Search

A 48-year-old male with history of schizoaffective disorder on clozapine presented with chest pain, dyspnea, and new left bundle branch block. He underwent coronary angiography, which revealed no atherosclerosis. The patient’s workup was unrevealing for a cause for the cardiomyopathy and thus it was thought that clozapine was the offending agent. The patient was taken off clozapine and started on guideline directed heart failure therapy. During the course of hospitalization, he was also discovered to have a left ventricular (LV) thrombus for which he received anticoagulation. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of clozapine-induced cardiomyopathy complicated by a LV thrombus.

Background The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is rising in industrialized and developing countries. Though invasive coronary angiography (ICA) remains the gold standard for anatomical assessment of coronary artery disease in HF patients, alternatives are being sought. Computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTA) has emerged as an accurate non-invasive diagnostic tool for coronary artery disease (CAD) and has been demonstrated to have prognostic value. Whether or not CTA can be used in HF patients is unknown. Acknowledging the aging population, the growing prevalence of HF and the increasing financial burden of healthcare, we need to identify non-invasive diagnostic tests that are available, safe, accurate and cost-effective. Methods/Design The proposed study aims to provide insight into the efficacy of CTA in HF patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial will enroll 250 HF patients requiring coronary anatomical definition. Enrolled patients will be randomized to either CTA or ICA (n = 125 per group) as the first test to define coronary anatomy. The primary outcomes will be collected to determine downstream resource utilization. Secondary outcomes will include the composite clinical events and major adverse cardiac events. In addition, the accuracy of CTA for detecting coronary anatomy and obstruction will be assessed in patients who subsequently undergo both CTA and ICA. It is expected that CTA will be a more cost-effective strategy for diagnosis: yielding similar outcomes with fewer procedural risks and improved resource utilization. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01283659 Team grant #CIF 99470

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of rubidium (Rb)-82 positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in comparison to single-photon emission tomography (SPECT).BackgroundMyocardial perfusion imaging is widely used in the assessment of patients with known or suspected CAD. PET using Rb-82 has potential advantages over SPECT that may make it more accurate and that reduce radiation exposure compared with SPECT but has increased costs. Comparisons of these technologies are highly relevant for policy makers and practice guidelines. However, studies directly comparing Rb-82 PET with contemporary SPECT have been limited.MethodThe authors therefore undertook a systematic review of studies where either Rb-82 PET or technetium-99m SPECT with both attenuation correction and electrocardiography-gating were used as a diagnostic test for obstructive CAD with invasive coronary angiogram as a reference standard. These technologies were then compared.ResultsFifteen PET and 8 SPECT studies (1,344 and 1,755 patients, respectively) met inclusion criteria and pooled accuracy using weighted averages according to the size of the patient population was determined for PET and SPECT with sensitivities of 90% (confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 0.92) and 85% (CI: 0.82 to 0.87) and specificities of 88% (CI: 0.85 to 0.91) and 85% (CI: 0.82 to 0.87), respectively. Summary receiver-operating characteristic curves were computed: area under the curve was 0.95 and 0.90 for PET and SPECT, respectively (p < 0.0001). There was heterogeneity among study populations and some studies were limited by referral bias.ConclusionsRb-82 PET is accurate for the detection of obstructive CAD and, despite advances in SPECT technology, remains superior. More widespread use of Rb-82 PET may be beneficial to improve CAD detection.