Search

Objective. This study examines the effects of process-oriented approach to working with body symptoms on clients' symptom severity, well-being, and satisfaction. Method. We used an additive design. Quantitative repeated measures were obtained from 67 participants randomized into experimental and control groups. Thirty-five participants from the experimental group underwent an experimental session by using Process-oriented Psychology, and were administered questionnaires immediately before, immediately after, and one week after the session. Thirty-two participants in the control group were administered questionnaires twice - one week apart, while no session was provided in the meantime. We used the following methods for data collection: Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), Individual Symptoms Scale (ŠIP), and Outcome Rating Scale (ORS). The effect of process-oriented approach was assessed using a two-way ANOVA for repeated measures, supplemented by Tukey's post-hoc test and descriptive statistics on subjective session rating scales. Results. Compared to the control group, the experimental group clients displayed a subjective alleviation of reported symptoms, a significantly larger improvement in subjective well-being, and higher satisfaction (in society) after the session. Conclusions. Process-oriented approach to working with body symptoms seems to be effective in reducing the severity of subjectively reported symptoms and increasing well-being and satisfaction in society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Psychology & Its Contexts / Psychologie a Její Kontexty is the property of Psychology & Its Contents and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Due to the role of the human factor in traffic accidents and the effort to prevent these accidents, it is necessary to distinguish between different forms of risk behaviour of drivers and their different psychological causes (motives). The aim of this study is to prepare and experimentally verify the reliability and factor validity of the Czech version of the Driver Behaviour Questionnaire (DBQ) and provide orientational norms for the population of Czech drivers. In addition, predictors of individual factors of driving behaviour are discussed, which define groups of drivers showing a tendency towards specific types of driving behaviour. This article also deals with practical impacts in relation to driver training, assessment, preventive measures and driver's assistance systems in the vehicle. Sample and setting. The original 50-item version of the DBQ questionnaire was translated and subsequently adapted to the population of Czech drivers. The study involved a total of 2,684 Czech drivers, of which 1,791 were men and 893 were women. Statistical analysis. Responses to all 50 items were subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Results. The results confirm that DBQ can be modeled as a two-factor method where the first factor can be described as unintentional driving mistakes, the other as deliberate committing of traffic offenses. Of all tested models, the best fit was observed using a shortened 36-item version of the questionnaire. Omega coefficients for both scales exceeded 0.85. The limitation of this study, which has to be taken into the account especially when dealing with the norms, is age structure of the research sample, when young drivers are dominant and drivers older 65 years are represented rarely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]