Search

Thusharika D Dissanayaka,1 Gourav Banerjee,2,3 Mark I Johnson2,3 1Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka; 2Centre for Pain Research, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK; 3Leeds Pallium Research Group, Leeds, UK Introduction: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive, inexpensive, self-administered technique used throughout the world to relieve pain. In Sri Lanka, physiotherapists may use TENS for their patients as they receive a small amount of education about the principles and practice of TENS in their undergraduate training. To date, there have been no data gathered about the use of TENS by physiotherapists in Sri Lanka. The aim of this study was to assess attitudes and beliefs of physiotherapists working in Sri Lanka about their use of TENS for pain management. Methods: A postal survey was undertaken using a 12-item questionnaire developed by the investigators to gather information about attitudes, beliefs and use of TENS in clinical practice. The questionnaire was distributed to 100 physiotherapists working in three government hospitals and six private hospitals in the cities of Kandy and Colombo. A descriptive analysis of data was performed. Results: Sixty-seven completed questionnaires were returned (67% response rate). Over half of the respondents (58.2%) reported that they used TENS to treat pain “often” or “very often”, with use for musculoskeletal/orthopedic (61.3%) and neuropathic/neuralgic (79.1%) pain being most common. TENS was used less for postsurgical pain and rarely for cancer pain. Most (95.5%) respondents reported that their patients benefitted “considerably” from TENS. 76.1% of the respondents reported that they did not recommend and/or prescribe TENS for patients to use at home. Conclusion: Physiotherapists value TENS as a treatment option to manage musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain. However, there is a need for systems and resources to enable to patients to self-administer TENS rather than having to visit clinics. Keywords: transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation, electrotherapy, non pharmacological analgesia

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of proprioceptive training on hand dexterity, upper limb function, and quality of life (QoL) in people with Parkinson disease (PD) compared with no or other active interventions., Data Sources: Medline PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PEDro, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify published studies until February 2023., Study Selection: Peer-reviewed English publications of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of proprioceptive training conducted among people with PD., Data Extraction: Study characteristics, exercise program type and dosage, outcome of interest, and between-group comparisons of post-test results of intervention and comparison groups., Data Synthesis: Eight RCTs were included, involving 344 people with PD. Six RCTs contributed to meta-analyses. There was very low certainty of evidence that proprioceptive training may improve dominant hand (standard mean difference [SMD] 0.34, 95% CI 0.08-0.60, P=.01) and non-dominant hand (SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.10-0.63, P<.01) fine motor dexterity, and dominant hand gross manual dexterity (SMD 1.73, 95% CI 0.30-3.16, P=.02), following 2-8 weeks of proprioceptive training. There was no evidence of effects on non-dominant hand gross manual dexterity, upper limb function, and QoL after proprioceptive training., Conclusions: Findings regarding the effect of proprioceptive training on hand dexterity in the short-term are inconclusive. The small sample size likely limited effect detection. Future large RCTs should compare proprioceptive training with no intervention and perform comprehensive biomechanical analysis to gain a clearer idea of its effects. Incorporating longer-duration proprioceptive training programs is also recommended to investigate long-lasting effects., (Copyright © 2023 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate whether baseline joint space narrowing (JSN) predicted disease remission, knee pain, and physical function changes in persons with knee osteoarthritis (OA)., Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of a two-armed randomized controlled trial. Participants were aged ≥50 years (n = 171) with a body mass index ≥28 kg/m 2 and radiographic medial tibiofemoral OA. Participants in the intervention group received diet and exercise programs and special treatment (cognitive behavioral therapy, knee brace, and muscle strengthening exercises) according to the disease remission. Remission of pain and remission of patient global assessment of disease activity and/or functional impairment were used to define the disease remission. The control group were provided with an education pamphlet. The primary outcome was disease remission at 32 weeks, and the secondary outcomes were the changes in knee pain and physical function at 20 and 32 weeks. Baseline JSN was scored from 0 to 3, and the association between baseline JSN and outcomes was assessed using multiple regression., Results: There was no association of baseline JSN with disease remission at 32 weeks when the disease remission has been achieved. The baseline JSN grade 3 was associated with changes in knee pain at 20 weeks (p < .05). There was no association between baseline JSN and physical function., Conclusion: Baseline JSN severity predicted changes in knee pain but not the disease remission or changes in physical functions. Identification of baseline radiographic severity may be helpful in identifying differences in response to diet and exercise programs in knee OA., (© 2023 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic inflammatory disease that is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. This study aimed to determine the relationship between ankylosing spondylitis and the risk of stroke., Methods: A systematic literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were conducted from inception to December 2021 to identify relevant articles investigating the risk of stroke in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. A random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird) was used to estimate a pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-regression based on the length of follow-up and subgroup analysis based on the type of stroke, study location, and year of publication to investigate the source of heterogeneity., Results: A total of eleven studies comprising 1.7 million participants were included in this study. Pooled analysis showed a significantly increased stroke risk (56%) among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (HR: 1.56, 95% CI 1.33-1.79). Subgroup analysis revealed a higher risk of ischemic stroke among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.23-1.68). However, meta-regression analysis showed no association between the duration of ankylosing spondylitis and stroke incidence (Coef=-0.0010, P=0.951)., Conclusion: This study reveals that ankylosing spondylitis was associated with an increased risk of suffering a stroke. Management of cerebrovascular risk factors and the control of systemic inflammation should be considered in patients with ankylosing spondylitis., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología. All rights reserved.)

Background: Supra-threshold scaling of multiple pressure-pain sensations involves delivery of varied stimulus intensities, either via stimulus-dependent or response-dependent manner, and recording of subjective pain ratings by participants. The focus of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-session reliability of pain intensity and pain unpleasantness ratings related to pressure-pain thresholds (PPTs) of just noticeable pain (JNP), weak pain (WP) and moderate pain (MP) among healthy individuals., Methods: Fourteen healthy participants (eight women, six men) participated in three sessions of testing at varied intervals over the course of 72 h. In session one, a multiple random staircase method using hydraulic pressure algometry was used to measure PPT of JNP, WP and MP on thumbnail bed. In session 2, ratings of pain intensity and pain unpleasantness were recorded when stimuli at levels corresponding to PPT of JNP, WP and MP were repeatedly applied before and after 20 min of no intervention., Results: Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values for pain ratings of JNP, WP and MP in intra-session reliability were 0.810, 0.826 and 0.881, respectively, whereas the values were 0.817, 0.792 and 0.910, respectively, for inter-session reliability. ICC values for pain unpleasantness were also highly consistent and repeatable. Temporal summation of pain intensity and pain unpleasantness were not related to the repeated application of pressure stimuli., Conclusions: The findings indicate that the pain intensity and pain unpleasantness ratings for stimuli at levels equal to the thresholds of JNP, WP and MP have good intra- and inter-session reliability., Significance: This study showed that both pain intensity and pain unpleasantness of JNP, WP and MP have good intra- and inter-session reliability and agreement. Furthermore, the temporal summation of pain or unpleasantness is not related to repeated application of pressure stimuli., Abbreviations: JNP: Just noticeable pain; WP: Weak pain; MP: Moderate pain; PPTs: pressure-pain thresholds; HPA: Hydraulic pressure algometry; MRSM: multiple random staircase method.

Sham stimulation is used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy of active stimulation and placebo effects. It should mimic the characteristics of active stimulation to achieve blinding integrity. The present study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature to identify the effects of sham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) - including anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS, c-tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) - on corticospinal excitability (CSE), compared to baseline in healthy individuals. Electronic databases - PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Science Direct and MEDLINE (Ovid) - were searched for RCTs of tES from 1990 to March 2017. Thirty RCTs were identified. Using a random-effects model, meta-analysis of a-tDCS, c-tDCS, tACS, tRNS and tPCS studies showed statistically non-significant pre-post effects of sham interventions on CSE. This review found evidence for statically non-significant effects of sham tES on CSE.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential therapy (IFT) both in combination with hot pack, myofascial release, active range of motion exercise, and a home exercise program on myofascial pain syndrome patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger point., Design: A total of 105 patients with an upper trapezius myofascial trigger point were recruited to this single-blind randomized controlled trial. Following random allocation of patients to three groups, three therapeutic regimens-control-standard care (hot pack, active range of motion exercises, myofascial release, and a home exercise program with postural advice), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-standard care and IFT-standard care-were administered eight times during 4 wks at regular intervals. Pain intensity and cervical range of motions (cervical extension, lateral flexion to the contralateral side, and rotation to the ipsilateral side) were measured at baseline, immediately after the first treatment, before the eighth treatment, and 1 wk after the eighth treatment., Results: Immediate and short-term improvements were marked in the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group (n = 35) compared with the IFT group (n = 35) and the control group (n = 35) with respect to pain intensity and cervical range of motions (P < 0.05). The IFT group showed significant improvement on these outcome measurements than the control group did (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with standard care facilitates recovery better than IFT does in the same combination.