1. Psychosocial predictors of doping intentions and use in sport and exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Ntoumanis N, Dølven S, Barkoukis V, Boardley ID, Hvidemose JS, Juhl CB, and Gucciardi DF
- Subjects
- Humans, Doping in Sports psychology, Doping in Sports prevention & control, Intention, Exercise psychology
- Abstract
Objective: To conduct a meta-analytic review of psychosocial predictors of doping intention, doping use and inadvertent doping in sport and exercise settings., Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis., Data Sources: Scopus, Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL Plus, ProQuest Dissertations/Theses and Open Grey., Eligibility Criteria: Studies (of any design) that measured the outcome variables of doping intention, doping use and/or inadvertent doping and at least one psychosocial determinant of those three variables., Results: We included studies from 25 experiments (N=13 586) and 186 observational samples (N=3 09 130). Experimental groups reported lower doping intentions ( g =-0.21, 95% CI (-0.31 to -0.12)) and doping use ( g =-0.08, 95% CI (-0.14 to -0.03), but not inadvertent doping ( g =-0.70, 95% CI (-1.95 to 0.55)), relative to comparators. For observational studies, protective factors were inversely associated with doping intentions ( z =-0.28, 95% CI -0.31 to -0.24), doping use ( z =-0.09, 95% CI -0.13 to to -0.05) and inadvertent doping ( z =-0.19, 95% CI -0.32 to -0.06). Risk factors were positively associated with doping intentions ( z =0.29, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.32) and use ( z =0.17, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.19), but not inadvertent doping ( z =0.08, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.22). Risk factors for both doping intentions and use included prodoping norms and attitudes, supplement use, body dissatisfaction and ill-being. Protective factors for both doping intentions and use included self-efficacy and positive morality., Conclusion: This study identified several protective and risk factors for doping intention and use that may be viable intervention targets for antidoping programmes. Protective factors were negatively associated with inadvertent doping; however, the empirical volume is limited to draw firm conclusions., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF