clinicopathological data such as previous history, surgery time, operation extent and TNM staging., Conclusions: This real-world study indicated that performing colorectal surgery during coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic might be safe and feasible based on comprehensive screening and investigation. We have summarized several recommendations here, hoping to help surgeons from related departments across the world., (© 2020 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)

Background: Assessing composite measures of quality such as textbook outcome may be superior to focusing on individual parameters when evaluating hospital performance. The aim of the current study was to assess the impact of teaching hospital status on the occurrence of a textbook outcome after hepatopancreatic surgery., Methods: The Medicare Inpatient Standard Analytic Files were used to identify patients undergoing hepatopancreatic surgery from 2013 to 2015 for a malignant indication. Stratified and multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between teaching hospital status, hospital surgical volume and textbook outcome., Results: Among 8,035 Medicare patients (hepatectomy; 41.8%, pancreatectomy; 58.2%), 6,196 (77.1%) patients underwent surgery at a major teaching hospital, whereas 1,839 (22.9%) patients underwent surgery at a minor teaching hospital. Patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancer at a major teaching hospital had a greater likelihood of achieving a textbook outcome compared with patients treated at a minor teaching hospital (minor teaching hospital: 456, 40% versus major teaching hospital: 1,606, 45.4%; P = .002). The likelihood of textbook outcome was also greater among patients undergoing hepatopancreatic surgery at high-volume centers (pancreas, low volume: 875, 40.5% versus high volume: 1,187, 47.1% P < .001; liver, low volume: 608, 41.8% versus high volume: 886, 46.6%; P = .005). When examining only major teaching hospitals, patients undergoing a pancreatectomy at a high-volume center had 29% greater odds of achieving a textbook outcome (odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.49). In contrast, among patients undergoing pancreatic resection at high-volume centers, the odds of achieving a textbook outcome was comparable among major versus minor teaching hospital (odds ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 0.89-1.53)., Conclusion: The odds of achieving a textbook outcome after pancreatic and hepatic surgery was greater at major versus minor teaching hospitals; however, this effect was largely mediated by hepatopancreatic procedural volume. Patients and payers should focus on regionalization of pancreatic and liver resection to high-volume centers in an effort to optimize the chances of achieving a textbook outcome., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In hospitals and medical schools as densely populated sites with high risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), it is vital to adjust the teaching and training strategy for medical students to ensure curriculum completion with safety. This article aims to introduce the experience of teaching and training for medical students under the epidemic situation at Department of Surgery, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University and Zhongshan Hospital. The content includes exploring diversified online teaching models for undergraduate surgery courses and clinical practice, carrying out online graduate education and dissertation plans, and strengthening comprehensive education of medical humanity combined with knowledge of COVID-19 prevention. Through implementation of the above teaching strategies, scheduled learning plans of medical students can be well completed in an orderly, safe and quality-ensured manner. Our experience provides practical solution of medical teaching and could be advisable for other medical colleges and teaching hospitals.

Background: Hand Hygiene (HH) has been described as the cornerstone and starting point in all infection control. Compliance to HH is a fundamental quality indicator. The aim of this study was to investigate the HH compliance among Health-care Workers (HCWs) in Benin surgical care units., Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted for two months. The World Health Organization (WHO) Hand Hygiene Observation Tool was used in obstetric and gastrointestinal surgery through six public hospitals in Benin. HH compliance was calculated by dividing the number of times HH was performed by the total number of opportunities. HH technique and duration were also observed., Results: A total of 1315 HH opportunities were identified during observation period. Overall, the compliance rate was 33.3% (438/1315), without significant difference between professional categories (nurses =34.2%; auxiliaries =32.7%; and physicians =32.4%; p = 0.705). However, compliance rates differed (p < 0.001) between obstetric (49.4%) and gastrointestinal surgery (24.3%). Generally, HCWs were more compliant after body fluid exposure (54.5%) and after touching patient (37.5%), but less before patient contact (25.9%) and after touching patient surroundings (29.1%). HCWs were more likely to use soap and water (72.1%) compared to the alcohol based hand rub solution (27.9%). For all of the WHO five moments, hand washing was the most preferred action. For instance, hand rub only was observed 3.9% after body fluid exposure and 16.3% before aseptic action compared to hand washing at 50.6 and 16.7% respectively. Duration of HH performance was not correctly adhered to 94% of alcohol hand rub cases (mean duration 9 ± 6 s instead of 20 to 30 s) and 99.5% of hand washing cases (10 ± 7 s instead of the recommended 40 to 60 s). Of the 432 HCWs observed, 77.3% followed HH prerequisites (i.e. no artificial fingernails, no jewellery). We also noted a lack of permanent hand hygiene infrastructures such as sink, soap, towels and clean water., Conclusion: Compliance in surgery was found to be low in Benin hospitals. They missed two opportunities out of three to apply HH and when HH was applied, technique and duration were not appropriate. HH practices should be a priority to improve patient safety in Benin.

Importance: The association between quality of surgery and overall survival in patients affected by localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is not completely understood., Objective: To assess the risk of death with and without imatinib according to microscopic margins status (R0/R1) using data from a randomized study on adjuvant imatinib., Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a post hoc observational study on patients included in the randomized, open-label, phase III trial, performed between December 2004 and October 2008. Median follow-up was 9.1 years (IQR, 8-10 years). The study was performed at 112 hospitals in 12 countries. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of primary GIST, with intermediate or high risk of relapse; no evidence of residual disease after surgery; older than 18 years; and no prior malignancies or concurrent severe/uncontrolled medical conditions. Data were analyzed between July 17, 2017, and March 1, 2020., Interventions: Patients were randomized after surgery to either receive imatinib (400 mg/d) for 2 years or no adjuvant treatment. Randomization was stratified by center, risk category (high vs intermediate), tumor site (gastric vs other), and quality of surgery (R0 vs R1). Tumor rupture was included in the R1 category but also analyzed separately., Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end point of this substudy was overall survival (OS), estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared between R0/R1 using Cox models adjusted for treatment and stratification factors., Results: A total of 908 patients were included; 51.4% were men (465) and 48.6% were women (440), and the median age was 59 years (range, 18-89 years). One hundred sixty-two (17.8%) had an R1 resection, and 97 of 162 (59.9%) had tumor rupture. There was a significant difference in OS for patients undergoing an R1 vs R0 resection, overall (hazard ratio [HR], 2.05; 95% CI, 1.45-2.89) and by treatment arm (HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.37-3.75 with adjuvant imatinib and HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.16-2.99 without adjuvant imatinib). When tumor rupture was excluded, this difference in OS between R1 and R0 resections disappeared (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.54-2.01)., Conclusions and Relevance: The difference in OS by quality of surgery with or without imatinib was associated with the presence of tumor rupture. When the latter was excluded, the presence of R1 margins was not associated with worse OS., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00103168.

Background: The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) was introduced in Japan to improve the quality of laparoscopic surgery. This cohort study investigated the short- and long-term postoperative outcomes of colorectal cancer laparoscopic procedures performed by or with qualified surgeons compared with outcomes for unqualified surgeons., Methods: All laparoscopic colorectal resections performed from 2010 to 2013 in 11 Japanese hospitals were reviewed retrospectively. The procedures were categorized as performed by surgeons with or without the ESSQS qualification and patients' clinical, pathological and surgical features were used to match subgroups using propensity scoring. Outcome measures included postoperative and long-term results., Results: Overall, 1428 procedures were analysed; 586 procedures were performed with ESSQS-qualified surgeons and 842 were done by ESSQS-unqualified surgeons. Upon matching, two cohorts of 426 patients were selected for comparison of short-term results. A prevalence of rectal resection (50·3 versus 40·5 per cent; P < 0·001) and shorter duration of surgery (230 versus 238 min; P = 0·045) was reported for the ESSQS group. Intraoperative and postoperative complication and reoperation rates were significantly lower in the ESSQS group than in the non-ESSQS group (1·2 versus 3·6 per cent, P = 0·014; 4·6 versus 7·5 per cent, P = 0·025; 1·9 versus 3·9 per cent, P = 0·023, respectively). These findings were confirmed after propensity score matching. Cox regression analysis found that non-attendance of ESSQS-qualified surgeons (hazard ratio 12·30, 95 per cent c.i. 1·28 to 119·10; P = 0·038) was independently associated with local recurrence in patients with stage II disease., Conclusion: Laparoscopic colorectal procedures performed with ESSQS-qualified surgeons showed improved postoperative results. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of the qualification on long-term oncological outcomes., (© 2020 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the BJS Society Ltd.)

The World Health Organization declared on March 11, 2020 that the COVID-19 epidemic has become a pandemic. In Tunisia, the Ministry of Health has recommended enhanced preventive hygiene measures to contain and limit the spread of the virus. Following the entry of Tunisia into phase 4 of the COVID-19 epidemic, the Tunisian Association of Surgery proposed recommendations related to surgical activity. Surgical emergencies must be treated urgently and without delay. Non-tumor pathologies which require surgery in an elective situation and for which the risk of aggravation or complication is considered low shoud be postponed. For digestive tumor pathology, and apart from complicated forms, neoadjuvant treatment is highly recommended in the context of multidisciplinary concertation staff.

Background: The use of mechanical bowel preparation and prophylaxis with oral antimicrobial agents can prevent surgical site infection (SSI) in colorectal surgical procedures, but routine adoption of these and other practices by surgeons has been limited. The aim of this study was to determine the actual practice and surgeon beliefs about preventative measures in elective colorectal operations and to compare them with established recommendations. Methods: Web-based survey was sent to colorectal surgeons assessing knowledge, beliefs, and practices regarding the use of preventative measures for SSI. Results: Of 355 surgeons, 33% had no feedback of SSI rate; 60% believed in evidence for normothermia, wound edge protection, and use of alcohol solution, and reported use of these strategies. There was a discrepancy in the assumed evidence and use of hyperoxia, glove replacement after anastomosis, surgical tools replacement, and saline surgical site lavage. Most of respondents believe that oral antibiotic prophylaxis diminishes infection, but is indicated only by one third of them. Few surgeons believe in MBP, but many actually use it. Most surgeons believe that there is a discrepancy between published guidelines and actual clinical practice. As proper means to implement guidelines, checklists, standardized orders, surveillance, feedback of SSI rates, and educational programs are rated most highly by surgeons, but few of these are in place at their institutions. Conclusions: Gaps in the translation of evidence into practice remain in the prevention of SSI in colorectal surgical procedures. Several areas for improvement have been identified. Specific implementation strategies should be addressed in colorectal units.

Background: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows highly reliable imaging of the mesorectal fascia (mrMRF) and its relationship to the tumor. The prospective multicenter observational study OCUM uses these findings to indicate neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal carcinoma., Methods: nCRT was indicated in patients with positive mrMRF (≤ 1 mm) in cT4 and cT3 carcinomas of the lower rectal third., Results: A total of 527 patients (60.2%) underwent primary total mesorectal excision, and 348 patients (39.8%) underwent long-term nCRT followed by surgery. The mrMRF was involved in 4.6% of the primary surgery group and 80.7% of the nCRT group. Rates of resections within the mesorectal plane (90.8%), sparing of pelvic nerves on both sides (97.8%), and number of regional lymph nodes (95.3% with ≥ 12 lymph nodes examined) are indicative of high-quality surgery. Resection was classified as R0 in 98.3%, the pathological circumferential resection margin (pCRM) was negative in 95.1%. Patients in the nCRT group had more advanced carcinomas with a significantly higher rate of abdominoperineal excision. Independent risk factors for pCRM positivity were advanced stage (T4), metastatic lymph nodes, resection in the muscularis propria plane, and location in the lower third., Conclusions: The risk classification of rectal cancer patients by MRI seems to be highly reliable and allows the restriction of nCRT to approximately half of the patients with clinical stage II and III rectal carcinoma, provided there is a high-quality MRI diagnostic protocol, high-quality surgery, and standardized examination of the resected specimen.

Background: Rectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary and multimodality treatment approach. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide a framework for delivering consistent, evidence-based health care. We compared provincial/territorial CPGs across Canada to identify areas of variability and evaluate their quality., Methods: We retrieved CPGs from Canadian organizations responsible for cancer care oversight and evaluated their quality and developmental methodology using the AGREE-II instrument. Recommendations for diagnostic and staging investigations, treatment by stage, and post-treatment surveillance of stage I–III rectal cancers were abstracted and compared., Results: We identified 7 sets of CPGs for analysis, varying in content, presentation, quality, and year last updated. Differences were noted in locoregional staging: 4 recommended magnetic resonance imaging over endorectal ultrasonography, 2 recommended either modality, and 3 specified scenarios for one over the other. Recommendations also varied for use of staging computed tomography of the chest versus chest radiography and for surgical management and indications for transanal excision. Recommendations for neoadjuvant therapy in stage II/III disease also differed: 3 guidelines recommended long-course chemoradiation over short-course radiation therapy alone, while 3 others recommended short-course radiation in specific clinical scenarios. Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III disease was uniformly recommended, with variable protocols. The use of proctosigmoidoscopy and interval/duration of endoscopic post-treatment surveillance varied among guidelines., Conclusion: Canadian CPGs vary in their recommendations for staging, treatment, and surveillance of rectal cancer. Some of these differences reflect areas with limited definitive evidence. Consistent guidelines with uniform implementation across provinces/territories may lead to more equitable care to patients., Competing Interests: None declared., (© 2020 Joule Inc. or its licensors)

Background: Although enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) have demonstrated promising results in published literature, their effectiveness has been inconsistent. The objective of this study was to identify the most important data use practices associated with successful implementation of ERPs., Study Design: As part of a national ERP implementation initiative, data regarding hospitals' previous ERP implementation experience were collected. Specifically, 4 data use practices (data collection, report generation, feedback to leadership, and feedback to frontline providers) and 2 data types (process measures and outcome measures) were correlated with ERP implementation outcomes (hospital-reported success and patient outcomes from the American College of Surgeons [ACS] NSQIP data)., Results: Of 140 hospitals evaluated, 73 (52.1%) reported previous ERP implementation, with wide variations in data use practices. Of these, 33 (45.2%) reported successful implementation. Feedback of both process and outcome measure data was performed by only 15.1% of hospitals, but was associated with significantly higher likelihood of successful implementation when compared with no feedback (relative risk [RR] 2.45, 95% CI 1.69 to 3.56; p < 0.001) and feedback of only outcome measure data (RR 2.73, 95% CI 1.06 to 7.00; p = 0.037). Using ACS NSQIP data from 6,888 colorectal surgery patients from 52 hospitals with colorectal ERPs, hospital-reported success was associated with significantly lower surgical site infection rates (6.6% vs 8.1%; p = 0.011) and shorter length of stay (6.2 vs 7.0 days; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The most important data use practice associated with successful ERP implementation was data feedback to frontline providers of both process and outcome measures. However, this was rarely performed in a national cohort of hospitals and represents a substantial but straightforward opportunity for improvement., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Operative skills correlate with patient outcomes, yet at the completion of training or after learning a new procedure, these skills are rarely formally evaluated. There is interest in the use of summative video assessment of laparoscopic benign foregut and hiatal surgery (LFS). If this is to be used to determine competency, it must meet the robust criteria established for high-stakes assessments. The purpose of this review is to identify tools that have been used to assess performance of LFS and evaluate the available validity evidence for each instrument., Methods: A systematic search was conducted up to July 2017. Eligible studies reported data on tools used to assess performance in the operating room during LFS. Two independent reviewers considered 1084 citations for eligibility. The characteristics and testing conditions of each assessment tool were recorded. Validity evidence was evaluated using five sources of validity (content, response process, internal structure, relationship to other variables, and consequences)., Results: There were six separate tools identified. Two tools were generic to laparoscopy, and four were specific to LFS [two specific to Nissen fundoplication (NF), one heller myotomy (HM), and one paraesophageal hernia repair (PEH)]. Overall, only one assessment was supported by moderate evidence while the others had limited or unknown evidence. Validity evidence was based mainly on internal structure (all tools reporting reliability and item analysis) and content (two studies referencing previous papers for tool development in the context of clinical assessment, and four listing items without specifying the development procedures). There was little or no evidence supporting test response process (one study reporting rater training), relationship to other variables (two comparing scores in subjects with different clinical experience), and consequences (no studies). Two tools were identified to have evidence for video assessment, specific to NF., Conclusion: There is limited evidence supporting the validity of assessment tools for laparoscopic foregut surgery. This precludes their use for summative video-based assessment to verify competency. Further research is needed to develop an assessment tool designed for this purpose.

Introduction: There are currently widespread clinical practices that, because they do not have been supported by available scientific evidence, are inappropriate for most patients. The objective of the present study was to identify and review these low-value clinical practices in General Surgery., Material and Methods: A systematic review of the specialized databases and the published guidelines with identification of low-value practices in General Surgery was carried out. Of the low-value practices selected for a tertiary and university hospitals through the consensus of expert surgeons, those that do not provide clinical value were identified., Results: In a first search, 4,019 recommendations were found, of which 60 were selected because they were focused on General Surgery. After evaluation by the experts, a total of 29 clinical recommendations were selected to be implemented in a specialty service, which were divided into those corresponding to diagnostic processes (n=9), procedures and surgical technique (n=10) and of perioperative care and medication (n=10)., Conclusions: There is evidence in the literature of some clinical practices that provide little value in General Surgery. The changes referring to do-not-do these practices should be implemented in current clinical practice of this specialty., (Copyright © 2019 FECA. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

The studyPeden CJ, Stephens T, Martin G et al. Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2019;393:2213-21.This project was funded by the NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research Programme (project number 12/5005/10).To read the full NIHR Signal, go to https://discover.dc.nihr.ac.uk/content/signal-000789/national-quality-improvement-programmes-need-time-and-resources-to-have-impact., Competing Interests: Competing interests The BMJ has judged that there are no disqualifying financial ties to commercial companies. The authors declare the following other interests: none Further details of The BMJ policy on financial interests is here: https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/forms-policies-and-checklists/declaration-competing-interests, (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Background: EORTC (European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer) 62024 is a phase III randomised trial evaluating adjuvant imatinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) and no evidence of residual disease after surgery in 908 patients from 11 countries participated. As surgical treatment aspects (tumour rupture and incomplete resection) contribute to the risk of recurrence, the data of primary surgery were reviewed., Methods: The surgical record, local pathology report and a surgical questionnaire on details of the operation had to be completed when patients entered the study. Surgeons from 5 countries, covering 8 languages, reviewed the full set of data being available from 793 patients (87.3%)., Results: A known GIST was the reason for surgery in only 58% of the cases, and 12% of the patients were treated as an emergency. The R0-resection rate was 87%. The extent of resection was local excision in 17%, segmental resection in 59%, full-organ resection in 11% and multivisceral resection in 11%, with lymphadenectomy performed in 24% of the patients. Shelling out of the tumour was performed in 9.7%, and the proportion of tumours removed in parts was higher in the endoscopy/laparoscopy group. The incidence of tumour rupture (representing M1) was 9%. The consistency between preoperative and intraoperative findings was 82%. The postoperative complication rate was 7.3%., Conclusion: The standardisation of surgery in this study was inferior. Given the review data, 18% of the patients should not have participated in the trial. Quality of surgery and improperly reported intraoperative details might influence the trial results. A detailed surgical questionnaire filled out by the surgeon is mandatory before entering the patient in an adjuvant trial in GIST., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

About 30% of patients with MEN1 develop a Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Meanwhile it is well established that the causative gastrinomas are almost exclusively localized in the duodenum and not in the pancreas, MEN1 gastrinomas occur multicentric and are associated with hyperplastic gastrin cell lesions and tiny gastrin-producing micro tumors in contrast to sporadic duodenal gastrinomas. Regardless of the high prevalence of early lymphatic metastases, the survival is generally good with an aggressive course of disease in only about 20% of patients. Symptoms can be controlled medically. The indication, timing, type, and extent of surgery are highly controversial and are discussed in detail in this article by a thorough and critical review of literature. More radical procedures, like partial pancreaticoduodenectomy, are weighed against less aggressive local excision of gastrinomas and the pros and cons of both approaches are discussed in terms of long-term morbidity, biochemical cure, and survival., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Hospital variation in risk-adjusted outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery has been shown. However, explanatory factors are not sufficiently clear. The objective of this study was to identify factors perceived by gastrointestinal surgeons as important to achieve excellent casemix-adjusted outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery., Design: Based on literature and experts' opinion, 86 factors associated with serious complications, failure to rescue and mortality were listed. These were presented to gastrointestinal surgeons through two web-based surveys and an expert meeting. Participants were asked to choose their top 10 of most important factors., Participants: Dutch gastrointestinal surgeons (n=52) of different hospitals and different hospital types (general/teaching/academic)., Results: Of 31 invited experts for the first survey and meeting, 71% responded. Of 130 invited surgeons, 34 responded to the second survey. Factors deemed important were: procedural hospital volume (46% in top 10), specialised surgeons performing surgery, (elective 87%, emergency 60% and reoperations 62% in top 10), accessibility of, and daily ward rounds by specialised surgeons (41% and 38% in top 10), preoperative screening for malnutrition (57% in top 10), a protocol for recognition of anastomotic leakage and rapid reintervention (54% and 49% in top 10)., Conclusion: Procedural hospital volume, specialisation of surgeons, screening for malnutrition, early recognition of complications followed by rapid action were perceived as most important factors to achieve good outcomes by gastrointestinal surgeons., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Assessments of surgical quality should consider both surgeon and patient perspectives simultaneously. Focusing on patients undergoing major gastrointestinal cancer surgery, we sought to characterize hospitals, and their patients, on both these axes of quality., Methods: Using the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry, hospitals were profiled on a risk-adjusted composite measure of death or serious morbidity (DSM) generated from patients who underwent colectomy, esophagectomy, hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, or proctectomy for cancer between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2016. These hospitals were also profiled using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. Highest-performing hospitals on both quality axes, and their respective patients, were compared to the lowest-performing hospitals., Results: Overall, 60,526 patients underwent their cancer operation at 530 hospitals. There were 38 highest- and 48 lowest-performing hospitals. The correlation between quality axes was poor (ρ = 0.10). Compared to the lowest-performing hospitals, the highest-performing hospitals were more often NCI-designated cancer centers (29.0% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.002) and cared for a lower proportion of Medicaid patients (0.14 vs. 0.23, p < 0.001). Patients who had their operations at the lowest- versus highest-performing hospitals were more often black (17.2% vs. 8.4%, p < 0.001), Hispanic (8.3% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001), functionally dependent (3.8% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001), and not admitted from home (4.4% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Hospital performance varied when assessed by both risk-adjusted surgical outcomes and patient experiences. In this study, poor-performing hospitals appeared to be disproportionately serving disadvantaged and minority cancer patients.

With the development in the past 20 years, minimally invasive gastrointestinal and colorectal surgery is now in its prime of life, with a high level in terms of surgical technique, surgical standardization, innovative technology and technical training. However, in the prime of life, in order to avoid the decline, we must meet new challenges. With the advent of the era of 5G and artificial intelligence, plus a series of changes in the internal and external environment, minimally invasive surgery, and even the entire surgery will have a major impact, including changes in treatment patterns, emphasis of multidisciplinary comprehensive treatment, changes in disease spectrum, and except neoplasms, more benign and functional diseases may require minimally invasive surgery. The gastrointestinal surgery specialist relying on "craft" will likely be replaced by an artificial intelligence surgical system. In the face of challenges, we should not forget our initial intentions, and should diligently reflect on ourselves, keeping the patient-centered minimally invasive treatment concept. Meanwhile, we should go to the basic hospitals to further establish a standardized training system, continue to maintain innovative thinking and keep pace with the times, so that we can grasp the prime of life for minimally invasive gastrointestinal and colorectal surgery.

Department of minimally invasive gastrointestinal surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital (also named as Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV) was established on April 7, 2009. Up to now, ten years have passed since its foundation. As the first department built in specialized cancer hospital, which mainly focuses on laparoscopic surgery, its foundation and development has a very important historical and practical significance in the development of surgical oncology in China. Reviewing the rapid growth of the Department of Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery over the past decade, on the one hand, it has benefited from the opportunities of the times and the support of leaders in Peking University Cancer Hospital at that time. More importantly, the progress owes to the pioneering Professor Su Xiangqian, who is brave and innovative, with indomitable spirit and advanced management philosophy. With rigorous training, the ability of the team has been steadily enhanced, the competitiveness has been gradually improved, and the development direction which focuses on laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery and laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery has been established. Now, the Department of Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery has become a well-known domestic gastrointestinal tumor center. In the past ten years, under the leadership of Professor Su Xiangqian, the growth of this team is innovative and comprehensive: (1) Introduce the internationally advanced Baldrige medical service management framework, and propose the "management by principle" concept to improve the core competitiveness of the department; (2) Establish an academic brand by laparoscopic standardized surgery training courses for gastrointestinal tumors, promote cooperation and exchange at home and abroad, and participate in international multi-center clinical research projects; (3) Adhere to the "formation of a research-oriented department, conducting clinical and basic research simultaneously" as the development direction; (4) Stick to the core development concept of team building and cultivate professional talents. Looking forward to the future, our team will not forget the beginning of the heart, and move forward! In the next ten years, we will break through ourselves and continue to pursue the higher level!

Background: Many approaches to treat rectal prolapse exists, yet little is known regarding their safety in the elderly., Method: NSQIP (2008-2014) was queried to identify patients ≥ 70 years who underwent open rectopexy (OR), laparoscopic rectopexy (LR) and perineal rectosigmoidectomy (PR). Patients were selected using NSQIP's estimated probability of morbidity of ≥50 th percentile. Outcomes were 30-day mortality and a composite: mortality, septic shock and organ space abscess and fascial dehiscence., Results: Overall, 1361 patients underwent OR(18%), LR(15%) and PR(67%) with no difference in outcomes among 3 approaches. After adjustment of other factors, the composite was associated with PR [OR 2.5, CI 1.1, 5.7] and not with older age [OR 1.3, (CI) 0.7, 2.4]. From 2008 to 2014, LR increased from 11% to 19%; and PR decreased from 75% to 72%., Conclusions: All 3 surgical approaches carry low morbidity among the sick, elderly. PR remains the predominant approach nationally. A paradigm shift accepting the safety of abdominal approaches is needed. There should also be less focus on age in the decision-making process of surgical treatment., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

About the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer: The Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC) is an independent organization funded by the federal government to accelerate action on cancer control for all Canadians. As the steward of the Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control (the Strategy), the Partnership works with Canada’s cancer community to take action to ensure fewer people get cancer, more people survive cancer and those living with the disease have a better quality of life. This work is guided by the Strategy, which was refreshed for 2019 to 2029, and will help drive measurable change for all Canadians affected by cancer. The Strategy includes 5 priorities that will tackle the most pressing challenges in cancer control as well as distinct First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples–specific priorities and actions reflecting Canada’s commitment to reconciliation. A specific action in the Strategy calls for reducing the differences in practice and service delivery by setting standards for high-quality care and promoting their adoption. The CPAC will oversee the implementation of the priorities in collaboration with organizations and individuals on the front lines of cancer care: the provinces and territories; health care professionals; people living with cancer and those who care for them; First Nations, Inuit and Métis communities; governments and organizations; and its funder, Health Canada. Learn more about the Partnership and the refreshed Strategy at www.cancerstrategy.ca., Competing Interests: None declared., (© 2019 Joule Inc. or its licensors)

Background: The use of laparoscopic surgery has become widespread, and many surgeons are striving to acquire the necessary techniques for it. The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS), established by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, serves to maintain and improve the quality of laparoscopic surgery in Japan. In this study, we aimed to determine whether ESSQS certification is useful in maintaining and improving the quality of surgical techniques and in standardization of laparoscopic surgery in Japan., Methods: This retrospective study used data from the Institute for Integrated Medical Sciences, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan. From January 2016 to October 2017, 241 patients with colorectal cancer underwent laparoscopic surgery. Of them, 220 patients were selected and divided into two groups on the basis of surgery performed by an ESSQS-qualified surgeon (QS group) (n = 170) and a non-ESSQS-QS (NQS) (n = 50). We compared the short-term results in the two groups and examined those before and after propensity score matching (PSM)., Results: Mean operation time was longer in the NQS group than in the QS group. Furthermore, mean blood loss was significantly less in the QS group. These were similar before and after PSM. The rate of conversion to open surgery was significantly higher in the NQS group before PSM. However, the rate of postoperative complications was not different between the two groups., Conclusions: A laparoscopic procedure performed by ESSQS-QS often leads to good short-term outcomes. Thus, the ESSQS system works and is potentially useful in maintaining and improving the quality of surgical techniques and in standardization of laparoscopic surgery in Japan.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the effect of rigid or flexible stoma bridges used for loop ostomy diversions on peristomal skin integrity. Additional aims were to describe surgeon practices related to stoma bridges, and determine the availability of an ostomy nurse specialist., Design: Retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey., Sample and Setting: The sample used to address the first aim (effect of stoma bridges) comprised 93 adult patients cared for at Morristown Medical Center, Atlantic Health System, Morristown, New Jersey, an acute care facility. Data provided by 355 colorectal surgeons from 30 countries were used to describe surgeon practice in this area and determine the availability of an ostomy nurse specialist. Respondents were invited from an international roster of colorectal surgeons obtained with permission from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS)., Methods: In order to accomplish the initial aim, we retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who underwent ostomy surgery from 2008 to 2015 and met inclusion criteria. In order to meet our additional aims, analyzed data were obtained from a survey of colorectal surgeons that queried practices related to stoma bridges, and availability of an ostomy nurse specialist., Results: Patients managed with a rigid bridge were significantly more likely to experience leakage beneath the pouching system faceplate than were patients managed by a flexible bridge (42% vs 11%, P < .001). Slightly less than one quarter of patients who developed leakage (n = 22, 24%) experienced pressure and moisture-related peristomal skin complications. Peristomal wounds, inflammation, and infection were significantly higher when a rigid bridge was used (χ test, P < .003). The surgeon's survey (N = 355) showed variability in the use of bridges. Ninety-three percent of all surgeons indicated an ostomy nurse specialist was part of their health care team., Conclusions: Rigid ostomy bridges were associated with a higher likelihood of leakage from underneath the faceplate of the pouching system and impaired peristomal skin integrity. Analysis of colorectal surgeon responses to a survey indicated no clear consensus related to bridge use in patients undergoing loop ostomies.

Background: Emergency abdominal surgery is associated with poor patient outcomes. We studied the effectiveness of a national quality improvement (QI) programme to implement a care pathway to improve survival for these patients., Methods: We did a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial of patients aged 40 years or older undergoing emergency open major abdominal surgery. Eligible UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals (those that had an emergency general surgical service, a substantial volume of emergency abdominal surgery cases, and contributed data to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) were organised into 15 geographical clusters and commenced the QI programme in a random order, based on a computer-generated random sequence, over an 85-week period with one geographical cluster commencing the intervention every 5 weeks from the second to the 16th time period. Patients were masked to the study group, but it was not possible to mask hospital staff or investigators. The primary outcome measure was mortality within 90 days of surgery. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN80682973., Findings: Treatment took place between March 3, 2014, and Oct 19, 2015. 22 754 patients were assessed for elegibility. Of 15 873 eligible patients from 93 NHS hospitals, primary outcome data were analysed for 8482 patients in the usual care group and 7374 in the QI group. Eight patients in the usual care group and nine patients in the QI group were not included in the analysis because of missing primary outcome data. The primary outcome of 90-day mortality occurred in 1210 (16%) patients in the QI group compared with 1393 (16%) patients in the usual care group (HR 1·11, 0·96-1·28)., Interpretation: No survival benefit was observed from this QI programme to implement a care pathway for patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Future QI programmes should ensure that teams have both the time and resources needed to improve patient care., Funding: National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research Programme., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Attempting to decrease iatrogenic injuries and preventable harm, safety initiatives have become a priority in surgery. For adult hepatobiliary surgery, it has become common to study and consider "error traps" or common pitfalls that exist for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 1-4 Extending this work to children, we have attempted to apply some of these initiatives by identifying error traps common to the care of patients born with anorectal malformations (ARM)., Methods: Five error traps were identified based on a retrospective analysis of operative records and radiographic studies from 398 re operative ARM cases performed by the authors. Once identified, the authors constructed a specific safety plan for each trap to promote a culture that will hopefully prevent ARM iatrogenic injuries., Results: The identified error traps are: 1) creation of a colostomy too distal in the sigmoid colon, 2) inaccurate distal colostogram and definition of the patient's preoperative anatomy 3) absence of a Foley catheter during the repair of an ARM in males and the hazards of separating the anterior rectal wall from the genito-urinary (GU) tract 4) mismanagement of a post-operative anal stricture following an ARM reconstructive procedure 5) limited or unstructured follow up of these patients. For each of the five traps the authors present suggestions for their avoidance., Conclusion: The repair on an anorectal malformation is an elective procedure and while not completely avoidable, there should be little tolerance for iatrogenic injury and preventable harm. A culture of safety should be followed, beginning with a recognition of the common error traps associated with ARM procedures., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Despite existence of international guidelines for diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in children, there might be differences in the clinical approach., Methods: A survey on clinical practice in paediatric IBD was performed among members of the ESPGHAN Porto IBD working group and interest group, PIBD-NET, and IBD networks in Canada and German-speaking countries (CIDsCANN, GPGE), using a web-based questionnaire. Responses to 63 questions from 106 paediatric IBD centres were collected., Results: Eighty-four percentage of centres reported to fulfil the revised Porto criteria in the majority of patients. In luminal Crohn disease (CD), exclusive enteral nutrition is used as a first-line induction therapy and immunomodulators (IMM) are used since diagnosis in the majority of patients. Infliximab (IFX) is mostly considered as first-line biological. Sixty percentage of centres have experience with vedolizumab and/or ustekinumab and 40% use biosimilars. In the majority of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients 5-aminosalicylates are continued as concomitant therapy to IMM (usually azathioprine [AZA]/6-MP). After ileocaecal resection (ICR) in CD patients without postoperative residual disease, AZA monotherapy is the preferred treatment., Conclusions: A majority of centres follows both the Porto diagnostic criteria as well as paediatric (ESPGHAN/ECCO) guidelines on medical and surgical IBD management. This reflects the value of international societal guidelines. However, potentially desirable answers might have been given instead of what is true daily practice, and the most highly motivated people might have answered, leading to some bias.

Objective: To determine whether laparoscopic surgery is noninferior to open surgery for rectal cancer in terms of quality of surgical resection outcomes., Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have evaluated the oncologic safety of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer with conflicting results. Prior meta-analyses comparing these operative approaches in terms of quality of surgical resection aimed to demonstrate if one approach was superior. However, this method is not appropriate and potentially misleading when noninferiority RCTs are included., Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched to identify RCTs comparing these operative approaches. Risk differences (RDs) were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. One-sided Z tests were used to determine noninferiority. Noninferiority margins (ΔNI) for circumferential resection margin (CRM), plane of mesorectal excision (PME), distal resection margin (DRM), and a composite outcome ("successful resection") were based on the consensus of 58 worldwide experts., Results: Fourteen RCTs were included. Laparoscopic resection was noninferior compared with open resection for the rate of positive CRM [RD 0.79%, 90% confidence interval (CI) -0.46 to 2.04, ΔNI = 2.33%, PNI = 0.026], incomplete PME (RD 1.16%, 90% CI -0.27 to 2.59, ΔNI = 2.85%, PNI = 0.025), and positive DRM (RD 0.15%, 90% CI -0.58 to 0.87, ΔNI = 1.28%, PNI = 0.005). For the rate of "successful resection" (RD 6.16%, 90% CI 2.30-10.02), the comparison was inconclusive when using the ΔNI generated by experts (ΔNI = 2.71%, PNI = 0.07), although no consensus was achieved for this ΔNI., Conclusions: Laparoscopy was noninferior to open surgery for rectal cancer in terms of individual quality of surgical resection outcomes. These findings are concordant with RCTs demonstrating noninferiority for long-term oncologic outcomes between the 2 approaches.

Introduction: Over the last decade, damage control surgery (DCS) has been emerging as a feasible alternative for the management of patients with abdominal infection and sepsis. So far, there is no consensus about the role of DCS for acute perforated diverticulitis. In this study, we present the outcome of a multi-institutional series of patients presenting with Hinchey's grade III and IV diverticulitis managed by DCS., Methods: All the participating centers were tertiary referral hospitals. A total of 34 patients with perforated diverticulitis treated with DCS during the period 2011-2017 were included in the study. During the first laparotomy, a limited resection of the diseased segment was performed followed by lavage and use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). After 24/48 h of resuscitation, patients returned to the operating room for a second look. Mortality, morbidity, and restoration of bowel continuity were the primary outcomes of the study., Results: There were 15 males (44%) and 19 females (56%) with a mean age of 66.9 years (SD ± 12.7). Mean BMI was 28.42 kg/m 2 (SD ± 3.33). Thirteen cases (38%) were Wasvary's modified Hinchey's stage III, and 21 cases (62%) Hinchey's stage IV. Mean Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) was 25.12 (SD ± 6.28). In 22 patients (65%), ASA score was ≥ grade III. Twenty-four patients (71%) had restoration of bowel continuity, while 10 (29%) patients had an end colostomy (Hartmann's procedure). Three of these patients received a temporary loop ileostomy. One patient had an anastomotic leak. Mortality rate was 12%. Mean length of hospital stay was 21.9 days. At multivariate analysis, male gender ( p  = 0.010) and MPI ( p  = 0.034) correlated with a high percentage of Hartmann's procedures., Conclusion: DCS is a feasible procedure for patients with generalized peritonitis secondary to perforated diverticulitis, and it appears to be related to a higher rate of bowel reconstruction. Due to the open abdomen, stay in ICU with prolonged mechanical ventilation is required, but these aggressive measures may be needed by most patients undergoing surgery for perforated diverticulitis, whatever the procedure is done., Competing Interests: Data were collected as part of routine postoperative follow-up, and all patients provided informed consent for the use of their data for research purposes. The institutional review board approval was therefore not required for this study.Not applicable.The authors state that they have no competing interests. The abstract has been presented at the 5th WSES congress by DT. No funding was given to the authors for the presentation.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Objective: To analyze potential benefits with regards to infectious complications with combined use of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) and ABP in elective colorectal resections., Background: Despite recent literature suggesting that MBP does not reduce infection rate, it still is commonly used. The use of oral antibiotic bowel preparation (ABP) has been practiced for decades but its use is also controversial., Methods: Patients undergoing elective colorectal resection in the 2012 to 2015 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program cohorts were selected. Doubly robust propensity score-adjusted multivariable regression was conducted for infectious and other postoperative complications., Results: A total of 27,804 subjects were analyzed; 5471 (23.46%) received no preparation, 7617 (32.67%) received MBP only, 1374 (5.89%) received ABP only, and 8855 (37.98%) received both preparations. Compared to patients receiving no preparation, those receiving dual preparation had less surgical site infection (SSI) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.39, P < 0.001], organ space infection (OR = 0.56, P ≤ 0.001), wound dehiscence (OR = 0.43, P = 0.001), and anastomotic leak (OR = 0.53, P < 0.001). ABP alone compared to no prep resulted in significantly lower rates of surgical site infection (OR = 0.63, P = 0.001), organ space infection (OR = 0.59, P = 0.005), anastomotic leak (OR = 0.53, P = 0.002). MBP showed no significant benefit to infectious complications when used as monotherapy., Conclusions: Combined MBP/ABP results in significantly lower rates of SSI, organ space infection, wound dehiscence, and anastomotic leak than no preparation and a lower rate of SSI than ABP alone. Combined bowel preparation significantly reduces the rates of infectious complications in colon and rectal procedures without increased risk of Clostridium difficile infection. For patients undergoing elective colon or rectal resection we recommend bowel preparation with both mechanical agents and oral antibiotics whenever feasible.

Background: Extended venothromboprophylaxis (eVTP) after abdominal surgery for hepatobiliary (HPB) and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) malignancies is recommended. Safety, efficacy and compliance within this group of surgical patients are not well described. The primary aim was to assess safety and compliance of post-operative administration of eVTP with low molecular weight heparin. Secondary aim was to assess barriers to treatment and monitor the rate of post-operative venous thromboembolism., Methods: A prospective observational cohort study of patients undergoing abdominal surgery for HPB or UGI malignancies was undertaken from January 2014 to June 2016. All patients were assessed for eVTP. Demographics, clinical outcomes and clinical questionnaires on discharge and at follow-up 6 weeks post their initial surgery were used to assess the safety, compliance and efficacy of eVTP., Results: A total of 100 patients were assessed for post-operative eVTP. Of these, 80 patients were prescribed 28 days of low molecular weight heparin. Of 80 patients, 65 (85%) patients completed the full eVTP, 11 (13%) missed 1-5 injections and only four (6%) missed 6-15 injections. In the 80 eVTP patients, there were no episodes of significant bleeding or venous thromboembolism. A total of nine (11%) patients would be unwilling to undertake eVTP again for a variety of reasons, including ease of disposal of syringes and needle phobias., Conclusion: The administration of eVTP in patients undergoing major HPB and UGI surgery is safe, with minimal morbidity and high compliance. The greatest barrier to administration is doctor prescription., (© 2018 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)