Search

Purpose: This study aimed to report pain during and following injection for trigger finger as well as failure to resolve triggering. We hypothesized that a corticosteroid injection alone would be equally or less painful compared with the standard combination of corticosteroid and lidocaine for the treatment of trigger fingers, and there would be no difference in the resolution of triggering., Methods: Our study was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial at a single institution, comprising 76 patients with a diagnosis of trigger finger. Each treatment group consisted of 38 patients. Patients were randomized to receive either a betamethasone (1 mL, 6 mg) injection without lidocaine or a betamethasone injection (1 mL, 6 mg) with 1% lidocaine (1 mL). Patients were assessed during injection and at 1 hour, 6 hours, 2 days, and 6 weeks after the injection. The primary outcome was pain measured using a numerical rating scale. The secondary outcome was the rate of failure to resolve symptoms at 6 weeks., Results: There was a statistically significant difference in pain scores between the lidocaine and betamethasone versus betamethasone-only injections during administration (4.6 vs 6.2) and after 1 hour (1.3 vs 2.5). There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores after 6 hours (1.5 vs 2.0) and 2 days (0.7 vs 0.6) or in failure rate at the 6-week time point (21% vs 18%)., Conclusions: This study showed that there is a statistically significant difference in pain during and shortly after injection when using a steroid with lidocaine versus steroid alone for the treatment of trigger finger, but that difference may not be clinically relevant. There was no significant difference in the failure rate between the treatments., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Therapeutic II., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly to this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Medial epicondylitis is a tendinosis found commonly in throwing and golfing athletes. Although there are choices for nonsurgical treatments, when these fail, surgical intervention can be considered. When surgical treatment is performed, the objective is to debride the diseased tissue from the epicondyle. The purpose of this study was to clarify the locations and size of the common flexor tendons and medial collateral ligament (MCL) relative to each other and to the posterior ridge of the medial epicondyle., Methods: The common flexor tendons and MCL were dissected and reflected their origin on the medial epicondyle in six cadaver elbows. Measurements were taken from the posterior and distal ridges of the medial epicondyle with respect to the humerus. Each origin was also measured for its height and width., Results: The flexor carpi ulnaris origin starts at a mean of 4.2 mm from the posterior ridge of the medial epicondyle and extends anteriorly an average of 4.8 mm. The flexor carpi radialis starts at a mean of 4.2 mm from the posterior ridge and extends anteriorly an average of 7.4 mm. The pronator teres begins at a mean of 4.6 mm from the posterior ridge and extends an average of 5.7 mm anteriorly. The MCL starts at an average of 10.4 mm from the posterior ridge and extends 5.2 mm anteriorly., Conclusions: The measurements found have allowed the creation of a map of the specific common flexor tendon origins and their sizes on the medial epicondyle, as well as their position relative to the MCL., Clinical Relevance: A surgeon may debride 1 cm anteriorly from the posterior ridge of the medial epicondyle to safely address the affected tissues and ensure the safety and integrity of the MCL., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly to this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)