1. Perilipin 1 Expression Differentiates Liposarcoma from Other Types of Soft Tissue Sarcoma
- Author
-
Lena Maria Pawella, Gunhild Mechtersheimer, Beate K. Straub, Wilfried Roth, Hagen Roland Witzel, Peter Schirmacher, Marcus Renner, E Eiteneuer, and Merita Hashani
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,0301 basic medicine ,Perilipin-1 ,Perilipin 2 ,Adipose tissue ,Liposarcoma ,Pleomorphic Liposarcoma ,Pathology and Forensic Medicine ,Diagnosis, Differential ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cell Line, Tumor ,Lipid droplet ,Biomarkers, Tumor ,medicine ,Humans ,neoplasms ,biology ,Soft tissue sarcoma ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Neoplasm Proteins ,Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic ,body regions ,030104 developmental biology ,Adipogenesis ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,biology.protein ,Perilipin ,Cancer research ,Female - Abstract
Lipid droplets, a morphologic feature of adipocytic tumors, are strongly regulated by associated proteins of the perilipin/PAT (perilipin, adipophilin, and tail-interacting protein of 47 kD) family. So far, the use of perilipins as markers for differential diagnosis of soft tissue tumors has only been studied in a few cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of perilipins in 478 human soft tissue tumors and 60 respective normal tissues. Perilipin 1 was immunohistochemically positive in all studied cases of well-differentiated liposarcomas, >90% of myxoid round cell liposarcomas, and >70% of pleomorphic liposarcomas, whereas only the differentiated components of dedifferentiated liposarcomas were immunohistochemically positive for perilipin 1. All other types of soft tissue sarcomas were negative for perilipin 1. Perilipin 2 was more prominent in dedifferentiated and pleomorphic liposarcomas and nearly all other high-grade sarcomas. In well-differentiated liposarcomas, lipomas, or normal adipose tissue, perilipin 2 was virtually absent. In addition, long-term stimulation of adipogenesis in the liposarcoma cell line LiSa-2 restored perilipin 1 expression, as exhibited in the source tumor. Furthermore, knockdown of perilipin 2 or perilipin 3 in LiSa-2 cells influenced lipid droplet number and size as well as cell vitality. In summary, perilipin 1 is a promising marker for the differential diagnosis of liposarcomas from other soft tissue sarcomas, whereas perilipin 2 correlates negatively with tumor grade and may be therapeutically useful.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF