Search

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) and postpartum depression (PPD) are disabling conditions. This integrated analysis of MDD and PPD clinical trials investigated the impact of zuranolone-a positive allosteric modulator of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA A receptors and neuroactive steroid under investigation for adults with MDD and approved as an oral, once-daily, 14-day treatment course for adults with PPD in the US-on health-related quality of life, including functioning and well-being, as assessed using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey V2 (SF-36)., Methods: Integrated data from 3 MDD (201B, MOUNTAIN, WATERFALL) and 1 PPD trial (ROBIN) for individual SF-36 domains were compared for zuranolone (30- and 50-mg) vs placebo at Day (D)15 and D42. Comparisons between zuranolone responders (≥50 % reduction from baseline in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total score) and nonresponders were assessed., Results: Overall, 1003 patients were included (zuranolone, n = 504; placebo, n = 499). Significant differences in change from baseline (CFB) to D15 for patients in zuranolone vs placebo groups were observed in 6/8 domains; changes were sustained or improved at D42, with significant CFB differences for all 8 domains. Zuranolone responders had significantly higher CFB scores vs nonresponders for all domains at D15 and D42 (p < 0.001)., Limitations: Two zuranolone doses were integrated across populations of 2 disease states with potential differences in functioning, comorbidities, and patient demographics. All p-values presented are nominal., Conclusions: Integrated data across 4 zuranolone clinical trials showed improvements in functioning and well-being across all SF-36 domains. Benefits persisted after completion of treatment course at D42., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Clayton has received grant support from Daré Bioscience, Janssen, Otsuka, Praxis Precision Medicines, Relmada Therapeutics, and Sage Therapeutics, Inc.; advisory board or consulting fees from AbbVie; Brii Biosciences; Fabre-Kramer; Initiator Pharma; Janssen Research and Development; Mycomedica Life Sciences; Praxis Precision Medicines; PureTech Health; Reunion Neuroscience (formerly Field Trip Health); S1 Biopharma; Sage Therapeutics, Inc.; Sertsei Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and Vella Bioscience; and royalties from Ballantine Books/Random House, the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire, and Guilford Publications. She also holds shares/restricted stocks in Euthymics, Mediflix, and S1 Biopharma. Dr. Suthoff is an employee of Sage Therapeutics, Inc., and may hold stock and/or stock options. Drs. Huang and Bonthapally are former employees of Sage Therapeutics, Inc., and may hold stock and/or stock options. Dr. Jain received an honorarium from Amgen and consultant fees from Chugai, Merck, Ophthotech, Pfizer, SPARC, and SynDevRx; owns equity in Accurius, Enlight, Ophthotech, and SynDevRx; and serves on the Boards of Trustees of Tekla Healthcare Investors, Tekla Healthcare Opportunities Fund, Tekla Life Sciences Investors, and Tekla World Healthcare Fund. Dr. Kosinki works for QualityMetric, the publisher of the SF-36v2. Dr. Fridman has received consulting fees from Arena; CSL Behring; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; GlaxoSmithKline; Janssen; Jazz; Kala; KalVista; Novo Nordisk; Pfizer; Reata; and Sage Therapeutics, Inc.; and grants from the California State Department of Public Health, National Institutes of Health (NIH), and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Dr. Deligiannidis serves as a consultant to Brii Biosciences, Inc.; Gerbera Therapeutics; GH Research Ltd.; Neuroscience Software, Inc.; Reunion Neuroscience; and Sage Therapeutics, Inc.; reports grants from Sage Therapeutics, Inc., awarded to Zucker Hillside Hospital/Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research during the conduct of the brexanolone injection and zuranolone clinical trials; and received grants from the NIH, Premier Healthcare, and Woebot Health and royalties from an NIH employee invention outside of the submitted work. Dr. Meltzer-Brody reports grants and other research funding from Sage Therapeutics, Inc., awarded to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill during the conduct of the study; grant funding from Janssen awarded to the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill; and grants from the NIH and PCORI. She also reports advisory board or consulting fees from Embarck Neuro, Modern Health, and WebMD/MedScape outside the submitted work. Dr. Chen and Dr. Gervitz are employees of Biogen Inc. and may hold stock. Dr. Trivedi has served as a consultant or advisor for Alto Neuroscience Inc., Axsome Therapeutics, Biogen Inc., Cerebral Inc., Circular Genomics Inc., Compass Pathfinder Limited, Daiichi Sankyo Inc., GH Research, Heading Health, Janssen, Legion Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mind Medicine Inc., Naki Health Ltd., Neurocrine Biosciences Inc., Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc., Praxis Precision Medicines Inc., Relmada Therapeutics Inc., Sage Therapeutics, Inc., Signant Health, Sparian Biosciences, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc., and WebMD. He has received grant/research funding from American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, NCATS, NIDA, NIMH, and PCORI. Additionally, he has received editorial compensation from Engage Health Media and Oxford University Press., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: Previous societal burden estimations for major depressive disorder (MDD) often fail to account for several hidden cost components. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of societal costs for adults with MDD in the United States (USA) in 2019. The potential impact of a more effective, rapid-acting MDD therapy vs standard of care on the economic burden of MDD was estimated to illustrate the utility of such a framework in evaluating new interventions., Methods: This study used a prevalence-based human capital approach. Incremental costs (2019 US dollars) per individual with MDD were derived from national survey inputs and published literature and included incremental healthcare costs and indirect costs. For each cost component, the societal costs were extrapolated by multiplying the per-patient costs by the number of individuals with MDD. The impact of a more effective, rapid-acting novel therapy on the economic burden of MDD was then simulated on the basis of these inputs., Results: In 2019, the number of adults with MDD in the USA was estimated at 19.8 million (62.7% female; 32.9% severe MDD), and the incremental societal economic burden of MDD was estimated at $333.7 billion ($382.4 billion in 2023 US dollars), or $16,854 per adult with MDD. The primary cost drivers were healthcare costs ($127.3 billion; 38.1%), household-related costs ($80.1 billion; 24.0%), presenteeism ($43.3 billion; 13.0%), and absenteeism ($38.4 billion; 11.5%). In the simulated scenario, a hypothetical novel therapy with a 50.0% early response rate was associated with a 7.7% reduction in the economic burden of MDD relative to standard of care over 12 months., Conclusions: The economic burden of MDD is substantial and extends beyond healthcare costs, underscoring the impact of MDD across multiple aspects of life. Such a broad societal perspective should be considered in assessing the impact of the advent of effective, rapid-acting MDD therapies., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: While literature has suggested that the duration of a major depressive episode (MDE) may affect both symptomatic and functional outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD), study designs are limited in their ability to isolate a causal relationship., Methods: A targeted literature review was conducted using the MEDLINE database to assess whether there was an association between (1) shorter duration of an MDE, or (2) increased rapidity of symptom improvement, and MDD outcomes in adult patients. Given findings from the literature, we hypothesized that rapid symptom improvement could be associated with other longer-term clinical outcomes and used a previously-developed microsimulation model to test this hypothesis. The base case of the model replicated step-therapy treatment patterns, for 10,000 simulated patients, based on lines of therapy related to standard of care, observed remission rates, and observed time to relapse from the STAR*D study. In alternative scenario analyses, the step 1 remission rate was varied by +25 % and +50 % from the base case value to simulate the potential impact of improved earlier remission on disease trajectory and patient-level clinical outcomes., Results: The literature review (N = 35 studies) suggests a statistically significant relationship between the duration of MDE or early symptom improvement and MDD outcomes. The microsimulation model corroborated these findings and demonstrated that increasing the rate of remission in step 1 results in patients experiencing decreased number of treatment steps, faster time to remission, decreased rate of reaching treatment-resistant depression, and delayed time to relapse., Limitations: Rates of relapse in STAR*D were deemed unreliable due to the high-loss of follow-up; rates of relapse for the MDD DTM were instead derived using parametric extrapolation methods (i.e., exponential, Weibull, log-logistic, Gaussian, log-normal, logistic). Adherence to treatment was assumed to be 100 %; however, non-adherence is expected to result in lower cumulative remission rates., Conclusion: Findings from the literature, coupled with quantification through a novel microsimulation model, demonstrate the potential impact of increased remission on disease trajectory and patient outcomes in MDD. While additional analyses with the model may be warranted to explore the impact of novel interventions on population health, including long-term outcomes (i.e., 5-year follow-up, lifetime follow-up), efforts by clinicians to increase remission early in the disease trajectory may improve long-term outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest AA and BW were employees of Sage Therapeutics Inc. at the time this study was performed and may own stock and/or stock options in the company. ES is an employee of Sage Therapeutics Inc. and may own stock and/or stock options in the company. JB and MS were employees of Panalgo LLC, at the time this study was performed, a research consultancy organization, funded by Sage for work on this study and manuscript. MR and RCK have no conflicts to declare. The authors received no direct compensation related to the development of the manuscript and report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. Approximately 5% of people with CF have residual function (RF) CFTR mutations that result in partially retained CFTR activity. Published literature on disease trajectory among those with RF mutations is limited. In this retrospective study, we characterized lung function decline across different age groups in CFTR modulator-untreated people with CF heterozygous for F508del and an RF mutation (F/RF)., Methods: Rate of decline in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV 1 ) was analyzed using data from the US CF Foundation Patient Registry (2006-2014) in F/RF (all), F/RF (excluding R117H), and F508del homozygous (F/F) cohorts. Annual rates of ppFEV 1 decline were estimated over 2-year periods based on calendar year. Subgroup analyses by age [6-12 (children), 13-17 (adolescents), 18-24 (young adults), and ≥ 25 years (adults)] were performed., Results: The estimated annualized rate of ppFEV 1 decline was - 0.70 percentage points per year (95% CI -1.09, -0.30) in the F/RF (all) cohort (N = 1242) versus -1.91 percentage points per year (95% CI -2.01, -1.80) in the F/F cohort (N = 11,916) [difference, 1.29 percentage points per year (95% CI 0.88, 1.70); P < 0.001]. In the F/RF (all) cohort, all age groups demonstrated lung function decline ranging from -0.30 to -1.38. In the F/RF (excluding R117H) cohort, the rate of decline was -1.05 percentage points per year (95% CI -1.51, -0.60) [difference versus F/F cohort, 0.95 percentage points per year (95% CI 0.48, 1.41; P < 0.001); not statistically significant in children and young adults]., Conclusion: Progressive lung function decline was observed in people with F/RF genotypes across all assessed age groups, reinforcing the importance of early intervention and clinical monitoring to preserve lung function in all people with CF., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) continues to rise year over year, resulting in significant economic implications. However, when patients are treated with contemporary standard-of-care antidepressant pharmacotherapies, a suboptimal response is often attained, resulting in frequent treatment changes. OBJECTIVE: To compare health care resource utilization (HCRU) and all-cause medical and pharmacy costs between commercially insured patients with an MDD diagnosis and matched non-MDD patients and explore treatment patterns among patients with MDD initiating antidepressant pharmacotherapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational analysis of IBM MarketScan US commercial claims data. Adults aged 18 years and older with continuous enrollment 12 or more months before and after the patient's first MDD diagnosis from 2017 to 2018 were included in the analysis. HCRU and all-cause medical and pharmacy costs were compared among patients with MDD and a 1:1 exact-matched cohort of non-MDD patients during the same period (Objective 1). Treatment patterns (persistence, discontinuation, switch, combination, and augmentation) were analyzed for patients with MDD starting first-line antidepressant monotherapy for up to 12 months following their antidepressant initiation index date (Objective 2). Time to first treatment change or discontinuation was calculated and treatment patterns were graphically displayed in Sankey diagrams. RESULTS: 625,272 patients with MDD were matched 1:1 to a cohort of non-MDD patients in Objective 1. Patients with MDD had statistically significantly greater all-cause medical (20.4 vs 9.4; P < 0.0001), outpatient (19.5 vs 9.0; P < 0.0001), emergency department (0.51 vs 0.23; P < 0.0001), inpatient (0.35 vs 0.11; P < 0.0001), and any mental health-related (7.7 vs 0.58; P < 0.0001) visits compared with non-MDD patients. Mean all-cause medical costs were $6,809 ( P < 0.0001) higher among patients with MDD than among patients without MDD ($13,183 vs $6,374, respectively). In Objective 2, 44,485 patients with MDD who received antidepressant monotherapy as their first-line MDD treatment were examined. Among the first treatment patterns observed following initiation, 19.3% of patients persisted with their first-line therapy, 56.2% discontinued antidepressant therapy, 24.5% experienced a treatment change (switching, adding a second antidepressant, or augmenting their existing therapy). The median days until first treatment change were 65 days for those discontinuing and 47 days for those switching antidepressants. Among the 24.5% of patients with a treatment change, 50.0% experienced another change in therapy within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: The HCRU and costs accrued for patients with MDD is significantly greater than those for non-MDD patients. A large proportion of patients with MDD experienced treatment changes shortly after initiating their first-line antidepressant therapy. The results of this study highlight the need for reevaluation of the current MDD treatment paradigm. DISCLOSURES: Drs Zhu and Namjoshi are employees of Biogen Inc. and may hold stock. Dr Ferries and Ms Suthoff are employees of Sage Therapeutics, Inc., and may hold stock and/or stock options. Dr Bera has no potential conflicts of interest to disclose. This research was funded by Sage Therapeutics and Biogen. Manuscript editorial services were provided by Boston Strategic Partners, Inc., funded by Sage Therapeutics and Biogen. This work was supported by Sage Therapeutics, Inc., and Biogen. The authors had full editorial control of the manuscript and provided final approval on all content.

Background: Depression (major depressive disorder [MDD]) affects the functioning of patients in many facets of life. Very few large-scale studies to date have compared health and economic related outcomes of those with versus without depression, and across various depression severity groups. We aimed to evaluate humanistic and economic burden in respondents with and without depression diagnosis, and across symptom severity groups., Methods: Data from the 2017 US National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) were utilized. Of the adult respondents (N = 75,004), 59,786 were < 65 years old. Respondents not meeting eligibility criteria were excluded (e.g., those self-reporting bipolar disorder or experiencing depression in past 12 months but no depression diagnosis). Overall, data from 39,331 eligible respondents (aged 18-64 years) were analyzed; and comprised respondents 'with depression diagnosis' (n = 8853; self-reporting physician diagnosis of depression and experiencing depression in past 12 months) and respondents 'without depression diagnosis' (n = 30,478; no self-reported physician diagnosis of depression and not experiencing depression). Respondents with depression were further examined across depression severity based on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Outcome measures included health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL; Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form [SF-36v2]: mental and physical component summary [MCS and PCS]; Short-Form 6 Dimensions [SF-6D]; and EuroQol 5 Dimensions [EQ-5D]), work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI), and health resource utilization (HRU). Multivariate analysis was performed to examine group differences after adjusting covariates., Results: Respondents with depression diagnosis reported significantly higher rates of diagnosed anxiety and sleep problems versus those without depression (for both; P < 0.001). Adjusted MCS, PCS, SF-6D, and EQ-5D scores were significantly lower in respondents with depression versus those without depression (all P < 0.001). Consistently, respondents with depression reported higher absenteeism, presenteeism, and overall WPAI, as well as greater number of provider visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations compared with those without depression (all P < 0.001). Further, burden of each outcome increased with an increase in disease severity., Conclusions: Diagnosed depression was associated with lower health-related quality-of-life and work productivity, and higher healthcare utilization than those without depression, and burden increased with an increase in symptom severity. The results show the burden of depression remains high even among those experiencing minimal symptoms., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD), a disabling, potentially life-threatening condition, negatively affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This secondary analysis aimed to understand the impact of the neuroactive steroid zuranolone on HRQoL using the Short Form-36v2 Health Survey (SF-36v2)., Methods: Adult patients with MDD and 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score ≥22 were randomized 1:1 to receive zuranolone 30 mg or placebo for 2 weeks, with 4 weeks follow-up. SF-36v2 scores were assessed at Day 15 across 8 domains (Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health) and 2 summary scores (Physical and Mental Component), using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Correlations between SF-36v2 scores and clinician-reported efficacy endpoints were assessed using Pearson's correlation., Results: Eighty-nine patients were treated with zuranolone 30 mg (n = 45) or placebo (n = 44). In zuranolone-treated patients, HRQoL improved across all SF-36v2 domains and summary scores at Day 15. Improvements exceeding established minimally important difference thresholds were observed in Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health scores. Improvements in General Health, Vitality, Mental Health, and Mental Component Summary were statistically significant versus placebo (p ≤ 0.025). Clinician-rated endpoints negatively correlated with SF-36v2 scores., Limitations: The small unipolar depression sample may not be representative of all US MDD patients. HRQoL measures could be impacted by factors unrelated to depression., Conclusions: Zuranolone-treated patients reported rapid and significant improvements in HRQoL versus placebo at Day 15. HRQoL improvements correlated with improvements in clinician-rated assessments., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov:NCT03000530; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03000530., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and serious disorder with significant impact on patients and families. The goal of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the economic burden among patients with MDD stratified by number of treatment lines needed for episode resolution., Methods: Truven Health Analytics MarketScan ® claims data were used to identify US patients (≥ 18 years) who were diagnosed with MDD and started on an antidepressant between 2013 and 2017. A generalized linear model estimated direct and employment-related costs for the first 12 months following initiation of treatment across cohorts with increasing number of lines of MDD pharmacotherapy. Analyses were adjusted for demographics and clinical factors., Results: A total of 73,597 patients with MDD comprising the commercial (n = 66,459) and Medicare (n = 7138) populations met selection criteria. Patients who completed treatment for their episode with a single line of antidepressant had the lowest total adjusted direct costs (commercial $9975; Medicare $14,628) followed by those who completed with two lines (commercial $11,723; Medicare $15,526) and those treated with three or more lines of antidepressant regimens (commercial $21,259; Medicare $20,964). Patients who completed treatment with two lines as opposed to one incurred significantly higher direct costs (commercial +$1748, p < 0.0001; Medicare +$898, p = 0.0092). Patients who completed treatment with one line had the lowest employment-related costs compared to other groups., Conclusions: There was an increased economic burden associated with delay of episode resolution as early as the second line compared to the first line in MDD.

Background: Zuranolone (SAGE-217) is a novel, investigational positive allosteric modulator of GABA A receptors being investigated in major depressive disorder (MDD). This analysis of phase 2 data quantified the benefit and risk of zuranolone (30mg) versus placebo and antidepressants in terms of number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH)., Methods: Rates of response, remission, and all-cause discontinuation for zuranolone and 11 antidepressant comparators were obtained from the zuranolone phase 2 clinical study (N=89) and a published network meta-analysis, respectively. An indirect treatment comparison was conducted using the Bucher method to compare zuranolone to standard-of-care., Results: Zuranolone demonstrated greater benefit compared to placebo on Day 3 (NNT range for response=4-5, NNT for remission=10) and at Day 15 (NNT=3 for response and remission). Compared to SSRIs and SNRIs, zuranolone at Day 15 showed improved treatment response (NNT=4 [95% CI = 3; 16] and 5 [95% CI = 3; 25], respectively) and remission (NNT=4 [95% CI = 2; 13] and 4 [95% CI = 2; 18], respectively). This was accompanied by a reduction in all-cause discontinuation, with negative NNH values (-57 and -28), respectively., Limitations: Variations in study design across the included trials may limit the generalizability of results., Conclusions: With a small positive NNT as early as Day 3 indicating robust benefit and a negative NNH indicating reduced harm, this analysis based on a phase 2 study suggests that patients with MDD may benefit from the benefit-to-risk profile of zuranolone., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: To describe the poorly understood burden of pulmonary exacerbations experienced by primary caregivers of children (aged 2-17 years) with cystic fibrosis (CF), who frequently require prolonged hospitalizations for treatment of pulmonary exacerbations with intravenous (IV) antibiotics., Study Design: In this prospective observational study, 88 caregivers in Germany, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the US completed a survey during pulmonary exacerbation-related hospitalizations (T1) and after return to a "well state" of health (T2). The impact of pulmonary exacerbations on caregiver-reported productivity, mental/physical health, and social/family/emotional functioning was quantified., Results: Primary caregivers of children with CF reported significantly increased burden during pulmonary exacerbations, as measured by the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey mental health component and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment component scores. Compared to the "well state," during pulmonary exacerbations-related hospitalization caregivers reported lower physical health scores on the Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form 28. Quality-of-life scores on the Caregiver Quality of Life Cystic Fibrosis scale and total support score on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support did not differ significantly between T1 and T2. More caregivers reported a negative impact on family/social/emotional functioning during pulmonary exacerbations than during the "well state.", Conclusions: Pulmonary exacerbations necessitating hospitalization impose a significant burden on primary caregivers of children with CF. Preventing pulmonary exacerbations may substantially reduce this burden., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an inherited, rare autosomal recessive disease that results in chronically debilitating morbidities and high premature mortality. We evaluated how ivacaftor treatment affected CF symptoms, functioning, and well-being, as measured by the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R), a widely-used patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure., Methods: STRIVE, a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial, evaluated ivacaftor (150 mg) in CF patients aged 12+ with the G551D-CFTR mutation for 48 weeks. Treatment effect analysis used a mixed-effects repeated measures model. Treatment benefit analyses applied the cumulative distribution function and a categorical analysis of change scores ("improvement," "no change," or "decline"). Content-based interpretation examined treatment effect on specific item responses., Results: Data from 152 patients with a baseline CFQ-R assessment were analyzed. The treatment effect analysis favored treatment with ivacaftor over placebo on the Body Image, Eating, Health Perceptions, Physical Functioning, Respiratory, Social Functioning, Treatment Burden, and Vitality scales. Findings were supported by the analysis of categorical change. On all CFQ-R scales, the percentage of patients who improved was greater for ivacaftor. In the content-based analysis, the treatment benefit was characterized by better scores across a broad range of domains., Conclusions: Results illustrate broad benefits of ivacaftor treatment across many domains: respiratory symptoms, physical and social functioning, health perceptions, and vitality, as measured by the CFQ-R. The breadth of improvements reflects the systemic mechanism of action of ivacaftor compared to other therapies. Findings support the patient-reported value of ivacaftor treatment in this patient population., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00909532.

Work productivity is impacted in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients and has been linked to treatment. In two Phase 3 trials, ADVANCE and ILLUMINATE, treatment-naïve genotype 1 chronic HCV-infected patients received 12-week telaprevir (T) with 24 (T12PR24)- or 48 (T12PR48)-week peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin. The objective of this analysis was to examine the impact of chronic HCV infection and its treatment with combination therapy on work productivity. The 5-item, self-reported work productivity questionnaire (WPQ) was administered in Phase 3 trials to assess unemployment status, days unable to work due to HCV/treatment, reduced hours worked and impact on productivity in prior 4 weeks. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analyses were employed in analyses of pooled trial data. About 1147 patients were included; 22% (n = 255) were unemployed at baseline, with 8% being unemployed due to health reasons. At week 12, there were no differences by treatment regimen in the number of days unable to work. At week 48, improvements were observed earlier among patients receiving the shorter duration of T combination treatment. Mean (95% CI) change from baseline in days unable to work was -0.48 (-0.85, -0.11) days for T12PR24, 1.43 (0.63, 2.24) days for T12PR48 and 1.24 (0.18, 2.30) days for PR48 with placebo. Predictors of days unable to work were identified and include demographic characteristics, pretreatment and on-treatment levels of fatigue, as well regional variation. In post hoc analyses of the ADVANCE and ILLUMINATE trials, work productivity decreased during the initial 12 weeks regardless of treatment group., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)