Search

Your search keyword '"Dominsky N."' showing total 6 results
Start Over Author "Dominsky N."
6 results on '"Dominsky N."'

1. PO-1392 Salvage radiotherapy of prostate cancer: a risk stratification system based on prognostic factors

Author

Bisello, S., primary, Arcelli, A., additional, Deodato, F., additional, Dominsky, N., additional, Tarantino, G., additional, Ntreta, M., additional, Cilla, S., additional, Siepe, G., additional, Cavallini, L., additional, Pezzulla, D., additional, Alitto, A.R., additional, Re, A., additional, Cammelli, S., additional, Cortesi, A., additional, Romeo, A., additional, Frezza, G.P., additional, Morganti, A.G., additional, Macchia, G., additional, and Buwenge, M., additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. PO-1380 Adjuvant radiotherapy of prostate cancer: a risk stratification system based on prognostic factors

Author

Bisello, S., primary, Arcelli, A., additional, Deodato, F., additional, Dominsky, N., additional, Tarantino, G., additional, Ntreta, M., additional, Cilla, S., additional, Siepe, G., additional, Cavallini, L., additional, Pezzulla, D., additional, Alitto, A.R., additional, Re, A., additional, Cammelli, S., additional, Cortesi, A., additional, Romeo, A., additional, Frezza, G.P., additional, Morganti, A.G., additional, Macchia, G., additional, and Buwenge, M., additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. PO-1391 Curative radiotherapy of prostate cancer: a risk stratification system based on prognostic factors

Author

Bisello, S., primary, Arcelli, A., additional, Deodato, F., additional, Dominsky, N., additional, Tarantino, G., additional, Ntreta, M., additional, Cilla, S., additional, Siepe, G., additional, Cavallini, L., additional, Pezzulla, D., additional, Alitto, A.R., additional, Cammelli, S., additional, Cortesi, A., additional, Romeo, A., additional, Frezza, G.P., additional, Morganti, A.G., additional, Macchia, G., additional, and Buwenge, M., additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma: A comparison of the predictive role of EAU versus NCCN risk stratification systems

Author

Buwenge, M., Deodato, Francesco, Dominsky, N., Ntreta, M., Cilla, Savino, Siepe, G., Alitto, Anna Rita, Bisello, S., Valentini, Vincenzo, Macchia, Gabriella, Morganti, Alessio Giuseppe, Deodato F. (ORCID:0000-0003-1276-5070), Cilla S., Alitto A. R., Valentini V. (ORCID:0000-0003-4637-6487), Macchia G., Morganti A. G., Buwenge, M., Deodato, Francesco, Dominsky, N., Ntreta, M., Cilla, Savino, Siepe, G., Alitto, Anna Rita, Bisello, S., Valentini, Vincenzo, Macchia, Gabriella, Morganti, Alessio Giuseppe, Deodato F. (ORCID:0000-0003-1276-5070), Cilla S., Alitto A. R., Valentini V. (ORCID:0000-0003-4637-6487), Macchia G., and Morganti A. G.

Abstract

Background/Aim: To compare the predictive efficacy of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Association of Urology (EAU) risk stratification systems in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: One-thousand-nine-hundred-nine patients treated with definitive (1,074), adjuvant (381), and salvage radiotherapy (454) were analysed. Results: Both systems significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-freesurvival, and disease-free-survival, while only the NCCN system correlated with local-control in the definitive radiotherapy group. In the adjuvant setting, both systems failed to predict all outcomes. In the salvage setting, only the NCCN system significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-free-survival and disease-free-survival. Conclusion: This analysis confirms the efficacy of both systems in definitive radiotherapy and suggests the utility of the NCCN also in salvage radiotherapy.

Published
2020

5. Radiotherapy of Prostate Carcinoma: A Comparison of the Predictive Role of EAU Versus NCCN Risk Stratification Systems

Author

Vincenzo Valentini, Gabriella Macchia, M. Ntreta, Milly Buwenge, Silvia Bisello, Anna Rita Alitto, Alessio G. Morganti, Francesco Deodato, Savino Cilla, Naama Dominsky, Giambattista Siepe, Buwenge M., Deodato F., Dominsky N., Ntreta M., Cilla S., Siepe G., Alitto A.R., Bisello S., Valentini V., Macchia G., and Morganti A.G.

Subjects
Male, Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.medical_treatment, Prostate neoplasm, Risk Assessment, Prostate cancer, Retrospective Studie, Internal medicine, Humans, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Medicine, Prostate neoplasms, Risk stratification systems, Definitive radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Retrospective Studies, Settore MED/36 - DIAGNOSTICA PER IMMAGINI E RADIOTERAPIA, NCCN, Aged, Salvage Therapy, Radiotherapy, business.industry, Prostatic Neoplasms, Cancer, Radiotherapy Dosage, Kallikrein, General Medicine, Prostate carcinoma, Prostate-Specific Antigen, medicine.disease, Survival Analysis, Risk stratification system, Radiation therapy, Observational Studies as Topic, Treatment Outcome, EAU, Prostatic Neoplasm, Risk stratification, Kallikreins, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Survival Analysi, business, Human
Abstract

Background/aim To compare the predictive efficacy of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Association of Urology (EAU) risk stratification systems in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Patients and methods One-thousand-nine-hundred-nine patients treated with definitive (1,074), adjuvant (381), and salvage radiotherapy (454) were analysed. Results Both systems significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-free-survival, and disease-free-survival, while only the NCCN system correlated with local-control in the definitive radiotherapy group. In the adjuvant setting, both systems failed to predict all outcomes. In the salvage setting, only the NCCN system significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-free-survival and disease-free-survival. Conclusion This analysis confirms the efficacy of both systems in definitive radiotherapy and suggests the utility of the NCCN also in salvage radiotherapy.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Radiotherapy of Prostate Carcinoma: A Comparison of the Predictive Role of EAU Versus NCCN Risk Stratification Systems.

Author

Buwenge M, Deodato F, Dominsky N, Ntreta M, Cilla S, Siepe G, Alitto AR, Bisello S, Valentini V, Macchia G, and Morganti AG

Subjects
Aged, Humans, Kallikreins metabolism, Male, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Observational Studies as Topic, Prostate-Specific Antigen metabolism, Prostatic Neoplasms metabolism, Radiotherapy Dosage, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Prostatic Neoplasms radiotherapy, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant statistics & numerical data, Salvage Therapy statistics & numerical data
Abstract

Background/aim: To compare the predictive efficacy of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Association of Urology (EAU) risk stratification systems in radiotherapy of prostate cancer., Patients and Methods: One-thousand-nine-hundred-nine patients treated with definitive (1,074), adjuvant (381), and salvage radiotherapy (454) were analysed., Results: Both systems significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-free-survival, and disease-free-survival, while only the NCCN system correlated with local-control in the definitive radiotherapy group. In the adjuvant setting, both systems failed to predict all outcomes. In the salvage setting, only the NCCN system significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-free-survival and disease-free-survival., Conclusion: This analysis confirms the efficacy of both systems in definitive radiotherapy and suggests the utility of the NCCN also in salvage radiotherapy., (Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results