Search

The value of ustekinumab (UST) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in clinical practice remains unclear. This study examined the impact of UST TDM on clinical decision making in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). A total of 110 consecutive UST-treated CD patients were enrolled in this multicenter, single-arm cross-sectional study. During a single study visit, clinical decisions, disease characteristics, and serum and fecal samples were obtained. The primary outcome was congruency of the actual and two hypothetical clinical decisions based on provision of UST TDM (with and without fecal calprotectin [FCP]) to participating clinicians. Decisions were compared against those of a review panel. A sub-study retrospectively measured the associations of clinical outcomes at the next follow-up visit with serum UST concentration [UST]. No differences in the pattern of decisions by clinicians were observed before and after provision of UST TDM (P = 1.0) or UST TDM + FCP (P = 0.86). However, 39% (TDM) and 50% (TDM + FCP) of hypothetical decisions differed from the initial decisions. The review panel’s decisions differed with the addition of TDM + FCP (P = 0.0006), but not TDM alone (P = 0.16). The sub-study (n = 53) failed to detect an association between therapeutic serum [UST] at the initial study visit and clinical outcomes at the next visit. In consecutive CD patients treated with UST, the addition of TDM into routine clinical practice did not significantly impact clinical decisions and there was no association between short-term clinical outcomes and serum [UST]. Further studies are warranted before clinicians routinely implement UST TDM into clinical practice.

Adalimumab and golimumab are subcutaneously administered anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) biologics used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). To date, no studies have directly compared treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among patients with UC receiving these therapies in a real-world setting. The objective of this study was to compare these outcomes among patients with UC treated with either adalimumab or golimumab using a US claims database. Patients with UC treated with golimumab or adalimumab were identified using the US Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart database. Outcomes of interest included treatment patterns (discontinuations, dose optimizations, persistence, and concomitant medication use) and HRU (outpatient office visits, emergency room [ER] visits, and inpatient stays). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to account for differences in confounding variables between groups. Overall, 990 patients were identified (golimumab: n = 277; adalimumab: n = 713). After PSM, 246 patients were included in each group. There were no significant differences between the adalimumab and golimumab groups over the full follow-up period in terms of treatment discontinuations (53.7% vs. 51.2%; P = 0.5881), dose optimizations (35.4% vs. 39.4%; P = 0.3515), or persistence (338.2 vs. 361.2 days; P = 0.4194). During the year after initiating therapy, there were no significant differences in concomitant immunosuppressant (21.9% vs. 21.7%; P = 0.9686) or corticosteroid use (74.7% vs. 78.8%; P = 0.3573) or in HRU outcomes including outpatient office visits (93.3% vs. 94.0%; P = 0.7660), ER visits (15.2% vs. 10.9%; P = 0.2238), and inpatient stays (15.2% vs. 13.6%; P = 0.6680). In this nationwide PSM cohort study of patients with UC receiving golimumab or adalimumab, no significant differences were observed between groups for treatment patterns or HRU outcomes. High rates of concomitant corticosteroid use, treatment discontinuations, and HRU while on therapy highlight key unmet needs in the treatment of UC.

Adalimumab and golimumab are subcutaneously administered anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) biologics used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). To date, no studies have directly compared treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among patients with UC receiving these therapies in a real-world setting. The objective of this study was to compare these outcomes among patients with UC treated with either adalimumab or golimumab using a US claims database.Patients with UC treated with golimumab or adalimumab were identified using the US Optum ClinformaticsOverall, 990 patients were identified (golimumab: n = 277; adalimumab: n = 713). After PSM, 246 patients were included in each group. There were no significant differences between the adalimumab and golimumab groups over the full follow-up period in terms of treatment discontinuations (53.7% vs. 51.2%; P = 0.5881), dose optimizations (35.4% vs. 39.4%; P = 0.3515), or persistence (338.2 vs. 361.2 days; P = 0.4194). During the year after initiating therapy, there were no significant differences in concomitant immunosuppressant (21.9% vs. 21.7%; P = 0.9686) or corticosteroid use (74.7% vs. 78.8%; P = 0.3573) or in HRU outcomes including outpatient office visits (93.3% vs. 94.0%; P = 0.7660), ER visits (15.2% vs. 10.9%; P = 0.2238), and inpatient stays (15.2% vs. 13.6%; P = 0.6680).In this nationwide PSM cohort study of patients with UC receiving golimumab or adalimumab, no significant differences were observed between groups for treatment patterns or HRU outcomes. High rates of concomitant corticosteroid use, treatment discontinuations, and HRU while on therapy highlight key unmet needs in the treatment of UC.

Background Therapeutic drug monitoring is an important adjunct in optimising IBD management in patients treated with anti-TNF therapies. However, it remains unclear whether these principles apply to non-anti-TNF biologic therapies, such as the anti-IL12/23 agent, ustekinumab (UST). A follow-up analysis of the ‘mUST-DECIDE’ study explores the correlation between UST drug level and clinical outcomes. Methods 111 consecutive UST-treated adult CD patients across 11 sites in Canada from April 2017 to January 2018 were evaluated. Clinical decisions were recorded for all subjects at the single study visit and blood was drawn for TDM (Sanquin, radioimmunoassay). A retrospective chart review was completed in patients who had a follow-up visit ≥ 30 days after the baseline visit. Improved disease control (primary outcome) was defined as a composite assessment outcome meeting ≥ 1 disease control criterion (symptomatic, endoscopic/imaging, biochemical) without any of the non-response criteria (inadequate or loss of response, worsening of any disease control criteria, initiation of any CD-related medications and adverse events). Serum [UST] were categorised as therapeutic, subtherapeutic or uninterpretable based on their position in a 2 compartment PK model [subjects on Q8W dosing were assessed as per the log-linear model which projected a therapeutic level of ≥4.5 µg/ml at 4 weeks and ≥1.0 µg/ml at 8 weeks]. Results 53 patients had a clinical follow-up visit and an interpretable serum [UST]. Patients had refractory disease (89% anti-TNF-exposed, median 16.4 years since diagnosis), but clinically well (66% had baseline HBI Conclusion The sub-study did not detect any association between routine serum [UST] and short-term clinical outcomes at the next patient visit. These data broadly suggests that the routine measurement of serum UST in CD patients does not aid in disease management, though further studies across different clinical scenarios (e.g. loss of response) are warranted.

James C Gregor,1 Martin Williamson,2 Dorota Dajnowiec,2 Bernie Sattin,2 Erik Sabot,3 Baljinder Salh4 1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada; 2Janssen Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada; 3OptumInsight, Boston, MA, USA; 4Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada Background: Given the large armamentarium of therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), physicians cannot fully describe all treatments to patients and, therefore, make assumptions regarding treatment attributes communicated to patients. This study aimed to assess out-of-pocket willingness-to-pay that IBD patients allocate to treatment attributes.Methods: Adult patients receiving therapy for IBD were invited to access a cross-sectional web-based discrete-choice experiment (May 22–August 31, 2015) that presented paired medication scenarios with varying efficacy, safety, and administration parameters. Preference weights and willingness-to-pay for each attribute level were assessed by a hierarchical Bayes method including a multinomial logit model.Results: A total of 586 IBD patients were included, 404 (68.9%) with Crohn’s disease and 182 (31.1%) with ulcerative colitis. Genders were evenly distributed; the majority of patients (70.1%) were 50 years or younger and had postsecondary education (75.4%), while the median health status was 7 (Likert scale: 1 [poor] – 10 [perfect]). Regarding relative preference-weight estimates, for the average respondent, reducing pain during administration, mucosal healing, and symptom relief were the highest-ranking attributes. Conversely, infusion reactions and risk of hospitalization or surgery were the lowest-ranking attributes. In multivariate analysis, patient sociodemographics did not affect the rank order of attributes although small differences were observed between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients in the previous year.Conclusion: This study has important implications related to understanding patient preferences and designing patient-centered strategies. IBD patients prioritize treatments with low administration pain. Additionally, these results concur with treatment guidelines emphasizing patients’ preference for mucosal healing and symptom control. Keywords: inflammatory bowel disease, patient preference, willingness-to-pay, discrete choice

To understand the perception of intravenous infusions in patients receiving infliximab (Remicade) within the BioAdvance patient support program (PSP).Intravenous infusion of infliximab occurs at approximately 200 clinics across Canada and is managed via the BioAdvance PSP. Patients were invited to complete a 28-question survey on demographics, disease/treatment characteristics, health rating, lifestyle, employment, and perception of intravenous infusions and the BioAdvance program.Analyses were exploratory and descriptive; collected data were self-reported ordinal (Likert scale, unfavorable-to-favorable, 1-10). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess statistical significance, and multinomial logistic regression identified predictors of a positive perception of intravenous infusions.1,712 patients completed the survey. Most respondents had been treated with infliximab for2 years (58%), had not been previously treated with a biologic (74%), and were receiving treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (76%). Sixty-two percent of patients were employed and most traveled for personal/work reasons (57%) and had a busy/active lifestyle (76%) while attending the BioAdvance clinics. Before treatment, participants rated their perceived favorability of intravenous infusions at 5/10 (median; interquartile range, 5-7); after multiple infusions, their rating increased significantly to 8 (7-9) (P.001). Regression analysis identified four predictors of a positive infusion experience: French language, favorable ratings of health, accuracy of physician's description, and satisfaction with their BioAdvance coordinator. The vast majority of participants were likely to recommend the BioAdvance PSP.The survey results indicate that the majority of patients receiving infliximab have a positive infusion experience within the BioAdvance PSP.

Healthy mature arteries are usually extremely quiescent tissues with cell proliferation rates much below 1%/day and with extracellular matrix constituents exhibiting half-lives of years to decades. However, chronic physiological or pathological changes in haemodynamic function elicit arterial remodelling processes that may involve substantial tissue synthesis, degradation or turnover. Although these remodelling processes accommodate changing demands placed upon the cardiovascular system by physiological adaptations, they can compromise further perfusion in the context of arterial occlusive disease and they entrench hypertension and may exacerbate its progression. Recent findings indicate that some of the most important such remodelling responses involve the integrated effects of persistently altered vascular tone that feed into restructuring responses, with common signalling pathways frequently interacting in the control of both phases of the response. Current efforts to define these signals and their targets may provide new directions for therapeutic interventions to treat important vascular disorders.

Objectives— Arterial tortuosity is a frequent manifestation of vascular disease and collateral vessel growth, but its causes are poorly understood. This study was designed to assess the relationship between the development of tortuosity and the mechanical forces that are imposed on arterial tissue. Methods and Results— Axial strain in rabbit carotid arteries was reduced from 62±2% to 33±2% by implanting an interposition graft, prepared from the contralateral carotid, at the downstream end of the artery. Axial strain remained unchanged for 12 weeks; however, all vessels became tortuous because of tissue growth and remodeling. After 7 days, there was a marked elevation in proliferation rates of endothelial and smooth muscle cells; however, increased apoptosis was also detected, and no net accumulation of DNA was observed. Significant accumulations of elastin (24%) and total collagen (26%) occurred by 5 weeks. Gelatin zymography detected upregulation and activation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), and confocal microscopy revealed enlargement of fenestrae in the internal elastic lamina. MMP inhibition by treatment with doxycycline prevented enlargement of fenestrae and development of tortuosity, and it enabled normalization of axial strain by 5 weeks. Conclusions— These findings indicate that substantial axial strain is necessary to sustain the morphological stability of arteries, and that a reduction in strain results in arterial tortuosity attributable to aberrant MMP activity.

Tightly regulated remodeling of arterial tissues is essential for survival in all vertebrate species. Arterial remodeling tunes development of the vasculature to the changing metabolic demands of embryonic tissues, it accommodates the extraordinary and diverse adjustments of cardiovascular function that occur at birth in both mother and neonate, and it adapts vascular structure to a host of physiological changes in adults. Arterial tissue remodeling also greatly influences the progression of the most important vascular pathologies including atherosclerosis, hypertension, and restenosis.1 Mechanical forces, particularly blood flow-derived shear stress, are potent stimuli for arterial remodeling. Large increases in shear stress elicit immediate vasodilation that is largely NO-dependent,2 and then a subsequent growth and remodeling selectively deliver new tissue in the circumferential direction to further increase vessel diameter. Conversely, decreased blood flow rate stimulates reduction in arterial diameter during some phases of development, in the postpartum maternal circulation, and in occlusive vascular pathologies.1 Early vasoregulation can be particularly important when shear stress is reduced because increases in vasomotor tone can cause substantial vasoconstriction, even in conduit arteries, and true remodeling often serves only to entrench the reduction in vessel diameter.3 The entrenchment of reduced vessel diameter during inward remodeling has important implications for the reversal of vascular pathologies after therapeutic interventions including bypass graft implantation, angioplasty, stenting, and antihypertensive therapy. But what does “remodeling” mean in this context? What causes the resetting of resting arterial diameter, and how do smooth muscle cells ultimately achieve a capacity to narrow diameter below that which previously characterized maximal constriction?3 Two recent studies have shed light on novel mechanisms by which constrictor responses can be converted to structural remodeling. Martinez-Lemus et al4 found that maintenance of norepinephrine-induced constriction for only 4 hours was sufficient to at least partially entrench the diameter …

Arteries display highly directional growth and remodeling that are specific to increases in the mechanical loads imposed on them by blood pressure, blood flow, and lengthwise tensile forces that are transmitted from the tissues to which they are attached. This study examined the effect of mechanical forces on the direction in which mitosis delivers daughter cells, as a mechanism for directional growth. Lateral forces were imposed on surface integrins of cultured endothelial cells by seeding the cells with arginine-glycine-aspartate peptide–coated magnetic microspheres and applying a magnetic field. Video images revealed that the mitotic axis of dividing cells became highly biased in the direction of applied force. Distribution of cortactin, which participates in polarized mitoses driven by other stimuli, was highly sensitive to mechanical loading and interfering with cortactin function arrested cell growth. Smooth muscle cell mitoses also proved to be sensitive to mechanical force: when lengthwise force imposed on rabbit carotid arteries was altered by excision of a vessel segment and reanastomosis of the cut ends, direction of mitosis was dramatically altered. These findings indicate that influences of mechanical force can modulate the manner in which mitosis of vascular cells contributes to reorganization of arterial wall tissue.