Search

A patient with complete AVB had been recently implanted with a dual-chamber PM with an atrial lead and a His lead. He presented with bouts of lightheadedness.

A patient with dilated cardiomyopathy was implanted with a dual-chamber ICD for primary prevention of sudden death. The patient was asymptomatic. An arrythmia episode was retrieved from the device memory.

A 60-year-old man presented to the pacing department for a routine device check 6 months following an implant of a primary prevention CRT-D. This was implanted for persisting severe LV systolic dysfunction due to aortic regurgitation, treated with a mechanical aortic valve replacement. He had NYHA class III dyspnoea and LBBB.

A patient awaiting AVN ablation for rapidly conducted AF had a PM implanted.

A patient with dilated cardiomyopathy and LBBB implanted with a CRT-D was seen at follow-up. The patient had no complaints. Percentage of VP was 98% (with LV pacing only).

A 32-year-old woman attends the device clinic following an episode of palpitations. She had a CRT defibrillator implanted 2 years previously due to dilated cardiomyopathy with severe LV systolic dysfunction, New York Heart Association class III. She has responded well to CRT and her biventricular pacing percentage is 98%.

A 73-year-old man had been implanted with a DDD PM for brady–tachy syndrome. He attended the device clinic, reporting several episodes of unprovoked palpitations.

The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) was developed to defibrillate ventricular arrhythmias, avoiding drawbacks of transvenous leads. The global EFFORTLESS S-ICD (Evaluation oF FactORs ImpacTing CLinical Outcome and Cost EffectiveneSS of the S-ICD) registry is collecting outcomes in 985 patients during a 5-year follow-up.The primary goal of the EFFORTLESS registry is to determine the safety of the S-ICD by evaluating complications and inappropriate shock rate.This is the first report on the full patient cohort and study endpoints with follow-up ≥1 year. The predefined endpoints are 30- and 360-day complications, and shocks for atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia.Patients were followed for 3.1 ± 1.5 years and 82 completed the study protocol 5-year visit. Average age was 48 years, 28% were women, ejection fraction was 43 ± 18%, and 65% had a primary prevention indication. The S-ICD system and procedure complication rate was 4.1% at 30 days and 8.4% at 360 days. The 1-year complication rate trended toward improvement from the first to last quartile of enrollment (11.3% [quartile 1]) to 7.8% [quartile 2], 6.6% [quartile 3], and 7.4% [quartile 4]; quartile 1 vs. quartiles 2 to 4; p = 0.06). Few device extractions occurred due to need for antitachycardia (n = 5), or biventricular (n = 4) or bradycardia pacing (n = 1). Inappropriate shocks occurred in 8.1% at 1 year and 11.7% after 3.1 years. At implant, 99.5% of patients had a successful conversion of induced ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. The 1- and 5-year rates of appropriate shock were 5.8% and 13.5%, respectively. Conversion success for discrete spontaneous episodes was 97.4% overall.This registry demonstrates that the S-ICD fulfills predefined endpoints for safety and efficacy. Midterm performance rates on complications, inappropriate shocks, and conversion efficacy were comparable to rates observed in transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator studies. (Evaluation oF Factors ImpacTing CLinical Outcome and Cost EffectiveneSS of the S-ICD [The EFFORTLESS S-ICD Registry]; NCT01085435).

After catheter ablation there is often a discrepancy between acute and chronic success rates. We aimed to evaluate major determinants for lesion quality and understand different manifestations of lesion structures.In a canine thigh muscle model radiofrequency (RF) current was delivered for 60 seconds at 30 W (n = 39) or 50 W (n = 18) with 15-g contact force. A second-generation 12-hole gold open irrigation catheter (SGIT) and a first-generation six-hole platinum-iridium catheter (FGIT; Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) were used. Electrode and tissue temperatures (at the surface and 3.5-mm and 7-mm depth) were recorded and lesion dimensions were measured. Lesions with steam pops were excluded. Histological examination was performed to evaluate homogeneity of the lesions. Inhomogeneity was defined as a visual multiband lesion pattern indicating different histological characteristics.In total 57 lesions were created. Seventeen lesions were excluded (steam pops) and 40 lesions were analyzed. A total number of 11 homogeneous and 29 inhomogeneous lesions were identified. Using the SGIT catheter 16.7% of the lesions was homogeneous and 83.3% inhomogeneous; for FGIT it was 43.8% and 56.2% (P = 0.065), respectively. Homogeneous lesions had lower volumes as compared to inhomogeneous lesions (514.0 ± 198.8 vs 914.8 ± 399.1 mm, P = 0.003). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that the SGIT catheter is a significant predictor for inhomogeneous lesions (odds ratio 6.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1-38.8; P = 0.040) independent from power setting and flow rate.The development of inhomogeneous lesions after acute RF ablation is associated with higher lesion volumes and the use of the second-generation irrigation gold-tip catheter.

Knowledge about predictive factors for mortality and (in)appropriate shocks in cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) should be available and updated to predict clinical outcome.We retrospectively analyzed 543 consecutive patients assigned to CRT-D in 2 tertiary medical centers. The aim of this study was to assess risk factors for all-cause mortality, appropriate and inappropriate shocks.Mean follow-up time was 3.2 (±1.8) years. A total of 110 (20%) patients died, 71 (13%) received ≥1 appropriate shocks, and 33 (6.1%) received ≥1 inappropriate shocks. No patients received a His bundle ablation and biventricular pacing percentage was not analyzed. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) (HR 1.74 CI 1.06-2.86), higher creatinine (HR 1.12; CI 1.08-1.16), and a poorer left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HR 0.97; CI 0.94-1.01) independently predict all-cause mortality. In the entire cohort, history of AF and secondary prevention were independent predictors of appropriate shocks and variables associated with inappropriate shocks were history of AF and QRS ≥150 milliseconds. In primary prevention patients, history of AF also predicted appropriate shocks as did ischemic cardiomyopathy and poorer LVEF. History of AF, QRS ≥150 milliseconds, and lower creatinine were associated with inappropriate shocks in this subgroup. Appropriate shocks increased mortality risk, but inappropriate shocks did not.In symptomatic CHF patients treated with CRT-D, history of AF is an independent risk factor not only for mortality, but also for appropriate and inappropriate shocks. Further efforts in AF management may optimize the care in CRT-D patients.

Epicardial pacing lead implantation is the currently preferred surgical alternative for left ventricular (LV) lead placement. For endocardial LV pacing, we developed a fundamentally new surgical method. The trans-apical lead implantation is a minimally invasive technique that provides access to any LV segments. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the outcome of patients undergoing either trans-apical endocardial or epicardial LV pacing.In group I, 11 end-stage heart failure (HF) patients (mean age 59.7 ± 7.9 years) underwent trans-apical LV lead implantation. Epicardial LV leads were implanted in 12 end-stage HF patients (group II; mean age 62.8 ± 7.3 years). Medical therapy was optimized in all patients. The following parameters were compared during an 18-month follow-up period: LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), LV end-systolic diameter, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class.Nine out of 11 patients responded favorably to the treatment in group I (LVEF 39.7 ± 12.5 vs 26.0 ± 7.8%, P0.01; LVEDD 70.4 ± 13.6 mm vs 73.7 ± 10.5 mm, P = 0.002; NYHA class 2.2 ± 0.4 vs 3.5 ± 0.4, P0.01) and eight out of 12 in group II (LVEF 31.5 ± 11.5 vs 26.4 ± 8.9%, P =0.001; NYHA class 2.7 ± 0.4 vs 3.6 ± 0.4, P0.05). During the follow-up period, one patient died in group I and three in group II. There was one intraoperative LV lead dislocation in group I and one early postoperative dislocation in each group. None of the patients developed thromboembolic complications.Our data suggest that trans-apical endocardial LV lead implantation is an alternative to epicardial LV pacing.

Biphasic rectilinear shocks are more effective than monophasic shocks for transthoracic atrial defibrillation and for ventricular arrhythmias during electrophysiological testing. We undertook the present study to compare the efficacy of 100 J rectilinear biphasic waveform shocks with 150 J monophasic damped sine waveform shocks for transthoracic defibrillation of true ventricular fibrillation during defibrillation threshold testing (DFT). The second aim of the study was to analyse the influence of patch positions on the efficacy of defibrillation.50 episodes of 14 patients (age ranging from 37 to 82 years) who underwent DFT testing were randomised for back-up shocks with either a sequence of 100 and 200 J biphasic waveform, or a sequence of 150 and 360 J conventional monophasic shocks. A binary search protocol was used at implantation and before hospital discharge. Patients were also randomised to an anteroposterior position versus a right-anterior-apical position. A crossover was performed between implantation and pre-hospital discharge for biphasic versus monophasic sequence as well as for the 2 different positions.After failed internal shocks, 27 episodes were treated with biphasic, and 23 with monophasic shocks. The first attempt by the external device did not terminate II episodes (2 biphasic, 9 monophasic). The first shock efficacy was significantly greater with biphasic than with monophasic shocks (p0.02). The overall success rate was 93% with biphasic shocks and 64% with monophasic shocks. In multivariate regression analysis including patch position, arrhythmia duration, type of waveform, testing order and session, only waveform was associated with successful defibrillation (p0.02).For transthoracic defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation, low-energy rectilinear biphasic shocks are more effective than monophasic shocks. The position of the defibrillation shock pads has no influence on the biphasic shock efficacy, but anteroposterior pad position is more effective using monophasic shocks.