Search

Abstract: The level of frailty, according to the International Myeloma Working Group frailty index, is highly dynamic during antimyeloma treatment. Dynamic frailty assessment improved the prediction of survival and early mortality compared with the prognostic value of static frailty level at baseline., (© 2025 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Purpose: Frail patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma have an inferior outcome, mainly because of a high discontinuation rate due to toxicity. We designed a phase II trial specifically for frail patients, evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of ixazomib-daratumumab-low-dose-dexamethasone (Ixa-Dara-dex)., Methods: Sixty-five patients, who were frail according to the International Myeloma Working Group frailty index, were treated with nine induction cycles Ixa-Dara-dex followed by maintenance with Ixa-Dara for a maximum of 2 years., Results: The overall response rate on induction therapy was 78%. After a median follow-up of 22.9 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.8 months and 12-month overall survival (OS) was 78%. Median PFS and 12-month OS were 21.6 months and 92% in patients who were frail based on age > 80 years alone, versus 13.8 months and 78%, and 10.1 months and 70% in patients who were frail based on additional frailty parameters either ≤ 80 or > 80 years of age, respectively. In 51% of patients, induction therapy had to be discontinued prematurely, of which 6% because of noncompliance to study treatment, 9% because of toxicity, and 9% because of death (8% within 2 months, of which 80% because of toxicity). Quality of life improved during induction treatment, being clinically meaningful already after three induction cycles., Conclusion: Ixa-Dara-dex lead to a high response rate and improved quality of life. However, treatment discontinuation because of toxicity and early mortality, negatively influencing PFS and OS, remains a concern in frail patients. The outcome was heterogeneous across frail subpopulations. This should be taken into account in the design and interpretation of future studies in frail patients, to pave the way for more precise treatment guidance., Competing Interests: Ellen van der SpekOther Relationship: Amgen Alain KentosConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Sanofi, Janssen-Cilag Niels W. C. J. van de DonkConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, Servier, Takeda, BayerSpeakers' Bureau: Janssen Research & Development, Celgene, Amgen, Bristol Myers SquibbResearch Funding: Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cellectis Esther G. M. de WaalSpeakers' Bureau: CelgeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Marie-Christiane VekemansConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, TakedaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Teva, Janssen Gert Jan TimmersConsulting or Advisory Role: Daiichi Sankyo Ned, Janssen-CilagSpeakers' Bureau: Novartis, ServierTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Gilead Sciences Paul A. F. GeertsHonoraria: SanofiConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen-Cilag Inger S. NijhofConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb Pieter SonneveldConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, CARsgen TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Janssen, Amgen, Skyline Diagnostics Mark-David LevinHonoraria: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, TakedaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, Janssen Sonja ZweegmanConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, Celgene, Sanofi, OncopeptidesResearch Funding: Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, CelgeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, CelgeneNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.