Search

A woman in her 40s presented with a 3-month history of intermittent bilateral daily headache of moderate intensity. She had severe headaches for almost 1 month prior to the presentation, which was aggravated by standing and relieved by lying down. She underwent a non-contrast CT of the head followed by MRI of the brain and spine. Neuroimaging of the brain showed features of intracranial hypotension and spine MRI myelography fast imaging employing steady state acquisition sequences confirmed the site of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. An epidural blood patch (EBP) was placed to close the CSF leakage site. She had significant improvement in her symptoms and repeat MRI at 4 weeks of follow-up showed resolution of imaging abnormalities. She became symptom-free without the requirement of additional EBP. Our report highlights the importance of suspecting and evaluating spontaneous intracranial hypotension in a patient presented with a typical orthostatic headache. Early intervention and keeping a low threshold for evaluation based on a few early clinical and imaging clues can lead to successful management of such cases.

Ulnar nerve is frequently involved in mononeuropathies of the upper limb. Ulnar neuropathies have been diagnosed conventionally using clinical and electrophysiological findings. Physicians opt for nerve imaging in patients with ambiguous electrophysiological tests to gain additional information, identify etiology and plan management.The aim of this study was to describe the electrophysiological and the magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) findings in patients with nontraumatic ulnar neuropathy.All consecutive patients with suspected nontraumatic ulnar mononeuropathy were recruited; clinical assessment and electrophysiological studies (EPSs) were done in all. After EPS, patients with localization of lesion along the ulnar nerve underwent MRN.All 39 patients recruited had clinical findings suggestive of ulnar neuropathy; Electrophysiological confirmation was possible in 36/39 (92.30%) patients. Localization of ulnar nerve lesion to elbow and wrist was possible in 27 (75%) and 9 (25%) patients, respectively. MRN was done in 22 patients; a lesion was identified in 19 of 22 (86.36%) ulnar nerves studied. Thickening and hyperintensity in T2 W/short TI inversion recovery images of ulnar nerve at the level of olecranon, suggesting ulnar neuropathy at elbow, was the commonest (8/22) imaging finding.MRN acts as a complimentary tool to EPS for evaluating nontraumatic ulnar neuropathy. By identifying the etiology, MRN is likely to modify the management decision.

and objective: Tremor is a disabling symptom of PD that usually responds poorly to available standard pharmacological agents. This study aimed to assess the effect of Zonisamide 25 mg on tremor in tremor-dominant PD patients as compared to placebo.This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Parkinson's disease patients were allocated either to the intervention group (standard treatment along with Zonisamide 25 mg add-on) or the placebo group (standard treatment along with placebo). Baseline Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Scale (TETRAS) scores, as well as accelerometric tremor analysis were done and follow-up assessments of the same were done after 12 weeks of intervention. Percentage change from baseline in the UPDRS tremor score was the primary outcome whereas percentage change from baseline of total UPDRS score, UPDRS rigidity and bradykinesia scores, TETRAS score, and accelerometric tremor analysis values were the secondary outcomes.There was no significant difference in the percentage change from baseline UPDRS tremor scores between the two groups (placebo: 8.33 [-19.89-23.86] vs drug: 26.14 [-35.58 to -16.07], p-value: 0.164, CI: 0.157-0.171). Best-case analysis for missing values showed a significant improvement in the drug group, compared to the placebo group (p-value:0.001, CI:0.001 -0.001).Zonisamide at a dose of 25 mg per day did not improve tremor in tremor-dominant PD patients, however, a positive trend was seen as compared to Placebo in the UPDRS tremor score. Larger studies are required to confirm this finding.

The objective of this study is to synthesise the findings of clinical studies in order to derive evidence for use of the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy in the treatment of neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxias. In order to find relevant studies for the systematic review, we searched through Medline (1985 to July 2020), PubMed and Clinical trial register. We included both single-arm and comparative studies in which MSCs were given as intervention in neurodegenerative ataxia patients at any time after the diagnosis. We used Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) quality scale to evaluate the methodological qualities of the included studies. Our literature search obtained 81 publications. Three articles comprising a total of 47 patients were included in the meta-analysis. None of them were randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Pooled analysis noted that there was a decrease in the Berg Balance Scale (BBS)/Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) score from pre to post assessment; however, the difference was statistically not significant (standardised mean difference (SMD) - 0.20; 95% CI - 0.78 to 0.38). No significant side effects were reported in any of the studies. We did not observe any statistically significant difference in the pooled mean difference in the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) score between pre and post assessment in patients with ataxia after receiving the stem cells (SMD 0.36, 95% CI - 0.08 to 0.81). Our systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that MSC cell therapy appeared safe but provided insufficient evidence to support the use of MSCs to treat patients with neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxia at present. No l RCTs was available in the literature to test efficacy; therefore, well-designed RCTs are needed to ascertain the effectiveness of MSCs in patients with neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxias.

Background and objectivesOne year after the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we aimed to summarize the frequency of neurologic manifestations reported in patients with COVID-19 and to investigate the association of these manifestations with disease severity and mortality.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Medline, Cochrane library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EMBASE for studies from December 31, 2019, to December 15, 2020, enrolling consecutive patients with COVID-19 presenting with neurologic manifestations. Risk of bias was examined with the Joanna Briggs Institute scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for neurologic manifestations. Odds ratio (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated to determine the association of neurologic manifestations with disease severity and mortality. Presence of heterogeneity was assessed with I2, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses. Statistical analyses were conducted in R version 3.6.2.ResultsOf 2,455 citations, 350 studies were included in this review, providing data on 145,721 patients with COVID-19, 89% of whom were hospitalized. Forty-one neurologic manifestations (24 symptoms and 17 diagnoses) were identified. Pooled prevalence of the most common neurologic symptoms included fatigue (32%), myalgia (20%), taste impairment (21%), smell impairment (19%), and headache (13%). A low risk of bias was observed in 85% of studies; studies with higher risk of bias yielded higher prevalence estimates. Stroke was the most common neurologic diagnosis (pooled prevalence 2%). In patients with COVID-19 ≥60 years of age, the pooled prevalence of acute confusion/delirium was 34%, and the presence of any neurologic manifestations in this age group was associated with mortality (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.11–2.91).DiscussionUp to one-third of patients with COVID-19 analyzed in this review experienced at least 1 neurologic manifestation. One in 50 patients experienced stroke. In those >60 years of age, more than one-third had acute confusion/delirium; the presence of neurologic manifestations in this group was associated with nearly a doubling of mortality. Results must be interpreted with the limitations of observational studies and associated bias in mind.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42020181867.

Background: Teleneurology consultations can be highly advantageous since neurological diseases and disabilities often limit patient's access to health care, particularly in a setting where they nee...

Medical training programs are witnessing immense disruptions worldwide due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Keeping in mind the trainees' future prospects, it is important to provide continuity of teaching and timely certification assessments. Overcoming the obstacles to routine functioning presented by SARS-CoV-2 spread, we recently conducted the DM Neurology exit examination in a hybrid virtual format. We created a curated case repository with history and clinical examination findings followed by structured questions that could be built upon for case discussions. The external examiners assessed the candidates virtually through a video conferencing platform. The end results were well accepted by all key stake holders. The concerns, logistics and experience of conducting the DM Neurology exit exam in a virtual format are summarized here.

BACKGROUND: Early evidence suggests good response to pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) in DYT‐KMT2B. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess outcomes and identify predictors of good outcome following GPi‐DBS in DYT‐KMT2B. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane and MDS‐abstracts databases using the MeSH terms “KMT2B and DYT28”. We included studies that reported objective outcomes following GPi‐DBS in DYT‐KMT2B. The BFMDRS‐M (Burke‐Fahn‐Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale‐ Movement) total scores pre‐ and post‐surgery were used to quantify outcomes. We calculated pooled effects using a random effects meta‐analysis and used meta‐regression to identify potential effect modifiers. Multiple linear regression using individual patient data was used to identify predictors of good outcome (>50% improvement from baseline on BFMDRS‐M). RESULTS: Initial searches screened 132 abstracts of which 34 full‐text articles were identified to be of potential interest. Ten studies reporting 42 individual patients, met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in the final review. The mean age at onset was 6.4 ± 5.7 years and 40% were male. The median follow‐up was 12 months (range: 1–264 months). GPi‐DBS resulted in median BFMDRS‐M improvement of 42.7% (range: −103.5% to 95.9%) postoperatively. Pooled proportion of patients experiencing clinical improvement >50% on BFMDRS‐M was 41% (95% CI: 27%–57%). Male gender [β: 22.6, 95% CI: 8.0–37.3, P = 0.004), and higher pre‐operative BFMDRS‐M score [β: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.36–0.87, P

The association of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) with progressive myoclonic epilepsy, also known as “SMA plus,” is a unique syndrome linked to non-survival motor neuron (non-SMN) genes. The disease starts in childhood with progressive weakness and atrophy of muscles; myoclonic epilepsy develops during later childhood, after the onset of motor symptoms. In this report, we describe a case of SMN gene unrelated SMA and myoclonic epilepsy, supported by electrophysiological and neuropathological evidences.

Lumbar spinal or epidural anaesthesia has a lower complication rate compared to general anaesthesia. An occasional patient may develop spinal cord injury during the procedure and develop neurological complications. We report an interesting case of paraparesis due to dorsal spinal cord involvement and syrinx formation following spinal anaesthesia for abdominal surgery.

SummaryObjectiveTo summarize the frequency of neurological manifestations reported in COVID-19 patients and investigate the association of these manifestations with disease severity and mortality.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysisEligibility criteriaStudies enrolling consecutive COVID-19 patients (probable or confirmed) presenting with neurological manifestations.Data sourcesPubMed, Medline, Cochrane library, clinicaltrials.gov and EMBASE from 31st December 2019 to 15th December 2020.Data extraction and analysisTwo authors independently screened titles and abstracts retrieved by literature search. Risk of bias was examined using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and pooled prevalence and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated for neurological manifestations. Odds ratio (OR) and 95%CI were calculated to determine the association of neurological manifestations with disease severity and mortality. Presence of heterogeneity was assessed using I-square, meta-regression, and subgroup analyses. Statistical analyses were conducted in R version 3.6.2.ResultsOf 2,455 citations, 350 studies were included in this review, providing data on 145,634 COVID-19 patients, 89% of whom were hospitalized. Forty-one neurological manifestations (24 symptoms and 17 diagnoses) were identified. Pooled prevalence of the most common neurological symptoms included: fatigue (32%), myalgia (20%), taste impairment (21%), smell impairment (19%) and headache (13%). A low risk of bias was observed in 85% of studies; studies with higher risk of bias yielded higher prevalence estimates. Stroke was the most common neurological diagnosis (pooled prevalence-2%). In COVID-19 patients aged >60, the pooled prevalence of acute confusion/delirium was 34% and the presence of any neurological manifestations in this age group was associated with mortality (OR 1.80; 95%CI 1.11 to 2.91).ConclusionsUp to one-third of COVID-19 patients analysed in this review experienced at least one neurological manifestation. One in 50 patients experienced stroke. In those over 60, more than one-third had acute confusion/delirium; the presence of neurological manifestations in this group was associated with near doubling of mortality. Results must be interpreted keeping in view the limitations of observational studies and associated bias.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42020181867.What is already known on this topicThe frequency of neurological manifestations including fatigue, myalgia, taste and smell impairments, headache and dizziness in COVID-19 patients has been reported in a few systematic reviews and meta-analyses. However, considerable heterogeneity has been observed in terms of methodological quality of the studies, severity of the disease, mean age and hospitalization status of the patients. The evidence regarding the frequency of neurological diagnoses including stroke, encephalitis, Guillain Barré syndrome (GBS) is also limited to case reports and case series and no data exists thus far on the pooled prevalence estimates for neurological diagnoses in COVID-19 patients.What this study addsTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the largest systematic review and meta-analysis to date (including 350 studies with data on 145,634 cases) summarizing the evidence on the frequency of the full spectrum of neurological manifestations in COVID-19 patients in the overall, young and elderly populations. For the first time, our review reports the pooled prevalence of stroke in COVID-19 patients. Risk of bias, old age and disease severity were potential determinants of the frequency and nature of neurological manifestations as well as its association with mortality. Our review also highlights the need to develop reporting standards for studies describing the frequency of clinical features. Moreover, we note that this will be the first systematic review and meta-analysis on this subject to include studies reported in all languages.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has precipitated a global health crisis. Non-COVID diseases across specialties have been significantly compromised. The greatest challenge has been to continue providing care to non-COVID cases with minimum transmission risk to health care workers, patients, and caregivers. In this specter, better described as a medical holocaust, we present our experiences of dealing with acute neurological patients who could access our facility. We attempted to work on three key areas – initial screening using a more inclusive, dynamic checklist for COVID suspicion over and above the emergency triage, a mandatory initial holding on a separate floor of our inpatient service equipped with infection control strategies similar to a COVID-designated area, and daily screening of health care workers and caregivers for symptoms and possible exposures. It was a steep learning curve, a couple of close shaves, and many more lessons that went into the development of an algorithm that seems to be working well.

Levosulpiride is a newer prokinetic agent with increasingly extensive use in India by general physicians. Levosulpiride selectively inhibits gut and central D2 receptors and is associated with various movement disorders like- tremor, Parkinsonism, dyskinesias and rarely dystonia. We report 7 cases of levosulpirideinduced dystonia at our institute. Though all patient had at least 50% improvement after discontinuation of levosulpiride, none had complete recovery at mean follow up of 5.5 months. Through this article we want to highlight extrapyramidal side effects of levosulpiride, need of its awareness among physicians.

BACKGROUND: Hemi masticatory spasm (HMS) is a rare movement disorder affecting muscles of mastication attributed to dysfunction of motor branch of trigeminal nerve and is characterized by painful spasm of masticatory muscles. Microvascular compression leading to focal demyelination of motor branch of trigeminal nerve is the most speculated on mechanism of HMS. Treatment options range from medical to surgical approaches, but botulinm toxin (BTX) has now become the preferred treatment. CASES: We report a retrospective review of 7 cases of HMS, supported by electrophysiological and clinical findings. All the cases had excellent response to BTX therapy. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In this article, we highlight the delay in diagnosis of HMS attributed to rarity, long course of illness, association with hemiatrophy, “Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus,” and scleroderma/morphea. Considering the favorable outcome to BTXs, surgical treatment can be avoided or delayed in majority except secondary cases.

Background: The use of the raw and naturally available substance is increasing in the Himalayan region of the Indian subcontinent. Strikingly, not a single study points out the magnitude of substance abuse among stroke patients. Aims and Objectives: This record analysis aims to study the sociodemographic, clinical profile, and magnitude of substance abuse among stroke patients. Materials and Methods: A retrospective record analysis was conducted using 48 medical records of stroke patients admitted during the period of June 1, 2018,–May 1, 2019, in a newly established tertiary care public hospital, North India. Records were studied for the clinical profile, epidemiological details, and other relevant investigations at the time of admission. Appropriate statistics was applied to generate the results. Results: Majority (70.8%) of patients were old (>50 years) with a mean age of 55.25 (±1.322) years. Of the 48 medical records, ischemic stroke (79.16%) patients reported substance abuse (80.6%) and rehospitalization (31.25%) within a year of stroke. Patients with alcohol use as compared to non-users had significantly lower good cholesterol (high-density lipoprotein) (P < 0.003), lower diastolic hypertension (P < 0.032), higher pulse rate (P < 0.037), and higher creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) (P < 0.005) status. Further, substance abuse found a significant association with the type of stroke (P < 0.01), dyslipidemia (P < 0.018), and stroke recurrence events (P < 0.031). Conclusion: Smoking and alcohol are an alarming stage among stroke patients in the Himalayan region. Stroke patients should be routinely screened and counseled regarding abstinence from substance abuse, if present, as it may be associated with poor control of vascular risk factors and contribute to recurrence.

Tenecteplase is a product of genetic modification of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator with superior pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. This meta-analysis was to determine whether intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke has better efficacy and safety outcomes than with intravenous alteplase. PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, WHO International clinical trials registry platform (ICTRP), Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), EU Clinical Trials Register (EU-CTR) and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for trials comparing tenecteplase with alteplase in acute ischemic stroke. Functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale at 90 days), early major neurological improvement, rates of any intracerebral haemorrhage, symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage and mortality rate at 90 days were the outcomes compared. Four randomized controlled trials involving 1334 patients were included. The Tenecteplase group compared to the alteplase group had significantly better early major neurological improvement (RR = 1.56, 95% CI [1.00, 2.43], p = 0.05). There was no significant difference between tenecteplase and alteplase in excellent functional outcome at 90 days, good functional outcome at 90 days, any intracerebral haemorrhage, symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage or mortality at 90 days. Our meta-analysis found tenecteplase to be significantly favouring one outcome: early major neurological improvement. Other outcomes did not differ between the tenecteplase and alteplase groups. Trials of cost-effective/benefit analysis comparing tenecteplase versus alteplase and tenecteplase versus endovascular treatment are necessary to reinforce the evidence for the potential cost advantage of tenecteplase.

OBJECTIVE The primary objective of present study was to observe the effect of providing SUDEP (Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy) information on drug adherence in persons with epilepsy (PWE). We also looked at impact of disclosing SUDEP information on patient's quality of life and mood. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective study had a pretest/post-test design. A total of 231 consecutive PWE (>15 years) were enrolled. Of these 121 PWE received information about SUDEP in addition to standard epilepsy care. One hundred and ten PWE (control group) received routine standard epilepsy care but did not receive SUDEP information. Follow up assessment was done at 6 months. The primary outcome was a change in drug adherence (measured by Modified Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, MMAS) in PWE following disclosure of SUDEP information. RESULTS After 6 months, 116 PWE in the SUDEP information group and 106 in control group were available for follow up. A non-significant higher adherence was observed in the SUDEP information group as compared to the control group (Mean MMAS change 0.51 ± 1.66 vs 0.25 ± 1.26, P value = 0.194). No significant change was perceived in patient's anxiety and depression levels or quality of life in either group. CONCLUSION The present study suggests that providing information on SUDEP to PWE and their caregivers may increase drug adherence without adverse effect on quality of life or mood. Well-designed studies with high methodological quality are required to determine the precise effect size associated with disclosure of SUDEP information on drug adherence in PWE.