3 results on '"Douma LH"'
Search Results
2. Nivolumab and ipilimumab in the real-world setting in patients with mesothelioma.
- Author
-
Dumoulin DW, Douma LH, Hofman MM, van der Noort V, Cornelissen R, de Gooijer CJ, Burgers JA, and Aerts JGJV
- Subjects
- Humans, Nivolumab adverse effects, Ipilimumab adverse effects, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Mesothelioma, Malignant drug therapy, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Mesothelioma pathology
- Abstract
Objectives: Nivolumab (anti-PD-1) plus ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) is a new first-line treatment combination for patients with pleural mesothelioma. Nivolumab-ipilimumab improved the survival, however, 30.3% of the patients suffered from grade 3-4 treatment related adverse events (TRAE's) and TRAE's led to discontinuation in 23.0% of all patients. Here, we present the first real-world data of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with malignant mesothelioma treated in two mesothelioma expert centers., Methods: Clinical data of patients with mesothelioma treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab were prospectively collected. Clinical parameters were obtained every visit, CT scans were evaluated every 12 weeks and adverse events were assessed continuously during the treatment. Data on grade 2-5 TRAE's and activity (overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were reported., Results: Between January 2021 and August 2022, 184 patients were treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The median follow-up was 12.1 months (95 %CI 11.1 - 13.1). Grade 3-4 TRAEs were seen in 27.7 % of the patients and 25.0 % discontinued immunotherapy treatment early because of TRAE's. ORR was 21.7 % (95 % CI 15.7-27.7), median DOR was 5.7 months (IQR 3.2-8.7) and DCR at 12 weeks 56.0 % (95 % CI 48.8-63.2). The mPFS was 5.5 months (95 %CI 4.1-6.9), mOS was 14.1 months (95 % CI 11.1-18.2)., Conclusions: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab had an equal efficacy in a real-world comparable population but also a high risk of TRAE's, leading to discontinuation of treatment in 25% of the patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib in second-line and third-line patients with pleural mesothelioma (PEMMELA): a single-arm phase 2 study.
- Author
-
Douma LH, Lalezari F, van der Noort V, de Vries JF, Monkhorst K, Smesseim I, Baas P, Schilder B, Vermeulen M, Burgers JA, and de Gooijer CJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological adverse effects, Mesothelioma, Malignant drug therapy, Mesothelioma pathology, Pleural Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Background: The combination of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, and lenvatinib, an antiangiogenic multikinase inhibitor, shows synergistic activity in preclinical and clinical studies in solid tumours. We assessed the clinical activity of this combination therapy in patients with pleural mesothelioma who progressed after platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy., Methods: In this single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 study, done at the Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with pleural mesothelioma with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, progression after chemotherapy (no previous immunotherapy), and measurable disease according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (mRECIST) for mesothelioma version 1.1. Patients received 200 mg intravenous pembrolizumab once every 3 weeks plus 20 mg oral lenvatinib once per day for up to 2 years or until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was objective response rate identified by a local investigator according to mRECIST version 1.1. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04287829, and is recruiting for the second cohort., Findings: Between March 5, 2021, and Jan 31, 2022, 42 patients were screened, of whom 38 were included in the primary endpoint and safety analyses (median age 71 years [IQR 65-75], 33 [87%] male and five [13%] female) . At data cutoff (Jan 31, 2023), with a median follow-up of 17·7 months (IQR 13·8-19·4), 22 (58%; 95% CI 41-74) of 38 patients had an objective response. The independent review showed an objective response in 17 (45%; 95% CI 29-62) of 38 patients. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in ten (26%) patients, including one treatment-related death due to myocardial infarction. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypertension (eight patients [21%]) and anorexia and lymphopenia (both four patients [11%]). In 29 (76%) of 38 patients, at least one dose reduction or discontinuation of lenvatinib was required., Interpretation: Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib showed promising anti-tumour activity in patients with pleural mesothelioma with considerable toxicity, similar to that in previous studies. Available evidence from the literature suggests a high starting dose of lenvatinib for optimal anti-tumour activity. This, however, demands a high standard of supportive care. The combination therapy of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib warrants further investigation in pleural mesothelioma., Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests PB reports consulting fees (paid to his institution) from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Amheart; honoraria for lectures from Bristol Myers Squibb; travel expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb; has received research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb (paid to his institution); and participated on advisory boards for MSD. JAB has received research support from MSD (sponsored the study financially and provided the medication); consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb (paid to his institution); and honoraria from MSD (paid to his institution). KM has received consulting fees from Amgen, Lilly, and Bayer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.