Search

Objective: To assess the safety and tolerability of ultra-low dose estradiol and dydrogesterone (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg) among postmenopausal women. Methods: This pooled analysis of data from three clinical studies assessed the effects of continuous combined ultra-low-dose estradiol and dydrogesterone among postmenopausal women. Participants received E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 13 weeks (double-blind, randomized, European study), E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 12 weeks (double-blind, randomized, Chinese study), or E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg for 52 weeks (open-label, European study). Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs), treatment discontinuation due to a TEAE, and adverse events of special interest (AESIs). Results: Overall, 1027 women were included in the pooled analysis (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg, n  = 736; placebo, n  = 291). Mean treatment exposure was 288.9 days in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg group and 86.6 days in the placebo group. The proportion of women experiencing ≥1 TEAE was similar in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg and placebo groups (50.1% vs 49.5%, respectively). TESAEs occurred in 12 (1.6%) women receiving E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg and 9 (3.1%) women receiving placebo. Discontinuation of study treatment was infrequent in both groups (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg: 1.5%; placebo: 2.4%). The occurrence of breast pain was more common in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg group than in the placebo group (2.0% vs 0.3%) as was uterine hemorrhage (6.5% vs 2.4%). The incidence of acne, hypertrichoses and weight increased was similar between groups. Conclusions: Across three studies, ultra-low-dose estradiol plus dydrogesterone was well tolerated among postmenopausal women, with no increase in TEAEs or TESAEs compared with placebo.

Drug exposure during pregnancy lacks global fetal safety data. The maternal drug exposure birth cohort (DEBC) study, a prospective longitudinal investigation, aims to explore the correlation of maternal drug exposure during pregnancy with pregnancy outcomes, and establish a human biospecimen biobank. Here we describe the process of establishing DEBC and show that the drug exposure rate in the first trimester of pregnant women in DEBC (n = 112,986) is 30.70%. Among the drugs used, dydrogesterone and progesterone have the highest exposure rates, which are 11.97% and 10.82%, respectively. The overall incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes is 13.49%. Dydrogesterone exposure during the first trimester is correlated with higher incidences of stillbirth, preterm birth, low birth weight, and birth defects, along with a lower incidence of miscarriage/abortion. Due to the limitations of this cohort study, causative conclusions cannot be drawn. Further follow-up and in-depth data analysis are planned for future studies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To compare the effects and safety of dydrogesterone (DG) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) on the treatment in patients with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (EH). Methods: This was a single-center, open-label, prospective non-inferior randomized controlled phase Ⅲ trial. From February 2019 to November 2021, patients with EH admitted to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University were recruited. Enrolled patients were stratified according to the pathological types of simple hyperplasia (SH) or complex hyperplasia (CH), and were randomised to receive MPA or DG. Untill May 14, 2022, the median follow-up time after complete response (CR) was 9.3 months (1.1-17.2 months). The primary endpoint was the 6-month CR rate (6m-CR rate). The secondary endpoints included the 3-month CR rate (3m-CR rate), adverse events rate, recurrence rate, and pregnancy rate in one year after CR. Results: (1) A total of 292 patients with EH were enrolled in the study with the median age of 39 years (31-45 years). A total of 135 SH patients were randomly assigned to MPA group ( n =67) and DG group ( n =68), and 157 CH patients were randomly assigned to MPA group ( n =79) and DG group ( n =78). (2) Among 292 patients, 205 patients enrolled into the primary endpoint analysis, including 92 SH patients and 113 CH patients, with 100 patients in MPA group and 105 in DG group, respectively. The 6m-CR rate of MPA group and DG group were 90.0% (90/100) and 88.6% (93/105) respectively, and there were no statistical significance ( χ 2 =0.11, P =0.741), with the rate difference ( RD ) was -1.4% (95% CI :-9.9%-7.0%). Stratified by the pathology types, the 6m-CR rate of SH patients was 93.5% (86/92), and MPA group and DG group were respectively 91.1% (41/45) and 95.7% (45/47); and the 6m-CR rate of CH patients was 85.8% (97/113), and MPA group and DG group were 89.1% (49/55) and 82.8% (48/58) respectively. The 6m-CR rates of the two treatments had no statistical significance either (all P >0.05). A total of 194 EH patients enrolled into the secondary endpoint analysis, including 88 SH patients and 106 CH patients, and 96 patients in MPA group and 98 in DG group, respectively. The 3m-CR rate of SH patients were 87.5% (77/88), while the 3m-CR rates of MPA group and DG group were 90.7% (39/43) and 84.4% (38/45), respectively; the 3m-CR rate of CH patients was 66.0% (70/106), and MPA group and DG group had the same 3m-CR rate of 66.0% (35/53). No statistical significance was found between the two treatments both in SH and CH patients (all P >0.05). (3) The incidence of adverse events between MPA group and DG group had no statistical significance ( P >0.05). (4) A total of 93 SH patients achieved CR, and the cumulative recurrence rate in one year after CR were 5.9% and 0 in MPA group and DG group, respectively. While 112 CH patients achieved CR, and the cumulative recurrence rate in one year after CR were 8.8% and 6.5% in MPA group and DG group, respectively. There were no statistical significance between two treatment groups (all P >0.05). Among the 93 SH patients, 10 patients had family planning but no pregnancy happened during the follow-up period. Among the 112 CH patients, 21 were actively preparing for pregnancy, and the pregnancy rate and live-birth rate in one year after CR in MPA group were 7/9 and 2/7, while in DG group were respectively 4/12 and 2/4, and there were no statistical significance in pregnancy rate and live-birth rate between the two treatment groups (all P >0.05). Conclusions: Compared with MPA, DG is of good efficacy and safety in treating EH. DG is a favorable alternative treatment for EH patients.

No data support the suggestion that first-trimester dydrogesterone use increases the risk of fetal abnormalities; however, two low-quality retrospective studies (one retracted by the journal) have suggested such a link. A scoping review and meta-analysis were carried out to address this discrepancy. The literature was reviewed but it was not possible to identify any evidence of a plausible mechanism for potential causality between dydrogesterone and fetal abnormalities. To investigate whether any evidence existed, a preliminary meta-analysis was undertaken of clinical studies published since 2005 on first-trimester dydrogesterone use with assessment of fetal abnormalities. A fixed effects model was used to determine pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). From 83 articles identified, six randomized controlled trials were included. Pooled risk ratios (RR) for maternal dydrogesterone use and fetal abnormalities gave a RR approaching 1 (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.57, 1.62), confirming previous conclusions of no causal association between fetal abnormalities and first-trimester dydrogesterone use. Physicians, scientists and journal reviewers should exercise due diligence to prevent promulgation of retracted data. We are confident in using dydrogesterone, if indicated, in the treatment of threatened or recurrent miscarriage, and believe that its favourable safety profile should extend to its appropriate use in assisted reproductive technologies., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The objective of the study was to compare the live birth rate and miscarriage rate after fresh embryo transfer (Fresh ET) when patients are treated either with oral dydrogesterone or micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) as luteal phase support (LPS). The vaginal route is still preferred, despite the discomfort for the patients and recent RCTs showing similar results for dydrogesterone and MVP., Methods: All 556 consecutive Fresh ET after autologous IVF procedure, from December 2011 to March 2013 in one centre in France were included. Patients were treated either with dydrogesterone 10mg every 12hours (n=267) or MVP 200mg every 12hours (n=289), the physician's arbitrary choice on the day of the oocyte aspiration procedure., Results: The groups were comparable regarding the demographic data and stimulation protocols, except for the rank of the oocyte pickup procedure [1.54±0.80 vs. 1.74±0.96, (P=0.01)], with no significant difference in live birth rates (22.4% vs. 23.8%, P=0.77) and miscarriage rates (4.1% vs. 5.5%, P=0.55) for dydrogesterone vs. MVP respectively. The results were similar in a good prognosis patients' subgroup., Conclusions: LPS with either dydrogesterone or MVP after Fresh ET showed similar live birth rates and miscarriage rates. The benefits of the oral over vaginal route might be higher tolerance and possibly better compliance. Dydrogesterone seems to be a safe treatment, but its long-term innocuity needs to be further proven., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Objective: To provide an evidence-based safety and tolerability overview of dydrogesterone under various progesterone-deficient conditions as a commemoration of its role in managing women's reproductive health over the past 60 years., Methods: To identify relevant publications, we used a semi-systematic approach, which included performing a structured search through the PubMed and Cochrane central databases as well as an unstructured search for publications published in English from 2010 onward with human clinical data., Results: A total of 32 relevant clinical studies were identified. Results were reported in the context of overall adverse events (AEs) and segregated according to various progesterone-deficient conditions. AEs concerning breasts (breast cancer risk), the endometrium (endometrial cancer risk), venous thromboembolism risk, and cardiovascular risk were found to be minimal when dydrogesterone was used as part of a menopausal hormone therapy regimen lasting ≤260 weeks. Vagina-related AEs, such as bleeding, discharge, irritation, and difficult coitus, occurred less frequently with dydrogesterone when used as luteal phase support in the context of assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs). However, other common AEs, such as headache, dizziness, abdominal pain, flatulence, and nausea, occurred more frequently with dydrogesterone. No maternal complications or congenital anomalies could be linked to dydrogesterone usage during ARTs or during early pregnancy to prevent recurrent miscarriages. Studies on dydrogesterone in endometriosis and premenstrual syndrome remain scarce., Conclusions: Post-approval, dydrogesterone has displayed a favorable safety and tolerability profile during its 60-year use, which is reassuring, considering its important role in managing women's reproductive health.

The studyVinogradova Y, Coupland C, Hippisley-Cox J. Use of hormone replacement therapy and risk of breast cancer: nested case-control studies using the QResearch and CPRD databases. BMJ 2020;371:m3873. To read the full NIHR Alert, go to: https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/alert/risk-of-breast-cancer-with-hrt-depends-therapy-type-and-duration/., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The BMJ has judged that there are no disqualifying financial ties to commercial companies. The authors declare the following other interests: none. Further details of The BMJ policy on financial interests is here: https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/forms-policies-and-checklists/declaration-competing-interests, (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the use of micronized vaginal progesterone and oral dydrogesterone in the endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer., Methods: This was a randomized, controlled, open, two-armed clinical trial, with women undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer along with hormone replacement therapy for endometrial preparation, between September 2019 and February 2021. A total of 73 patients were randomly selected and orally administered 40 mg/day dydrogesterone (dydrogesterone group, n=36) or 800 mg/day micronized vaginal progesterone (micronized vaginal progesterone group, n=37), after endometrial preparation with transdermal estradiol. The main outcome was a viable ongoing pregnancy with 12 weeks of gestation as evaluated by ultrasound., Results: The reproductive outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles were similar, with pregnancy rates in the dydrogesterone and micronized vaginal progesterone treatment groups being, respectively, 33.3 and 32.4% at 12 weeks pregnancy (confidence interval= -22.4-20.6, p=0.196)., Conclusions: The use of oral dydrogesterone may be a more patient-friendly approach to endometrial preparation in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles, avoiding undesirable side effects and discomfort resulting from vaginal administration, while also providing similar reproductive results.

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is characterised by left ventricular apical ballooning, in the absence of coronary artery disease, and classically occurs at times of intense stress. Due to the striking preponderance of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy occurring in postmenopausal women, it has been postulated that female sex hormones may also be implicated in its pathogenesis. This case report describes the first case of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy associated with the initiation of dydrogesterone (a synthetic retroprogesterone) in a premenopausal woman., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is most common in ovulation dysfunction, which seriously compromises patients' health. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Mirena) plus hysteroscopy respectively in perimenopausal AUB. Sixty perimenopausal AUB patients treated with hysteroscopic electric resection in our hospital between January 2020 and December 2020 were enrolled and randomized to control group given dydrogesterone and study group treated with Mirena, with 30 cases in each group. The treatment efficacy, sex hormone level, hemoglobin (Hb) level, endometrial thickness and menstruation conditions were compared. The total efficacy was higher in the study group than that in the control group (P<0.05). The study group had lower follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol (E2) levels and higher Hb levels compared with those of the control group (all P<0.05). Thinner endometrial thickness, lower pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) scores and shorter duration of menstruation were observed in the study group (all P<0.05). Both Mirena and dydrogesterone enhance the clinical efficacy of hysteroscopic treatment of perimenopausal AUB patients, with the advantages of Mirena being more promising.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of oral dydrogesterone for luteal phase support (LPS) in modified natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfers (mNC-FET) compared to micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) gel., Methods: This was a randomized, single-center, parallel controlled trial conducted at an ART and Reproductive Genetics Centre within a private hospital between January and August 2019. A total of 134 women, aged below 38, were assigned randomly to receive oral dydrogesterone (n=67) or MVP (n=67) for LPS in mNC-FET. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) and secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates, patients' satisfaction and tolerability of oral and vaginal progesterone. A questionnaire was developed to compare patient satisfaction and side effect profiles., Results: There was no significant difference in demographic features such as female age, body mass index, AMH levels and fresh cycle characteristics between two groups (p>0.05). When mNC-FET outcomes were compared, OPR was 68.7 % in MVP gel group and 71.6 % in the dydrogesterone group respectively percentage difference, -2.99; 95 % CI: -17.96, 13.10) Biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates and biochemical and clinical miscarriage rates were also similar between two groups. A significantly higher patient tolerability score was present in the dydrogesterone arm (4.09 ± 0.96 vs 3.36 ± 1.23, p=0.001)., Conclusion: Our results suggest that oral dydrogesterone provides similar ongoing pregnancy rates compared to MVP gel as a LPS in mNC FET. Since dydrogesterone is an effective and easy-to-use option with fewer intolerable side effects including vaginal irritation, vaginal discharge, and preventing sexual intercourse, it can be used as LPS in mNC FET., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no declarations of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Preterm birth is a major challenge in obstetric and perinatal care. It is the leading cause of neonatal death. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of oral dydrogesterone on latency period in managing preterm labor. The secondary aims were to evaluate the gestational age at delivery, percentage of preterm delivery before 34 weeks and 37 weeks, time to recurrent uterine contraction, pregnancy outcomes, neonatal outcomes, compliance and side effects., Methods: This was a randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Forty-eight pregnant women with preterm labor, singleton pregnancy, and gestational age of 24-34 weeks were enrolled into the study. The study group received 10 mg of oral dydrogesterone three times per day and the control group received placebo. All pregnant women received standard treatment with tocolytic and antenatal corticosteroids., Results: The median latency periods were not significantly different between the dydrogesterone group (27.5 days) and placebo group (34 days, p = 0.45). Additionally, there were no differences in the gestational age at delivery, percentage of preterm delivery before 34 weeks and 37 weeks, pregnancy outcomes, neonatal outcomes, compliance and side effects. However, the time to the recurrence of uterine contractions in participants that had recurrent preterm labor was longer in the dydrogesterone group than in the placebo group (30.6 ± 12.3 vs 13.7 ± 5.0 days, p = 0.01)., Conclusions: Adjunctive treatment with 30 mg of oral dydrogesterone could not prolong latency period in preterm labor when compared to placebo., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Clinical trials registration: NCT03935152 , registered on May 2,2019).

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the evidence on the efficacy and safety of oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) for luteal phase support. Embase and MEDLINE were searched for studies that evaluated the effect of luteal phase support with daily administration of oral dydrogesterone (20 to 40 mg) versus MVP capsules (600 to 800 mg) or gel (90 mg) on pregnancy or live birth rates in women undergoing fresh-cycle IVF (protocol registered at PROSPERO [CRD42018105949]). Individual participant data (IPD) were extracted for the primary analysis where available and aggregate data were extracted for the secondary analysis. Nine studies were eligible for inclusion; two studies had suitable IPD (full analysis sample: n = 1957). In the meta-analysis of IPD, oral dydrogesterone was associated with a significantly higher chance of ongoing pregnancy at 12 weeks of gestation (odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 1.61; P = 0.0075) and live birth (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.57; P = 0.0214) compared to MVP. A meta-analysis combining IPD and aggregate data for all nine studies also demonstrated a statistically significant difference between oral dydrogesterone and MVP (pregnancy: OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.34; P = 0.04; live birth: OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.38; P = 0.02). Safety parameters were similar between the two groups. Collectively, this study indicates that a higher pregnancy rate and live birth rate may be obtained in women receiving oral dydrogesterone versus MVP for luteal phase support., Competing Interests: G.G.'s institution has received investigator fees from Abbott during the conduct of the Lotus I and Lotus II studies. Outside of this submitted work, G.G. has received nonfinancial support from MSD, Ferring, Merck Serono, IBSA, Finox, TEVA, Glycotope and Gedeon Richter, as well as personal fees from MSD, Ferring, Merck Serono, IBSA, Finox, TEVA, Glycotope, Vitrolife, NMC Healthcare, ReprodWissen, Biosilu, Gedeon Richter and ZIVA. C.B.’s institution has received investigator fees from Abbott during the conduct of the Lotus I and Lotus II studies. C.B. is the President of the Belgian Society of Reproductive Medicine (unpaid) and Section Editor of Reproductive BioMedicine Online. C.B. has received grants from Ferring, participated in an MSD-sponsored trial and has received consultancy fees from Ferring, MSD, BioMérieux, Abbott and Merck. E.K. is an employee of Abbott Laboratories GmbH, Hannover, Germany and owns shares of Abbott. C.P.-F. is an employee of Abbott GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden, Germany and owns shares in Abbott. J.I.O. is an employee of Abbott Products Operations AG, Allschwil, Switzerland. S.D. is an employee of Abbott Healthcare Products BV, Weesp, The Netherlands and owns shares in Abbott. H.T.'s institution has received investigator fees from Abbott during the conduct of the Lotus I and Lotus II studies. H.T.’s institution has received grants from Merck, MSD, Goodlife, Cook, Roche, CooperSurgical, Besins, Ferring and Allergan. H.T. has received consultancy fees from Gedeon Richter, Merck, Ferring, Abbott and ObsEva. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

BACKGROUND Drug-induced liver failure is a rare complication of pregnancy and occasionally requires liver transplantation. However, fulminant liver failure arising from in vitro fertilization (IVF) therapy involving progestogens (e.g. dydrogesterone) is extremely rare and has not been reported in pregnancy. Furthermore, dydrogesterone-mediated hepatic dysfunction has not previously necessitated liver transplantation and is usually conservatively managed. We report the first Australian case of a pregnant woman with delayed fulminant liver failure and in utero fetal death requiring a liver transplant from dydrogesterone use. CASE REPORT A 35-year-old multiparous (G₅P₂) woman presented with painless jaundice and transaminitis (alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase of 2800 U/L and 2990 U/L respectively). She was pregnant at 14 weeks' gestation after successful IVF in Thailand four months before involving dydrogesterone therapy. She was diagnosed with delayed, subfulminant liver failure arising from previous dydrogesterone use. Initially, she was not encephalopathic and conservative management strategies were instituted. Her hepatic dysfunction progressed and she deteriorated clinically with encephalopathy, necessitating an emergent liver transplantation. Fetal death was confirmed in utero four days before transplantation. A combined orthotopic liver transplant and hysterotomy with fetal evacuation were performed without complication. CONCLUSIONS Fulminant liver failure in pregnancy due to idiosyncratic drug reactions are rare. Dydrogesterone may cause significant, albeit delayed, liver dysfunction in pregnancy necessitating the need for liver transplantation. Early recognition of progressive liver failure despite best supportive care efforts should prompt early considerations for liver transplantation. Delays in liver transplantation with prolonged hyperbilirubinemia and coagulopathy may exacerbate fetal death in utero.

Dydrogesterone (DDG) is a synthetic progestin widely used in numerous gynecological diseases. DDG has been shown to disturb fish reproduction, however, the mechanism is still unclear. Here we studied the histological changes and differences of metabolome between exposed and control fish gonads after exposure of zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos to 2.8, 27.6, and 289.8 ng/L DDG until sexual maturity for a total of 140 days. Dydrogesterone exposure led to male-biased zebrafish sex ratios. Histological examination revealed that DDG induced postovulatory follicles and atretic follicles in the ovary of the female fish. Postovulatory follicles indicated the occurrence of ovulation. DDG also increased spermatids and spermatozoa in the male fish testis, suggesting promotion of spermatogenesis. Ovarian metabolome showed that DDG increased the concentrations of free amino acids, urea, putrescine, free fatty acids, acylcarnitines, lysophospholipids, and other metabolites catabolized from phospholipids. Most of these metabolites are biodegradation products of proteins and lipids, suggesting the existence of ovulated oocytes over-ripening. Further, DDG upregulated arachidonic acid (AA) and its 5‑lipoxygenase (5-LOX) metabolites 5‑oxo‑6,8,11,14‑eicosatetraenoic acid (5-oxo-ETE) in the ovary, which could lead to suppression of AA cyclooxygenase (COX) metabolite prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α). It is believed that AA induced oocyte maturation, while 5-oxo-ETE and related metabolites in purinergic signaling promoted ovulation. Whereas, the suppression of PGF2α production might block spawning and damaged follicular tissue digestion, which explained the oocytes over-ripening and atretic follicles in the treated ovary. Overall, our results suggested that DDG exposure induced zebrafish oocyte maturation and ovulation but led to oocytes over-ripening via the AA metabolic pathway and purinergic signaling., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Dydrogesterone is a retro-progesterone preparation widely used for over a half century. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dydrogesterone in Japanese women with dysmenorrhea., Methods: This study was conducted as an open-label, single-arm, multicenter study. One dydrogesterone 5-mg tablet (Duphaston) was administered orally twice daily for 21 days from the 5th to 25th day of each menstrual cycle. A total of 44 (safety analysis) and 31 patients (efficacy analysis) were enrolled. Total dysmenorrhea score, dysmenorrhea subscale scores, dysmenorrhea visual analog scale, severity of menstruation-related lower abdominal pain, low back pain, headache, and nausea/vomiting, basal body temperature, and serum estradiol and progesterone levels were evaluated., Results: Baseline of the total dysmenorrhea score was 4.61, which went down over time following the administration of dydrogesterone, and the decrease was statistically significant at and after 2nd cycle of menstruation. Mean change from baseline at the final evaluation point was -1.84 (P < 0.001). Severity of menstruation-related lower abdominal pain, low back pain, headache, and nausea/vomiting, in the evaluated menstruation cycles tended to decrease over time. Basal body temperature showed a biphasic pattern in 70% at baseline, 50% in 2nd menstruation cycle, and 61% in 5th menstruation cycle, and at least half of the patients may have had ovulation during the treatment. Incidence of adverse drug reactions was 31.8%, and the most common adverse event was metrorrhagia., Conclusion: Dydrogesterone is efficacious, safe, and clinically beneficial in patients with dysmenorrhea, thereby indicating that dydrogesterone can be considered as a treatment option for patients with dysmenorrhea., (© 2018 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT) is the most common type of porphyria: it is characterized by blistering lesions, erosions and crusts on the back of the hands, associated with photosensitivity and facial hypertrichosis. It is produced by acquired or hereditary deficiency of the enzyme UROD, fifth enzyme in the chain of production of the Heme group. This causes accumulation of porphyrins in the liver, which are subsequently mobilized to the skin, where lesions are generated by photosensitivity. This deficiency can be exacerbated by multiple causes. We report a 51-year-old female presenting with the characteristic dermal lesions described above, which disappeared when she discontinued her hormone replacement therapy with estradiol and dydrogesterone. Urinary and blood uroporphyrin and hexacarboxyl porphyrins were elevated and plasma ferritin was 479 ng/ml. Hormone replacement therapy was discontinued and phlebotomies were attempted but not tolerated by the patient. The dermic lesions have not relapsed.

Objective: To identify, appraise, and summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral dydrogesterone to vaginal progesterone capsules for luteal-phase support (LPS) in women offered fresh or frozen embryo transfers following in vitro fertilization., Methods: Two independent authors screened the literature for papers based on titles and abstracts, then selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Dydrogesterone and progesterone were compared based on risk ratios (RR) and the precision of the estimates was assessed through the 95% confidence interval (CI)., Results: An electronic search performed on June 7, 2017 retrieved 376 records, nine of which were papers deemed eligible and included in this systematic review and quantitative analysis. Good quality evidence indicates that oral dydrogesterone provided at least similar results than vaginal progesterone capsules on live birth/ongoing pregnancy (RR=1.08, 95%CI=0.92-1.26, I2=29%, 8 RCTs, 3,386 women) and clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.27; I2=43%; 9 RCTs; 4,061 women). Additionally, moderate quality evidence suggests there is no relevant difference on miscarriage rates (RR=0.92, 95%CI=0.68-1.26, I2=6%, 8 RCTs, 988 clinical pregnancies; the quality of the evidence was downgraded because of imprecision)., Conclusions: Good quality evidence from RCTs suggest that oral dydrogesterone provides at least similar reproductive outcomes than vaginal progesterone capsules when used for LPS in women undergoing embryo transfers. Dydrogesterone is a reasonable option and the choice of either of the medications should be based on cost and side effects.

Background: Current medical treatments for endometriosis are very limited. Progestin and selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRM) are developed but their efficacy, safety, mechanism and recurrence in endometriosis are not fully studied., Methods: In order to compare therapeutic, side effects and therapeutic actions of Esmya, Duphaston and Dienogest in endometriosis. Experimental endometriosis was induced by either intraperitoneal or subcutaneous mouse endometrium transplantation. Lesion size, weight and histology at the end of intervention were compared. Expression of related markers in the endometriotic lesions were examined. Body, uterus and ovary weights, endometrial glands and thickness (ETI), and follicle count were measured. For recurrent study, lesion growth before and after intervention was monitored., Results: After Esmya, Duphaston, Dienogest treatment, lesion size and weight were significantly decreased. Proliferation Pcna expression was significantly decreased in all groups, but proliferation cells were significantly decreased only in Duphaston group. Apoptosis Mapk1 expression and TUNEL-positive cells were significantly increased in Duphaston group. Adhesion Mmp2 and Itgavβ3 expression were significantly increased in Esmya group. Plau, Hif1α and Vegfa expression, peritoneal fluid PGE2 levels, and ERα and ERβ expression were not affected; while PR expression was significantly lower in all groups. Endometrial gland count in uterus was significantly increased in Dienogest group, ETI was significantly decreased in Duphaston group, and AFC were significantly increased in Esmya group. Upon treatment cessation, lesion growth rebound quickly in Dienogest and Duphaston groups, but slowly in Esmya group., Conclusion: Esmya, Duphaston and Dienogest are effective anti-endometriosis drugs targeting proliferation, apoptosis and adhesion. Esmya, Duphaston and Dienogest are all well tolerable, although endometrial glandular hyperplasia was found in Dienogest, endometrial atrophy in Duphaston, follicle accumulation in Esmya.

Study Question: Is oral dydrogesterone 30 mg daily (10 mg three times daily [TID]) non-inferior to micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) 600 mg daily (200 mg TID) for luteal support in in vitro fertilization (IVF), assessed by the presence of fetal heartbeats determined by transvaginal ultrasound at 12 weeks of gestation?, Summary Answer: Non-inferiority of oral dydrogesterone versus MVP was demonstrated at 12 weeks of gestation, with a difference in pregnancy rate and an associated confidence interval (CI) that were both within the non-inferiority margin., What Is Known Already: MVP is routinely used in most clinics for luteal support in IVF, but it is associated with side effects, such as vaginal irritation and discharge, as well as poor patient acceptance. Dydrogesterone may be an alternative treatment due to its patient-friendly oral administration., Study Design, Size, Duration: Lotus I was an international Phase III randomized controlled trial, performed across 38 sites, from August 2013 to March 2016. Subjects were premenopausal women (>18 to <42 years of age; body mass index (BMI) ≥18 to ≤30 kg/m2) with a documented history of infertility who were planning to undergo IVF. A centralized electronic system was used for randomization, and the study investigators, sponsor's study team, and subjects remained blinded throughout the study., Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: In total, 1031 subjects were randomized to receive either oral dydrogesterone (n = 520) or MVP (n = 511). Luteal support was started on the day of oocyte retrieval and continued until 12 weeks of gestation (Week 10), if a positive pregnancy test was obtained at 2 weeks after embryo transfer., Main Results and the Role of Chance: In the full analysis set (FAS), 497 and 477 subjects in the oral dydrogesterone and MVP groups, respectively, had an embryo transfer. Non-inferiority of oral dydrogesterone was demonstrated, with pregnancy rates at 12 weeks of gestation of 37.6% and 33.1% in the oral dydrogesterone and MVP treatment groups, respectively (difference 4.7%; 95% CI: -1.2-10.6%). Live birth rates of 34.6% (172 mothers with 213 newborns) and 29.8% (142 mothers with 158 newborns) were obtained in the dydrogesterone and MVP groups, respectively (difference 4.9%; 95% CI: -0.8-10.7%). Oral dydrogesterone was well tolerated and had a similar safety profile to MVP., Limitations, Reasons for Caution: The analysis of the results was powered to consider the clinical pregnancy rate, but the live birth rate may be of greater clinical interest. Conclusions relating to the differences between treatments in live birth rate, observed in this study, should therefore be made with caution., Wider Implications of the Findings: Oral dydrogesterone may replace MVP as the standard of care for luteal phase support in IVF, owing to the oral route being more patient-friendly than intravaginal administration, as well as it being a well tolerated and efficacious treatment., Study Funding/competing Interest(s): Sponsored and supported by Abbott Established Pharmaceuticals Division. H.T.'s institution has received grants from Merck, MSD, Goodlife, Cook, Roche, Besins, Ferring and Mithra (now Allergan) and H.T. has received consultancy fees from Finox, Ferring, Abbott, ObsEva and Ovascience. G.S. has nothing to disclose. E.K. is an employee of Abbott GmbH. G.G. has received investigator fees from Abbott during the conduct of the study; outside of this submitted work, G.G. has received personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, Ferring, Merck-Serono, Finox, TEVA, Glycotope, as well as personal fees from VitroLife, NMC Healthcare LLC, ReprodWissen LLC and ZIVA LLC., Trial Registration Number: NCT01850030 (clinicaltrials.gov)., Trial Registration Date: 19 April 2013., Date of First Patient's Enrollment: 23 August 2013., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.)

Background: Miscarriage is a common complication of pregnancy occurring in 15-20 % of all clinically recognized pregnancies. Currently, there is still no good scientific evidence to support the routine use of progestogens for the treatment of threatened miscarriage because the existing studies were not large enough to show a significant difference and some of them were not randomized or double-blind., Methods: This is a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. A total of 400 patients presenting with first-trimester threatened miscarriage will be enrolled. They will be randomized to take dydrogesterone 40 mg per os, followed by 10 mg per os three times a day or placebo until twelve completed weeks of gestation or 1 week after the bleeding has stopped, whichever is longer. The primary outcome is the percentage of miscarriage before 20 weeks of gestation., Discussion: We postulate that the dydrogesterone therapy will significantly reduce the risk of miscarriage in women with threatened miscarriage., Trial Registration: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02128685 . Registered on 29 April 2014.

Oral administration of dydrogesterone during second half of menstrual cycle has been shown to reduce menstrual irregularities. This prospective, observational study aimed to determine continued effectiveness of dydrogesterone (prescribed between 1 and 6 cycles or longer) in menstrual cycle regularization in Indian women aged ≥18 years with irregular menstrual cycle for at least 3 months. Those achieving regular cycles (21 to 35 days, inclusive) during treatment were followed up for 6 months after cessation of dydrogesterone treatment. Of the 910 women completing dydrogesterone treatment, 880 (96.7%) achieved cycle regularization (p<0.0001 for 90% success rate) at end of treatment (EOT). Of the 788 subjects available for follow up at 6 months, 747 (94.8%) reported cycle regularity (p<0.0001 for 90% success rate). At EOT, the mean cycle duration reduced by 16.14 (±24.04) days and mean amount of menstrual bleeding decreased by 0.45 (±1.20) pads/day. While five subjects reported worst pain at baseline, none experienced it at EOT. One serious adverse event (appendicitis) and three non-serious adverse events were reported. Dydrogesterone regularizes and improves the duration of the menstrual cycle, reduces the amount of bleeding, relieves menstrual pain and prevents relapse of irregular cycles at six months after discontinuation of treatment.

Background: Tacrolimus (Tac) is one of the most commonly used immunosuppressive drugs after solid organ transplantation. Eight Tac metabolites have been described, but their clinical importance remains unclear. The aim of this study was quantification of the 2 major Tac metabolites, 13-O-demethyl (M-I) and 15-O-demethyl (M-III), in kidney transplant recipients and to link them with parameters of kidney and liver function, peripheral blood cell counts, and infection incidence., Methods: In 81 kidney transplant recipients, concentrations of Tac, M-I, and M-III were measured with the use of liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS)., Results: There was a negative correlation between M-III levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; r = -0.244; P < .05). Also, a negative correlation between M-III concentrations and red blood cell count (RBC) was found (r = -0.349; P < .05). Neither concentrations of Tac nor of M-I correlated with eGFR or RBC. M-I, M-III, and Tac were not related to alanine aminotransferase activity. Significantly higher Tac and M-III concentrations in the group with all types of infections in comparison with the group without infections were observed (6.95 ± 2.09 ng/mL vs 5.73 ± 2.43 ng/mL [P = .03] and 0.27 ± 0.17 ng/mL vs 0.20 ± 0.11 ng/mL [P = .04], respectively)., Conclusions: The results suggest that higher concentrations of M-III may have a nephrotoxic or myelotoxic effect and result in higher incidence of infections. Further studies are needed to confirm if monitoring of M-III could minimalize adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity or infections., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Congenital heart disease is the most frequent form of congenital anomaly in newborn infants and accounts for more than a quarter of all serious congenital afflictions worldwide. A genetic etiology is identified in <20 % of cases of congenital heart defects, and in most cases the etiology remains a mystery. In the context of the health burden caused by congenital heart disease, the contribution of non-inherited risk factors is important especially if it turns out to be caused by a drug which can be avoided during pregnancy. We sought to determine whether maternal dydrogesterone treatment in early pregnancy is associated with congenital heart disease in the infant. We conducted a retrospective case-control study of birth defects and associated risk factors. Data were obtained and compared between 202 children born with congenital heart disease and a control group consisting of 200 children. All children were born in the period of 2010-2013. Dydrogesterone exposure was defined as any reported use during the first trimester of pregnancy. Exclusion criteria included stillbirths, children with chromosomal abnormalities and infants of mothers with chronic medical illnesses, e.g., diabetes. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the data and attempt to identify a causal relationship between drug exposure and congenital heart disease. Mothers of children born with congenital heart disease received more dydrogesterone during first trimester of pregnancy than mothers of children in the control group [adjusted odds ratio 2.71; (95 % CI 1.54-4.24); P = 0.001]. We identified a positive association between dydrogesterone usage during early pregnancy and congenital heart disease in the offspring. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) with dydrogesterone applied for the same duration in patients having endometrial hyperplasia (EH) without atypia., Materials and Methods: One hundred thirty eight women aged between 30 and 50 years with abnormal uterine bleeding and diagnosed as EH by transvaginal ultrasound were randomized to receive either LNG-IUD or dydrogesterone for 6 months. Primary outcome measures were regression of hyperplasia after 6 months of therapy. Secondary outcome measures were occurrence of side effects during treatment or recurrence of hyperplasia during follow-up period., Results: After 6 months of treatment, regression of EH occurs in 96% of women in the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) group versus 80% of women in the oral group (P < .001). Adverse effects were relatively common with minimal differences between the 2 groups. Intermenstrual vaginal spotting and amenorrhea were more common in the LNG-IUD group (P value .01 and .0001). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the LNG-IUS group (P value .0001). Hysterectomy rates were lower in the LNG-IUS group than in the oral group (P = .001). Recurrence rate was 0% in the LNG-IUD group compared to 12.5% in the oral group., Conclusion: In management of EH without atypia, LNG-IUS achieves a higher regression and a lower hysterectomy rate than oral progesterone and could be used as a first-line therapy., (© The Author(s) 2014.)

Objectives: To compare efficacy, satisfaction and tolerability of oral dydrogesterone and micronized vaginal progesterone gel used for luteal supplementation., Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. A total of 853 infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment in University Hospital Center "Sisters of Mercy", Zagreb, Croatia. Luteal support was provided as Crinone 8%(®) vaginal progesterone gel (90mg) administered daily, or oral dydrogesterone Duphaston(®) (2× 10mg) administered two times daily. Progesterone was administered from the day of oocyte retrieval (day 0) till pregnancy test or in a case of pregnancy, until week 10., Results: The on-going pregnancy rates were comparable between Crinone 8%(®) vaginal progesterone gel and oral dydrogesterone - Duphaston(®) (28.1% versus 30.3%; OR 1.11 (0.82-1.49 with 95% CI)). Overall satisfaction and tolerability were significantly higher in the dydrogesterone group than in the Crinone group. Vaginal bleeding, interference with coitus and local adverse side effects such as vaginal irritation and discharge occurred significantly more in Crinone group than in dydrogesterone group., Conclusions: Oral dydrogesterone is effective drug, well tolerated and accepted among patients and can be considered for routine luteal support., Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT01178931; www.clinicaltrials.gov., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

It is established that hormone therapy (HT) is related with significant increased prothrombotic risk factor. The aim of our study was to assess the effects of oral hormone therapy (o-HT) and transdermal hormone therapy (t-HT) on hemostasis parameters: fibrinogen (Fg) concentration, the maximum velocity of polymerization of clot formation, fibrin half-time lysis, plasma level of thrombin inhibitor of fibrinolysis (TAFI) and activity of generated thrombin and plasmin amidolytic activity. We observed that values of initial velocity of polymerization in o-HT group were increased (94.64 mOD/min vs. 131.50 mOD/min, p < 0.001) compared to control group. Fibrin lysis half-time increased in both groups with HT (controls - 18.26 min vs. 32.43 min (o-HT); 23.34 min transdermal hormone therapy (t-HT) p < 0.001) compared to controls. The activity of thrombin was statistically higher in plasma of women after o-HT (72.6 ± 8.5 mOD/min) than in patients with t-HT (53.7 ± 10.1 mOD/min) and controls (51.2 ± 10 mOD/min. Plasmin activity was the highest in controls (84.5 ± 10.2 mOD/min). The highest level of TAFI we observed in patients after oral hormones (80.38 ± 8.23%); women on transdermal HT had 61.58 ± 9.81% and the lowest concentration of TAFI we noted in controls 44.70 ± 10.16). The results of our study show that HT may partly explain the increase in venous thrombosis (VTE) and cardiovascular events reported after the use of it, especially the oral form of treatment.

The objective of this systematic review was to assess whether the orally acting progestagen, dydrogesterone lowers the incidence of miscarriage in women with threatened miscarriage. A computerized search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Ovid Medline for original reports with the product name 'Duphaston' or 'dydrogesterone', and limited to clinical human data. Twenty-one reports of dydrogesterone treatment were identified with 1380 patients. Five randomized trials were identified, including 660 women who fulfilled the criteria for meta-analysis. The number of subsequent miscarriages or continuing pregnancies per randomized woman was compared in women receiving dydrogesterone compared to standard bed rest or placebo intervention. There was a 13% (44/335) miscarriage rate after dydrogesterone administration compared to 24% in control women [odds ratio for miscarriage 0.47, (CI = 0.31-0.7), 11% absolute reduction in the miscarriage rate]. The adverse and side effects were summarized in all 21 reports, and seemed to be minimal. Although all the predictive and confounding factors could not be controlled for, the results of this systematic review show a significant reduction of 47% in the odds for miscarriage when dydrogesterone is compared to standard care indicating a real treatment effect.

Progesterone is indispensable in creating a suitable endometrial environment for implantation, and also for the maintenance of pregnancy. Successful pregnancy depends on an appropriate maternal immune response to the fetus. A protein called progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) acts by inducing Th2-dominant cytokine production to mediate the immunological effects of progesterone. The aim of this prospective study was to compare serum concentrations of progesterone (P), estradiol (E2), anti-inflammatory (IL-10) and pro-inflammatory (IL-6, TNFα, IFNγ) cytokines, and serum PIBF concentrations in women with threatened preterm delivery who were given progesterone supplementation (study group) with those of women with threatened preterm delivery who were not given progesterone supplementation (control group). After dydrogesterone treatment of patients in the study group, serum PIBF as well as progesterone concentrations significantly increased. Women in this group had significantly higher serum levels of IL-10 than controls. The length of gestation was significantly higher in the group of women who were given progesterone supplementation. Our data suggest that dydrogesterone treatment of women at risk of preterm delivery results in increased PIBF production and IL-10 concentrations, and lower concentrations of IFNγ., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare the efficacy of oral dydrogesterone with that of micronized vaginal P gel and micronized P capsule for luteal supplementation., Design: Prospective, randomized clinical study., Setting: Institute of Reproductive Medicine, Kolkata, India., Patient(s): A total of 1,373 infertile women undergoing IVF participated., Intervention(s): Micronized P gel, P capsule, and oral dydrogesterone were administered for luteal support and compared., Main Outcome Measure(s): Demographic profile and pregnancy and miscarriage rates., Result(s): The overall pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate were comparable among the three groups., Conclusion(s): Oral dydrogesterone seems to be a promising drug for luteal support in woman undergoing IVF., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of dydrogesterone and calcium plus vitamin D on young women's general health., Method: One hundred and eighty students studying at Shiraz University were recruited. Students completed the General Health Questionnaires (GHQ-28) prior to participation. They were then randomly assigned to take a tablet containing either 5 mg of dydrogesterone, 500 mg of calcium plus 200 mg of vitamin D, or a placebo twice daily from the 15th to the 24th day of their menstrual cycle for 2 consecutive cycles, and to complete the same questionnaires during both the intervention cycles., Results: The effects of dydrogesterone and calcium plus vitamin D on general health scores were similar during the first month of intervention (11.41 ± 4.28, 12.23 ± 3.76, respectively) (p>0.05) and both of them were more effective than placebo (16.69 ± 3.28) (p<0.05). However, dydrogesterone was more effective than calcium plus vitamin D and placebo during the second month of intervention (4.33 ± 2.69, 6.2 ± 3.55, 14.39 ± 3.45, respectively) (p<0.05). No significant differences between groups regarding drugs' side effects (p>0.05) were found., Conclusion: Both dydrogesterone and calcium D were more effective than placebo in promoting women's general health. Dydrogesterone was, however, more efficient than calcium plus vitamin D.

Background: Use of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) used to be promoted to reduce the risk of ischemic cardiovascular diseases, a concept which has been challenged by results of the large Women's Health Initiative trial in users of estrogen and progestin. It is postulated that the type of progestin used in HRT affects the cardiovascular risk., Methods: We used the UK-based General Practice Research Database to conduct a follow-up study with a nested case-control analysis. We assessed and compared the risk of developing myocardial infarction, thrombotic stroke or venous thromboembolism in estradiol/dydrogesterone users, users of other HRT, or non-users of HRT., Results: The incidence rates of myocardial infarction, thrombotic stroke and venous thromboembolism in estradiol/dydrogesterone users were 0.40 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.76), 0.27 (95% CI 0.10-0.58) and 0.31 (95% CI 0.13-0.64) per 1000 person-years, respectively. As compared to non-users of HRT, the adjusted relative risk estimates (odds ratios) in the nested case-control analysis for estradiol/dydrogesterone users or users of other HRT were 1.06 (95% CI 0.48-2.36) and 1.12 (95% CI 0.84-1.51) for myocardial infarction, 0.50 (95% CI 0.21-1.22) and 1.18 (95% CI 0.94-1.48) for thrombotic stroke, and 0.84 (95% CI 0.37-1.92) and 1.42 (95% CI 1.10-1.82) for venous thromboembolism, respectively., Conclusion: The study provides evidence that estradiol/dydrogesterone use of several months to a few years is not associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events than use of other HRT.

Between 1977 and 2005, 28 cases of potential links between maternal dydrogesterone use during pregnancy and congenital birth defects were reported. The types of defects were very diverse, with no evidence of a pattern of abnormalities. The data do not provide evidence for congenital malformations associated with dydrogesterone use.

Large numbers of hormone replacement therapies (HRTs) are available for the treatment of menopausal symptoms. It is still unclear whether some are more deleterious than others regarding breast cancer risk. The goal of this study was to assess and compare the association between different HRTs and breast cancer risk, using data from the French E3N cohort study. Invasive breast cancer cases were identified through biennial self-administered questionnaires completed from 1990 to 2002. During follow-up (mean duration 8.1 postmenopausal years), 2,354 cases of invasive breast cancer occurred among 80,377 postmenopausal women. Compared with HRT never-use, use of estrogen alone was associated with a significant 1.29-fold increased risk (95% confidence interval 1.02-1.65). The association of estrogen-progestagen combinations with breast cancer risk varied significantly according to the type of progestagen: the relative risk was 1.00 (0.83-1.22) for estrogen-progesterone, 1.16 (0.94-1.43) for estrogen-dydrogesterone, and 1.69 (1.50-1.91) for estrogen combined with other progestagens. This latter category involves progestins with different physiologic activities (androgenic, nonandrogenic, antiandrogenic), but their associations with breast cancer risk did not differ significantly from one another. This study found no evidence of an association with risk according to the route of estrogen administration (oral or transdermal/percutaneous). These findings suggest that the choice of the progestagen component in combined HRT is of importance regarding breast cancer risk; it could be preferable to use progesterone or dydrogesterone.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to confirm the endometrial safety and describe the bleeding profile of continuous combined 1 mg 17beta-oestradiol and 5 mg dydrogesterone in post-menopausal women., Methods: An open, multicentre study was carried out in 290 healthy, non-hysterectomised post-menopausal women receiving oral continuous combined 1 mg 17beta-oestradiol and 5 mg dydrogesterone (Femoston-conti) for 1 year. Aspiration endometrial biopsies were performed at baseline and at the end of the study; those classified as hyperplasia or malignancy were considered treatment failures., Results: Only one woman developed simple hyperplasia without atypia at the end of the study; the treatment failure rate was therefore 0.4%. Cross-sectional analysis showed that the percentage of women without bleeding increased from 71% during the first cycle to around 80% by the end of the study. Approximately 50% of the bleeding episodes occurred in the form of spotting; severe bleeding was rare and only seven women withdrew prematurely from the study due to uterine bleeding. Overall, 41% of the women were amenorrhoeic throughout the study., Conclusions: Continuous combined 1 mg 17beta-oestradiol and 5 mg dydrogesterone provides excellent endometrial safety and is associated with an acceptable bleeding profile.

Background: Cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVR) is an index of cerebrovascular dilatory capacity which can readily be assessed using trans-cranial Doppler ultrasound. Impaired CVR is associated with elevated risk of stroke. We performed a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial to investigate the effect of two HRT preparations upon CVR., Methods: We examined middle cerebral artery mean flow velocity (MFV), internal carotid artery pulsatility index (PI) and CVR to an i.v. acetazolamide bolus using ultrasound in three groups of post-menopausal women randomized to oral estradiol 1 mg+norethisterone 0.5 mg (group N), estradiol 1 mg+dydrogesterone 5 mg (group D) or placebo (group P). The MFV, PI and CVR were measured before and after 3 months treatment., Results: Thirty-eight post-menopausal women were recruited (N=12, D=14, P=12); mean (SE) age was 56.7 (4) years. Neither HRT preparation affected CVR [% (SE) change from baseline N +4.2 (11); D +3.8 (5.5); P +4.0 (3.8); all comparisons P = NS]. PI was significantly reduced in recipients of dydrogesterone [% (SE) change from baseline D -5.4% (4.6); N +12.3 (6.9); P +11.6 (6.9). P=0.025]. Middle cerebral artery velocity was significantly increased following dydrogesterone treatment compared with placebo [% (SE) change from baseline D +6.8 (3.4) N +3.9 (4.2) P -4.6% (3.4) P=0.03 for D versus P]., Conclusion: HRT did not alter CVR. The reduced PI and increased MFV suggest HRT-induced intracranial vasodilatation, which is more apparent in dydrogesterone recipients. Differences may exist between progestogens with regard to changes in intracranial haemodynamics.

Dydrogesterone, similar to women's natural progesterone, has been used in a wide range of gynecological conditions. Despite its widespread use, dydrogesterone-induced hepatotoxicity and dydrogesterone-induced hemolytic anemia have, to the best of our knowledge, never been reported previously. We describe a case of hepatitis and warm antibody hemolytic anemia due to dydrogesterone.

As hormone replacement therapy is associated with an early excess risk of venous thrombosis, we investigated the effect of different oral hormone replacement therapies on resistance to activated protein C, and on levels of factor VIII antigen (FVIII:Ag) and factor XI antigen (FXI:Ag). In a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled 12-week study, 60 healthy post-menopausal women daily received either placebo (n = 16) or 2 mg of micronized 17beta-oestradiol, either alone (E2, n = 16) or sequentially combined with dydrogesterone 10 mg (E2 + D, n = 14) or trimegestone 0.5 mg (E2 + T, n = 14). Medication was given orally. Normalized activated protein C sensitivity ratios (nAPCsr) were determined by quantifying the effect of activated protein C on the endogenous thrombin potential. FVIII:Ag and FXI:Ag were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Compared with baseline and placebo, the nAPCsr increased (92% to 142%; all P < 0.001) in all active treatment groups after both 4 and 12 weeks. Compared with placebo, hormone replacement therapy was not associated with significant changes in FVIII:Ag. After 4 and 12 weeks, FXI:Ag levels were significantly decreased in the E2 group (mean percentage changes from baseline versus placebo: -15.0%, P = 0.001 at 4 weeks and -16.6%, P = 0.003 at 12 weeks) and in the E2 + D group (-10.4%, P = 0.02 and -10.4%, P = 0.02). In conclusion, all hormone replacement regimens were associated with a large increase in resistance to activated protein C. In contrast, hormone replacement therapy had no effect on FVIII:Ag. Oral E2 and E2 + D had a small, favourable effect on FXI:Ag.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a three-month continuous administration of oral E2, alone, or combined with 2 different dosages of dydrogesterone, on the glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women. In a prospective placebo-controlled study, 43 normal weight and normoinsulinemic women were randomized to receive either 2 mg of oral 17beta E2 daily (group A), or 2 mg E2 daily plus 5 mg daily oral dydrogesterone, from day 14 to 28, in a sequentially combined regimen (group B), or 2 mg of E2 and 10 mg dydrogesterone in the same sequentially combined regimen (group C) or placebo for 12 weeks. An OGTT and a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp were performed before and after treatment. Serum glucose and insulin concentrations were measured both in fasting conditions and after OGTT. C-peptide pancreatic secretion was tested only in fasting conditions. Total body glucose utilization (M), for insulin sensitivity evaluation, was determined in each subject. Postmenopausal women treated with unopposed 17beta E2 (group A) showed a slight but statistically significant decrease of insulin sensitivity (p<0.05). A more marked deterioration of the same parameter was observed in the 2 groups treated with E2 plus dydrogesterone (group B and group C: p<0.01). Post hoc testing for the percent change from baseline indicated that group A significantly differed from group C (p<0.05) and all treated groups significantly differed from the placebo group (p<0.01). Finally, after treatment in group C, a significant reduction of insulin and an increase of glucose responses to OGTT (p<0.01) were observed. These results indicate that, in a short-term period, the use of 17beta E2 and overall 17beta E2 plus dydrogesterone, even with the reduction of insulin plasma levels, might cause a decrease in insulin sensitivity in normal weight and normoinsulinemic post-menopausal women.

Objective: To assess the endometrial safety and bleeding patterns of 17 beta-estradiol sequentially combined with dydrogesterone., Methods: Endometrial safety and bleeding patterns were assessed in 579 postmenopausal women randomized to oral treatment with placebo, 1 mg/day 17 beta-estradiol sequentially combined with 5 or 10 mg/day dydrogesterone for the last 14 days of each 28-day cycle, or 2 mg/day 17 beta-estradiol sequentially combined with 10 or 20 mg/day dydrogesterone for the last 14 days of each 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued for 26 cycles. Proliferative endometrium, endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial malignancy in the end-of-study biopsy were considered as inadequate progestational responses., Results: Biopsies were not available in 137 women mainly because of an insufficient treatment period or non-compliance. An adequate progestational response was seen in more than 98% of the 442 women who underwent biopsy after treatment. Bleeding data were not available in 193 women, most of whom did not remain on treatment for the full 26 cycles. The 1-mg 17 beta-estradiol dose was associated with less cyclic and intermittent bleeding than the 2-mg dose. Higher doses of dydrogesterone were associated with a higher incidence of cyclic bleeds and a later day of onset, while duration, severity and regularity were similar in all groups irrespective of estradiol or dydrogesterone dose., Conclusion: Sequential combinations of 1 mg 17 beta-estradiol with 5 or 10 mg dydrogesterone and 2 mg 17 beta-estradiol with 10 or 20 mg dydrogesterone are associated with very good endometrial safety. The incidence of bleeding is lower with the 1-mg dose of 17 beta-estradiol.

Although gestagens have been reported to influence bone metabolism, whether these contribute to the beneficial effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on the skeleton of postmenopausal women is currently unclear. To address this question, we compared changes in bone turnover markers after commencing HRT in 26 postmenopausal women randomized to receive 8 weeks of treatment with 2 mg estradiol daily or 2 mg estradiol plus 10 mg dydrogesterone daily. Serum and second morning void urine samples were obtained at baseline (twice) and after 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Serum estradiol was measured by RIA, urinary total deoxypyridinoline (DPD) excretion by high pressure liquid chromatography, and serum osteocalcin and C-terminal procollagen peptide by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The increase in serum estradiol after treatment with estradiol alone was slightly, but significantly, greater than that in the combination group (P = 0.04). Although estradiol suppressed urinary DPD excretion to a greater extent when given alone (P = 0.02), osteocalcin levels were significantly higher in this group than in women receiving combination therapy (P = 0.04). To assess the effect of dydrogesterone on the balance between formation and resorption in more detail, we subsequently compared the ratio between formation and resorption markers in the two treatment groups. We found that osteocalcin/DPD and C-terminal procollagen peptide/DPD ratios were significantly higher in women treated with estradiol alone (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.002, respectively), suggesting that dydrogesterone may reduce formation relative to resorption. These results suggest that gestagens may reduce estrogen's beneficial effects on the skeleton of postmenopausal women, as assessed over the first 8 weeks of replacement therapy.

Objectives: To determine the endometrial safety of oral 17beta-oestradiol combined continuously with dydrogesterone in preventing endometrial proliferation., Methods: The low dose group comprised three 52-week (13 cycles of 28 days) studies (two of which were double blind) using a 17beta-oestradiol dose of 1 mg daily combined with dydrogesterone 2.5, 5, 10 or 20 mg daily. The high dose group comprised two 24-week double-blind studies using a 17beta-oestradiol dose of 2 mg daily combined with dydrogesterone 2.5, 5, 10 or 15 mg daily. Endometrial safety was verified by aspiration endometrial biopsies. Inadequate progestational response was defined as proliferative endometrium, endometrial polyp, hyperplasia and carcinoma., Results: Data was evaluable from 650 healthy postmenopausal women in the low dose group and 310 in the high dose group. Endometrial protection was achieved with dydrogesterone at doses of 5 mg or higher combined with 1 or 2 mg 17beta-oestradiol. The success rate was 97%, 97% and 98% in women receiving 1/5, 1/10 and 1/20 mg, respectively, and 95%, 98% and 91% in women receiving 2/5, 2/10 and 2/15 mg, respectively. A lower success rate was achieved with the 2.5 mg dydrogesterone dosage (93% in the 1/2.5 mg group and 85% in the 2/2.5 mg group) due to more cases of proliferative endometrium. None of the women in the low dose group developed hyperplasia or carcinoma; five (0.7%) had endometrial polyps. In the high dose group, one woman given 2.5 mg dydrogesterone developed hyperplasia; there were no cases of carcinoma., Conclusion: 5 mg daily dydrogesterone appears to be the lowest effective dose to ensure endometrial safety in a continuous combined regimen with 1 or 2 mg 17beta-oestradiol.

A meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the incidence of endometrial hyperplasia during sequentially combined oral 17 beta-estradiol and dydrogesterone (Femoston) treatment in postmenopausal women. Bleeding pattern was assessed separately in each study. Two studies were double-blind, 6-month studies and two were open, long-term (1- or 2-year) studies. 17 beta-estradiol 2 mg daily was combined with dydrogesterone 10 mg for 14 days per 28-day cycle. Endometrial safety was assessed by endometrial biopsy in 369 women treated. In 236 women treated for one year or more, one simple hyperplasia was diagnosed (success rate: 99.61%; lower limit of one-sided 95% confidence interval: 98.16). The last observation carried forward analysis in 369 women also revealed one simple hyperplasia (success rate: 99.73%; lower limit of one-sided 95% confidence interval: 98.72). Cyclic bleeding occurred in approximately 90% of women; the duration and day of onset was highly predictable between cycles and the severity of bleeding was generally rated as slight. In conclusion, sequentially combined 17 beta-estradiol 2 mg and dydrogesterone 10 mg has very good endometrial safety and is associated with light and predictable bleeding of short duration.

A case of recurrent bleeding from a probable left thalamic cavernoma in a 26 year old woman taking hormonal treatment is reported. Four episodes of bleeding were clinically and radiologically documented, prior to her referral to our institution. Interestingly, each episode occurred three weeks after starting hormonal treatment, dydrogesterone, desogestrel ethinylestradiol, chlormadin, nomegestrel acetate). The patient was not operated because of the deep situation of the cavernoma which was remote from the thalamic surface within the third ventricle. There was no recurrent bleeding after the onset hormonal treatment was discontinued. Although no similar case has been found in the literature, we believe that this case gives further argumentation in favor of a role of hormonal factors influencing the biological behavior of cavernous angiomas which has been previously suggested in pregnant females with bleeding cavernous angiomas.

Objective: To evaluate the links between hormone replacement therapy and lipid-lipoprotein concentrations (total cholesterol [T.Ch] triglycerids, high density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] and very low density lipoprotein cholesterol [VLDL-C]) in a total of 6416 postmenopausal women., Study Design: Open prospective longitudinal study. Of the 2184 surgical postmenopausal women, 1102 received conjugated equine estrogen (CEE), and 1082 transdermal estradiol (TDE2). Of the 4232 natural postmenopausal women: 1073 received CEE+medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 1068 CEE+dydrogesterone (DD), 1044 TDE2+MPA, 1047 TDE2+DD. Lipid-lipoprotein concentrations were evaluated by using a SPSS program at 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 years of therapy and cumulatively., Results: Cumulative evaluation of the data on estrogen only replacement therapy revealed a significant decrease in T.Ch, LDL-C and VLDL-C, and an increase in HDL-C; however, the increase in HDL-C and triglycerids was significantly higher in CEE than TDE2 (P<0.01). Cumulative evaluation of the data on estrogen progestin hormone replacement therapy revealed a significant decrease in T.Ch, LDL-C and an increase in HDL-C for all; however, triglycerides and VLDL levels decreased in TDE2+MPA and TDE2+DD groups (P<0.05)., Conclusion: Both the natural and surgical menopause patients were found to have more favorable lipid profiles after treatment with estrogen progesterone combined formulations and estrogen only replacement.