Search

Background: The feasibility of a laparoscopic approach in patients who have had a prior laparotomy (PL) remains controversial. We hypothesized that laparoscopic colorectal resection was safe and feasible in patients with previous open abdominal surgery., Methods: A retrospective review (2007-2015) of all patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for sigmoid and rectal adenocarcinoma with or without prior midline laparotomy (NPL) was performed. Primary endpoints included conversion and perioperative morbidity. Secondary endpoints included length of stay and perioperative outcomes. Demographics, surgical history, oncologic staging, and short-term outcomes were reviewed., Results: We identified 211 patients, of whom 33 (15.6%) had a prior laparotomy. Significantly more patients in the PL group were female (76.2 vs. 52.8%, p = 0.004). Patients with PL were of similar age to NPL patients (69.3 vs. 62.5, p = 0.09), and comorbidities, tumor staging, and neoadjuvant therapy were comparable between groups (all p > 0.05). Additional trocar placement was significantly higher in PL group (33.3 vs. 17.4%, p = 0.03), while conversion rate did not reach statistical significance (24.2 vs. 12.9%, p = 0.08). The postoperative complication rate was comparable between PL and NPL patients (33.3 vs. 25.3%, respectively, p = 0.2)., Conclusions: Prior laparotomy should not be a contraindication to patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery, though surgeons should anticipate a higher likelihood of conversion to open.

Background: Surgeons often approach anal fissure with chemical denervation (Botulinum toxin, BT) instead of initial lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) due to concerns for long-term incontinence. We evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of patients who received BT or LIS., Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing LIS and BT for anal fissure between 2009 and 2015. In 2015, a telephone survey was performed to evaluate durability, long-term incontinence and patient satisfaction., Results: Ninety-four patients met criteria: 73 LIS and 21 BT. Age (BT 49 vs. LIS 52) was similar between groups (p = 1.0). Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence (CCFI) score pre-intervention was higher in BT than LIS patients (2.1 vs. 0.4, p = 0.007) with fewer BT patients with perfect continence (50% vs. 88%). Telephone survey response was 61%. Fissure recurrence was significantly higher for BT than LIS patients (36% vs. 9%, p = 0.03)., Conclusion: Patients undergoing LIS were less likely to recur. Both LIS and BT patients had some durable changes in continence raising the question of whether there is a safe technique., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Abdominoperineal Resection (APR) remains an important option for patients with advanced rectal cancer though some may require multivisceral resection (MVR) in addition to APR. We hypothesized that oncological outcomes would be worse with MVR., Methods: A retrospective review from 2006 to 2015 of 161 patients undergoing APR or MVR for rectal cancer, of whom 118 underwent curative APR or APR with MVR. Perioperative, oncologic and survival metrics were evaluated., Results: There were 82 patients who underwent APR and 36 who underwent MVR. Surgical approach and incidence of complications were similar (All P > 0.05). There was 1 local recurrence in each of the APR and MVR groups at a mean follow-up of 34 and 32 months, respectively. Distant recurrences occurred in 3 APR patients and 4 MVR patients., Conclusions: APR and APR with MVR can be performed with comparable morbidity and oncologic outcomes., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)