1. COmplex coronary Bifurcation lesions: RAndomized comparison of a strategy using a dedicated self-expanding biolimus-eluting stent versus a culotte strategy using everolimus-eluting stents: primary results of the COBRA trial
- Author
-
Joseph Dens, Jan D'hooge, Walter Desmet, Giovanni J. Ughi, Tom Adriaenssens, Dries De Cock, Johan Bennett, Christophe Dubois, Mathias Vrolix, Peter Sinnaeve, and Ann Belmans
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Lumen (anatomy) ,Cobra ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Coronary Angiography ,Balloon ,Coronary Restenosis ,03 medical and health sciences ,Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ,0302 clinical medicine ,Angioplasty ,medicine ,Clinical endpoint ,Humans ,Everolimus ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ,Coronary bifurcation ,Aged ,computer.programming_language ,Sirolimus ,business.industry ,Biolimus eluting stent ,Stent ,Drug-Eluting Stents ,Middle Aged ,Coronary Vessels ,Treatment Outcome ,Female ,Radiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,computer ,Immunosuppressive Agents - Abstract
Aims: We aimed to compare healing responses with optical coherence tomography, and clinical and angiographic outcome after treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with a dedicated stent versus a conventional culotte technique. Methods and results: Forty patients with true and complex coronary bifurcation lesions were randomly assigned to treatment with the Axxess™ bifurcation stent in the proximal main vessel (MV) and additional BioMatrix™ stents in the branches (Biosensors Europe SA, Morges, Switzerland), versus a culotte technique using XIENCE™ stents (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The primary endpoint of percentage of uncovered struts at nine months was similar with the dedicated strategy vs. culotte in the proximal MV (median 17.8 [IQR 3.3-24.7] vs. 6.8 [2.0-20.5]; p=0.19), bifurcation core (9.5 [5.7-19.5] vs. 4.0 [0.7-17.6]; p=0.17), distal MV (2.6 [2.3-18] vs. 2.2 [0.5-6.0]; p=0.09) and side branch (5.7 [1.5-11.5] vs. 1.9 [0-5.8]; p=0.14). As compared with culotte, a strategy using Axxess resulted in a significantly larger lumen in the proximal MV both acutely (minimum lumen diameter 3.03±0.51 vs. 2.71±0.44 mm, p=0.04) and at follow-up (mean lumen area 10.0±2.1 vs. 7.1±1.8 mm 2 , p
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF