Search

Simple Summary: Relapse and treatment-related side effects pose significant challenges for older patients with high-risk blood cancers (myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML)) undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplants from HLA-haploidentical donors. We compared two preparative treatment regimens to identify the most tolerable and effective approach: one using fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and melphalan, and the other using fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and treosulfan. Our goal was to determine which treatment offers better survival rates and fewer side effects. We found that both regimens resulted in similar survival outcomes. However, the melphalan regimen was associated with fewer relapses but more treatment-related deaths, while the treosulfan regimen had fewer side effects but exhibited poorer disease control. These findings suggest that treosulfan may be safer, though higher doses might improve disease control, providing valuable insights for future treatments. Relapse and regimen-related toxicities remain major challenges in achieving long-term survival, particularly among older patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of treosulfan-based conditioning, noting stable engraftment and low non-relapse mortality (NRM) in patients undergoing HLA-matched allo-HSCT. However, data on treosulfan-based conditioning in the HLA-haploidentical transplantation (HaploT) setting are limited. We retrospectively compared conditioning with fludarabine–cyclophosphamide (FC)–melphalan (110 mg/m2) and FC-treosulfan (30 g/m2) prior to HaploT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in patients with high-risk MDS/AML patients ≥ 50 years, transplanted from 2009–2021 at our institution (n = 80). After balancing patient characteristics by a matched-pair analysis, we identified twenty-one matched pairs. Two-year OS and LFS were similar among the groups (OS 66% and LFS 66%, p = 0.8 and p = 0.57). However, FC-melphalan was associated with a significantly lower probability of relapse compared to FC-treosulfan (0% vs. 24%, p = 0.006), counterbalanced by a higher NRM (33% vs. 10%, p = 0.05). Time to engraftment and incidences of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) did not differ significantly. In conclusion, HaploT using FC-treosulfan in combination with PTCy in patients aged ≥50 years with MDS/AML appears safe and effective, particularly in advanced disease stages. We confirm the favorable extramedullary toxicity profile, allowing for potential dose intensification to enhance antileukemic activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This analysis of the RASH trial (NCT01729481) aimed at gaining a better understanding of the "Burden of Therapy" (BOTh®TM) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In the RASH study, 150 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic PDAC were treated with gemcitabine plus erlotinib (gem/erlotinib) for four weeks. Patients who developed a skin rash during this four-week run-in phase continued with the gem/erlotinib treatment, while rash-negative patients were switched to FOLFIRINOX. The study demonstrated a 1-year survival rate of rash-positive patients who received gem/erlotinib as first-line treatment that was comparable to previous reports of patients receiving FOLFIRINOX. To understand whether these comparable survival rates may be accompanied by better tolerability of the gem/erlotinib treatment compared to FOLFIRINOX, the BOTh®TM methodology was used to continuously quantify and depict the burden of therapy generated by treatment emergent events (TEAEs). Sensory neuropathy was significantly more common in the FOLFIRINOX arm, and prevalence as well as severity increased over time. In both arms, the BOTh®TM associated with diarrhea decreased over the course of treatment. The BOTh®TM caused by neutropenia was comparable in both arms but decreased in the FOLFIRINOX arm over time, possibly due to chemotherapy dose reductions. Overall, gem/erlotinib was associated with a slightly higher overall BOTh®TM, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.6735). In summary, the BOTh®TM analysis facilitates the evaluation of TEAEs. In patients fit for intense chemotherapeutic regimens, FOLFIRINOX is associated with a lower BOTh®TM than gem/erlotinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: To this date, surgery remains the only potentially curative approach in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. To analyse the clinical impact of a structured post-operative follow-up programme, we retrospectively analysed a cohort of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients treated at LMU Munich. Methods: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who underwent resection and presented for regular follow-up visits at our centre between 2002 and 2017 were identified from two existing study cohorts. Diagnosis of recurrences was categorised by timing (within or outside a scheduled follow-up visit) and detection modality (imaging, CA 19-9 increase, or clinical deterioration) and correlated with disease-free survival and overall survival (OS). Results: One hundred and twenty-five patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this analysis. Median OS in the whole cohort was 21.1 months. Of these 125 patients, 103 (82.4%) patients had a documented relapse. Tumour recurrences detected within a scheduled follow-up visit (n = 86, 83.5%) compared to recurrences becoming apparent at an unplanned visit (n = 17, 16.5%) were associated with a significantly improved OS (median 25.5 vs. 20.2 months, p = 0.019). Compared to patients with recurrence detected by clinical deterioration (n = 4, 3.9%), patients with recurrences detected by imaging or laboratory abnormalities (n = 99, 96.0%) had a longer median OS (24.8 vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.007). Discussion: A structured follow-up after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resection may have an impact on patient outcome. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate the clinical impact of post-operative follow-up programmes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In pancreatic cancer, systemic treatment options in addition to chemotherapy remain scarce, and so far only a small proportion of patients benefit from targeted therapies. Objective: The patients with pancreatic cancer discussed in the CCCMunichLMU Molecular Tumor Board were reviewed to gain a better real-world understanding of the challenges and chances of precision oncology in this hard-to-treat cancer. Methods: Patients with pancreatic cancer who received comprehensive genomic profiling and were discussed in the interdisciplinary Molecular Tumor Board between May 2017 and July 2022 were included. These patients' medical charts, comprehensive genomic profiling results, and Molecular Tumor Board recommendations were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Results: Molecular profiles of 165 patients with pancreatic cancer were discussed in the Molecular Tumor Board. In the 149 cases where comprehensive genomic profiling was successful, KRAS mutations were detected in 87.9%, TP53 in 53.0%, and CDKN2A in 14.1%. 33.3% of KRAS wild-type patients harbored targetable mutations, while these were only found in 19.1% of patients with the KRAS mutation; however, this difference was not statistically significant. 63.8% of patients with successful testing received a targeted treatment recommendation by the Molecular Tumor Board; however, only 3.2% of these were put into practice. Compared to a historic cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer with synchronous metastatic disease diagnosed between 2010 and 2017, the patients from the pancreatic cancer cohort with synchronous metastatic disease had a longer survival. Conclusions: This single-center experience emphasizes the challenges of targeted treatment in pancreatic cancer. Very few patients ultimately received the recommended therapies, highlighting the need for more and better targeted treatment options in pancreatic cancer, early comprehensive genomic profiling to allow sufficient time to put Molecular Tumor Board recommendations into practice, and close cooperation with clinical trial units to give patients access to otherwise not available targeted treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/aim: Endometriosis is a common disorder in reproductive-age women leading to a broad range of symptoms and is associated with a higher risk for endometrioid ovarian carcinoma., Case Report: We report the case of a 55 year-old woman with previously undiagnosed endometriosis presenting with a large mediastinal cancer of unknown primary (CUP) and synchronous Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) stage II rectal adenocarcinoma. Histopathologically the mediastinal tumor resembled endometrial carcinoma and laparoscopically endometriotic lesions on the patient's peritoneum were detected. The patient was treated with neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by resection of the mediastinal tumor. After recovery, the patient received neoadjuvant short-course radiation to the rectal adenocarcinoma, which was resected afterwards. No primary endometrial carcinoma was found in the uterus, leading to the most likely conclusion that the mediastinal tumor derived from an extragenital endometriotic lesion., Conclusion: Although rare, cases of degeneration of endometriosis have been described. In this case not only the localization of endometriosis was uncommon, but also its malignant transformation and synchronous diagnosis of a rectal adenocarcinoma, complicating diagnosis, and treatment of the patient. This rare case highlights the importance of diagnosing and treating patients with CUP or multiple malignancies at large interdisciplinary centers to reach the best possible outcome., (Copyright © 2023 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)