Search

Aim. A comparative analysis of mertoplasty results for treatment of uterine scar leak by different approaches.Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of hospital records of 51 patients was made, which were divided into three groups depending on the surgical approach used: group 1 – laparotomy access, group 2 – laparoscopic access, group 3 – transvaginal access. All patients had hysteroscopic and ultrasound signs of uterine scar leak after cesarean section (thickness of the myometrium in the scar area less than 4 mm, discontinuity of the scar). One month after the surgery, all the patients were examined by an obstetrician-gynecologist, all had a control ultrasound to assess the condition of the uterine scar. To assess the reliability of differences between groups, differences were considered significant at p

During present research, 216 patients with external genital endometriosis were examined. Examined women had been suffering from complaints (pelvic pain, dyspareunia, psycho-emotional disorders) from 1.5 to 19 years. The influence of these methods of rehabilitation was monitored on parameters of life quality and intensity of pain before and after treatment. Therapy included use of dienogest 2 mg or ethynilestradiol 30 mсg/dienogest 2 mg with or without radonotherapy. Positive effects of all three methods were revealed. After treatment amount of women, still complaining of pelvic pain reduced to 12.0-30.6%. In comparison application of dienogest 2 mg and radon appears to be more effective.