Search

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to highlight key published oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocols and post-desensitization strategies for the major food allergens and to cover important concepts to consider when evaluating OIT for food-allergic patients. Shared decision-making should help identify patient and family values which will help influence the type of evidence-based protocol and maintenance strategy to use. RECENT FINDINGS: With food OIT emerging as a treatment option, there is a pressing need for patients, physicians, and other providers to have a nuanced understanding of the management choices available to them. There are now randomized controlled trials (RCT) of OIT for peanut, egg, milk, and wheat, and reports of cohorts of patients who have undergone OIT for tree nuts and sesame clinically. The current published protocols contain significant diversity in terms of starting dose, build-up schedule, maintenance dose, and even the product used for desensitization. Emerging data can help direct the long-term maintenance strategy for patients on OIT. Based on patient and family values elicited through the shared decision-making process, an OIT protocol may be selected that balances the level of desensitization, potential side effects, frequency of clinic visits, and potential to induce sustained unresponsiveness, among other factors. Once maintenance dosing is reached, most patients will need to maintain regular exposure to the food allergen to remain desensitized. The option to transition to commercial food products with equivalent amounts of food protein as the OIT maintenance dose would simplify the dosing process and perhaps improve palatability as well. Less frequent or decreased OIT dosing can provide practical benefits but may affect the level of desensitization and safety for some patients.

Background: We investigated the clinical outcomes of involved‐field high‐dose (≥66 Gy) chemoradiotherapy (CRT) combined with respiratory motion management for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: Patients who underwent definitive CRT for histologically confirmed ESCC in our department between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Respiratory motion management strategies included breath‐holding (63%) and mask immobilization (29%) based on individual measurements of respiratory tumor motion using radiographic fluoroscopy with endoscopically placed clip markers as landmarks. We evaluated patient characteristics, treatment efficacy, failure patterns, and toxicities. Results: We enrolled 35 patients with a prescribed dose of 66–70 Gy in 33–35 fractions. The overall response rate within 6 months post‐CRT was 94.3%; the median follow‐up period for survivors was 43 months. The 2‐year overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival, and locoregional failure‐free survival rates were 51.4%, 42.9%, and 42.9%, respectively. A significant difference in OS was observed between patients with and without esophageal fistulas after CRT (p = 0.002, log‐rank test). Disease failure occurred in 16 patients (45.7%), including one (2.9%) with out‐of‐field regional nodal failure. Major grade 3 or higher toxicities included decreased white blood cell count (48.6%), neutrophil count (34.3%), and esophageal stenosis (31.4%). No grade 3 or higher cardiopulmonary toxicities were observed. Bronchial/tracheal tumor compression and a higher radiotherapy dose (70 Gy) were significantly correlated with esophageal fistulas. Conclusion: Involved‐field high‐dose CRT with respiratory motion management may be a feasible treatment option for ESCC. However, a comprehensive assessment of esophageal fistula risk is required to identify suitable candidates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cetuximab, used to treat head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer, can cause severe infusion reactions. Case presentation: We report an 87-year-old East Asian woman with stage IV ileocecal signet ring cell carcinoma who experienced severe allergic reactions to cetuximab despite pre-treatment. A dose escalation method, involving weekly incremental doses with comprehensive pre-treatment and close monitoring, was employed, successfully reducing allergic reactions and allowing safe administration. Conclusion: This approach demonstrates a viable alternative for patients with hypersensitivity to cetuximab, warranting further research for personalized treatment optimization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiotherapy planning feasibility of dose escalation with intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) to hypoxic tumor regions identified on 18F‐Fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET‐CT) in NPC. Materials and methods: Nine patients with stages T3‐4N0‐3M0 NPC underwent 18F‐FMISO PET‐CT before and during week 3 of radiotherapy. The hypoxic volume (GTVhypo) is automatically generated by applying a subthresholding algorithm within the gross tumor volume (GTV) with a tumor to muscle standardized uptake value (SUV) ratio of 1.3 on the 18F‐FMISO PET‐CT scan. Two proton plans were generated for each patient, a standard plan to 70 Gy and dose escalation plan with upfront boost followed by standard 70GyE plan. The stereotactic boost was planned with single‐field uniform dose optimization using two fields to deliver 10 GyE in two fractions to GTVhypo. The standard plan was generated with IMPT with robust optimization to deliver 70GyE, 60GyE in 33 fractions using simultaneous integrated boost technique. A plan sum was generated for assessment. Results: Eight of nine patients showed tumor hypoxia on the baseline 18F‐FMISO PET‐CT scan. The mean hypoxic tumor volume was 3.9 cm3 (range.9–11.9cm3). The average SUVmax of the hypoxic volume was 2.2 (range 1.44–2.98). All the dose‐volume parameters met the planning objectives for target coverage. Dose escalation was not feasible in three of eight patients as the D0.03cc of temporal lobe was greater than 75GyE. Conclusions: The utility of boost to the hypoxic volume before standard course of radiotherapy with IMPT is dosimetrically feasible in selected patients. Clinical trials are warranted to determine the clinical outcomes of this approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Anaplastic meningiomas, categorized as WHO grade 3 tumors, are rare and highly aggressive, accounting for 1-2% of all meningioma cases. Despite aggressive treatment, including surgery and Radiation, they exhibit a high recurrence rate and poor survival outcomes. The aggressive histopathological features emphasize the urgent need for effective management strategies. Methods: A retrospective multi-institutional analysis was conducted on patients with recurrent anaplastic meningioma who underwent re-irradiation between 2017 and 2023. Clinical, dosimetric, and outcome data were collected and analyzed, focusing on local control, progression free survival and treatment-related adverse events. Results: Thirty-four cases were analyzed, with a median follow-up 11 months after re-irradiation. Progression-free survival at 12 months was 61.9%, with higher doses correlating with better outcomes. Concomitant Bevacizumab improves progression-free survival and reduces the risk of radiation necrosis. CDKN2A homozygote deletion correlated with a higher risk of local failure. Symptomatic radiation necrosis occurred in 20.5% of cases, but its incidence was lower with concomitant Bevacizumab treatment. Conclusion: Re-irradiation presents a viable option for recurrent anaplastic meningioma despite the associated risk of radiation necrosis. Higher doses with concomitant Bevacizumab improve clinical outcomes and reduce toxicity. Individualized treatment approaches are necessary, emphasizing the importance of further research to refine management strategies for this challenging disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatment options for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) who experience disease progression on lenvatinib treatment are limited. Although dose escalation of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors at disease progression has been reported across cancer types, clinical significance in patients with DTC has not been investigated. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with DTC who experienced disease progression on lenvatinib treatment from September 2011 to June 2022. We compared subjects who received dose-escalation treatment with standard treatment of termination at the time of initial disease progression. The escalated dose was decided by referencing to the previous effective and tolerated dose. Results: Thirty-three patients were identified, 15 with dose escalation and 18 with lenvatinib termination. In both groups, the starting dose of lenvatinib was 24 mg/day, and the median dose at initial disease progression was 10 mg/day. In the former, the median dose escalation was 6 mg/day (range: 4–12). Objective response rate, clinical benefit rate by escalation, and median treatment duration of the dose-escalation phase were 13.3%, 73.3%, and 9.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.71–27.6), respectively. Median overall survival from initial disease progression was significantly longer in the dose-escalation group (median OS: 20.4 months [95% CI 7.0–NA] vs. 3.9 months [95% CI 1.7–7.9], log-rank p-value; 0.0004, hazard ratio; 0.22 [95% CI 0.09–0.55]). There were no grade 5 adverse events, and one patient discontinued due to a grade 3 lung abscess. Conclusion: The dose-escalation strategy appears to be a safe and effective treatment option after disease progression in patients treated with lenvatinib for DTC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background We investigated the clinical outcomes of involved‐field high‐dose (≥66 Gy) chemoradiotherapy (CRT) combined with respiratory motion management for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Patients who underwent definitive CRT for histologically confirmed ESCC in our department between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Respiratory motion management strategies included breath‐holding (63%) and mask immobilization (29%) based on individual measurements of respiratory tumor motion using radiographic fluoroscopy with endoscopically placed clip markers as landmarks. We evaluated patient characteristics, treatment efficacy, failure patterns, and toxicities. Results We enrolled 35 patients with a prescribed dose of 66–70 Gy in 33–35 fractions. The overall response rate within 6 months post‐CRT was 94.3%; the median follow‐up period for survivors was 43 months. The 2‐year overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival, and locoregional failure‐free survival rates were 51.4%, 42.9%, and 42.9%, respectively. A significant difference in OS was observed between patients with and without esophageal fistulas after CRT (p = 0.002, log‐rank test). Disease failure occurred in 16 patients (45.7%), including one (2.9%) with out‐of‐field regional nodal failure. Major grade 3 or higher toxicities included decreased white blood cell count (48.6%), neutrophil count (34.3%), and esophageal stenosis (31.4%). No grade 3 or higher cardiopulmonary toxicities were observed. Bronchial/tracheal tumor compression and a higher radiotherapy dose (70 Gy) were significantly correlated with esophageal fistulas. Conclusion Involved‐field high‐dose CRT with respiratory motion management may be a feasible treatment option for ESCC. However, a comprehensive assessment of esophageal fistula risk is required to identify suitable candidates.

Abstract Introduction Cetuximab, used to treat head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer, can cause severe infusion reactions. Case presentation We report an 87-year-old East Asian woman with stage IV ileocecal signet ring cell carcinoma who experienced severe allergic reactions to cetuximab despite pre-treatment. A dose escalation method, involving weekly incremental doses with comprehensive pre-treatment and close monitoring, was employed, successfully reducing allergic reactions and allowing safe administration. Conclusion This approach demonstrates a viable alternative for patients with hypersensitivity to cetuximab, warranting further research for personalized treatment optimization.

Abstract Introduction Anaplastic meningiomas, categorized as WHO grade 3 tumors, are rare and highly aggressive, accounting for 1-2% of all meningioma cases. Despite aggressive treatment, including surgery and Radiation, they exhibit a high recurrence rate and poor survival outcomes. The aggressive histopathological features emphasize the urgent need for effective management strategies. Methods A retrospective multi-institutional analysis was conducted on patients with recurrent anaplastic meningioma who underwent re-irradiation between 2017 and 2023. Clinical, dosimetric, and outcome data were collected and analyzed, focusing on local control, progression free survival and treatment-related adverse events. Results Thirty-four cases were analyzed, with a median follow-up 11 months after re-irradiation. Progression-free survival at 12 months was 61.9%, with higher doses correlating with better outcomes. Concomitant Bevacizumab improves progression-free survival and reduces the risk of radiation necrosis. CDKN2A homozygote deletion correlated with a higher risk of local failure. Symptomatic radiation necrosis occurred in 20.5% of cases, but its incidence was lower with concomitant Bevacizumab treatment. Conclusion Re-irradiation presents a viable option for recurrent anaplastic meningioma despite the associated risk of radiation necrosis. Higher doses with concomitant Bevacizumab improve clinical outcomes and reduce toxicity. Individualized treatment approaches are necessary, emphasizing the importance of further research to refine management strategies for this challenging disease.

BACKGROUND: Olipudase alfa is a recombinant human acid sphingomyelinase enzyme replacement therapy for non-central-nervous-system manifestations of acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD). The ASCEND randomized placebo-controlled trial in adults with ASMD demonstrated reductions in sphingomyelin storage, organomegaly, interstitial lung disease and impaired diffusion capacity of the lung (DLCO), during the first year of olipudase alfa treatment. In an ongoing open-label extension of the ASCEND trial, individuals in the placebo group crossed over to olipudase alfa, and those in the olipudase alfa group continued treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-five of 36 participants continued in the extension trial, and 33 completed year 2. Change-from-baseline results are presented as least-square mean percent change ± SEM. Improvements in the cross-over group after 1 year of treatment paralleled those of the olipudase alfa group from the primary analysis, while clinical improvement continued for those receiving olipudase alfa for 2 years. In the cross-over group, percent-predicted DLCO increased by 28.0 ± 6.2%, spleen volume decreased by 36.0 ± 3.0% and liver volume decreased by 30.7 ± 2.5%. For those with 2 years of olipudase alfa treatment, the percent predicted DLCO increased by 28.5 ± 6.2%, spleen volume decreased by 47.0 ± 2.7%, and liver volume decreased by 33.4 ± 2.2%. Lipid profiles and elevated liver transaminase levels improved or normalized by 1 year and remained stable through 2 years of treatment. Overall, 99% of treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate, with one treatment-related serious adverse event (extrasystoles; previously documented cardiomyopathy). No individual discontinued due to an adverse event. CONCLUSION: Treatment with olipudase alfa is well tolerated and reduces manifestations of chronic ASMD with sustained efficacy. Trial registration NCT02004691 registered 9 December 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02004691.

Background: High‐dose‐rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) has been acknowledged as a widely utilized treatment for patients with intermediate‐ and high‐risk prostate cancer, despite its side effects such as edema, incontinence, and impotence. Nevertheless, the treatment is consistently limited by the potential danger of excessive irradiation to organs‐at‐risk (OARs) like the urethra, bladder, and rectum. Purpose: This study aims to introduce curvilinear catheter implantation in the prostate gland for HDR treatment. The objective is to improve the radiation dose distribution by offering access channels conformal to the prostate anatomy. This approach seeks to minimize toxicity to nearby OARs while utilizing a reduced number of needles, potentially leading to improved clinical outcomes. Methods: Curvilinear catheters were first pre‐planned for an anonymized patient using Oncentra treatment planning system (TPS) and hybrid inverse planning optimization (HIPO) algorithm. The trajectories of the catheters were then analyzed using MATLAB to extract their radius of curvature. Tendon‐driven active needles were then used to implant curvilinear catheters inside an anthropomorphic phantom. Results: Proposed curvilinear catheter implantation resulted in significant improvement in terms of dosimetric constraints to the OARs and coverage to the prostate. Tendon‐driven active needles were shown to be capable of realizing the required pre‐planned curvatures inside prostate. It was shown that the active needle can realize a desired radius of curvature and a desired trajectory with an average accuracy of 9.1 ± 8.6 and 1.27 ± 0.50 mm in air and inside a tissue‐mimicking phantom, respectively. Conclusion: This work demonstrates the feasibility of using tendon‐driven active curvilinear catheter implantation in prostate to improve the outcomes of HDR‐BT via improved radiation dose distribution to the prostate and reduced toxicity to the OARs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Local failure remains the major concern in grade 4 glioma or glioblastoma (GBM). Pilot studies have shown a radiotherapy (RT) dose–response relationship in GBM. Here we present our preliminary data of RT dose escalation using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET scan. High 68Ga-pentixafor uptake in glioma cells helps in sharp demarcation between tumour and normal brain. This phase II prospective study was conducted from 2018 to 2020. Thirty, biopsy-proven cases of grade 4 glioma were included. All patients underwent post-operative MRI of the brain and 68Ga-Pentixafor PET scan. RT was planned in 2-phases. Phase-1 GTV (GTV1) comprised of T2/flair abnormality, PET-avid disease and post-op cavity. A margin of 2cm was given to GTV-1 to create phase-1 CTV (CTV1), which was further expanded to 0.5cm to generate phase-1 PTV (PTV1). A radiation dose of 46Gy/23fr was prescribed to PTV-1. Phase-2 GTV (GTV2) consisted of CT/MRI contrast-enhancing lesion, PET avid disease and post-op cavity. A margin of 0.5 cm was given to GTV2 to create phase-2 CTV (CTV2) which was expanded to 0.5 cm to create phase-2 PTV (PTV2). RT dose of 14 Gy/7 fr was prescribed to PTV2. PET avid disease was delineated as GTV PET and a margin of 3mm was given to generate PTV-PET which received escalated RT dose of 21 Gy/7fr by simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in phase 2 (Total dose to PTV PET = 67 Gy/30 fr). All patients received concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. The data was prospectively maintained in Microsoft Excel sheet. SPSS v 23 was used for statistical analysis. The primary endpoints were estimation of the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoint was to measure the incidence of radiation necrosis. Categorical variables were reported as frequency and percentage and quantitative variables were reported as median and range. Data from thirty patients were analysed. A median OS of 23 months was observed with estimated 1, 2 and 3 years OS of 90%, 40% and 17.8% respectively. A significant association of OS was seen with the extent of surgery (p = 0.04) and kernofsky performance status (p = 0.007). No patient developed significant radiation necrosis. The index study did not show any survival benefit from dose escalation RT. However, all of the patients tolerated the treatment well and none of them developed radiation necrosis. Considering the small sample size as a limitation of the index study, the role of 68Ga-pentixafor PET scan for radiation dose escalation should be further explored. CTRI/2019/05/019146. • Radiotherapy dose escalation in grade 4 glioma using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET scan. • Increased RT dose (67Gy/30#/6 weeks) was used for PET avid lesion. • None of the patients developed radiation necrosis. • No survival benefit from RT dose escalation. • Limitation – Small sample size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

First-in-human (FIH) dose-escalation trials on oncology should prioritize safety and emphasize efficacy. We reviewed the FIH trials of 67 anti-tumor products approved by the Food and Drug Administration between 2018 and 2023 and found that the "3 + 3" design remains the predominant dose-escalation method (66.2%). The number of patients receiving sub-therapeutic doses is positively correlated with the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum dose (MD) to starting dose ratio (P = 0.056) and the number of dose levels in trials (P < 0.001). In addition, the proportion of products with a high ratio in antibody drugs is higher than that in small molecules (P < 0.001). The MTD or MD exceeded the label dose by three or more doses in 22.03% of the products. In conclusion, optimizing the starting dose selection method, refining the way of determining doses, and finding alternative indicators to replace toxicity as the endpoints will increase the effectiveness and broaden the beneficiary scope. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of bevacizumab has been hampered by safety concerns despite demonstrable progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in subjects with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, highlighting the need for novel effective and safe antiangiogenic agents. This study aimed to characterize the tolerability, safety, and antitumor activities of escalating doses of anti-VEGF antibody suvemcitug plus chemotherapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients. This open-label, dose-escalation trial enrolled adult patients (≥18 years) with platinum-resistant histologically or cytologically-confirmed epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer. Eligible patients received paclitaxel or topotecan plus escalating doses of suvemcitug 0.5, 1, 1.5, or 2 mg/kg once every two weeks. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, and antitumor activities of suvemcitug. Twenty-nine subjects received paclitaxel (n = 11) or topotecan (n = 18). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. The most common adverse events of special interest were proteinuria (41.4%), hypertension (20.7%) and epistaxis (10.3%). No gastrointestinal perforations occurred. Nine subjects (31.0%, 95% CI 15.3–50.8) demonstrated investigators-confirmed objective response, including complete response in 1 and partial response in 8. The median PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI 2.2–7.4). Suvemcitug demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and promising antitumor activities in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients, supporting its further clinical development. • In this trial, 29 platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients received escalating doses of suvemcitug plus chemotherapy. • No dose-limiting toxicities occurred and no gastrointestinal perforations were reported. • Nine patients showed investigators-confirmed objective response, with a median progression-free survival of 5.4 months. • The recommended dose for phase 2 study is suvemcitug 1.5 mg/kg every two weeks. • The safety and antitumor activities of suvemcitug support its clinical development for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties maximize the therapeutic potential of bone marrow aspiration concentrate (BMAC) in osteoarthritis (OA) knee. There is a lack of studies to standardize the treatment procedure to make the studies done across various centers comparable to understand the lacunae better and develop further the deficiency in our understanding of BMAC for OA knee. We aimed to assess the degree of pain relief, functional outcome, and cartilage thickness with different doses of BMAC in primary OA knee. Materials and Methods: A single-centered prospective observational study was conducted with 80 patients of OA knee who were divided into 4 groups where group A (n = 20), group B (n = 20), group C (n = 20), and group D (n = 20) received intra-articular 1, 2, 5 million BMAC cells per kg body weight, and intra-articular saline, respectively. All patients were followed up with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores both pre and post-procedurally at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up. Results: The study found no significant differences in demographics or co-morbidities across four participant groups (A, B, C, D). However, clinical outcomes varied markedly: Groups B and C showed significant improvements in pain perception (VAS scores), knee function, and quality of life (KOOS and WOMAC scores), while Group A showed marginal or non-significant changes, and Group D exhibited no significant improvements. These findings suggest that treatments in Groups B and C reached the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, significantly enhancing patient-reported outcomes. Conclusion: A dose of 2 million BMAC cells per kg body weight for knee OA serves as the better regenerative modality of choice in cartilage regeneration. With our dose-escalation study, we would be able to standardize the treatment procedure and enable global comparison of the treatment method across various regions of the world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myristoylation, the N-terminal addition of the fatty acid myristate to proteins, regulates membrane-bound signal transduction pathways important in cancer cell biology. This modification is catalyzed by two N-myristoyltransferases, NMT1 and NMT2. Zelenirstat is a first-in-class potent oral small molecule inhibitor of both NMT1 and NMT2 proteins. Patients with advanced solid tumors and relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphomas were enrolled in an open label, phase I dose escalation trial of oral daily zelenirstat, administered in 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The endpoints were to evaluate dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) to establish a maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetic parameters, and anticancer activity. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled (25 advanced solid tumor; 4 R/R B-cell lymphoma) and 24 were DLT-evaluable. Dosing ranged from 20 mg once daily (OD) to 210 mg OD without DLT, but gastrointestinal DLTS were seen in the 280 mg cohort. MTD and recommended phase 2 dose were 210 mg OD. Common adverse events were predominantly Gr ≤ 2 nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue. Plasma concentrations peaked at 2 h with terminal half-lives averaging 10 h. Steady state was achieved by day 15, and higher doses achieved trough concentrations predicted to be therapeutic. Stable disease as best response was seen in eight (28%) patients. Progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly better in patients receiving 210 mg OD compared to those receiving lower doses. Zelenirstat is well-tolerated, achieves plasma exposures expected for efficacy, and shows early signs of anticancer activity. Further clinical development of zelenirstat is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of IBD. This drug has a well-established efficacy; however, patients may not respond or lose response. The availability of other biological therapies prompts the need for comparative data between different agents to suggest first- or second-line strategies. Aim of this review is to compare the effectiveness of ustekinumab to other biologics in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, as well as report the available data on dose escalation and reinduction. A systematic electronic search of the English literature was performed up to November 2023, using Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. Conference proceedings were also screened. Out of 659 citations, 80 relevant articles were selected and included in the present narrative review. Head-to-head comparisons of different biological drugs are relatively scarce, mostly deriving from indirect comparison or retrospective studies. Overall available data indicate similar effectiveness in the treatment of IBD patients. Dose escalation and reinduction strategies are well documented, but the optimal treatment schedule is still to be defined. Response and remission rates vary in different studies, and a proportion of patients fail to achieve clinical and endoscopic outcomes. However, both approaches are effective and safe in nonresponders and secondary loss of response. IBD patients may benefit from dose escalation or reinduction. Both strategies prove effective in regaining response in a proportion of patients, avoiding unnecessary early switch. Head-to-head trials are still needed to determine the exact placement of this drug compared to other biologics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intravenous (IV) racemic ketamine and intranasal (IN) esketamine have demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ketamine and esketamine at various dosages for depression. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with parallel group dose comparison of ketamine and esketamine for depression/TRD. Ovid Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched. Standardized mean differences were calculated using Hedges'-g to complete random effects meta-analysis. The efficacy outcomes were changes in depression outcomes for IV ketamine and IN esketamine respectively. Safety was assessed by reported adverse effects. A random effects meta-analysis of studies (n = 12) showed efficacy in reducing depression symptoms with IV ketamine (Hedges'g = 1.52 [0.98–2.22], Z = 4.23, p < 0.001) and IN esketamine (Hedges' g = 0.31 [0.18–0.44], Z = 4.53, P < 0.001) compared to control/placebo. Treatment response was observed at IV ketamine doses ≤0.2 mg/kg, >0.2–0.5 mg/kg and > 0.5 mg/kg. Higher IV ketamine doses (>0.5 mg/kg) did not lead to greater treatment response. Esketamine doses of 56–84 mg were superior to 28 mg dose. Overall quality of evidence was low and limited by small number of studies. Publication bias was high. This meta-analysis suggests that IV ketamine may be efficacious at doses as low as 0.2 mg/kg, with increasing dose response at 0.5 mg/kg, without demonstrable increased benefit at 1 mg/kg, based on a small number of studies. Efficacy for IN esketamine increases with doses above 28 mg with best response being found between 56 and 84 mg for reducing depressive symptoms. • Intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine showed rapid antidepressant effect for patients with TRD. • For intranasal esketamine, higher dosages (56–84 mg) showed superior antidepressant response compared to 28 mg for TRD. • For IV racemic ketamine, there were similar efficacy for standard dose (0.5 mg/kg) and higher dose (> 0.5 mg/kg). • There is insufficient evidence for superiority of higher IV racemic ketamine doses compared to the standard dose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Tildrakizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of interleukin-23 (IL-23), has shown promise in the management of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, offering potential improvements in clinical outcomes and quality of life. Objectives: The study aimed to identify patient characteristics that indicate the initiation of a 200-mg dosage of tildrakizumab in a real-world setting, focusing on factors that enhance treatment efficacy and safety. Methods: This prospective study included 54 adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with tildrakizumab 200 mg from March 2023 to March 2024 across 13 Italian Dermatology Units. Data collected included demographics, disease duration, comorbidities, and previous treatments. PASI, BSA, and DLQI scores were recorded at baseline, week 4, 16, and 28. Safety was assessed through adverse event reporting. Univariate analysis was performed to identify baseline characteristics significantly associated with achieving PASI ≤ 5 at week 16. Results: Significant reductions in PASI scores were observed at week 4 (9 ± 6.9, p 30) had higher odds (OR = 4.333, p < 0.05) of achieving PASI ≤ 5. Longer disease duration and starting with a 100 mg dose also correlated with better outcomes. The safety profile was favorable, with minimal adverse events reported. Conclusions: Tildrakizumab 200 mg is effective and safe for moderate-to-severe psoriasis, particularly in obese patients. These findings support its use as a long-term treatment option.

Focal boost to intra-prostatic lesions (IPLs) in radiotherapy could enhance treatment efficacy. Brachytherapy (BT), delivering highly conformal dose with sharp dose gradients emerges as a potentially optimal approach for precise dose escalation to IPLs. This study aims to consolidate clinical and planning studies that implemented whole gland prostate BT and focal dose escalation to IPLs, with the view to synthesize evidence on the strategy’s effectiveness and variability. In this review, we identified nine clinical studies and ten planning/simulation studies focusing on whole gland prostate BT with IPL dose escalation. From the clinical studies, the use of whole gland prostate BT with focal dose escalation in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) appears to be a safe and effective 21 form of treatment for men with T1b – T2c prostate cancer with average five-year biochemical failure22 free survival (BFFS) of 94 % (range 81.1 %−100 %) and minimal grade three toxicities reported. Both clinical and planning studies exemplified the high level of focal dose escalation achievable using BT with a mean IPL D90 % of 132 % and 146 %, respectively (expressed as a % of the whole gland prescription dose). There was considerable variation in the reporting of clinical and technical data in the identified studies. To facilitate a more widespread and uniform adoption of the technique, recommendations on essential and desirable items to be included in future studies incorporating whole gland prostate BT with focal boost to IPLs are provided.

BackgroundNeratinib is an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for HER2-positive early-stage and metastatic breast cancer. Diarrhea is the most frequent side effect and the most common reason for early discontinuation. The phase II CONTROL trial investigated antidiarrheal prophylaxis or neratinib dose escalation (DE) for prevention of diarrhea. We present complete study results including final data for two DE strategies.MethodsPatients who completed trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy received neratinib 240 mg/day for 1 year. Early cohorts investigated mandatory prophylaxis with loperamide, then additional budesonide or colestipol. Final cohorts assessed neratinib DE over the first 2 (DE1) or 4 weeks (DE2). The primary endpoint was incidence of grade ≥3 diarrhea. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using FACT-B and EQ-5D-5L.Results563 patients were enrolled into six cohorts. All strategies reduced grade ≥3 diarrhea with the lowest incidence in DE1 (DE1 13%; colestipol + loperamide [CL] 21%, DE2 27%; budesonide + loperamide [BL] 28%; loperamide [L] 31%; colestipol + loperamide as needed [CL-PRN] 33%). Diarrhea-related discontinuations occurred early and were lowest in DE1 (DE1 3%; CL 4%; DE2 6%; CL-PRN 8%; BL 11%; L 20%). More patients stayed on neratinib for the prescribed period versus historical controls. Prior pertuzumab use did not affect rates of grade ≥3 diarrhea, diarrhea-related discontinuations, or treatment duration. Early transient reductions in HRQoL scores were observed.ConclusionsThese complete results from CONTROL show improved neratinib tolerability with proactive management at the start of therapy. Two-week neratinib DE with loperamide as needed was particularly effective.ClinicaltrialsGov registration numberNCT02400476.

Introduction: With locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), uncontrolled local tumor growth frequently leads to mortality. Advancements in radiotherapy (RT) techniques have enabled conformal delivery of escalated‐dose RT (EDR), which may have potential local control and overall survival (OS) benefits based on retrospective and early prospective studies. With evidence for EDR emerging, we characterized the adoption of EDR across the United States and its associated outcomes. Methods: We searched the National Cancer Database for nonsurgically managed LAPC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2019. Pancreas‐directed RT with biologically effective doses (BED10) ≥39 and ≤70 Gy was labeled conventional‐dose RT (CDR), and BED10 >70 and ≤132 Gy was labeled EDR. We identified associations of EDR and OS using logistic and Cox regressions, respectively. Results: Among the definitive therapy subset (n = 54,115) of the entire study cohort (n = 91,493), the most common treatments were chemotherapy alone (69%), chemotherapy and radiation (29%), and RT alone (2%). For the radiation therapy subset (n = 16,978), use of pancreas‐directed RT remained between 13% and 17% over the study period (ptrend > 0.999). Using multivariable logistic regression, treatment at an academic/research facility (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.46, p < 0.001) and treatment between 2016 and 2019 (aOR 2.54, p < 0.001) were associated with greater receipt of EDR, whereas use of chemotherapy (aOR 0.60, p < 0.001) was associated with less receipt. Median OS estimates for EDR and CDR were 14.5 months and 13.0 months (p < 0.0001), respectively. For radiation therapy subset patients with available survival data (n = 13,579), multivariable Cox regression correlated EDR (adjusted hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.80–0.91; p < 0.001) with longer OS versus CDR. Discussion and Conclusions: Utilization of EDR has increased since 2016, but overall utilization of RT for LAPC has remained at less than one in five patients for almost two decades. These real‐world results additionally provide an estimate of effect size of EDR for future prospective trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Glioblastoma (GBM) poses therapeutic challenges due to its aggressive nature, particularly for patients with poor functional status and/or advanced disease. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) regimens have demonstrated comparable disease outcomes for this population while allowing treatment to be completed more quickly. Here, we report our institutional outcomes of patients treated with 2 hypofractionated RT regimens: 40 Gy/15fx (3w-RT) and 50 Gy/20fx (4w-RT). Methods A single-institution retrospective analysis was conducted of 127 GBM patients who underwent 3w-RT or 4w-RT. Patient characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The impact of chemotherapy and RT schedule was explored through subgroup analyses. Results Median OS for the entire cohort was 7.7 months. There were no significant differences in PFS or OS between 3w-RT and 4w-RT groups overall. Receipt and timing of temozolomide (TMZ) emerged as the variable most strongly associated with survival, with patients receiving adjuvant-only or concurrent and adjuvant TMZ having significantly improved PFS and OS (P <.001). In a subgroup analysis of patients that did not receive TMZ, patients in the 4w-RT group demonstrated a trend toward improved OS as compared to the 3w-RT group (P =.12). Conclusions This study demonstrates comparable survival outcomes between 3w-RT and 4w-RT regimens in GBM patients. Receipt and timing of TMZ were strongly associated with survival outcomes. The potential benefit of dose-escalated hypofractionation for patients not receiving chemotherapy warrants further investigation and emphasizes the importance of personalized treatment approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For high-risk neuroblastoma, planning target volume coverage is often compromised to respect adjacent kidney tolerance. This trial investigated whether intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy techniques (IMAT) could facilitate dose escalation better than conventional techniques. Children with high-risk abdominal neuroblastoma referred for radiotherapy to the primary tumour site and involved regional lymph nodes were randomised to receive either standard dose (21 Gy in 14 fractions) or escalated dose (36 Gy in 24 fractions) radiotherapy. Dual planning with both a conventional anterior-posterior parallel opposed pair radiotherapy technique and an IMAT technique was performed. The quality of target volume and organ-at-risk delineation, and dosimetric plans, were externally reviewed. Dosimetric parameters were used to judge the superior technique for treatment. This feasibility trial was not powered to detect improvement in outcome with dose escalation. Between 2017 and 2020, 50 patients were randomised and dual-planned. The IMAT technique was judged more favourable in 48 patients. In all patients randomised to receive 36 Gy, IMAT would have permitted delivery of the full dose (median D50% 36.0 Gy, inter-quartile range 36.0–36.1 Gy) to the target volume, whereas dose compromise would have been required with conventional planning (median D50% 35.6 Gy, inter-quartile range 28.7–35.9 Gy). IMAT facilitates safe dose escalation to 36 Gy in patients receiving radiotherapy for neuroblastoma. The value of dose escalation is now being evaluated in a current prospective phase III randomised trial. • The standard tumour bed radiotherapy dose used for neuroblastoma is 21 Gy. • The optimal dose is uncertain, and a higher dose may lead to better local control. • Organ-at-risk tolerance may limit the desired dose to the target volume. • Intensity-modulated arc therapy facilitates better delivery of higher doses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients receiving interleukin (IL)‐inhibiting biologics for moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis (PsO) may be treated with escalated doses to optimize outcomes. This study evaluated escalation prevalence in a Japanese claims analysis of patients with PsO diagnosis preceding IL‐inhibiting biologic treatment and ≥1 post‐induction maintenance claim (index date) with sufficient data availability from January 2014 to May 2022. Patients with non‐persistence were excluded. Expected daily dose (EDD) was calculated as the recommended maintenance dose divided by the treatment interval. Dose escalation was defined as ≥2 claims showing a ≥20% increase in the observed average daily dose (ADD) over the EDD (with sensitivities requiring ≥1 claim and ≥30%). Significant differences were tested using multivariable regressions. The study included 982 unique patients treated with brodalumab (BRO; n = 104), guselkumab (GUS; n = 207), ixekizumab (IXE; n = 159), risankizumab (RIS; n = 135), secukinumab (SEC; n = 215) and ustekinumab (UST; n = 196). Within 12 months, dose escalation was observed for all IL‐inhibiting biologics other than GUS and RIS: 44.4% for UST, 37.2% for IXE, 3.4% for SEC and 1.4% for BRO. In multivariable‐adjusted analyses, odds of dose escalation were significantly lower for all products relative to UST. In sensitivities, escalation was observed for all products except RIS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Simultaneous involvement of multiple distinct brain regions occurs in 2-5% of all high-grade gliomas (HGG) and is associated with poor prognosis. Whereas radiotherapy (RT) is an important and well-established treatment for high-grade glioma, the role of dose-escalated radiotherapy has yet to be established. In this case series, we report upon the dosimetry, adverse effects, and response in patients with multiple un-methylated high-grade gliomas receiving dose-escalated radiation. Materials and methods: We reviewed charts of patients with multifocal high grade glioma treated at our institution since January 2022. All patients had stereotactic biopsies after an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast-enhanced with T1, T2, FLAIR sequences and were discussed in a multidisciplinary oncology team. MGMT-positive patients received either TMZ alone or RT with TMZ and were excluded from this analysis. Un-methylated patients received dose-escalated RT without temezolamide (TMZ). Following computed tomography (CT) and MR simulation, the gros tumor volume (GTV) was delineated and prescribed 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions within the standard 40.05 Gy planning treatment volume (PTV). Treatment planning was volumetric modulated arc therapy. Results: A total of 20 patients with multiple un-methylated MGMT glioblastoma multiforme were treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy between January 2022 and June 2023. All patients completed dose escalated radiotherapy without acute adverse effects. Progression-free survival at six months was 85%, as defined by the RANO criteria. Conclusion: In this case series, we showed that un-methylated multiple high-grade glioma could be safely treated with dose escalation. Results of progression-free survival should be validated in a larger prospective clinical trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: To investigate the institutional experience of dose-escalated salvage whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) with the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 21 patients with BCR who received radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer and underwent salvage RT. Clinical target volume (CTV) of the whole pelvis (CTV56) included the prostate bed, common iliac, external iliac, internal iliac, and obturator lymph node regions. The boost CTV (CTV66) included the prostate bed. Planning target volumes (PTV) were generated by adding a margin of 6-8 mm to CTV (PTV56 and PTV66). Doses of 56.1 and 66 Gy in 33 fractions were delivered to PTV56 and PTV66, respectively. Results: The 5-year biochemical progressionfree survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival rates were 72%, 94%, and 94%, respectively. A grade 3 late genitourinary toxicity event of gross hematuria was observed in one patient (4%). Acute and late toxicities of grade ≥3, other than gross hematuria, were not observed in any patient. Conclusion: Dose-escalated salvage WPRT using the SIB technique provides appropriate tumor control without increasing the incident of significant toxicities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: While stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become increasingly used for the treatment of non-metastatic prostate cancer since its insurance coverage in Japan in 2016, optimal dose fractionation remains undetermined. This study was a phase 1 dose escalation trial of SBRT, aiming to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SBRT using five fractions. Patients were planned to receive SBRT at doses of 42.5, 45, or 47.5 Gy, with toxicity as the primary endpoint. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at 42.5 Gy, and one patient experienced a grade 4 rectal perforation at 45 Gy, leading to the determination of 42.5 Gy as the MTD. There were no deaths or biochemical recurrences during the follow-up period. This study underscores the need for further trials to ascertain the optimal SBRT dose fractionation, balancing efficacy and safety for non-metastatic prostate cancer treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of non-metastatic prostate cancer. This study was a phase 1 dose escalation trial conducted in Japan. Patients with histologically proven prostate cancer without lymph nodes or distant metastases were enrolled. The prescribed doses were 42.5, 45, or 47.5 Gy in five fractions. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade (G) 3+ gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity within 180 days after SBRT completion, and a 6 plus 6 design was used as the method of dose escalation. A total of 16 patients were enrolled, with 6 in the 42.5 Gy group and 10 in the 45 Gy group. No DLT was observed in the 42.5 Gy group. In the 45 Gy group, one patient experienced G3 rectal hemorrhage, and another had G4 rectal perforation, leading to the determination of 42.5 Gy as the MTD. None of the patients experienced biochemical recurrence or death during the follow-up period. We concluded that SBRT for non-metastatic prostate cancer at 42.5 Gy in five fractions could be safely performed, but a total dose of 45 Gy increased severe toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bayesian logistic regression model (BLRM) is widely used to guide dose escalation decisions in phase 1 oncology trials. An important feature of BLRM design is the appealing safety performance due to its escalation with overdose control (EWOC). However, some recent literature indicates that BLRM with EWOC may have a relatively low probability to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) compared to some other dose escalation designs. This work discusses this design problem and proposes a practical solution to improve the performance of BLRM design. Specifically, we suggest increasing the EWOC cutoff from routine value 0.25 to a value between 0.3 and 0.4, which will increase the chance of finding the correct MTD with minimal compromise to overdosing risk. Our comparative simulation studies indicate that BLRM with an increased EWOC cutoff has comparable operating characteristics on the correct MTD selection and over-toxicity control as other dose escalation designs (BOIN, mTPI, keyboard, etc.). Moreover, we compare the methodology and operating characteristics of BLRM designs with various decision rules that allow more flexible overdosing control. A case study of dose escalation in a recent phase 1 oncology trial is provided to show how BLRM with optimal EWOC cutoff operates well in practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: The aim of this review is to highlight key published oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocols and post-desensitization strategies for the major food allergens and to cover important concepts to consider when evaluating OIT for food-allergic patients. Shared decision-making should help identify patient and family values which will help influence the type of evidence-based protocol and maintenance strategy to use. Recent Findings: With food OIT emerging as a treatment option, there is a pressing need for patients, physicians, and other providers to have a nuanced understanding of the management choices available to them. There are now randomized controlled trials (RCT) of OIT for peanut, egg, milk, and wheat, and reports of cohorts of patients who have undergone OIT for tree nuts and sesame clinically. The current published protocols contain significant diversity in terms of starting dose, build-up schedule, maintenance dose, and even the product used for desensitization. Emerging data can help direct the long-term maintenance strategy for patients on OIT. Summary: Based on patient and family values elicited through the shared decision-making process, an OIT protocol may be selected that balances the level of desensitization, potential side effects, frequency of clinic visits, and potential to induce sustained unresponsiveness, among other factors. Once maintenance dosing is reached, most patients will need to maintain regular exposure to the food allergen to remain desensitized. The option to transition to commercial food products with equivalent amounts of food protein as the OIT maintenance dose would simplify the dosing process and perhaps improve palatability as well. Less frequent or decreased OIT dosing can provide practical benefits but may affect the level of desensitization and safety for some patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), improving local control through radiotherapy dose escalation might improve survival. However, a photon-based RCT showed increased organ at risk dose exposure and worse overall survival in the dose escalation arm. In this study, intensity-modulated proton therapy plans with dose escalation to the primary tumour were created for 20 NSCLC patients. The mediastinal envelope was delineated to spare structures around the heart. It was possible to increase primary tumour dose up to 74.0 Gy without a significant increase in organ at risk doses and predicted toxicity.

Background: The PRIDE trial (NOA-28; ARO-2024-01; AG-NRO-06; NCT05871021) is designed to determine whether a dose escalation with 75.0 Gy in 30 fractions can enhance the median overall survival (OS) in patients with methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor unmethylated glioblastoma compared to historical median OS rates, while being isotoxic to historical cohorts through the addition of concurrent bevacizumab (BEV). To ensure protocol-compliant irradiation planning with all study centers, a dummy run was planned and the plan quality was evaluated. Methods: A suitable patient case was selected and the computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography (PET) contours were made available. Participants at the various intended study sites performed radiation planning according to the PRIDE clinical trial protocol. The treatment plans and dose grids were uploaded as Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files to a cloud-based platform. Plan quality and protocol adherence were analyzed using a standardized checklist, scorecards and indices such as Dice Score (DSC) and Hausdorff Distance (HD). Results: Median DSC was 0.89, 0.90, 0.88 for PTV60, PTV60ex (planning target volume receiving 60.0 Gy for the standard and the experimental plan, respectively) and PTV75 (PTV receiving 75.0 Gy in the experimental plan), respectively. Median HD values were 17.0 mm, 13.9 mm and 12.1 mm, respectively. These differences were also evident in the volumes: The PTV60 had a volume range of 219.1–391.3 cc (median: 261.9 cc) for the standard plans, while the PTV75 volumes for the experimental plans ranged from 71.5–142.7 cc (median: 92.3 cc). The structures with the largest deviations in Dice score were the pituitary gland (median 0.37, range 0.00–0.69) and the right lacrimal gland (median 0.59, range 0.42–0.78). Conclusions: The deviations revealed the necessity of systematic trainings with appropriate feedback before the start of clinical trials in radiation oncology and the constant monitoring of protocol compliance throw-out the study. Trial registration: NCT05871021

Abstract Background Life expectancy of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is still limited despite several systemic treatments. Within five years after diagnosis of primary prostate cancer, 10–20% of the patients have mCRPC and curation is not an option. Radionuclide therapy (RNT) targeted against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) emerged as a new treatment option and showed effective results in patients with mCRPC. Survival benefit after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA RNT has already been demonstrated in several clinical trials. However, [225Ac]Ac-PSMA (225Ac-PSMA) appears to be an even more promising radiopharmaceutical for the treatment of mCRPC. The use of alpha emitting radionuclides offers advantages over beta emitting radionuclides due to the high linear energy transfer effective for killing tumor cells and the limited range to reduce the radiation effects on the healthy tissue. However, these results are based on retrospective data and safety data of 225Ac-PSMA are still limited. Therefore, a prospective trial is needed to determine the optimal amount of activity that can be administered. Methods The 225Ac-PSMA-Imaging & Therapy (I&T) trial is an investigator-initiated phase I, single-center, open label, repeated dose-escalation and expansion trial. Patient with PSMA-positive mCRPC after at least one line of chemotherapy and/or one line of nonsteroidal antiandrogen will be treated with 225Ac-PSMA-I&T in increasing amount of activity per cycle. Dose-escalation following an accelerated 3 + 3 design which allows to open the next dose-level cohort in the absence of dose limiting toxicity while the previous one is still ongoing. Up to 4 treatment cohorts will be explored including up to 3 dose-escalation cohorts and one expansion cohort where patients will be administered with the recommended dose. A total of up to 30 patients will be enrolled in this trial. All patients will be evaluated for safety. Additionally, dosimetry was performed for the patients in the dose-escalation cohorts after the first 225Ac-PSMA-I&T administration. Discussion This trial will assess the safety and tolerability of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T in patients with mCRPC to recommend the optimal dose for the phase II trial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, (NCT05902247). Retrospectively registered 13 June 2023.

Copyright of Remedia is the property of Medical Tribune CZ, s.r.o. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This study aims to compare dose escalation between two groups of reirradiated cancer patients, one with the previous contour and radiotherapy plan available on the treatment planning system and the other without. First group is identified as DICOM-group, while the other one is called non-DICOM group. The current study included 89 patients, 57 in the DICOM, and 32 in the non-DICOM group, who received reirradiation for recurrent or second primary tumours between 2019 and 2021. For the DICOM group, doses to 0.2cc volume for spine, brainstem, and optic apparatus from first radiation were converted into structures and transferred to reirradiation CT using deformable registration. First, one radiotherapy plan was created using the doctor prescribed dose (baseline prescription RxD_B); further an escalated dose (RxD_E) plan, taking into account all the dose volume parameters from previous radiation, was created only for DICOM group. In non-DICOM group patients were planned only for RxD_B. The maximum accepted dose escalation was 21 Gy. Radiotherapy prescription dose during earlier (first) treatment in DICOM and non-DICOM groups were 61 ± 5.6 Gy and 30–66 Gy, respectively. DICOM and non-DICOM groups had nearly identical baseline doses: 52.5 ± 10.7 Gy and 50.6 ± 6.9 Gy (difference 1.9 ± 12.7 Gy). Dose escalation was possible for 51 out of 57 patients in the DICOM-group. Average escalated dose in DICOM-group was 59.2 ± 6.2 Gy, with an incremental dose of 6.7 ± 12.4 Gy from the baseline prescription. No dose escalation was opted for in the non-DICOM group due to the unavailability of dose volume information from previous radiation. Reirradiation for head and neck cases allowed for a moderate to high dose escalation, facilitated by the presence of pertinent DICOM information from the initial radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The standard treatment of choice for inoperable esophageal cancer is concurrent chemoradiation therapy. However, the treatment effect varies among patients. Currently, the optimal dose for esophageal cancer for different histologies is still under debate, and the guidelines still recommend using the same dose to treat both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma despite their differences in radiation sensitivity. In this review article, we analyzed previous studies treating esophageal cancers with definitive radiotherapy, with or without concurrent chemotherapy. We found that squamous cell carcinoma shows an overall survival benefit with the use of radiation dose escalation, while no advantage was found for adenocarcinoma. Based on these findings, we suggest that further dose escalation can be performed for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Esophageal cancer, ranked as the eighth most prevalent cancer globally, is characterized by a low survival rate and poor prognosis. Concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) is the standard therapy in the non-surgical treatment of localized carcinoma of the esophagus. Nevertheless, the radiation doses employed in CCRT remain notably lower compared to the curative definite chemoradiation therapy utilized in the management of other carcinomas. In order to increase the local control rates and enhance the treatment outcomes, several clinical trials have used high-dose radiation to analyze the effect of dose escalation. Despite the integration of technically advanced RT schemes such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the results of these trials have failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in overall survival or local progression-free survival. In this review, we investigated previous clinical trials to determine the ineffectiveness of radiation dose escalation in the context of CCRT for esophageal cancer. We aim to clarify the factors contributing to the limited efficacy of escalated radiation doses in improving patient outcomes. Furthermore, we delve into recent research endeavors, exploring prospective radiation dose modifications being altered based on the histological characteristics of the carcinoma. The exploration of these recent studies not only sheds light on potential refinements to the existing treatment protocols but also seeks to identify novel approaches that may pave the way for more efficacious and personalized therapeutic strategies for esophageal cancer management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Pazopanib is approved in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and soft-tissue sarcoma at a flat-fixed dose despite a large pharmacokinetics interindividual variability and a narrow therapeutic index. To our knowledge, pazopanib exposure in patients with gastrointestinal resections (GIR) has not been described. This report focuses on feasibility of pharmacokinetics-guided dose escalation in these patients and clinical implications for their management. Method: A retrospective data collection was performed for three patients with GIR treated with pazopanib, including pazopanib plasma concentrations (high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection) and treatment adherence (Girerd score). Case presentation: First patient (55-year-old man, RCC, gastric bypass surgery) pazopanib Cmin,ss at day 39 was 4.1 mg/L. Dose escalation to 1800 mg/day fractionated allowed to reach Cmin,ss of 18.5 mg/L (target threshold in RCC patients: 20.5 mg/L). Patient 2 (50-year-old woman, metastatic myxofibrosarcoma, gastric band) showed Cmin,ss of 4.0 mg/L at day 13. In patient 3 (49-year-old man, gastric malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, gastrectomy), Cmin,ss at day 13 was 2.7 mg/L. For these two patients, intake with food and dose fractioning only slightly increased pazopanib Cmin,ss to 12.0 mg/L and 6.5 mg/L, respectively (therapeutic threshold in sarcoma patients: 27 mg/L). Treatment adherence was good in all patients. Conclusion: Optimal pazopanib exposure cannot be achieved in patients with GIR, and thus, other therapeutic strategies should be encouraged. Pretherapeutic assessment seems crucial to evaluate factors as bariatric surgery that may impact pazopanib concentrations. Therapeutic drug monitoring could be helpful to optimize pazopanib response in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Medications used to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D) often require dose escalation to optimize effectiveness. Physician and patient perceptions of treatment characteristics of T2D medications have previously been examined, but little is known about perceptions of escalation to the optimal dose for each patient. This study examined physicians' perceptions of dose escalation for medications used to treat T2D. Methods: Data on dose escalation and other factors influencing decision-making for treatment of T2D were collected via an online survey of endocrinologists and primary care physicians in the USA. Results: The sample included 501 physicians (348 primary care physicians and 153 endocrinologists). Dose escalation was not frequently considered by physicians as a primary factor keeping patients' from reaching treatment goals (mentioned as a factor by only 7.6% of the sample) or a barrier to prescribing T2D medication (16.2%). Factors more likely to keep patients from reaching treatment goals included an unhealthy diet (86.6%) and medication adherence (77.4%). The most common reasons that physicians reported for escalating dose levels were the need for better glycemic control (reported by 89.8% of the sample), ability to decrease the total number of medications by increasing the dose of one medication (39.9%), and the need for the patient to lose weight (39.3%). Data reported by primary care physicians and endocrinologists followed similar patterns. Conclusions: Although common with T2D treatments, escalating the dose of T2D medication was not perceived by physicians to be a significant barrier to attaining treatment goals or prescribing medication. Multiple factors contribute to the decision to escalate the dose of T2D medication. Plain Language Summary: In early phases of initiating medication treatment for a patient with type 2 diabetes (T2D), it is common for physicians to increase from a lower initial dose to a higher end dose to maximize treatment benefit. This process is known as dose escalation. The purpose of this study was to examine physicians' perceptions of dose escalation for medications used to treat T2D. An online survey was designed to identify reasons why physicians in the US may choose to escalate or not escalate a dose of medication for T2D. In addition, physicians were asked about factors that keep patients from reaching treatment goals to identify whether the requirement for dose escalation is perceived to be a common barrier to successful treatment. The sample included 501 physicians (348 primary care, 153 endocrinologists). Dose escalation was not frequently considered to be a primary factor keeping patients' from reaching treatment goals or a barrier to prescribing medication for T2D. Dose escalation decisions are complex, driven by a range of factors such as glycemic control medication tolerability, the patient's body mass index, treatment guidelines, comorbidities, characteristics of the patient's entire treatment regimen, and potential cardiovascular benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Life expectancy of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is still limited despite several systemic treatments. Within five years after diagnosis of primary prostate cancer, 10–20% of the patients have mCRPC and curation is not an option. Radionuclide therapy (RNT) targeted against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) emerged as a new treatment option and showed effective results in patients with mCRPC. Survival benefit after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA RNT has already been demonstrated in several clinical trials. However, [225Ac]Ac-PSMA (225Ac-PSMA) appears to be an even more promising radiopharmaceutical for the treatment of mCRPC. The use of alpha emitting radionuclides offers advantages over beta emitting radionuclides due to the high linear energy transfer effective for killing tumor cells and the limited range to reduce the radiation effects on the healthy tissue. However, these results are based on retrospective data and safety data of 225Ac-PSMA are still limited. Therefore, a prospective trial is needed to determine the optimal amount of activity that can be administered. Methods: The 225Ac-PSMA-Imaging & Therapy (I&T) trial is an investigator-initiated phase I, single-center, open label, repeated dose-escalation and expansion trial. Patient with PSMA-positive mCRPC after at least one line of chemotherapy and/or one line of nonsteroidal antiandrogen will be treated with 225Ac-PSMA-I&T in increasing amount of activity per cycle. Dose-escalation following an accelerated 3 + 3 design which allows to open the next dose-level cohort in the absence of dose limiting toxicity while the previous one is still ongoing. Up to 4 treatment cohorts will be explored including up to 3 dose-escalation cohorts and one expansion cohort where patients will be administered with the recommended dose. A total of up to 30 patients will be enrolled in this trial. All patients will be evaluated for safety. Additionally, dosimetry was performed for the patients in the dose-escalation cohorts after the first 225Ac-PSMA-I&T administration. Discussion: This trial will assess the safety and tolerability of 225Ac-PSMA-I&T in patients with mCRPC to recommend the optimal dose for the phase II trial. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, (NCT05902247). Retrospectively registered 13 June 2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction With locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), uncontrolled local tumor growth frequently leads to mortality. Advancements in radiotherapy (RT) techniques have enabled conformal delivery of escalated‐dose RT (EDR), which may have potential local control and overall survival (OS) benefits based on retrospective and early prospective studies. With evidence for EDR emerging, we characterized the adoption of EDR across the United States and its associated outcomes. Methods We searched the National Cancer Database for nonsurgically managed LAPC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2019. Pancreas‐directed RT with biologically effective doses (BED10) ≥39 and ≤70 Gy was labeled conventional‐dose RT (CDR), and BED10 >70 and ≤132 Gy was labeled EDR. We identified associations of EDR and OS using logistic and Cox regressions, respectively. Results Among the definitive therapy subset (n = 54,115) of the entire study cohort (n = 91,493), the most common treatments were chemotherapy alone (69%), chemotherapy and radiation (29%), and RT alone (2%). For the radiation therapy subset (n = 16,978), use of pancreas‐directed RT remained between 13% and 17% over the study period (ptrend > 0.999). Using multivariable logistic regression, treatment at an academic/research facility (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.46, p

Abstract Background Olipudase alfa is a recombinant human acid sphingomyelinase enzyme replacement therapy for non-central-nervous-system manifestations of acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD). The ASCEND randomized placebo-controlled trial in adults with ASMD demonstrated reductions in sphingomyelin storage, organomegaly, interstitial lung disease and impaired diffusion capacity of the lung (DLCO), during the first year of olipudase alfa treatment. In an ongoing open-label extension of the ASCEND trial, individuals in the placebo group crossed over to olipudase alfa, and those in the olipudase alfa group continued treatment. Results Thirty-five of 36 participants continued in the extension trial, and 33 completed year 2. Change-from-baseline results are presented as least-square mean percent change ± SEM. Improvements in the cross-over group after 1 year of treatment paralleled those of the olipudase alfa group from the primary analysis, while clinical improvement continued for those receiving olipudase alfa for 2 years. In the cross-over group, percent-predicted DLCO increased by 28.0 ± 6.2%, spleen volume decreased by 36.0 ± 3.0% and liver volume decreased by 30.7 ± 2.5%. For those with 2 years of olipudase alfa treatment, the percent predicted DLCO increased by 28.5 ± 6.2%, spleen volume decreased by 47.0 ± 2.7%, and liver volume decreased by 33.4 ± 2.2%. Lipid profiles and elevated liver transaminase levels improved or normalized by 1 year and remained stable through 2 years of treatment. Overall, 99% of treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate, with one treatment-related serious adverse event (extrasystoles; previously documented cardiomyopathy). No individual discontinued due to an adverse event. Conclusion Treatment with olipudase alfa is well tolerated and reduces manifestations of chronic ASMD with sustained efficacy. Trial registration NCT02004691 registered 9 December 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02004691

Abstract Background Approximately 40% of patients with hormone receptor (HR)‐positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) exhibit PIK3CA mutations. Aims This study aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of HS‐10352, a selective PI3Kα inhibitor, in this patient population. Materials and Methods Conducted as a phase 1 dose‐escalation trial, HS‐10352 was administered orally once‐daily (QD) at dose levels of 2, 4, 6, and 8 mg. The primary endpoints were dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04631835). Results Between August 2020 and March 2022, a total of 18 female patients were enrolled. DLT, manifested as hyperglycemia, occurred in two patients in the 8 mg QD group, establishing an MTD of 6 mg QD. The most common treatment‐related adverse events were hyperglycemia (88.9%) and weight loss (61.3%). In the 6 mg QD group, four patients (66.7%) had a partial response (PR), and one (16.7%) had stable disease (SD). Among the four patients with PIK3CA mutated tumors in this dosage group, three (75.0%) had PR and one (25.0%) had SD. The median progression‐free survival was not reached (95% confidence interval, 11.1‐NA). Discussion and Conclusion HS‐10352 at 6 mg QD was well‐tolerated in patients with HR‐positive, HER2‐negative ABC, and showed preliminary antitumor activity in patients with PIK3CA mutated tumors. These findings support the further clinical development of HS‐10352.

Abstract Background The THUNDER-2 phase II single institutional trial investigates the benefits of MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) in treating locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This study focuses on evaluating the impact of escalating radiation therapy dose in non-responder patients using the Early Tumour Regression Index (ERI) for predicting complete response (CR). The trial’s primary endpoint is to increase the CR rate in non-responders by 10% and assess the feasibility of the delta radiomics-based MRIgRT predictive model. This interim analysis assesses the feasibility and safety of the proposed MRIgRT dose escalation strategy in terms of acute toxicity (gastrointestinal, genitourinary and haematological) and treatment adherence. Methods Stage cT2-3, N0-2, or cT4 patients with anal sphincter involvement, N0-2a, M0, but without high-risk features were enrolled. MRIgRT treatment consisted of a standard dose of 55 Gy to the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) and mesorectum, and 45 Gy to the mesorectum and drainage nodes in 25 fractions with concomitant chemotherapy. 0.35 T MRI was used for simulation imaging and daily alignment. ERI was calculated at the 10th fraction. Non-responders with an ERI above 13.1 received intensified dose escalation from the 11th fraction, resulting in a total dose of 60.1 Gy. Acute toxicity was assessed using the CTCAE v.5 scale. Results From March 2021 to November 2022, 33 out of the total number of 63 patients to be enrolled (52.4%) were included, with one withdrawal unrelated to treatment. Sixteen patients (50%) underwent dose escalation. Treatment was well tolerated, with only one patient (3.1%) in the standard treatment group experiencing acute Grade 3 diarrhea, proctitis, and cystitis. No significant differences in toxicity were observed between the two groups (p = 0.5463). Conclusions MRIgRT treatment with dose escalation up to 60.1 Gy is well tolerated in LARC patients predicted as non-responders by ERI, confirming the feasibility and safety of this approach. The THUNDER-2 trial’s primary and secondary endpoints will be fully analyzed when all planned patients will be enrolled.

Abstract Background This phase I study aimed to assess the safety, dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and preliminary effect of nanoparticle albumin‐bound (nab)‐paclitaxel in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Patients with locally advanced ESCC who were ineligible or refused surgery were enrolled. Nab‐paclitaxel (60 mg/m2, 75 mg/m2, and 90 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) were administered intravenously weekly on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 on the basis of the 3 + 3 dose escalation method. The total dose of radiation was 50–64 Gy. The primary endpoint was the safety of chemotherapy. Results The study enrolled 12 patients across three dose levels. No treatment‐related deaths occurred. One patient in the 60 mg/m2 dose level occurred dose‐limiting Grade 3 febrile neutropenia. No DLT was found in the 90 mg/m2 dose level thus the MTD was not reached. The phase II study's recommended dose was 75 mg/m2 based on the available preclinical and clinical data including pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and toxicity. The frequent hematologic toxicities were leukocytopenia (Grade 1–2 of 66.7% and Grade 3–4 of 33.3%), neutropenia (Grade 1–2 of 91.7% and Grade 3–4 of 8.3%). Nonhematologic toxicities were mild and manageable. Overall response rate (ORR) of all patients achieved 100%. Conclusions Weekly schedule of cisplatin and nab‐paclitaxel in combination with concurrent radiotherapy showed manageable toxicities and promising antitumor activity in patients with locally advanced ESCC. The recommended dose of nab‐paclitaxel for further studies is 75 mg/m2.

Background and purpose: The PRIDE trial (NOA-28; ARO-2022-12; NCT05871021) is scheduled to start recruitment in October 2023. Its primary objective is to enhance median overall survival (OS), compared to historical median OS rates, in patients with methylguanine methlyltransferase (MGMT) promotor unmethylated glioblastoma by incorporating isotoxic dose escalation to 75 Gy in 30 fractions. To achieve isotoxicity and counteract the elevated risk of radiation necrosis (RN) associated with dose-escalated regimens, the addition of protective concurrent bevacizumab (BEV) serves as an innovative approach. The current study aims to assess the dosimetric feasibility of the proposed concept. Materials and methods: A total of ten patients diagnosed with glioblastoma were included in this dosimetric analysis. Delineation of target volumes for the reference plans adhered to the ESTRO-EANO 2023 guideline. The experimental plans included an additional volume for the integrated boost. Additionally, the 60 Gy-volume was reduced by using a margin of 1.0 cm instead of 1.5 cm. To assess the risk of symptomatic RN, the Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) was calculated and compared between the reference and experimental plans. Results: Median NTCP of the reference plan (NTCPref) and of the experimental plan (NTCPex) were 0.24 (range 0.11–0.29) and 0.42 (range 0.18–0.54), respectively. NTCPex was a median of 1.77 (range 1.60–1.99) times as high as the NTXPref. In a logarithmic comparison, the risk of RN is enhanced by a factor of median 2.00 (range 1.66–2.35). The defined constraints for the organs at risk were feasible. Conclusion: When considering the potential protective effect of BEV, which we hypothesized might reduce the risk of RN by approximately two-fold, achieving isotoxicity with the proposed dose-escalated experimental plan for the PRIDE trial seems feasible.

The R1 addendum to ICH E9 (E9-R1) provides guidance on the definition of estimands in clinical drug development. While the E9-R1 has seen uptake in randomized late-stage clinical trials, its implementation in early clinical development remains sporadic potentially jeopardizing clarity, consistency, and coherency in early phase. In this article, we call for a more systematic use of the estimand thinking in phase 1 dose escalation oncology trials. In these adaptive trials, the primary clinical objective is usually to characterize the dose-toxicity relationship and to ascertain the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). One estimand of interest is the probability of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Intercurrent events (ICE) interfering with the existence or interpretation of DLT outcomes are common in these studies. Three types of ICEs are reviewed in detail: treatment discontinuation for reasons not related to toxicity (e.g. disease progression), treatment discontinuation due to adverse events which would not qualify as DLT, and dose modifications or omissions. The concept of replacement of non-DLT evaluable participants, often used so far, is not an acceptable general solution to ICEs in dose escalation studies. To address clinically relevant questions, adequate ICE handling strategies and estimators aligned to these settings should be used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used in the context of oligometastatic disease, as fist prospective data show improved survival with additional ablative radiotherapy in subgroups of oligometastatic patients. The spine is a common site for metastases, and different treatment regimens are used for spinal SBRT. Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is a main safety concern. Our single-center retrospective analysis of 62 consecutive oligometastatic cancer patients with 71 spinal metastases provides first evidence for spinal SBRT utilizing a simultaneous integrated boost to the macroscopic lesion in a larger patient cohort and demonstrates the safety and effectivity of this treatment regimen: No ≥ grade III acute and one grade III late toxicity (VCF) occurred, and estimated local control rates were excellent and durable with 98.6% and 96.4% at one and two years. Regarding survival, patients with prostate cancer, secondary oligometastatic disease and good performance status might especially benefit from this treatment approach. (1) Purpose: To assess the safety and effectivity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on spinal metastases utilizing a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) concept in oligometastatic cancer patients. (2) Methods: 62 consecutive patients with 71 spinal metastases received SIB–SBRT between 01/2013 and 09/2022 at our institution. We retrospectively analyzed toxicity, local tumor control (LC), and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) following SIB–SBRT and assessed possible influencing factors (Kaplan–Meier estimator, log-rank test and Cox proportional-hazards model). (3) Results: SIB–SBRT was delivered in five fractions, mostly with 25/40 Gy (n = 43; 60.56%) and 25/35 Gy (n = 19, 26.76%). Estimated rates of freedom from VCF were 96.1/90.4% at one/two years. VCF development was significantly associated with osteoporosis (p < 0.001). No ≥ grade III acute and one grade III late toxicity (VCF) were observed. Estimated LC rates at one/two years were 98.6/96.4%, and histology was significantly associated with local treatment failure (p = 0.039). Median PFS/OS was 10 months (95% CI 6.01–13.99)/not reached. Development of metastases ≥ one year after initial diagnosis and Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 90% were predictors for superior PFS (p = 0.038) and OS (p = 0.012), respectively. (4) Conclusion: Spinal SIB–SBRT yields low toxicity and excellent LC. It may be utilized in selected oligometastatic patients to improve prognosis. To the best of our knowledge, we provide the first clinical data on the toxicity and effectivity of SIB–SBRT in spinal metastases in a larger patient cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Approximately 40% of patients with hormone receptor (HR)‐positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) exhibit PIK3CA mutations. Aims: This study aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of HS‐10352, a selective PI3Kα inhibitor, in this patient population. Materials and Methods: Conducted as a phase 1 dose‐escalation trial, HS‐10352 was administered orally once‐daily (QD) at dose levels of 2, 4, 6, and 8 mg. The primary endpoints were dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04631835). Results: Between August 2020 and March 2022, a total of 18 female patients were enrolled. DLT, manifested as hyperglycemia, occurred in two patients in the 8 mg QD group, establishing an MTD of 6 mg QD. The most common treatment‐related adverse events were hyperglycemia (88.9%) and weight loss (61.3%). In the 6 mg QD group, four patients (66.7%) had a partial response (PR), and one (16.7%) had stable disease (SD). Among the four patients with PIK3CA mutated tumors in this dosage group, three (75.0%) had PR and one (25.0%) had SD. The median progression‐free survival was not reached (95% confidence interval, 11.1‐NA). Discussion and Conclusion: HS‐10352 at 6 mg QD was well‐tolerated in patients with HR‐positive, HER2‐negative ABC, and showed preliminary antitumor activity in patients with PIK3CA mutated tumors. These findings support the further clinical development of HS‐10352. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dose escalation of self-injectable biologic therapy for inflammatory bowel diseases may be required to counteract loss of response and/or low drug levels. Payors often require completion of a prior authorization (PA), which is a complex approval pathway before providing coverage. If the initial PA request is denied, clinic staff must complete a time and resource-intensive process to obtain medication approval. Aims: This study measured time from decision to dose escalate to insurance approval and evaluated impact of approval time on disease activity. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of adult patients with IBD prescribed an escalated dose of biologic therapy at an academic center with an integrated specialty pharmacy team from January to December 2018. Outcomes included time to insurance approval and the association between approval time and follow-up C-reactive protein (CRP) and Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) scores. Associations were tested using linear regression analyses. Results: 220 patients were included, median age 39, 53% female, and 96% white. Overall median time from decision to dose escalate to insurance approval was 7 days [interquartile range (IQR) 1, 14]. Approval time was delayed when an appeal was required [median of 29 days (IQR 17, 43)]. Patients with a longer time to insurance approval were less likely to have CRP improvement (p = 0.019). Time to insurance approval did not significantly impact follow-up SIBDQ scores. Conclusion: Patients who had a longer time to insurance approval were less likely to have improvement in CRP, highlighting the negative clinical impact of a complex dose escalation process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]