Search

With remarkable deficiency in both oocyte stock and competence, the prognosis of IVF-ET in diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is obstinately poor, underscoring warranted optimization to current procedures. We compared the efficacy of dual-trigger (hCG plus GnRH-a) and hCG alone on the outcomes for DOR patients. A total of 381 couples and 857 controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles, and 222 couples and 366 frozen embryo transfer (FET) ones were included. The intermediate outcomes during oocyte retrieval and in vitro culture were compared based on COS dataset, while outcomes after embryo transfer analyzed based on FET dataset. The marginal effect of all study factors and covariates were evaluated with a cluster-weighted GEE model. Neither the intermediate nor implantation outcomes were improved by dual-trigger. The OR values were 1.08 (95 % CI: 0.41–2.78) for retrieval cancellation, 1.33 (95 % CI: 0.89–2.00) for oocyte harvest, 1.04(95 %CI: 0.94–1.15) for viable embryo and 1.03(95 %CI: 0.88–1.19) for top-quality embryo. Similarly, the ORs were 0.90 (95 %CI: 0.62–1.30) for implantation and 0.97 (95 %CI: 0.56–1.69) for clinical pregnancy. This equivalence remained unchanged after adjusting for the covariates such as age, BMI, controlled ovarian stimulation protocols, etc. Thus, dual-trigger cannot provide significant advantage over hCG in related to immediate or clinical outcomes of IVF-ET treatments in DOR patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study compared, in high responders undergoing IVF treatment, GnRH agonist-only trigger and dual trigger on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative live birth rate (LBR). The aim was to determine if the GnRH agonist-only triggers had provided outcomes comparable to dual trigger, while minimizing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Materials and methods: A retrospective, matched case-control study was conducted at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, including women who underwent IVF/ICSI between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022. Inclusion criteria were: GnRH antagonist protocol and estrogen level >3,000 pg/ml on trigger day. Exclusion criteria were: immune/metabolic diseases, donated oocytes, and mixed stimulation cycles. Propensity score matching was applied to balance age, AMH level, and oocyte number between the GnRH agonist-only and dual trigger groups. Outcomes were analyzed for patients who had complete treatment cycles, focusing on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative LBR. Results: We analyzed 116 cycles in the agonist-only group, and 232 cycles in the dual trigger group. No inter-group difference was found in their age, BMI, and AMH levels. The dual trigger group had a higher oocyte retrieval rate (93% vs. 80%; p <0.05), while fertilization rates, blastocyst formation rates, and cumulative LBR were comparable. Notably, no OHSS cases had been reported in the GnRH agonist-only group, compared with 7 cases in the dual trigger group. Conclusion: GnRH agonist-only triggers resulted in a lower oocyte retrieval rate compared to dual triggers but did not significantly affect cumulative LBR in high responders. This approach effectively reduces OHSS risk without compromising pregnancy outcomes, making it a preferable option in freeze-all strategies, despite a longer oocyte pick-up duration and a medium cost. GnRH agonistonly trigger, however, may not be suitable for fresh embryo transfers or patients with low serum LH levels on trigger day. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is one of the obstacles affecting the reproductive outcomes of patients receiving assisted reproductive therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether dual trigger, including gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), can improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with DOR undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles using mild stimulation protocols. Methods A total of 734 patients with DOR were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into a recombinant hCG trigger group and a dual trigger group (hCG combined with GnRHa) according to the different trigger drugs used. The main outcome measures included the number of oocytes retrieved, the fertilization rate, the number of transferable embryos, the implantation rate, the clinical pregnancy rate, the miscarriage rate, the live birth rate (LBR), and the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). Generalized linear model and logistic regression analyses were performed for confounding factors. Results There were 337 cycles with a single hCG trigger and 397 cycles with dual trigger. The dual trigger group demonstrated significantly higher numbers of retrieved oocytes [3.60 vs. 2.39, adjusted β = 0.538 (0.221–0.855)], fertilized oocytes [2.55 vs. 1.94, adjusted β = 0.277 (0.031–0.523)] and transferable embryos [1.22 vs. 0.95, adjusted β = 0.162 (-0.005–0.329)] than did the hCG trigger group, whereas no significant difference in the fertilization rate was observed between the two groups. Moreover, the embryo transfer cancellation rate (35.5% vs. 43.9%) was obviously lower in the dual trigger group. Among the fresh embryo transfer cycles, the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and live birth rate were similar between the two groups. After controlling for potential confounding variables, the trigger method was identified as an independent factor affecting the number of oocytes retrieved but had no significant impact on the CLBR. Conclusions Dual triggering of final oocyte maturation with hCG combined with GnRHa can significantly increase the number of oocytes retrieved in patients with DOR but has no improvement effect on the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate or LBR of fresh cycles or on the CLBR.

Purpose: To investigate whether gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) combined with human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) can improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with normal ovarian response (NOR). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data of 404 NOR patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer (ET) from 2018 to 2022 were studied. Patients were divided into HCG group and HCG plus GnRH-a group according to trigger methods. After confounding factors were controlled by propensity score matching, 67 cases were included in HCG group and HCG plus GnRH-a group, respectively, and pregnancy outcomes were assessed. Basal data, ovarian stimulation, embryological data and pregnancy outcomes were compared. The effect of trigger methods on pregnancy outcomes was analyzed by binary logistic regression. Results: There was no statistically significant differences in embryological data, embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate of ET, number of fresh embryos transferred and total number of embryos transferred after one cycle of oocyte retrieval. While, cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was better in the dual-trigger group than in the HCG group. The binary logistic regression analysis indicated that the trigger methods had an independent influence on embryo implantation and cumulative live birth. Conclusions: During IVF/ICSI, dual-trigger could potentially play a role in improving oocyte quality, ensuring embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate of ET and cumulative live birth rate at the end of one ovum pick-up (OPU) cycle, and reducing the physical, temporal and financial negative consequences due to repeated OPU cycle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is one of the obstacles affecting the reproductive outcomes of patients receiving assisted reproductive therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether dual trigger, including gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), can improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with DOR undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles using mild stimulation protocols. Methods: A total of 734 patients with DOR were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into a recombinant hCG trigger group and a dual trigger group (hCG combined with GnRHa) according to the different trigger drugs used. The main outcome measures included the number of oocytes retrieved, the fertilization rate, the number of transferable embryos, the implantation rate, the clinical pregnancy rate, the miscarriage rate, the live birth rate (LBR), and the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). Generalized linear model and logistic regression analyses were performed for confounding factors. Results: There were 337 cycles with a single hCG trigger and 397 cycles with dual trigger. The dual trigger group demonstrated significantly higher numbers of retrieved oocytes [3.60 vs. 2.39, adjusted β = 0.538 (0.221–0.855)], fertilized oocytes [2.55 vs. 1.94, adjusted β = 0.277 (0.031–0.523)] and transferable embryos [1.22 vs. 0.95, adjusted β = 0.162 (-0.005–0.329)] than did the hCG trigger group, whereas no significant difference in the fertilization rate was observed between the two groups. Moreover, the embryo transfer cancellation rate (35.5% vs. 43.9%) was obviously lower in the dual trigger group. Among the fresh embryo transfer cycles, the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and live birth rate were similar between the two groups. After controlling for potential confounding variables, the trigger method was identified as an independent factor affecting the number of oocytes retrieved but had no significant impact on the CLBR. Conclusions: Dual triggering of final oocyte maturation with hCG combined with GnRHa can significantly increase the number of oocytes retrieved in patients with DOR but has no improvement effect on the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate or LBR of fresh cycles or on the CLBR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: Despite recent advancements in assisted reproductive technology (ART), the effective management of patients with poor ovarian response (POR) remains a formidable challenge. While various treatment strategies and predictors of live births have been documented to provide guidance to fertility specialists in managing poor responders, research efforts have predominantly encompassed all POSEIDON groups. In this study, our objective was to analyze the factors correlated with live births (LB) within a subset of the POSEIDON groups, with a particular focus on POSEIDON groups 3 and 4. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Charts of 406 patients belonging to POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 who underwent ART treatment at a university- affiliated infertility clinic following a gonadotropin- releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cycle between January 2016 and December 2021 were analyzed. Clinically significant factors associated with live births were incorporated into a logistic regression model for multivariate analysis to ascertain independent predictors of LB. Additionally, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to establish the optimal cut-off values. RESULTS: Live births were achieved in 48 cycles (8.7%). Female age (OR, 0.930; 95% CI: 0.874-0.991; p < 0.024), baseline serum luteinizing hormone (LH) levels (OR, 0.854; 95% CI: 0.741-0.984; p < 0.029), and dual triggers (OR, 4.004; 95% CI: 1.290-12.426; p < 0.016) were identified as independent factors associated with LB following multivariate logistic regression analysis. The optimal age cut-off was determined to be 33 years, with a sensitivity of 70.8% and specificity of 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age, lower baseline serum LH levels, and dual-trigger administration appear to enhance the likelihood of live birth in POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 following treatments with the GnRH antagonist protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: to assess the effects of a dual trigger by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in women with normal ovarian response.Materials and Methods. This case-control analysis comprised 118 patients who responded normally to ovarian stimulation with a GnRH antagonist protocol at Hue Center for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Vietnam, between January 2018 and October 2019. Recruitment was achieved through case-control matching: a case (with Dual trigger – group A) was paired with control (with hCG trigger – group B) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary markers of success were the retrieval of oocytes and embryological data, the pregnancy rate, and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).Results. 59 patients in group A and 59 women in group B were recruited. Two groups had comparable patient characteristics and ovarian reserve. The initial dose, total dose, duration of gonadotropin administration, and peak of estradiol level were not statistically different across groups. The number of recovered oocytes (10.3 ± 4.2 vs. 10.0 ± 3.3; p = 0.663), mature oocytes (8.6 ± 3.7 vs.8.1 ± 2.8; p = 0.346), and high-quality embryos (56.2 ± 28.9 vs. 59.8 ± 35.9; p = 0.555) was equivalent. Fertilization, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates were comparable between the dual trigger and hCG groups. In neither group were any occurrences of OHSS seen.Conclusion. Dual trigger may substitute hCG for final oocyte maturation and fresh embryo transfer in patients with normal responses to GnRH antagonist protocol-induced ovarian stimulation without compromising IVF outcomes.

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether dual trigger could improve reproductive outcomes in women with low oocyte maturation rates compare to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger.MethodsThis study included expected normal ovarian responders younger than 40 years old whose immature oocyte rate in the previous cycle was more than 50% at the reproductive center from July 2021 to November 2022. A total of 73 patients were enrolled at trigger, including 34 in the hCG trigger group and 39 in the dual trigger group (co-administration of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and hCG, 40 and 34 h prior to oocyte retrieval, respectively). The primary outcome was oocyte maturation rate.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the number of oocytes retrieved between the two study groups, but the oocyte maturation rate was higher in dual trigger group (84.0% [14.0%] vs. 55.5% [19.8%], p

Propose: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the implementation of a "dual trigger" approach, utilizing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the GnRH antagonist protocol for in vitro fertilization (IVF), leads to improved pregnancy outcomes compared to the conventional hCG trigger alone. Previous meta-analyses have not provided sufficient evidence to support the superiority of the dual trigger over the hCG trigger in fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycles. Thus, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials were conducted to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of the dual trigger on pregnancy outcomes in fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycles. Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted. We searched the Medline and Embase databases for articles up to 2023 by using search terms: "dual trigger," "GnRHa," "hCG," "IVF." Eligible RCTs comparing the dual trigger with the hCG trigger were included. The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR) per cycle. The secondary outcomes were the number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature oocytes retrieved, implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, CPR, miscarriage rate and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate per started cycle We compared the oocyte maturation and pregnancy outcomes in the dual trigger and hCG trigger groups. In patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer (ET) and frozen–thawed ET, we also conducted a subgroup analysis to evaluate whether dual trigger improves the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). Results: We included 10 randomised studies, with 825 participants in the dual trigger group and 813 in the hCG trigger group. Compared with the hCG trigger, dual trigger was associated with a significant increase in the LBR per cycle (odds ratio (OR) = 1.61[1.16, 2.25]), number of oocytes retrieved (mean difference [MD] = 1.05 [0.43, 1.68]), number of mature oocytes retrieved (MD = 0.82 [0. 84, 1.16]), and CPR (OR = 1.48 [1.08, 2.01]). Subgroup analyses revealed that dual trigger was associated with a significantly increased CPR in patients who received fresh ET (OR = 1.68 [1.14, 2.48]). By contrast, the dual trigger was not associated with an increased CPR in the patient group with frozen–thawed ET (OR = 1.15 [0.64, 2.08]). Conclusion: The dual trigger was associated with a significantly higher number of retrieved oocytes, number of mature oocytes, CPR, and LBR in IVF than the hCG trigger. The beneficial effect for fresh ET cycles compared with frozen–thawed ET might be associated with increased endometrial receptivity. Relevance: After dual trigger, delaying ET due to the concern of endometrial receptivity might not be needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Risk factors associated with a suboptimal response to Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists include a high or low body mass index (BMI), prolonged use of oral contraceptive pills, and low luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on either the start or trigger days of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). However, this approach may increase the need for a dual trigger and may also result in a higher incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in hyper-responders. We aimed to investigate whether the maximum LH level during stimulation can serve as a predictive factor for achieving an optimal oocyte yield using the GnRH agonist trigger alone. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all antagonist protocols or progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocols triggered with GnRH agonist only between May 2012 and December 2022. Subjects were divided into three groups, depending on basal LH level and LH maximum level. The freeze-all strategy was implemented in all cycles: Group 1, consistently low LH levels throughout COS; Group 2, low basal LH level with high LH max level during COS; Group 3, consistently high LH levels throughout COS. The primary outcome was the oocyte yield rate. The secondary outcome includes the number of collected oocytes, suboptimal response to GnRH agonist trigger, oocyte maturity rate, fertilized rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and live birth rate. The pregnancy outcomes were calculated for the first FET cycle. Results: Following confounder adjustment, multivariable regression analysis showed that Group 1 (cycles with consistently low LH levels throughout COS) remains an independent predictor of suboptimal response (OR: 6.99; 95% CI 1.035-47.274). Group 1 (b = -12.72; 95% CI -20.9 to -4.55) and BMI (b = -0.25; 95% CI -0.5 to -0.004) were negatively associated with oocyte yield rate. Patients with low basal LH but high LH max levels had similar clinical outcomes compared to those with high LH max levels through COS. Conclusions: The maximum LH level during COS may serve as an indicator of LH reserve and could be a more reliable predictor of achieving an optimal oocyte yield when compared to relying solely on the basal LH level. In the case of hyper-responders where trigger agents (agonist-only or dual trigger) are being considered, we propose a novel strategy that incorporates the maximum LH level, rather than just the basal or trigger-day LH level, as a reference for assessing LH reserve. This approach aims to minimize the risk of obtaining suboptimal oocyte yield and improve overall treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundRisk factors associated with a suboptimal response to Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists include a high or low body mass index (BMI), prolonged use of oral contraceptive pills, and low luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on either the start or trigger days of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). However, this approach may increase the need for a dual trigger and may also result in a higher incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in hyper-responders. We aimed to investigate whether the maximum LH level during stimulation can serve as a predictive factor for achieving an optimal oocyte yield using the GnRH agonist trigger alone.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all antagonist protocols or progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocols triggered with GnRH agonist only between May 2012 and December 2022. Subjects were divided into three groups, depending on basal LH level and LH maximum level. The freeze-all strategy was implemented in all cycles: Group 1, consistently low LH levels throughout COS; Group 2, low basal LH level with high LH max level during COS; Group 3, consistently high LH levels throughout COS. The primary outcome was the oocyte yield rate. The secondary outcome includes the number of collected oocytes, suboptimal response to GnRH agonist trigger, oocyte maturity rate, fertilized rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and live birth rate. The pregnancy outcomes were calculated for the first FET cycle.ResultsFollowing confounder adjustment, multivariable regression analysis showed that Group 1 (cycles with consistently low LH levels throughout COS) remains an independent predictor of suboptimal response (OR: 6.99; 95% CI 1.035–47.274). Group 1 (b = −12.72; 95% CI −20.9 to −4.55) and BMI (b = −0.25; 95% CI −0.5 to −0.004) were negatively associated with oocyte yield rate. Patients with low basal LH but high LH max levels had similar clinical outcomes compared to those with high LH max levels through COS.ConclusionsThe maximum LH level during COS may serve as an indicator of LH reserve and could be a more reliable predictor of achieving an optimal oocyte yield when compared to relying solely on the basal LH level. In the case of hyper-responders where trigger agents (agonist-only or dual trigger) are being considered, we propose a novel strategy that incorporates the maximum LH level, rather than just the basal or trigger-day LH level, as a reference for assessing LH reserve. This approach aims to minimize the risk of obtaining suboptimal oocyte yield and improve overall treatment outcomes.

Abstract Background Despite a large number of studies on the selection of trigger drugs, it remains unclear whether the dual trigger with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, compared to the trigger with hCG alone, can improve the reproductive outcome of patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the laboratory and clinical outcomes of dual trigger versus single trigger. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 520 in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles between July 2014 and September 2020 at the Reproductive and Genetic Center of Integrative Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All patients underwent IVF/ICSI treatment with fresh embryo transfer using the GnRH antagonist protocol. We used propensity score matching to control for confounding variables and binary logistic regression analysis to determine the correlations between trigger methods and pregnancy outcomes. After propensity score matching, 57 cycles from each group were evaluated and compared for laboratory or clinical outcomes in this retrospective cohort study. Results There was no significant difference in the number of oocytes retrieved, embryos available, top-quality embryos, or the rate of normal fertilization between the dual-trigger and single-trigger protocols, respectively. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, and live birth rate were also similar between the two groups, while the miscarriage rate (37.0% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.045) was higher in the dual-trigger than the single-trigger group. Subsequent binary logistic regression analysis showed that age was a remarkably significant independent predictor of both clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.84–0.97, p = 0.006) and live birth rate (odds ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.82–0.97, p = 0.005). Conclusions Therefore, dual-trigger for final oocyte maturation might increase miscarriage rate, but in terms of the laboratory and other pregnancy outcomes such as clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate or live birth rate, there was no evidence to show that dual trigger was superior to an hCG-trigger alone for patients undergoing GnRH-antagonist cycles with fresh embryo transfer. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.

Objective Dual trigger is used to induce final oocyte maturation during the process of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, yet yielding controversial results. Also, there are yet no data regarding the effect of the dosage of the dual trigger on clinical outcomes. Based on the Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) criteria, this study aimed to determine the clinical difference of a single bolus versus two boluses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in POSEIDON group IV patients using dual trigger. Methods We screened a total of 1,256 patients who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles who met the POSEIDON group IV criteria. Six hundred and twenty-nine patients received one bolus of GnRHa, and 627 patients were given two boluses. All patients received the same dose of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin during the dual trigger cycle. Results Metaphase II oocyte retrieval rate, fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy rate did not differ between the two groups. However, a lower percentage of at least one top-quality embryo transfer (34.3% vs. 26.0%, P=0.001) in the two bolus-GnRHa group was noted. Conclusion A double bolus of GnRHa did not show superior clinical results compared to a single bolus of GnRHa in the dual trigger IVF cycle. Therefore, GnRHa doses for use should be decided based on individual clinical situations considering cost-effectiveness and patient compliance, but further investigation will be needed.

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of dual trigger, which is a combination of gonadotropin-releasing agonist (GnRH-a) and recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the final oocyte maturation, in the outcome of intrauterine insemination (IUI). Methods This retrospective observational study was conducted from January 2016 to October 2018 and involved 639 IUI cycles at the Halim Fertility Center, Indonesia. Controlled ovarian stimulation was performed during IUI cycles. The ovulation triggers were divided into two groups: group I received a combination of GnRH-a and recombinant hCG as a dual trigger, and group II received only recombinant hCG as a single trigger. The baseline characteristics, cycle parameters, and IUI outcomes of both groups were compared. Results Our study included a total of 639 IUI cycles, 334 were in the dual trigger group and 305 in the single trigger group. The clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the dual trigger group than in the single trigger group (P

Beginning in October 2020 and ending in April 2021, researchers from Al-Nahrain University's High Institute for Infertility Diagnosis and Assisted Reproductive Technologies compared the success rates of two different methods of diagnosing and treating infertility. The major purpose of the research was to assess the impact of a combined trigger (follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH] and human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG]) on endometrial receptivity (endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, sub-endometrial blood flow). A total of 100 females took part in the study. All patients gave their informed written consent, and the study was approved by the Al-Nahrain University Ethics Committee. Procedure Time To confirm ovulation, measure and analyze the endometrial pattern, and examine the sub-endometrial blood flow, a vaginal ultrasound was done 36 to 48 hours following trigger ovulation. All four hormones (FSH, LH, Progesterone, and E2) were tested in the blood at the same time to determine whether a couple was fertile, a complete medical history, and physical examination whereas performed on each member of the pair. An ultrasound vaginal probe was used to do the transvaginal examination. Patients were placed in the dorsal lithotomy position with an empty bladder for early follicular US (CD 2-3) to assess the number of antral follicles, measure endometrial thickness, and rule out ovarian cysts or other pathology. A second ultrasound was performed during the middle of the cycle (CD9-14) to determine whether a mature follicle had been found. A multiplanar image of the uterus was acquired after an ultrasound scan was swept across the mid-sagittal plane. Endometrial thickness in the median longitudinal plane of the uterus was calculated as the largest distance from one basal endometrial interface via the endometrial canal to the opposite endometrial-myometrial interface of the anterior-posterior uterine wall. A statistically significant difference was found between Group A's average E2 concentration of 69.62 pg/mL and Groups B and C's concentrations of 53.32 and 36.65 pg/mL. (P 0.001). In group C, there was a statistically significant difference in E2 levels on the day of the trigger and the day of the IUI (P = 0.036). On the day of IUI compared to the day of trigger, no statistically significant differences were seen between the study groups for any of the other hormonal indicators (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in any of the baseline clinical measures between the research groups. All clinical indicators were comparable across groups (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) between the research groups on any other clinical indicators. When comparing groups, A, B, and C on the decline in RI between the trigger and IUI days, group A significantly outperformed the others (P = 0.003). There was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in any of the other clinical parameters between the IUI and trigger groups on the day of IUI.

Is there any difference in clinical outcomes between a human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG)-only trigger and a dual trigger combining gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and HCG in a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol? This retrospective cohort study included women younger than 40 years old with a normal ovarian reserve who underwent IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment with a PPOS protocol. Participants were allocated to two groups according to the triggering medicines. The clinical outcomes were compared, with cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) being the primary outcome. In total, 1066 women were included, 565 in the HCG-only group and 501 in the dual trigger group. Demographic parameters were comparable between the groups. Fewer oocytes were retrieved in the HCG-only trigger group (dual trigger 12.56 ± 7.12 versus HCG-only trigger 11.62 ± 6.02, P = 0.020). No significant difference was observed in the numbers of two-pronuclear embryos (7.12 ± 4.90 versus 6.76 ± 4.45, P = 0.208) and high-quality embryos (4.01 ± 3.70 versus 3.96 ± 3.32, P = 0.815). The CLBR after one complete cycle was also similar (40.72% versus 43.72%, P = 0.354). Multivariate logistic analysis confirmed that the trigger method had no association with CLBR (odds ratio [OR] 0.763, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.578–1.005, P = 0.055) in the PPOS-treated patients. Compared with the HCG-only trigger group, comparable embryological and clinical outcomes were achieved, although more oocytes were retrieved in the dual trigger group. This suggests that there may be no extra benefit from dual triggering, and that it should not be recommended for routine use in the general population undergoing PPOS protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Does dual trigger (the co-administration of triptorelin 0.2 mg and recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) [Decapeptyl 0.2 mg + Ovitrelle 250 µg]) versus standard recombinant HCG (Ovitrelle 250 µg) affect embryo quality and morphokinetic parameters? Morphokinetic parameters and embryo quality of embryos derived from the first gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles triggered by dual trigger or standard HCG trigger in women ≤42 years. Outcome measures included time to pronucleus fading (tPNf), cleavage timings (t2–t8), synchrony of the second cycle (s2), duration of the second cycle (cc2) and known implantation data (KID) scoring for embryo quality. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed for confounding factors. A total of 4859 embryos were analysed: 1803 embryos from 267 cycles in the dual trigger group and 3056 embryos from 463 cycles in the HCG trigger group. The groups were similar in patient and treatment characteristics apart from a higher maternal body mass index and lower maturation rate in the dual trigger group. Time to second polar body extrusion was shorter in the dual trigger group. Cleavage timings from zygote to an 8-cell embryo did not differ between the two groups. There was a higher percentage of embryos with an optimal cc2 duration in the HCG group. In multivariate logistic regression models, the trigger type was not a significant factor for cell cycle division parameters. Overall, there was no significant difference in the morphokinetic parameters or quality of embryos evaluated using a time-lapse monitoring system between embryos derived following dual trigger compared with HCG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the safety and effectiveness between long-term GnRH agonist plus HCG (dual trigger) and HCG trigger alone in high ovarian responders., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on clinical data from 314 cases of high ovarian response who underwent in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment at Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital from July 2018 to January 2023. Participants were divided into two groups based on their triggering regimen: the Combined treatment group (GnRH agonist + HCG) and the HCG group (HCG alone). Blood routine, ovary ultrasound parameters, baseline hormone levels, clinical outcomes of controlled ovarian stimulation, clinical outcomes of the first transplantation, and incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were compared between the two groups., Results: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics, blood routines, ovary ultrasound parameters, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate and abortion rate between the two groups (all P > 0.05). However, the incidence of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) in combined treatment group was significantly lower than that in HCG group (mild OHSS: 31% vs. 46.26%, P=0.015; moderate/severe OHSS: 3.00% vs. 11.68%, P=0.021)., Conclusion: Long-term GnRH agonist plus HCG (dual trigger) does not affect the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes, high-quality embryos, or clinical pregnancy rate in patients with high ovarian response. Furthermore, the incidence of OHSS is significantly lower with the dual trigger compared to the HCG trigger alone., Competing Interests: None., (AJTR Copyright © 2024.)

Objective: To compare efficacy and safety of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, dual, and double triggers in predicted healthy responders undergoing ovarian stimulation and in vitro fertilization., Design: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)., Data Sources: Randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinical trial registries, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to December 2023., Study Selection and Synthesis: Twelve high-integrity RCTs comprising 1,931 women were included, which compared hCG trigger with GnRH agonist trigger, dual trigger, and double trigger. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 16., Main Outcome Measures: Key outcomes included clinical pregnancy rates (CPR), live birth rates (LBR), number of oocytes, number of mature oocytes, miscarriage rates, and rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome., Results: The network meta-analysis for CPR were risk ratio (RR), 1.13; (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.60) for hCG vs. GnRH agonist trigger, RR, 1.23 (95% CI, 0.92-1.65) for hCG vs. dual trigger, RR, 0.38 (95% CI, 0.21-0.69) for hCG vs. double trigger, RR, 1.09 (95% CI, 0.70-1.70) for GnRH agonist vs. dual trigger and 0.34 (95% CI, 0.17-0.67) for GnRH agonist vs. double trigger, and RR, 0.31 (95% CI, 0.16-0.60) for double vs. dual trigger. Dual trigger demonstrated the highest Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (85.1%), indicating superior efficacy for CPR. For LBR, although connectivity was limited, the RR was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.00-1.70) for dual vs. hCG trigger, and RR, 1.60 (95% CI, 1.05-2.43) for dual vs. GnRH agonist trigger. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome rates were significantly lower with the GnRH agonist compared with hCG trigger (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.19-1.75). There were no RCTs reporting ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome rates with the use of dual or double trigger. No significant differences were observed in the number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, or miscarriage rates among the trigger protocols., Conclusion and Relevance: The findings indicate that there is no evidence to suggest that using GnRH agonist, dual, or double protocols is superior to hCG trigger in improving CPR. Although LBR may benefit from dual trigger, results are limited by available RCTs. Larger, multicenter trials are needed for further evaluation of LBR and understanding of long-term outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Interests Y.B. has nothing to disclose. T.C. has nothing to disclose. J.M.N.D. has nothing to disclose. I.S. reports honoraria from Ferring, Merck, and Gideon Richter; and travel support from Ferring, Merck, and Institut Biochimique SA, outside the submitted work. M.S. has nothing to disclose. R.W. has nothing to disclose. S.K.S. has nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study compared outcomes of the standard 6000 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) triggerwith a dual trigger comprised of 6000 IU hCG and 1 mg leuprolide acetate for final oocyte maturation in an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle. By convention, ICSI was performed in most cases at the clinic.Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 50 women were included in each arm. Participantswere matched for age, indication and number of prior assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles. Women at riskfor ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were excluded. A flexible gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)antagonist protocol was used and final oocyte maturation was triggered when two leading follicles were >17 mm.Distribution of variables was evaluated visually with histograms. Continuous variables were defined by mean (standarddeviation) or median (25th-75th percentile) depending on distribution characteristics. Categorical variables weredefined by numbers and percentages. Continuous variables were compared between the groups with the t test orMann-Whitney U test as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared by the chi-square test and its derivativesas appropriate. A two-sided P

Aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of dual triggering with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on outcomes of fresh embryo transfers following gonadotropin antagonist cycles in POSEIDON group 3 and group 4 low prognosis women and to compare the outcomes with hCG-only triggering. This study was conducted by retrospective analysis of patients with expected poor ovarian response (POSEIDON group 3 and 4) that underwent fresh embryo transfers following in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with either dual triggering or hCG-only triggering between January 2010 and April 2020. A total of 1068 women that underwent dual triggering and 1931 that underwent hCG-only triggering were included in the study. Number of retrieved oocytes, M2 oocytes, oocyte maturation rate, fertilization rate, obtained 2PN embryos, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth delivery rates were found significantly higher in dual-triggering group in comparison to hCG-only group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.02, p < 0.001 respectively). Dual trigger with concomitant injections of GnRH agonist and hCG in GnRH antagonist cycles appears to improve IVF outcomes, increase quality of embryos, reduce miscarriage rates and consequently increase live birth delivery rates in POSEIDON groups 3/4 poor responders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The major limitations associated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) triggering are inferior clinical outcomes in fresh embryo transfer cycles caused by luteal phase insufficiency following the GnRHa triggering. We included 153 high-risk patients in this study. In group I, the patients received gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger + 1,500 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) support on the oocyte pick-up (OPU) day; in group II, the patients had a dual trigger (GnRHa + 1,500 IU hCG); and in group III (control), 10,000 IU hCG trigger was prescribed for the final oocyte maturation. The levels of LH, estradiol, and progesterone were evaluated in serum on the stimulation starting day, day 6 of stimulation, on the day of the trigger administration, OPU day, days 3 and 5 post-OPU, and day 14 post-ET, as well as in follicular fluid. Progesterone concentration was significantly lower in group I on OPU+5 compared to the hCG group (I vs. III, p = 0.0065). Progesterone levels were significantly lower in group II in serum on OPU+5 compared to groups I and III (I vs. II, p = 0.0068; II vs. III, p = 1.76 × 108). The progesterone levels were significantly higher in follicular fluid in group III compared to the study groups (I vs. III, p = 0.002; II vs. III, p = 0.009). However, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were found between the groups. Then, we divided all women into pregnant and non-pregnant groups and found that estradiol (p = 0.00009) and progesterone (p = 0.000036) on the day of the pregnancy test were significantly higher in the pregnant women group. Also, progesterone on OPU day was significantly higher in the non-pregnant group (p = 0.033). Two cases of moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) late-onset occurred in group I (3.5%, 2/56), no case of moderate/severe OHSS late-onset in group II, and three cases of moderate late-onset in group III (5.7%, 3/53). The low-dose hCG supplementation improves the luteal phase insufficiency after GnRHa triggering, which is confirmed by the comparable pregnancy rates in fresh transfer cycles between the groups. However, lowdose hCG carries a similar risk of OHSS as the full dose of hCG in highresponder patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Factors that may have an effect on euploidy rate of blastocysts have been investigated thoroughly in the literature. We aimed to assess whether dual trigger alters the ploidy chance of a blastocyst in preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a total of 385 PGT-A cycles at a single tertiary center for various indications. Final oocyte maturation was triggered using human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or the combination of hCG and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) (dual trigger). Participants were divided based on triggering method and all demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were compared. Final oocyte maturation was triggered in 143 cycles with hCG (37.1%), and in 242 cycles with dual trigger (62.9%). The duration of stimulation was shorter in the dual trigger arm compared to the hCG trigger group (10.0 ± 1.6 vs. 9.4 ± 1.4 days, p ≤.001). Euploidy rates per blastocyst tested were 23.4% and 26.1% respectively for hCG and dual trigger groups without significance. Similar rates of euploidy were noted, even after age stratification. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding positive pregnancy result and ongoing pregnancy rates (p =.779 vs. p =.188). Although dual triggering, compared to hCG triggering, does not provide an additional superiority on blastocyst euploidy rate, further studies in women with different infertility etiology are needed to specifically evaluate the impact of triggering method on ploidy rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Question: Is a dual ovulation trigger with a combination of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) and hCG superior to single hCG and/or single GnRHa trigger in improving treatment outcomes in advanced-age women (aged ≥ 35 years) undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment?Summary Answer: Co-administration of GnRHa and hCG as a dual trigger increases the number of good-quality embryos but it is not associated with a higher number of oocytes retrieved, compared with single hCG or GnRHa trigger.What Is Known Already: Many studies have demonstrated that a dual trigger has positive impact on oocyte maturation, retrieval rate and pregnancy rate without increasing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in some groups of IVF patients, when compared with single hCG trigger. Few studies have however been conducted to compare a dual trigger with a single GnRHa trigger, and insufficient evidence exists to support which trigger can achieve the best outcomes in IVF patients aged ≥35 years.Study Design, Size, Duration: This was an open-label randomized controlled trial of 510 participants conducted at single reproductive medical center from January 2019 to December 2021. After a sample size calculation performed by retrospectively analyzing our previous clinical data, we planned to recruit 170 patients in each group and 510 patients in total for the study.Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: Women aged ≥35 years undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment, receiving a non-pituitary down-regulation protocol, and with low risk of OHSS, were enrolled in this trial. On the trigger day, patients were randomized into three groups: hCG alone (who received 6000 IU of hCG), GnRHa alone (who received 0.2 mg of triptorelin) and dual trigger (who received 0.2 mg of triptorelin plus 2000 IU of hCG) groups. The primary outcome parameter was the number of retrieved oocytes. The secondary outcome parameters included, among others, the number and rates of mature oocytes, two pronuclei (2PN) embryos and good-quality embryos, as the rates of OHSS, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth.Main Results and the Role Of Chance: There were no significant differences in the baseline demographic characteristics among the three groups. The dual trigger was associated with a higher retrieval rate (87.9% vs 84.1% in the hCG group, P = 0.031; 87.9% vs 83.6% in the GnRHa group, P = 0.014). However, the number of retrieved oocytes in the dual trigger group was comparable with those in the hCG group (4.08 ± 2.79 vs 3.60 ± 2.71, P = 0.080) and the GnRHa group (4.08 ± 2.79 vs 3.81 ± 3.38, P = 0.101); comparable data between the groups were also found when analyzing the number of 2PN embryos and the 2PN rate. In the dual trigger group, the numbers of good-quality embryos and viable embryos were both significantly higher than in the hCG group (1.74 ± 1.90 vs 1.19 ± 1.45, P = 0.016 and 2.19 ± 2.11 vs 1.56 ± 1.66, P = 0.008, respectively) and the GnRHa group (1.74 ± 1.90 vs 1.20 ± 1.67, P = 0.003 and 2.19 ± 2.11 vs 1.45 ± 1.75, P = 0.001, respectively). Pregnancy outcomes after fresh embryo transfer (ET) were comparable between the groups. The live birth rate and ongoing pregnancy rate after frozen ET in the dual trigger group were significantly higher than those in the GnRHa group (32.6% vs 14.1%, P = 0.007 and 34.8% vs 17.6%, P = 0.013, respectively), but not superior to those in the hCG group (32.6% vs 27.9%, P = 0.537 and 34.8% vs 27.9%, P = 0.358, respectively).Limitations, Reasons For Caution: Women of advanced age are quite a heterogeneous population and overlap with poor ovarian responders or patients with diminished ovarian reserve. We therefore could not entirely exclude selection biases or confounding factors. This study was also not a double-blinded trial; the patients in the GnRHa and dual trigger groups could have been affected by the placebo effect.Wider Implications Of the Findings: The results of this study suggest that in advanced-age women with low risk of OHSS, a dual trigger or even a single hCG trigger may be a better choice than a single GnRHa trigger.Study Funding/competing Interest(s): This study was supported by the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission of Science and Research Fund (20184Y0289). The authors declare no conflict of interest.Trial Registration Number: This trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-1800016285).Trial Registration Date: 24 May 2018.Date Of First Patient’s Enrolment: 2 January 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite a large number of studies on the selection of trigger drugs, it remains unclear whether the dual trigger with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, compared to the trigger with hCG alone, can improve the reproductive outcome of patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the laboratory and clinical outcomes of dual trigger versus single trigger.Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 520 in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles between July 2014 and September 2020 at the Reproductive and Genetic Center of Integrative Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All patients underwent IVF/ICSI treatment with fresh embryo transfer using the GnRH antagonist protocol. We used propensity score matching to control for confounding variables and binary logistic regression analysis to determine the correlations between trigger methods and pregnancy outcomes. After propensity score matching, 57 cycles from each group were evaluated and compared for laboratory or clinical outcomes in this retrospective cohort study.Results: There was no significant difference in the number of oocytes retrieved, embryos available, top-quality embryos, or the rate of normal fertilization between the dual-trigger and single-trigger protocols, respectively. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, and live birth rate were also similar between the two groups, while the miscarriage rate (37.0% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.045) was higher in the dual-trigger than the single-trigger group. Subsequent binary logistic regression analysis showed that age was a remarkably significant independent predictor of both clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.84-0.97, p = 0.006) and live birth rate (odds ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.97, p = 0.005).Conclusions: Therefore, dual-trigger for final oocyte maturation might increase miscarriage rate, but in terms of the laboratory and other pregnancy outcomes such as clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate or live birth rate, there was no evidence to show that dual trigger was superior to an hCG-trigger alone for patients undergoing GnRH-antagonist cycles with fresh embryo transfer.Trial Registration: Retrospectively registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The study aimed to evaluate the impact of the dual trigger with the combination of GnRH agonist and standard dose of recombinant hCG on IVF outcomes in poor ovarian responders with GnRH antagonist protocol. 1283 cycles of 1010 poor responder patients according to Bologna criteria were retrospectively analysed in terms of final oocyte maturation: dual trigger group (250 μg hCG + 0.2 mg triptorelin) or standard group (250 μg hCG). Primary outcome measures were the number of retrieved and mature oocytes. The secondary outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates. The number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, and the top-quality embryos transferred were significantly higher in the dual trigger group (p <.001). Fertilisation rates (73.6% vs 69.6%, p =.009), implantation rates (18.7% vs 14.6, p =.039), clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer (27.5% vs. 19.9%, p =.010) and live birth rate per embryo transfer (21.6% vs. 14.9%, p =.011) were also significantly higher in the dual trigger group as compared to the hCG trigger group. The usage of dual trigger with a GnRH agonist and a standard dosage of hCG could improve clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates in poor ovarian responders undergoing GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles. What is already known on this subject? Dual trigger with standard dose of hCG has been the subject of trials in normal responders to optimise IVF outcomes. The results of these studies showed significant improvements in implantation and pregnancy rates with an increase in the number of mature oocytes retrieved. As a result, dual trigger has become a popular ovulation trigger option in GnRH antagonist cycles. What do the results of this study add? There is limited data about the use of dual trigger in poor ovarian responders (PORs). According to our study, increasing the number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, the number of fertilised oocytes, the number of transferred embryos and top quality embryos transferred by using dual trigger in patients with PORs have a positive impact on pregnancy outcomes. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings implies potential advantages of dual trigger usage for improving IVF outcomes in PORs. With large sample sized prospective randomised trials, dual trigger with combination of GnRHa and a standard dose of hCG might replace the traditional ovulation trigger with hCG in PORs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To study and compare the effectiveness of dual trigger with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and low dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for final oocyte maturation versus human chorionic gonadotropin trigger for improving clinical outcomes in GnRH Antagonist IVF-ICSI Cycles in normal responder patients. Materials and Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted at a tertiary care infertility centre. Eighty (80) normoresponders who were to undergo IVF-ICSI cycles were included in the study. Patients in both groups underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation using GnRH antagonist protocoI. Group 1/Study (n = 40) patients were given Inj Leuprolide acetate and low dose highly purified injection hCG. Group 2/control group received standard dose of highly purified injection hCG. Day 3 fresh embryo transfers were performed. Primary outcome measured was clinical pregnancy rate and secondary outcomes measured were: implantation rate, miscarriage rate, number of MII oocytes, number of embryos formed, risk of OHSS. Results: In group 1 the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate were higher than in group 2, 52.50% vs 47.50% and 29.67% vs 26.08% but the difference was not statistically significant. There were significantly higher number of MII oocytes retrieved (10.63±5.46 Vz 8.10±5.74) and higher number of embryos formed (8.2±3.4 Vz 6.8±3.6) in group1 than in group 2. Conclusion: Though there was increased clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate in dual trigger group but it was not statistically significant. There was significant increase in MII oocytes and number of embryos formed in the dual trigger group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The major limitations associated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) triggering are inferior clinical outcomes in fresh embryo transfer cycles caused by luteal phase insufficiency following the GnRHa triggering. We included 153 high-risk patients in this study. In group I, the patients received gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger + 1,500 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) support on the oocyte pick-up (OPU) day; in group II, the patients had a dual trigger (GnRHa + 1,500 IU hCG); and in group III (control), 10,000 IU hCG trigger was prescribed for the final oocyte maturation. The levels of LH, estradiol, and progesterone were evaluated in serum on the stimulation starting day, day 6 of stimulation, on the day of the trigger administration, OPU day, days 3 and 5 post-OPU, and day 14 post-ET, as well as in follicular fluid. Progesterone concentration was significantly lower in group I on OPU+5 compared to the hCG group (I vs. III, р = 0.0065). Progesterone levels were significantly lower in group II in serum on OPU+5 compared to groups I and III (I vs. II, р = 0.0068; II vs. III, р = 1.76 × 108). The progesterone levels were significantly higher in follicular fluid in group III compared to the study groups (I vs. III, р = 0.002; II vs. III, p = 0.009). However, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were found between the groups. Then, we divided all women into pregnant and non-pregnant groups and found that estradiol (p = 0.00009) and progesterone (p = 0.000036) on the day of the pregnancy test were significantly higher in the pregnant women group. Also, progesterone on OPU day was significantly higher in the non-pregnant group (p = 0.033). Two cases of moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) late-onset occurred in group I (3.5%, 2/56), no case of moderate/severe OHSS late-onset in group II, and three cases of moderate late-onset in group III (5.7%, 3/53). The low-dose hCG supplementation improves the luteal phase insufficiency after GnRHa triggering, which is confirmed by the comparable pregnancy rates in fresh transfer cycles between the groups. However, low-dose hCG carries a similar risk of OHSS as the full dose of hCG in high-responder patients.

Abstract Background Traditionally, final follicular maturation is triggered by a single bolus of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). This acts as a surrogate to the naturally occurring luteinizing hormone (LH) surge to induce luteinization of the granulosa cells, resumption of meiosis and final oocyte maturation. More recently, a bolus of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist in combination with hCG (dual trigger) has been suggested as an alternative regimen to achieve final follicular maturation. Methods This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating the effect of dual trigger versus hCG trigger for follicular maturation on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR) per started cycle. Results A total of 1048 participants were included in the analysis, with 519 in the dual trigger group and 529 in the hCG trigger group. Dual trigger treatment was associated with a significantly higher LBR per started cycle compared with the hCG trigger treatment (risk ratio (RR) = 1.37 [1.07, 1.76], I2 = 0%, moderate evidence). There was a trend towards an increase in both ongoing pregnancy rate (RR = 1.34 [0.96, 1.89], I2 = 0%, low evidence) and implantation rate (RR = 1.31 [0.90, 1.91], I2 = 76%, low evidence) with dual trigger treatment compared with hCG trigger treatment. Dual trigger treatment was associated with a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rate (RR = 1.29 [1.10, 1.52], I2 = 13%, low evidence), number of oocytes collected (mean difference (MD) = 1.52 [0.59, 2.46), I2 = 53%, low evidence), number of mature oocytes collected (MD = 1.01 [0.43, 1.58], I2 = 18%, low evidence), number of fertilized oocytes (MD = 0.73 [0.16, 1.30], I2 = 7%, low evidence) and significantly more usable embryos (MD = 0.90 [0.42, 1.38], I2 = 0%, low evidence). Conclusion Dual trigger treatment with GnRH agonist and HCG is associated with an increased live birth rate compared with conventional hCG trigger. Trial registration CRD42020204452 .

Introduction: The choice of trigger drug for the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol correlates with the outcome of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET). The co-administration of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), i.e., dual trigger, for final oocyte maturation, has received much attention in recent years. This trial was designed to determine whether a dual trigger approach by lengthening the time between trigger and ovum pick-up (OPU) improves the quantity and quality of mature oocytes/top-quality embryos and pregnancy outcomes in expected normal responders with a high immature oocyte rate. Methods and Analysis: We propose a study at the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Chinese Medicine. A total of 90 individuals undergoing COH use a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol. They will be assigned randomly into two groups according to the trigger method and timing: recombinant hCG (6500 IU) will be injected only 36 hours before OPU for final oocyte maturation (hCG-only trigger); co-administration of GnRH-a and hCG for final oocyte maturation, 40 and 34 hours prior to OPU, respectively (Dual trigger). The primary outcome is metaphase-II (MII) oocytes rate. Secondary outcomes are number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, top-quality embryos rate, blastula formation rate, embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate, cumulative pregnancy/live birth rates, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate. Ethics and Dissemination: The reproductive ethics committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine certified this study (Identifier: SDUTCM/2021.7.26) as ethical. All individuals will sign written informed consent. All data and biological samples will be protected according to law. The results of this study will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Clinical Trial Registration: [chictr.gov.cn], identifier [ChiCTR2100049292]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poor ovarian responders (PORs) pose a great challenge for fertility clinics worldwide. The aim of this study was to examine whether 'dual trigger' consisting of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) is beneficial or not regarding implantation rate, pregnancy rate, and live birth rate for POR. This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Risk of bias was evaluated by the Newcastle–Ottawa scale or version 2 (NOS) of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (ROB2) independently by two authors. Furthermore, RevMan version 5.4 was used to analyze the extracted data and to create an inverse-weighted summary-odds ratio (OR). A total of 1390 studies were screened. Seven studies containing a total of 2474 POR were included. The pooled meta-analysis revealed a 1.62-fold increase in clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.62 [1.00, 2.62], p =.05) and a 2.65-fold increase in live birth rate (OR = 2.65 [1.66, 4.24], p <.0001) in the dual trigger group compared to hCG trigger. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups regarding implantation rate (OR = 1.14 [0.93, 1.39], p =.21). The meta-analysis of this study indicates that dual trigger as finale oocyte maturation is advantageous compared to hCG trigger among POR. However, large-scale, high-quality, randomized controlled trials (RCT) are required to confirm this conclusion and fully address the magnitude of this effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effect of coadministration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) trigger (dual trigger) in high responders for fresh autologous cycles in order to investigate the pregnancy outcomes and rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in comparison to GnRH-a trigger alone. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE from inception through February 2020. The included materials were case-control, cohort and, cross-sectional studies as well as clinical trials in which the outcomes of dual trigger with GnRH-a were compared for final oocyte maturation in high responders undergoing GnRH-ant cycles. Results: Five retrospective studies were included for this review. Three of the studies showed that the use of dual trigger versus GnRH-a trigger resulted in no statistically significant difference in rates of OHSS while achieving a statistically significant difference in favor of the dual trigger group in ongoing pregnancy rates, early pregnancy loss, and fertilization rates. Conclusion: Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support improved clinical pregnancy rate, fertilization rate, live birth rate, and early pregnancy loss rate by the use of dual trigger versus GnRH-a trigger. Larger double-blind clinical studies are required to properly evaluate the efficacy of this protocol for use in high responders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine the optimal maturation method to increase the yield of mature oocytes, especially for cancer patients with fewer chances of fertility preservation (FP) before gonadotoxic therapy. Methods: A total of 373 cycles in 293 patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for FP using a gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol were enrolled. The control group (n = 225) received 250 µg of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (rhCG) while the study group (n = 148) received 250 µg of rhCG and 0.2 mg of triptorelin for triggering. Subgroup analyses were performed for stimulation cycles with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR; anti‐Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels <1.1 ng/ml, n = 86), with endometrioma (n = 104), or with breast cancer and endometrial cancer using 5 mg of letrozole during the COS cycles (n = 84). Results: There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics or the number of total and mature oocytes between the two groups. Subgroup analyses for women with endometrioma or DOR showed similar results. However, the dual trigger group had a significantly higher number of mature oocytes than the rhCG trigger group in breast and endometrial cancer patients using letrozole during the COS cycles (6.9 ± 6.0 vs. 4.6 ± 3.6, p = 0.034). The maturation rate was higher in the dual trigger group, although the difference was not statistically significant (59.3 ± 26.7 vs. 50.0 ± 28.0, p = 0.124). Conclusions: Dual triggering can be an efficient maturation method to maximize the yield of mature oocytes in breast or endometrial cancer patients using letrozole‐combined GnRH antagonist protocol for FP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) has been used for years for oocyte maturation in IVF cycles, however, with the risk of a few complications like ovarian hyperstimulation. The introduction of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist along with hCG as a dual trigger has helped to reduce the incidence of such complications. Aims: The study aims to compare the outcomes of IVF cycles in hCG versus hCG plus GnRH (dual trigger). Settings and Design: Retrospective center-based study. Materials and Methods: Retrospective center-based study to compare the effect of hCG and dual trigger on the cycle outcomes in normal responders. Statistics: Data analysis was done using ClinCalc online calculator through chi-square test, two-independent t test. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: The number of oocytes and clinical pregnancy rates was higher in the dual trigger group. A higher number of top quality embryos were formed in the dual trigger group with statistical significance. Conclusions: Dual trigger can help to improve the outcomes of IVF in normal responders too. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionThe choice of trigger drug for the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol correlates with the outcome of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET). The co-administration of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), i.e., dual trigger, for final oocyte maturation, has received much attention in recent years. This trial was designed to determine whether a dual trigger approach by lengthening the time between trigger and ovum pick-up (OPU) improves the quantity and quality of mature oocytes/top-quality embryos and pregnancy outcomes in expected normal responders with a high immature oocyte rate.Methods and AnalysisWe propose a study at the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Chinese Medicine. A total of 90 individuals undergoing COH use a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol. They will be assigned randomly into two groups according to the trigger method and timing: recombinant hCG (6500 IU) will be injected only 36 hours before OPU for final oocyte maturation (hCG-only trigger); co-administration of GnRH-a and hCG for final oocyte maturation, 40 and 34 hours prior to OPU, respectively (Dual trigger). The primary outcome is metaphase-II (MII) oocytes rate. Secondary outcomes are number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, top-quality embryos rate, blastula formation rate, embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate, cumulative pregnancy/live birth rates, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate.Ethics and DisseminationThe reproductive ethics committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine certified this study (Identifier: SDUTCM/2021.7.26) as ethical. All individuals will sign written informed consent. All data and biological samples will be protected according to law. The results of this study will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.Clinical Trial Registration[chictr.gov.cn], identifier [ChiCTR2100049292].

Abstract Purpose To determine the optimal maturation method to increase the yield of mature oocytes, especially for cancer patients with fewer chances of fertility preservation (FP) before gonadotoxic therapy. Methods A total of 373 cycles in 293 patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for FP using a gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol were enrolled. The control group (n = 225) received 250 µg of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (rhCG) while the study group (n = 148) received 250 µg of rhCG and 0.2 mg of triptorelin for triggering. Subgroup analyses were performed for stimulation cycles with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR; anti‐Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels

Introduction: This study compared, in high responders undergoing IVF treatment, GnRH agonist-only trigger and dual trigger on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative live birth rate (LBR). The aim was to determine if the GnRH agonist-only triggers had provided outcomes comparable to dual trigger, while minimizing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)., Materials and Methods: A retrospective, matched case-control study was conducted at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, including women who underwent IVF/ICSI between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022. Inclusion criteria were: GnRH antagonist protocol and estrogen level >3,000 pg/ml on trigger day. Exclusion criteria were: immune/metabolic diseases, donated oocytes, and mixed stimulation cycles. Propensity score matching was applied to balance age, AMH level, and oocyte number between the GnRH agonist-only and dual trigger groups. Outcomes were analyzed for patients who had complete treatment cycles, focusing on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative LBR., Results: We analyzed 116 cycles in the agonist-only group, and 232 cycles in the dual trigger group. No inter-group difference was found in their age, BMI, and AMH levels. The dual trigger group had a higher oocyte retrieval rate (93% vs. 80%; p <0.05), while fertilization rates, blastocyst formation rates, and cumulative LBR were comparable. Notably, no OHSS cases had been reported in the GnRH agonist-only group, compared with 7 cases in the dual trigger group., Conclusion: GnRH agonist-only triggers resulted in a lower oocyte retrieval rate compared to dual triggers but did not significantly affect cumulative LBR in high responders. This approach effectively reduces OHSS risk without compromising pregnancy outcomes, making it a preferable option in freeze-all strategies, despite a longer oocyte pick-up duration and a medium cost. GnRH agonist-only trigger, however, may not be suitable for fresh embryo transfers or patients with low serum LH levels on trigger day., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wang, Yi, Guu, Chen, Kung, Chang, Chen, Chuan and Chen.)

Copyright of Turkish Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: This study compared outcomes of the standard 6000 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger with a dual trigger comprised of 6000 IU hCG and 1 mg leuprolide acetate for final oocyte maturation in an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle. By convention, ICSI was performed in most cases at the clinic. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 50 women were included in each arm. Participants were matched for age, indication and number of prior assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles. Women at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were excluded. A flexible gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol was used and final oocyte maturation was triggered when two leading follicles were >17 mm. Distribution of variables was evaluated visually with histograms. Continuous variables were defined by mean (standard deviation) or median (25th-75th percentile) depending on distribution characteristics. Categorical variables were defined by numbers and percentages. Continuous variables were compared between the groups with the t test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared by the chi-square test and its derivatives as appropriate. A two-sided P<0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results: Both groups had similar antral follicle counts, median parity (0) and number of previous failed cycles (0). The median number of oocytes (8 vs. 7), metaphase-two oocytes (6 vs. 5.5), blastocysts (1 vs. 1), clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) (28% vs. 22%), ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) (22% vs. 20%) and pregnancy rate per transfer (53.3% vs 53.8%) were similar between the dual trigger and hCG only groups, respectively. Conclusion: Dual trigger for oocyte maturation stimulation failed to improve the ICSI outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study QuestionDoes dual trigger in freeze-all in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles improve the cumulative live-birth outcome compared with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger?Summary AnswerDual trigger for final follicular maturation improves the cumulative pregnancy and live-birth rates compared with hCG trigger in freeze-all IVF/ICSI cycles.What Is Known AlreadyDual trigger could increase the numbers of oocytes and mature oocytes and improve pregnancy rates.Study Design, Size, DurationThis retrospective cohort analysis included data from 4438 freeze-all IVF/ICSI cycles between January 2012 and December 2017.Participants/Materials, Setting, MethodsWomen aged 20−49 years who underwent ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval for autologous IVF/ICSI with a freeze-all policy in our centre were enrolled. Data on number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature oocytes, clinical pregnancy rate, live-birth rate, cumulative pregnancy rate, and cumulative live-birth rate (CLBR) were assessed and compared between patients who underwent a dual trigger and hCG trigger. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify and adjust for factors known to independently affect the CLBR.Main Results and the Role of ChanceA total of 4438 IVF/ICSI cycles were analyzed, including 1445 cycles with single hCG trigger and 2993 cycles with dual trigger. The cumulative biochemical pregnancy rate (60.8% vs. 68.1%, P

Objectives: To evaluates the effect of different modes of final follicular maturation triggering on the degree of apoptosis of granulosa cells (GCs) and the potential effect on progesterone secretion. Methods: Thirty patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF who received hCG, GnRH agonist, or dual trigger for final follicular maturation were included in the study. Granulosa cells were obtained at the time of oocyte retrieval. The proportion of apoptotic cells was evaluated via TUNEL and immunohistochemistry. Results: The proportion of apoptotic cells was significantly higher in the GnRH agonist–alone group compared to hCG-alone and the dual trigger groups (13.5 ± 1.5% vs. 7.8% ± 1.8 vs. 10.1% ± 2, respectively, P < 0.01). Moreover, the expression of active-caspase-3 was also significantly increased in the GnRH agonist–alone group compared with the hCG-alone and the dual trigger groups (15.5% ± 2.9 vs. 8.4% ± 1.6 vs. 12.7% ± 2.6, respectively, P < 0.01). The progesterone levels measured in the granulosa-luteal cell culture medium after 24 h of incubation were similar between the three groups. Conclusions: The levels of apoptosis are increased after GnRH agonist/dual trigger. The increased apoptosis might be one of the culprit of the subsequent premature demise of the corpus luteum post GnRH agonist trigger. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Question: Does dual trigger in freeze-all in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles improve the cumulative live-birth outcome compared with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger? Summary Answer: Dual trigger for final follicular maturation improves the cumulative pregnancy and live-birth rates compared with hCG trigger in freeze-all IVF/ICSI cycles. What Is Known Already: Dual trigger could increase the numbers of oocytes and mature oocytes and improve pregnancy rates. Study Design, Size, Duration: This retrospective cohort analysis included data from 4438 freeze-all IVF/ICSI cycles between January 2012 and December 2017. Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods: Women aged 20−49 years who underwent ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval for autologous IVF/ICSI with a freeze-all policy in our centre were enrolled. Data on number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature oocytes, clinical pregnancy rate, live-birth rate, cumulative pregnancy rate, and cumulative live-birth rate (CLBR) were assessed and compared between patients who underwent a dual trigger and hCG trigger. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify and adjust for factors known to independently affect the CLBR. Main Results and the Role of Chance: A total of 4438 IVF/ICSI cycles were analyzed, including 1445 cycles with single hCG trigger and 2993 cycles with dual trigger. The cumulative biochemical pregnancy rate (60.8% vs. 68.1%, P<0.001; odds ratio (OR): 0.727; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.638–0.828), cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (52.9% vs. 58.5%, P<0.001; OR: 0.796; 95%CI: 0.701–0.903), and CLBR (44.3% vs. 50.5%, P<0.001; OR: 0.781; 95%CI: 0.688–10.886) were all significantly lower in the hCG-trigger group compared with the dual-trigger group. The clinical pregnancy rate (48.2% vs. 58.2%, P=0.002; OR: 0.829; 95%CI: 0.737–0.934) and embryo implantation rate (34.4% vs. 38.9%, P<0.001; OR: 0.823; 95%CI: 0.750–0.903) in each transfer cycle were also significantly lower in the hCG-trigger group compared with the dual-trigger group. After controlling for all potential confounding variables, the trigger method was identified as an independent factor affecting the CLBR. The OR and 95%CI for hCG trigger were 0.780 and 0.641–0.949 (P=0.013). Limitations, Reasons for Caution: The data used to analyse the effect of dual trigger on cumulative pregnancy and live-birth outcomes were retrospective, and the results may thus have been subject to inherent biases. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are required to verify the beneficial effects of dual trigger. Wider Implications of the Findings: Dual trigger had a positive effect on CLBRs, suggesting that it could be used as a routine trigger method in freeze-all cycles. Study Funding/Competing Interest(s): This study was supported by grants from National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1004800), the Natural Science Program of Zhejiang (LY19H040009), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81601236). No authors have competing interests to declare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the in vitro fertilization treatment, human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) is routinely used as a substitute for the natural endogenous LH surge during the final stage of oocyte maturation. However, it does not provide the FSH surge observed in the mid-cycle of the natural cycle. To date, whether the FSH surge can improve oocyte quality and pregnancy outcomes remains unknown. Randomized controlled trials comparing the following four trigger methods to conventional hCG were examined: GnRH agonist (GnRHa), kisspeptin, GnRHa plus hCG (dual trigger), and FSH plus hCG (FSH co-trigger). The results showed that the use of dual triggers was associated with a significantly higher number of retrieved cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.625, 95% CI 0.684-2.565), retrieved mature oocytes (WMD 0.986, 95% CI 0.426-1.545) and fertilized (2PN) oocytes (WMD 0.792, 95% CI 0.083-1.501), compared with the use of hCG. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of pregnancy rate. The FSH co-trigger resulted in significantly higher rates of 2PN oocytes retrieved than the hCG trigger (WMD 0.077, 95% CI 0.028-0.126). Notably, the risk of OHSS did not differ among the three treatment groups compared to that of the hCG group. This review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42020194201). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome remains a serious complication during in vitro fertilization cycles if high dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is used to trigger ovulation in high responder patients. Though much of this risk is mitigated with trigger using gonadotropin releasing-hormone (GnRH) agonist alone, it may result in lower birth rates. GnRH-agonist trigger and adjuvant low dose hCG has been proposed to improve birth rates, but timing of this hCG support to corpus luteum function has never been fully described. In this randomized, prospective trial, we explore differences in live birth rates and incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high-responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) receiving low dose hCG at the time of GnRH-agonist (dual trigger) or hCG adjuvant at the time of oocyte retrieval. Does the timing of hCG support make a difference? Results Thirty-four subjects high-responder patients were randomized to receive low-dose hCG at the time of GnRH-agonist trigger (Group 1) and 37 received low-dose hCG at the time of oocyte retrieval (Group 2). There were no differences in the baseline characteristics and outcome of ovarian stimulation between the two groups. There were no differences in the live birth rates between Group 1 and Group 2 by intention-to-treat (14/34, 41.2% versus 21/37, 56.8%, p = 0.19) or per-protocol (14/26, 53.8% versus 19/31, 61.3%, p = 0.57) analyses. There was a slightly higher incidence of OHSS in Group 2 compared to Group 1 although the difference was not statistically significant (3/31, 9.7% versus 1/26, 3.8%). All the cases of OHSS in Group 2 were moderate while the one case of OHSS in Group 1 was mild. Conclusions For high responder patients receiving GnRH-agonist trigger, low dose hCG supplementation allowed high pregnancy rates after fresh embryo transfer, regardless of whether it was given at the time of trigger or at oocyte retrieval. Dual trigger may be preferable to reduce the risk of OHSS.

Abstract Background Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) remains one of the greatest obstacles affecting the chance of a successful live birth after fertility treatment. The present study was set to investigate whether using a “dual trigger” consisted of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) plus gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) for final oocyte maturation could improve the IVF cycle outcomes for patients with diminished ovarian reserve. Methods A total of 427 completed GnRH-antagonist downregulated IVF cycles with fresh embryo transfer (ET) were included in this retrospective analysis. DOR was defined as antral follicle count ≤5 and serum anti-Müllerian hormone level ≤ 1.1 ng/mL. The control group (n = 130) used a 6500 IU of recombinant hCG for trigger, and the study group (n = 297) used 0.2 mg of triptorelin plus 6500 IU of recombinant hCG for trigger. Results The dual-trigger group had significantly higher oocyte fertilization rate (73.1% vs. 58.6%), clinical pregnancy rate (33.0% vs. 20.7%) and live birth rate (26.9% vs. 14.5%) when compared to the hCG trigger group. In addition, the abortion rate (17.4% vs. 37.0%) and embryo transfer cancellation rate (6.1% vs. 15.4%) were both significantly lower in the dual trigger group. The primary outcome measure was the live birth rate per oocyte retrieval cycle. Secondary outcome measures were embryo transfer cancellation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, chemical pregnancy rate and abortion rate per oocyte retrieval cycle. Conclusions Dual triggering the final oocyte maturation with GnRH-a and standard dose of hCG can significantly improve the live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and fertilization rate in women with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing GnRH antagonist down-regulated IVF-ICSI cycles.

“Dual triggering” for final oocyte maturation using a combination of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) can improve clinical outcomes in high responders during in vitro fertilization–intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF–ICSI) GnRH-antagonist cycles. However, whether this dual trigger is also beneficial to normal responders is not known. We retrospectively analyzed the data generated from 469 normal responders from 1 January to 31 December 2017. The final oocyte maturation was undertaken with a dual trigger with a GnRHa combined with hCG (n = 270) or hCG alone (n = 199). Patients were followed up for 3 years. The cumulative live-birth rate was calculated as the first live birth achieved after all cycles having an embryo transfer (cycles using fresh embryos and frozen–thawed embryos) among both groups. Women in the dual-trigger group achieved a slightly higher number of oocytes retrieved (11.24 vs. 10.24), higher number of two-pronuclear (2PN) embryos (8.37 vs. 7.67) and a higher number of embryos available (4.45 vs. 4.03). However, the cumulative live-birth rate and the all-inclusive success rate for assisted reproductive technology was similar between the two groups (54.07 vs. 59.30%). We showed that a dual trigger was not superior to a hCG-alone trigger for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles in terms of the cumulative live-birth rate.

Problem: Interleukin 8 (IL‐8), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), its receptors 1 (VEGFR1) and 2 (VEGFR2) are associated with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) pathophysiological mechanisms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concentrations of these cytokines depending on the way of ovulation triggering. Method of Study: A total of 51 high‐responder patients underwent IVF program and received gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) trigger + 1500 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) support on the oocyte pick‐up (OPU) day (group I), dual trigger (GnRHa + 1500 IU hCG; group II), or hCG trigger 10,000 IU (group III) for the final oocyte maturation. The concentrations of cytokines were evaluated in serum by the enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay kit. Result(s): VEGFR2 levels were significantly lower in groups I and II than in group III in serum on the OPU (I vs. III, p =.0456; II vs. III, p =.0122) and OPU + 5 day (I vs. III, p =.0004; II vs. III, p =.0082). VEGFA levels were lower in group I than in group III (p =.0298) on the OPU day, however, were similar in all groups on the OPU + 5 day. Conclusion(s): A small dose of hCG elicits similar concentrations of VEGFA to a full dose of hCG; however, GnRHa triggering reduces the concentrations of VEGFR2, which could lead to the OHSS prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]