Search

Up to 80% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic variants remain of uncertain clinical significance (VUSs). Only variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic can guide breast and ovarian cancer prevention measures and treatment by PARP inhibitors. We report the first results of the ongoing French national COVAR (cosegregation variant) study, the aim of which is to classify BRCA1/2 VUSs. The classification method was a multifactorial model combining different associations between VUSs and cancer, including cosegregation data. At this time, among the 653 variants selected, 101 (15%) distinct variants shared by 1,624 families were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic or benign/likely benign by the COVAR study. Sixty-six of the 101 (65%) variants classified by COVAR would have remained VUSs without cosegregation data. Of note, among the 34 variants classified as pathogenic by COVAR, 16 remained VUSs or likely pathogenic when following the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines. Although the initiation and organization of cosegregation analyses require a considerable effort, the growing number of available genetic tests results in an increasing number of families sharing a particular variant, and thereby increases the power of such analyses. Here we demonstrate that variant cosegregation analyses are a powerful tool for the classification of variants in the BRCA1/2 breast-ovarian cancer predisposition genes.

In France, breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and the leading cause of cancer deaths. Identifying women with a "high" or "very high" breast cancer risk, according the terminology of the Haute Autorité de Santé 2014 guidelines, is essential to offer them special cares in term of screening and prevention. Women genetically predisposed have a very high risk of breast cancer. During the oncogenetic specialist consultation, familial and personal history of cancer is taken into account to evaluate the risk of hereditary Breast/Ovarian syndrome and thus the need of a genetic screening. In 2017, a list of 13 genes involved in hereditary ovarian or breast cancer has been established in France (Genetic and Cancer Group - Unicancer). Women carrying a BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, TP53, CDH1, PTEN mutation have a higher risk of breast cancer and are considered as "high risk". Therefore, medical breast surveillance similar to carriers of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation is recommended for these patients (INCa guidelines 2017). However a mutation in one of those genes is only identified in approximatively 10 % of the screened families. The oncogenetic specialist's assessment distinguishes families in which women remain at a "high" risk of breast cancer (HAS 2014 for screening) from those where women have a "very high" risk (INCa guidelines 2017 for screening and prevention).

In France, breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and the leading cause of cancer deaths. Identifying women with a “high” or “very high” breast cancer risk, according the terminology of the Haute Autorité de Santé 2014 guidelines, is essential to offer them special cares in term of screening and prevention.Women genetically predisposed have a very high risk of breast cancer. During the oncogenetic specialist consultation, familial and personal history of cancer is taken into account to evaluate the risk of hereditary Breast/Ovarian syndrome and thus the need of a genetic screening. In 2017, a list of 13 genes involved in hereditary ovarian or breast cancer has been established in France (Genetic and Cancer Group – Unicancer).Women carrying a BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, TP53, CDH1, PTEN mutation have a higher risk of breast cancer and are considered as “high risk”. Therefore, medical breast surveillance similar to carriers of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation is recommended for these patients (INCa guidelines 2017).However a mutation in one of those genes is only identified in approximatively 10 % of the screened families. The oncogenetic specialist's assessment distinguishes families in which women remain at a “high” risk of breast cancer (HAS 2014 for screening) from those where women have a “very high” risk (INCa guidelines 2017 for screening and prevention)., Le cancer du sein est, en France, le plus fréquent des cancers chez la femme et la première cause de décès par cancer. L’identification des femmes, dont le niveau de risque de cancer du sein est « élevé » ou « très élevé » selon la terminologie de la Haute Autorité de Santé en 2014, est essentielle puisque leur prise en charge, en termes de dépistage et de prévention, pourra ainsi être adaptée.Les femmes prédisposées génétiquement sont à risque très élevé de cancer du sein. La consultation d’oncogénétique a pour but d’étudier l’histoire personnelle et familiale de cancers de la patiente afin d’identifier les situations évocatrices d’une prédisposition héréditaire aux cancers du sein et/ou des ovaires et leur proposer des analyses de biologie moléculaire. Une liste de 13 gènes devant être étudiés face à ce risque héréditaire a été établie en France en 2017 (Groupe Génétique et Cancer – Unicancer).La mise en évidence d’une mutation constitutionnelle délétère des gènes BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, TP53, CDH1, PTEN confère un niveau de risque de cancer du sein considéré comme « très élevé » chez les femmes porteuses. Elles se voient recommander une surveillance mammaire similaire aux femmes porteuses d’une mutation d’un des deux gènes BRCA1/BRCA2 (Référentiel INCa 2017).Une mutation délétère sur un gène d’intérêt est identifiée dans environ 10 % des familles testées. Lorsque l’analyse est négative, l’évaluation faite par l’onco-généticien permet de distinguer les familles où les femmes restent à un risque « élevé » de cancer du sein (Référentiel HAS 2014 pour le dépistage) de celles où les femmes sont à un risque « très élevé » (Référentiel INCa 2017 pour le dépistage et la prévention).

Ovarian neoplasms secondary to germline BRCA mutations had been described to have a more favourable survival. There is only few data concerning the prognosis of non mutated patients presenting clinical features evocative of BRCA alterations. We retrospectively collected data from patients treated in our institution for an invasive ovarian carcinoma between 1995 and 2011. Patients considered at high risk of BRCA mutation were tested for BRCA1/2 germline mutations. We described clinical, pathological and therapeutic features and compared prognosis of BRCA mutation carriers and non-mutated patients. Out of 617 ovarian cancer patients, we identified 104 patients who were considered at high risk of mutation. The 33 mutated patients were more likely to present a personal (33 vs. 10 %, p = 0.003) or a family (42 vs. 24 %, p = 0.06) history of breast/ovarian cancers. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and wild type patients displayed similar prognosis: median progression–free survival (PFS) of 20.9 versus 37.7 months (p = 0.21); median overall survival (OS) of 151.2 versus 122.5 months (p = 0.52). Personal history of breast cancer increased both PFS [HR = 0.45 (95CI 0.25–0.81)] and OS [HR = 0.35 (95CI 0.16–0.75)]. In multivariate analysis, this parameter was an independent prognostic feature, whereas the identification of a BRCA1/2 mutation was not. In our cohort, all patients at high risk of BRCA mutation share a similar prognosis, whatever is their germline mutation status. Prognosis seems to be more influenced by clinical history than by germline mutations identification. If it is confirmed in larger and independent series, this result suggests that the hypothesis of other BRCA pathway alterations (BRCAness phenotype) deserves to be deeply explored.

Breast cancer carrying BRCA mutation may be highly sensitive to DNA-damaging agents. We hypothesized a better outcome for BRCA-mutated (BRCA(mut)) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HDC AHSCT) versus unaffected BRCA (BRCA wild type; (BRCA(wt))) or patients without documented BRCA mutation (BRCA untested (BRCA(ut))). All female patients treated for MBC with AHSCT at Institut Paoli-Calmettes between 2003 and 2012 were included. BRCA(mut) and BRCA(wt) patients were identified from our institutional genetic database. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point. A total of 235 patients were included. In all, 15 patients were BRCA(mut), 62 BRCA(wt) and 149 BRCA(ut). In multivariate analyses, the BRCA(mut) status was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio (HR): 3.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-8.64, P=0.0326) and PFS (HR: 2.52, 95% CI :1.29-4.91, P=0.0069). In this large series of MBC receiving HDC AHSCT, we report a highly favorable survival outcome in the subset of patients with documented germline BRCA mutations.