Search

Summary: Sleep symptoms, including excessive sleepiness, are frequently reported by patients with functional motor disorders (FMD). We aimed to classify the comorbid sleep disorders in FMD, and to investigate the relationship between subjective sleepiness and objective measures of hypersomnia, comparing them with data from people with central hypersomnia. A total of 37 patients (mean [SD] age 46.4 [11.2] years) with clinically definite FMD, and 17 patients (mean [SD] age 41.1 [11.6] years) with central hypersomnia underwent structured medical and sleep history, neurological examination, polysomnography, multiple sleep latency test (MSLT), and questionnaires assessing sleepiness, fatigue, and depression. In all, 23 patients with FMD (62%) reported excessive daytime sleepiness. Evidence of specific sleep disorders was identified in our cohort, with 35% having restless legs syndrome; 49% obstructive sleep apnea; and 8% periodic limb movements in sleep; however, the presence of these disorders was not correlated with subjective sleepiness. Patients with FMD with self‐reported sleepiness reported higher fatigue (p = 0.002), depression (p = 0.002), and had longer sleep latencies in the MSLT (p < 0.001) compared to the patients with central hypersomnia. No correlation was found between subjective and objective sleepiness in either group. Fatigue positively correlated with self‐reported sleepiness in patients with FMD (p < 0.001). This study did not find objective correlates of increased sleepiness in patients with FMD. While sleep abnormalities were found to be common in FMD, they were not correlated with self‐reports of excessive sleepiness. Positive correlations between self‐reported sleepiness and fatigue support the current unified model of non‐motor symptoms in FMD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Little attention has been paid to the long‐term development of idiopathic hypersomnia symptoms and idiopathic hypersomnia comorbidities. The aim of this study was to describe the general health of patients with idiopathic hypersomnia years after the initial diagnosis, focusing on current subjective hypersomnolence and the presence of its other possible causes. Adult patients diagnosed with idiopathic hypersomnia ≥ 3 years ago at sleep centres in Prague and Kosice were invited to participate in this study. A total of 60 patients were examined (age 47.3 ± SD = 13.2 years, 66.7% women). In all participants, their hypersomnolence could not be explained by any other cause but idiopathic hypersomnia at the time of diagnosis. The mean duration of follow‐up was 9.8 + 8.0 years. Fifty patients (83%) reported persisting hypersomnolence, but only 33 (55%) had no other disease that could also explain the patient's excessive daytime sleepiness and/or prolonged sleep. In two patients (3%), the diagnosis in the meantime had changed to narcolepsy type 2, and 15 patients (25%) had developed a disease or diseases potentially causing hypersomnolence since the initial diagnosis. Complete hypersomnolence resolution without stimulant treatment lasting longer than 6 months was reported by 10 patients (17%). To conclude, in a longer interval from the diagnosis of idiopathic hypersomnia, hypersomnolence may disappear or may theoretically be explained by another newly developed disease, or the diagnosis may be changed to narcolepsy type 2. Thus, after 9.8 years, only 55% of the examined patients with idiopathic hypersomnia had a typical clinical picture of idiopathic hypersomnia without doubts about the cause of the current hypersomnolence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Neurologie Pro Praxi is the property of SOLEN sro and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Delayed sleep-wake phase disorder (DSWPD) is a chronic condition with a multifactorial etiology that primarily affects adolescents, significantly influencing their quality of life. In clinical practice, the contribution of intrinsic and behavioral factors is difficult to determine. The aim of our study was to compare data from clinical interviews, sleep diaries, actigraphy, and nocturnal polysomnography (PSG) in a cohort of adolescents with DSWPD and to assess psychiatric/neurodevelopmental comorbidity.Methods: Thirty-one patients (22 male; mean age 15.4 ± 2.2 years, range 12 to 19 years) with a diagnosis of DSWPD based on detailed history, sleep diary, and actigraphy underwent nocturnal polysomnography (PSG) and neurological, psychological, and psychiatric examination.Results: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was present in 14 cases (45%), specific learning difficulties in nine (29%), and mood disorder (anxiety/depression) in 16 patients (52%). PSG revealed sleep-onset delay in only 12 (38%) cases. No differences in clinical data or psychiatric comorbidity between the group with sleep delay and the group with normal sleep onset were detected. Decreased total sleep time, sleep efficiency, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and prolonged REM sleep latency were observed in patients with delayed sleep onset.Conclusions: PSG showed delayed sleep timing in only 38% of patients with a diagnosis of DSWPD based on diagnostic criteria of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders. We suggest that PSG can provide useful information regarding the prevailing etiology (biological versus behavioral) if dim light melatonin onset testing is not available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Leber hereditary optic neuropathy and Dominant optic atrophy are associated with a selective loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGC). A subtype of RGC is responsible for light‐dependent physiological processes. The aim of our study was to evaluate both subjective and objective sleep parameters in 36 (18 males; mean age 33.8 ± 16.7) symptomatic/asymptomatic subjects with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy and dominant optic atrophy. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and nocturnal polysomnography were used to assess sleep disturbances and sleep quality. The questionnaires indicated significantly worse sleep quality (PSQI > 5; average 7.7 ± 3.8) in 21 (70%) and excessive daytime sleepiness (ESS > 10; average 6.3 ± 5.8) in six (20%) individuals. Nocturnal polysomnography has not revealed any significant changes of sleep structure. Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep without atonia was observed in two patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Obstructive sleep apnea was noted in eight cases. No correlation between subjective and polysomnographic data and no differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were observed. None of the subjects fulfilled criteria for a circadian sleep disorder. In both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, a subjective decrease of the quality of sleep and wakefulness was noted without any correlation on polysomnography. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate if prospective memory (PM) is impaired in idiopathic rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD). RBD is a parasomnia characterized by dream enactment and by REM sleep without muscle atonia. iRBD is considered as the initial stage of neurodegeneration with pathological storage of alpha-synuclein. Method: Sixty iRBD patients with polysomnography-confirmed RBD without parkinsonism and dementia and 30 demographically matched normal controls (NC) were enrolled in the present study. Clinical assessment included Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), dopamine transporter single-photon emission computed tomography (DaT-SPECT) for imaging synapses of dopaminergic neurons in the striatum and a neuropsychological battery with embedded time-based and event-based PM measures. Results: iRBD differed significantly from NC in event-based PM, a number of event-based failures to recall intention and total PM performance (all p < .001) but did not differ in time-based PM and recognition. PM did not contribute to impairment of instrumental activities of daily living in iRBD. Despite being preserved in iRBD in comparison to NC, time-based PM correlated significantly with dopaminergic neuronal loss measured by DaT-SPECT. Conclusions: We show evidence for a differential pattern of PM impairment in iRBD with severe impairment of event-based and concurrent preservation of time-based PM. We theorize that event-based PM impairment in iRBD is caused by severe impairment of retention and recognition mechanisms in episodic memory whereas time-based PM seems to be affected by reduced striatal dopaminergic synapses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]