Search

Introduction: The diverse implant landscape, the rising and disparate costs of implants in public healthcare institutions (PHIs), and the limited application of health technology assessment (HTA) impede fair and sustainable implant subsidies in Singapore. This study described the Agency for Care Effectiveness (ACE) Implant Subsidy List (ISL) methodology and the key enablers for supporting government subsidy of clinically effective and cost-effective implants in Singapore. Methods: A multi-tiered implant grouping scheme on the ISL was established by adapting overseas implant classifications, consulting clinicians, and conducting HTA evaluations, with subsidy extensions at the product group tier. Implants within a product group share similar biomechanical actions and patient outcomes and are subject to the same clinical criteria and pricing requirement. Implants on the ISL must be approved by the regulatory authority. Patients who meet the clinical criteria for ISL implants are eligible for subsidy. ACE conducted value-based pricing (VBP) and partnered with the public healthcare supply chain agency to harmonize PHI implant prices. The ISL is updated three times per year. Results: Implants listed on the ISL were deemed clinically and cost effective. Underpinned by HTA principles, the implant grouping scheme promoted parsimonious classification, while allowing the creation of new product groups for implants offering superior benefits for patients. Reasonable prices set for the product groups aided affordability and cost sustainability. The ISL clinical criteria and standardized implant identifiers encouraged the appropriate use of subsidized implants and facilitated implementation. By ISL implementation in December 2023, ACE assessed 42,165 implants and listed 22,689 ISL implants spanning 143 product groups. Industry can apply for ISL listing three times per year, which keeps the ISL updated and relevant. Conclusions: The ISL adopts a fit-for-purpose methodology to standardize implant classifications, enable scalable application of HTA, drive appropriate use of subsidized implants, and bring cost sustainability to the government subsidy of implants in Singapore. A strategic partnership with the public healthcare supply chain agency to concurrently establish national procurement contracts reduced disparate implant prices in PHIs and provided greater leverage for better implant prices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Public healthcare institutions (PHIs) experience rising and discordant implant costs. Implementing subsidies for implants without concurrent price harmonization through national procurement contracts impedes equitable patient access. This abstract describes the collaboration between the Agency for Care Effectiveness (ACE), Singapore's national health technology assessment (HTA) agency, and the public healthcare supply chain agency (ALPS) to establish the Implant Subsidy List (ISL). Methods: The alignment between ISL and concurrent national procurement contracts for implants required close coordination and co-development of streamlined and scalable processes. To achieve this, ACE and ALPS collaborated to understand the complex implant landscape by leveraging on known vendors and products and pre-empting upcoming ones, identifying key opinion leaders, and sharing technical expertise. Both agencies also developed common-use templates and streamlined vendor submission processes. Of note, joint request-for-proposal (RFP) exercises for national subsidy and procurement listings combined negotiation efforts to achieve lower implant prices. Regular cross-agency discussions enabled continuous knowledge sharing and process refinement in an evolving implants landscape. Results: For phase one rollout of ISL, 15 implant topics across eight clinical functions were evaluated, supported by concurrent establishment of 15 national procurement contracts. As of December 2023, ACE listed 22,689 ISL implants for implementation, with more topics onboarded on a rolling basis. ACE and ALPS streamlined process flows, standardized communications channels and information, and utilized contractual tools. Vendors could submit for both subsidy and procurement through the secure ALPS portal, reducing duplication of work and errors while allowing procurement and subsidy consideration processes to proceed concurrently. Combined negotiation efforts have resulted in an average price reduction of 19 percent. Conclusions: The alignment between national HTA and procurement agencies is important for successful scaling. The ACE–ALPS collaboration has synergized both agencies' understanding of the complex implant landscape and established streamlined workplans and processes to support initial establishment of ISL and its maintenance. Challenges include navigating strict procurement rules and continuous cross-agency improvement efforts to ensure applicability in an evolving landscape. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]