11 results on '"E Bensmann"'
Search Results
2. Phylloidestumor und empfohlene Resektionsabstände
- Author
-
A. Riffeser, J. Festl, V. Link, S. Grandl, M. Braun, and E. Bensmann
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Männlicher Patient mit Melanom-Metastase in der Brust – Immunhistochemische Merkmale
- Author
-
H. Spira, M. Beer, S. Grandl, M. Braun, and E. Bensmann
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Großes axilläres Lipom
- Author
-
E Bensmann, L Noschinski, and M Braun
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Mesh-pocket supported prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: Final results of a retrospective analysis
- Author
-
V Singh, A Faridi, A Shtian, M Sawatzki, D Dupont, Marion Kiechle, S Hadad, K Hilmer, R Ohlinger, T Pursche, N Bangemann, T Fysh, E Bensmann, A Critchley, J Weyrich, B Kunjuraman, Stefan Paepke, M Bräuer, S Findt, K. Kelling, K Dedes, S Ollig, C Ankel, M Aydogdu, M Thill, Ros A Huelbes, K Baumann, M Rezai, D Lüdders, R Mett, J-U Blohmer, HJ Strittmatter, and A Steffek
- Subjects
business.industry ,Retrospective analysis ,Dentistry ,Medicine ,Implant ,business ,Breast reconstruction - Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Der Phänotyp der Lymphknotenmetastasierung als Prediktor der Phänotypdiskrepanz zwischen dem Primärtumor und Rezidiv
- Author
-
O Gluz, C Althoff, N Harbeck, Rachel Würstlein, E Pelz, E Bensmann, U Nitz, and Cornelia Liedtke
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Korrelation von Recurrence Score, uPA/PAI-1 und Tumorbiologie bei der adjuvanten Therapieentscheidung des primären Mammacarcinoms: Interimsanalyse der Plan-B Studie der WSG
- Author
-
S Markmann, Bahriye Aktas, Doris Augustin, Ronald E. Kates, Peter Mallmann, Rachel Wuerstlein, Michael J. Clemens, Nadia Harbeck, U. Nitz, Oleg Gluz, C. Thomssen, M Salem, S Shak, E Bensmann, H.H. Kreipe, Tom Degenhardt, and Cornelia Liedtke
- Subjects
Maternity and Midwifery ,Obstetrics and Gynecology - Abstract
Fragestellung: Die WSG Plan-B Studie vergleicht den Standard EC-Doc mit einem anthracyclinfreien taxanhaltigen Schema (TC) bei Patientinnen mit HER2 negativem Mammacarcinom (MC). Plan-B integriert erstmals den 21-Gen Recurrence Score (RS) Oncotype DX neben Grading, molekularem Subtyp, Ki-67 und uPA/PAI-1 zur entscheidenden Risikostratifizierung bei hormonrezeptorpositivem MC mit bis zu 3 positiven Lymphknoten. Plan-B untersucht die Anwendung des RS im klinischen Alltag und den Nutzen von Gen- bzw. proteinbasierter sowie histopathologischer Risikoevaluation zur Vermeidung von Ubertherapien. Methode: Patientinnen (n=2448; Mai 2011: 2961 Pat. registriert, 2236 Pat. Randomisiert) mit primarem high-risk MC (nodalpositiv oder Tumorgrose >2cm, Grading 2–3
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Abstract P5-04-02: Biopsy of metastases impacts treatment choice and patient outcome in breast cancer – Final results of the WSG/DETECT PRIMET study
- Author
-
Rachel Wuerstlein, E Pelz, Ronald E. Kates, U. Nitz, Florian Heitz, O Gluz, Nadia Harbeck, A. du Bois, Peter Mallmann, Monika Ortmann, Cornelia Liedtke, M. Freudenberger, Tanja Fehm, and E Bensmann
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Lung ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,medicine.disease ,Primary tumor ,Gastroenterology ,Metastasis ,Surgery ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Breast cancer ,Oncology ,Internal medicine ,Biopsy ,medicine ,Lymph ,business ,Grading (tumors) - Abstract
Background: Changes in tumor biology (e.g., hormone receptor (HR) / HER2 status or grading) between primary tumor (PT) and metastatic tissue (MT) could impact outcome and treatment choice following first recurrence in breast cancer (BC). Methods: PRIMET is a prospectively planned, retrospective multicenter quality assurance study comparing BC phenotype in tissue from PT, involved lymph nodes (LN) of primary disease, and disease recurrence (DR). PRIMET comprises 635 patients from WSG and DETECT trial groups (11 centers), whose BC was diagnosed between 1980 and 2010; follow-up continued until mid-2012. Patients with unilateral primary BC suffering subsequent local-regional and / or distant DR (LDR / DDR) were included. Clinical data including ER, PR, HER2, and grade were obtained from a systematic chart review in PT and DR; in two centers, these factors were also measured in LN by central pathology. Dependence of post-recurrence survival (PRS) on changes in tumor biological factors was analyzed. Results: Data from 635 patients (including 592 cM0, of whom 46% had LDR only) were available for analysis. Median follow-up in patients alive at analysis was 101 months. Considering cM0 patients, median overall survival (OS) was 176 months; median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 48 months (DDR present: 45 months; LDR only: 50 months). Median PRS was 59 months (DDR present: 45 months; LDR only: 127 months). In patients with first DR within 18 months, median PRS was 29 months, in others 79 months. HR status in PT/MT was: 61.5% (+/+), 13.2% (+/-), 5.5% (-/+) 19.8% (-/-). Of the HR “switches” in either direction with LN biopsy available, about half already occurred in lymph nodes. HER2 status in PT/MT was: 14.6% (+/+), 6.7% (+/-), 14.9% (-/+) 63.8% (-/-). With LN biopsy available, most losses of HER2 overexpression were already observed in LN tissue, whereas acquired HER2 overexpression was observed in about half of LN biopsies. Triple negative (TN: HR-, HER2-) percentages were 74.4% (non-TN/non-TN), 9.0% (non-TN/TN), 6.1% (TN/non-TN), 10.5% (TN/TN). Compared to HR+/+, loss of HR+ status (HR+/-) was significantly associated with poorer PRS (hazard ratio: 1.62; p = 0.01). Significantly better PRS was associated with a switch from G3 to G1/2 (hazard ratio: 0.47; p = 0.02). Tumors that switched to TN or that lost HER2 overexpression showed trends toward poorer PRS. Persistent TN was associated with poorer PRS than other combinations. Among patients with DDR, metastasis in bone only was associated with better PRS than primary or visceral (CNS, lung, liver, etc.) metastasis. Among patients with visceral metastasis, negative HR status in metastasis was associated with poorer survival than in HR+/+ not only for HR-/- (p = 0.02), but also for HR+/- (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Tumor biology of primary and metastatic tissue differed in a substantial fraction of patients (HR: 19%; HER2: 22%, TN: 18%); more than half of all changes occurred already in LN. Status changes particularly loss of HR+ status, had significant prognostic impact. We can expect a switch in HR or HER2 status (or both) in about 38% of metastatic tissue biopsies, with presumably important clinical therapeutic consequences, in particular regarding targeted therapies. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-04-02.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Real-world data of perioperative complications in prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study.
- Author
-
Hamann M, Bensmann E, Andrulat A, Festl J, Saadat G, Klein E, Chronas D, and Braun M
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Middle Aged, Adult, Risk Factors, Reoperation statistics & numerical data, Breast Neoplasms surgery, Surgical Wound Dehiscence etiology, Surgical Wound Dehiscence epidemiology, Aged, Seroma etiology, Seroma epidemiology, Mammaplasty adverse effects, Mammaplasty methods, Surgical Mesh adverse effects, Necrosis etiology, Postoperative Hemorrhage etiology, Postoperative Hemorrhage epidemiology, Surgical Wound Infection etiology, Surgical Wound Infection epidemiology, Acellular Dermis adverse effects, Postoperative Complications etiology, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Breast Implantation adverse effects, Breast Implantation methods, Breast Implants adverse effects
- Abstract
Purpose: To analyze complications and potential risk factors associated with immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction (DTIBR)., Methods: 295 patients (326 operated breasts) with DTIBR between March 2021 and December 2023 were included in this prospective study. Postoperative complications (postoperative bleeding, seroma, infection, necrosis, wound dehiscence, implant exchange/loss) were analyzed for potential risk factors by descriptive and logistic regression analyses., Results: The implant was covered by TiLOOP® Bra Pocket in 227 breasts (69.6%), by "dual-plane" technique in 20 breasts (6.1%), by acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in 1 breast (0.3%). No additional support was used for 78 breasts (23.9%). The use of mesh did not increase the risk for complications. Major complications requiring surgical revision occurred due to postoperative bleeding in 22 (6.7%), seroma in 2 (0.6%), infection in 13 (4.0%), necrosis in 10 (3.1%), and wound dehiscence in 10 (3.1%) breasts. Thirteen (4.0%) implants were exchanged, and 5 (1.5%) were explanted without substitution. One patient had to switch to autologous reconstruction due to skin necrosis. The main reasons for the removal/exchange of implants were infections (11 breasts, 3.4%) and necrosis (4 breasts, 1.2%). The risk for necrosis, infection, and wound dehiscence was mainly associated with the type of incision, especially skin-reducing incisions, and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m
2 ., Conclusion: Severe complications occurred primarily in patients with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and when skin-reducing surgical techniques were performed., Trial Registry: This study was retrospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 20.06.2024., Drks-Id: DRKS00034493. https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00034493 ., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: E Bensmann received support from pfm medical GmbH, Applied Medical Germany GmbH, and Polytech Health & Aesthetics GmbH for a surgical workshop at the Department of Gynecology, Breast Center, Red Cross Hospital, Munich, Germany. A Andrulat was principal investigator of the PRO-Pocket study (Sponsor pfm medical GmbH). All other authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Ethics approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Technical University Munich (25.11.2020; 660/20 S-EB)., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Safety of Targeted Axillary Dissection After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer.
- Author
-
Kuemmel S, Heil J, Bruzas S, Breit E, Schindowski D, Harrach H, Chiari O, Hellerhoff K, Bensmann E, Hanf V, Graßhoff ST, Deuschle P, Belke K, Polata S, Paepke S, Warm M, Meiler J, Schindlbeck C, Ruhwedel W, Beckmann U, Groh U, Dall P, Blohmer JU, Traut A, and Reinisch M
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Neoadjuvant Therapy methods, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy methods, Lymphatic Metastasis pathology, Lymph Node Excision methods, Lymph Nodes pathology, Axilla, Breast Neoplasms surgery, Breast Neoplasms drug therapy
- Abstract
Importance: The increasing use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) has led to substantial pathological complete response rates in patients with initially node-positive, early breast cancer, thereby questioning the need for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) is feasible for axillary staging; however, data on oncological safety are scarce., Objective: To assess 3-year clinical outcomes in patients with node-positive breast cancer who underwent TAD alone or TAD with ALND., Design, Setting, and Participants: The SenTa study is a prospective registry study and was conducted between January 2017 and October 2018. The registry includes 50 study centers in Germany. Patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer underwent clipping of the most suspicious lymph node (LN) before NST. After NST, the marked LNs and sentinel LNs were excised (TAD) followed by ALND according to the clinician's choice. Patients who did not undergo TAD were excluded. Data analysis was performed in April 2022 after 43 months of follow-up., Exposure: TAD alone vs TAD with ALND., Main Outcomes and Measures: Three-year clinical outcomes were evaluated., Results: Of 199 female patients, the median (IQR) age was 52 (45-60) years. A total of 182 patients (91.5%) had 1 to 3 suspicious LNs; 119 received TAD alone and 80 received TAD with ALND. Unadjusted invasive disease-free survival was 82.4% (95% CI, 71.5-89.4) in the TAD with ALND group and 91.2% (95% CI, 84.2-95.1) in the TAD alone group (P = .04); axillary recurrence rates were 1.4% (95% CI, 0-54.8) and 1.8% (95% CI, 0-36.4), respectively (P = .56). Adjusted multivariate Cox regression indicated that TAD alone was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.34-2.05; P = .69) or death (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.31-3.70; P = .91). Similar results were obtained for 152 patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer after NST (invasive disease-free survival: HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.27-5.87; P = .77; overall survival: HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.15-3.83; P = .74)., Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that TAD alone in patients with mostly good clinical response to NST and at least 3 TAD LNs may confer survival outcomes and recurrence rates similar to TAD with ALND.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Phenotype Discordance between Primary Tumor and Metastasis Impacts Metastasis Site and Outcome: Results of WSG-DETECT-PriMet.
- Author
-
Kolberg-Liedtke C, Wuerstlein R, Gluz O, Heitz F, Freudenberger M, Bensmann E, du Bois A, Nitz U, Pelz E, Warm M, Ortmann M, Sultova E, Brucker SY, Kates RE, Fehm T, and Harbeck N
- Abstract
Introduction: Tumor biological factors of breast cancer (BC) such as hormone receptor (HR) status, HER2 status, and grade can differ in the metastatic cascade from primary to lymph node (LN) metastasis and to distant metastatic tissue. Systematic data regarding therapeutic consequences are yet limited., Methods: We conducted a prospectively planned, retrospective cohort study comparing BC phenotype in tissue from primary tumors (PTs), locoregional LN metastases, and disease recurrence (DR). HR and HER2 as well as tumor grade in PTs and DR were obtained by a database search. No centralized biomarker testing was performed. The impact of changes in tumor biological factors on post-recurrence survival (PRS) and overall survival was analyzed., Results: PriMet comprises 635 patients (LN tissue in 142 patients). Discrepancies for HR or HER2 status between PT and DR were observed in 18.7 and 21.6% of cases, respectively. For HR status, positivity of PT and negativity of DR was seen more often (13.2%) than vice versa (5.5%). For HER2 status, negativity of the primary and positivity of DR was seen more often (14.9%) than vice versa (6.7%). Discordance was more often observed between PT and LN metastasis compared to LN versus DR. However, numbers were small. Compared to concordant non-triple-negative (TN) disease, concordant TN disease showed significantly inferior PRS., Conclusion: We demonstrate receptor discordance to occur relatively frequently between PT, LN metastasis, and DR and to impact patient prognosis. However, clinical consequences of receptor discordance need to be drawn with caution considering clinical aspects as well as tumor biology., Competing Interests: C. Kolberg-Liedtke has received honoraria/travel support by Phaon Scientific, Novartis, Pfizer, Celgene, Roche, AstraZeneca, Lilly, HEXAL, Amgen, Eisai, and SonoScape and has received research funding by Roche, Novartis, and Pfizer (CKL). O. Gluz has received lecture/consultancy fees from Celgene, Roche, Genomic Health, Amgen, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Nanostring, Eisai, and MSD, and assistance with travel costs from Celgene, Roche, and Daiichi-Sankyo. N. Harbeck has received honoraria for lectures and/or consulting from Agendia, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Genomic Health, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Odonate, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz/Hexal, and Seattle Genetics. R. Wuerstlein, M. Freudenberger, E. Bensmann, A. du Bois, U. Nitz, E. Pelz, M. Warm, M. Ortmann, E. Sultova, S.Y. Brucker, R.E. Kates, and T. Fehm state that they have no conflict of interest regarding the paper., (Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.