Search

Background: The success of newly introduced surgical techniques is generally primarily assessed by surgical outcome measures. However, data on medical liability should concomitantly be used to evaluate provided care as they give a unique insight into substandard care from patient's point of view. The aim of this study was to analyze the number and type of medical claims after laparoscopic gynecologic procedures since the introduction of advanced laparoscopy two decades ago. Secondly, our objective was to identify trends and/or risk factors associated with these claims.Methods: To identify the claims, we searched the databases of the two largest medical liability mutual insurance companies in The Netherlands (MediRisk and Centramed), covering together 96% of the Dutch hospitals. All claims related to laparoscopic gynecologic surgery and filed between 1993 and 2015 were included.Results: A total of 133 claims met our inclusion criteria, of which 54 were accepted claims (41%) and 79 rejected (59%). The number of claims remained relatively constant over time. The majority of claims were filed for visceral and/or vascular injuries (82%), specifically to the bowel (40%) and ureters (20%). More than one-third of the injuries were entry related (38%) and 77% of the claims were filed after non-advanced procedures. A delay in diagnosing injuries was the primary reason for financial compensation (33%). The median sum paid to patients was €12,000 (500-848,689). In 90 claims, an attorney was defending the patient (83% for the accepted claims; 57% for the rejected claims).Conclusion: The number of claims remained relatively constant during the study period. Most claims were provoked by bowel and ureter injuries. Delay in recognizing injuries was the most encountered reason for granting financial compensation. Entering the abdominal cavity during laparoscopy continues to be a potential dangerous step. As a result, gynecologists are recommended to thoroughly counsel patients undergoing any laparoscopic procedure, even regarding the risk of entry-related injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Since the introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), concerns for patient safety are more often brought to the attention. Knowledge about and awareness of patient safety risk factors are crucial in order to improve and enhance the surgical team, the environment, and finally surgical performance. The aim of this study was to identify and quantify patient safety risk factors in laparoscopic hysterectomy and to determine their influence on surgical outcomes.Methods: A prospective multicenter study was conducted from April 2014 to January 2016, participating gynecologists registered their performed laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs). If deemed necessary, gynecologists could fill out a checklist with validated patient safety risk factors. Association between procedures with and without an occurred risk factor(s) and the surgical outcomes (blood loss, operative time, and complications) were assessed, using multivariate logistic regression and generalized estimation equations.Results: Eighty-five gynecologists participated in the study, registering a total of 2237 LHs. For 627(28 %) procedures, the checklist was entered (in total 920 items). The most reported risk factors were related to the surgeon (19.6 %), the surgical team (14.4 %), technology (16.6 %), and the patient (26.8 %). The procedures where a risk factor was registered had significantly less favorable outcomes, higher complication rate (10.5 vs. 4.8 % (p = 0.002), longer operative time [114 vs. 95 min (p < 0.001)], and more blood loss [110 vs. 168 mL (p = 0.047)], which was mainly due to the technological and patient-related risk factors.Conclusion: Technological incidents are the most important and clinically relevant risk factors affecting surgical outcomes of LH. Future improvements of MIS need to focus on this. As awareness of safety risk factors in MIS is important, embedding of a safety risk factor checklist in registration systems will help surgeons to evaluate and improve their individual performance. This will inherently improve the surgical outcomes and thus patient safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is frequently compromised by surgical flow disturbances due to technology- and equipment-related failures. Compared with MIS in a conventional cart-based OR, performing MIS in a dedicated integrated operating room (OR) is supposed to be beneficial to patient safety. The aim of this study was to compare a conventional OR with an integrated OR with regard to the incidence and effect of equipment-related surgical flow disturbances during an advanced laparoscopic gynecological procedure [laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH)].Methods: Using video recording, 40 LHs performed between November 2010 and April 2012 (20 in a conventional cart-based OR and 20 in an integrated OR) were analyzed by two different observers. Outcome measures were the number, duration and effect (on a seven-point ordinal scale) of the surgical flow disturbances (e.g., malfunctioning, intraoperative repositioning, setup device).Results: A total of 103 h and 45 min was observed. The interobserver agreement was high (kappa .85, p < .001). Procedure time was not significantly different (NS) [conventional OR vs. integrated OR, minutes ± standard deviation (SD), mean 161 ± 27 vs. 150 ± 34]. A total of 1651 surgical flow disturbances were observed (mean ± SD per procedure 40.8 ± 19.4 vs. 41.8 ± 15.9, NS). The mean number of surgical flow disturbances per procedure with regard to equipment was 6.3 ± 3.7 versus 8.5 ± 4.0, NS. No clinically relevant differences in the mean effect of these disturbances on the surgical flow between the two OR setups were observed.Conclusions: Performing LH in an integrated OR did not reduce the number of surgical flow disturbances nor the effect of these disturbances. Furthermore, in the integrated OR, repositioning of the monitors was a frequent and time-consuming source of disturbance. In order to maintain the high standard of surgical safety, the entire surgical team has to be aware that by performing surgery in an integrated OR different potential source for disruption arise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hysterectomy is still one of the most frequently performed gynaecological procedures. The use of the laparoscopic approach has increased over recent years and a shift in indication has been observed. However, not every clinic or gynaecologist is able to provide laparoscopic hysterectomy for more challenging patients. Therefore, referral to an expert centre is of the highest importance in order to offer the patient the least invasive approach to hysterectomy. The advantages of the laparoscopic approach have become more evident over recent years. The widespread introduction of minimally invasive surgery means that surgeons are encountering new challenges, such as the rapid introduction of new instruments, the absolute increased incidence of rare complications and the provision of post-operative counselling on recovery. Maintaining knowledge of these matters is essential in order to secure the quality of care.

Background: Actinomyces is an uncommon cause of infection which can occur in the lower pelvic area in women using an intrauterine device (IUD). The clinical presentation of actinomycosis can easily be confounded with a malignancy., Case Description: In a 53-year-old woman with abdominal pain and fluctuating temperature, ovarian carcinoma was strongly suspected. She underwent a laparotomy in which both adnexae were removed. Histopathological examination of the specimens revealed, however, a rare Actinomyces infection. The patient received long-term antibiotic therapy in the postoperative period, upon which her condition improved., Conclusion: Differentiation between actinomycosis (mycetoma) and a malignancy is difficult. There are few diagnostic tools to demonstrate an Actinomyces infection, and the diagnosis is therefore often not made until during or after operation. The treatment of actinomycosis consists of long-term administration of antibiotics, although combined surgery and antibiotic therapy is often necessary due to the extent of the infection.

Background: Uterine fibroids are common, benign tumours of the myometrium. The clinical symptoms include menorrhagia, abdominal pain and subfertility., Case Description: A 37-year-old black woman known to have uterine fibroids presented at the gynaecology outpatient clinic with abdominal pain. Ultrasonography and an MRI scan revealed haematometra caused by an obstructive myoma, which was drained during a hysteroscopy. The patient was subsequently treated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist in order to reduce the myoma. Resection of the myoma will take place sometime in the future., Conclusion: Haematometra is an accumulation of blood in the uterine cavity. It is a rare complication of uterine fibroids and causes abdominal pain and enlargement of the uterus. Amenorrhoea is often a finding because an adequate outflow of menstrual blood is no longer possible. The primary treatment is to drain the haematometra; a subsequent myomectomy should be performed.