Search

Photovoltaic backsheets are exposed to harsh outdoor weathering conditions throughout their service lives that can compromise their protective function, through adhesive debonding between their constituent layers and between the backsheet and the module. A large-scale study on adhesive degradation was conducted on 37 field-exposed modules, that spanned 19 different module manufacturers, that were deployed among six Köppen–Geiger climatic zones, and that were fielded between 0 and 28 years. Six outer layer polymer classes were identified among the backsheets: polyamide (PA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), fluoroethylene vinyl ether copolymer (FEVE), and tetrafluoroethylene hexafluoropropylene vinylidene fluoride copolymer (THV). Two adhesion tests were used to measure the adhesive strength: the wedge test and the width-tapered single-cantilever beam (SCB) test. Adhesion energies were compared across exposure time and Köppen–Geiger climatic zone. Many of the PET-, PVF-, and PVDF-based backsheets experienced degradation of the adhesive layer between the backsheet outer and core layers. A consistent trend of decreasing adhesion energy with exposure time was observed in five out of the six backsheet types. Trends among adhesion energy and climatic zone, while expected, were not observed, possibly due to broad ranges in temperature, humidity, and precipitation defining Köppen–Geiger climatic zones. The cantilever beam measurements produced an upper cutoff of approximately 100 J/m2, above which no modules exhibited field delamination. The results are part of a two-part study quantifying adhesion in both field-weathered and indoor-exposed PV backsheets. • Thirty-seven (37) PV modules were retrieved from various regions around the world • Two adhesion tests were used to characterize backsheet adhesion • Adhesion energy decreased with number of years of field exposure • Backsheets with adhesive tie layers often showed failure in an adhesive layer • Modules with adhesion energies greater than 100 J/m2 showed no field delamination [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Photovoltaic (PV) backsheets provide critical moisture, mechanical, and electrical insulation to the backside of PV modules, but their continued functionality depends upon their ability to remain well adhered over years of harsh environmental exposure. A study of adhesive strength was conducted on several PV backsheet types exposed to indoor accelerated weathering. Two adhesion tests – the wedge test and single cantilever beam test – were used to measure adhesion energy in four backsheets: two with fluoropolymer-based outer (airside) layers – polyvinyl fluoride (PVF), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) – and two with non-fluoropolymer-based outer layers–polyamide (PA) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The effects of changes in temperature, ultraviolet (UV) irradiance, relative humidity, and a periodic water spray were studied. The PET-, PVF- and PVDF-based backsheets all showed instances of debonding in an adhesive layer, which is commonly reported. For the PA-, PET-, and PVDF-based backsheets, adhesion energy dropped fairly rapidly with exposure, reaching very low levels by 4000 h. The PVF-based backsheet was relatively robust to weathering. Pull-off of an outer chalking layer in the PA- and PET-based backsheets suggested a sensitivity to UV. Adhesion in these two backsheets was also highly sensitive to changes in moisture level. Changes in UV irradiance and temperature did not show a statistically significant effect on adhesion loss for the exposure levels used. The present work is part of a two-part adhesion study on both field-weathered and indoor-exposed backsheets, and forms a basis for understanding adhesion degradation across a variety of backsheet types and degradation factors. • Four indoor-exposed backsheet types were adhesion-tested using two different methods. • Adhesion in the PVF-based backsheet was relatively stable. • The PA-, PET- and PVDF-based backsheets exhibited substantial decrease after 4000 hours. • The PA- and PET-based backsheets exhibited sensitivity to changes in moisture level. • The PET-, PVF-, and PVDF-based backsheets all exhibited debonding in an adhesive layer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Graphical abstract The breakdown voltage of some contemporary backsheets was reduced by ∼50% after UV weathering (a). The intermediate performance for unaged backsheet with the EVA layer removed identifies that degradation has occurred in the PET core layer. A red circle identifies a crack observed in EVA layer on the sun side in cross-section images of the backsheet immediately after weathering (b). The clean removal of the EVA layer using xylenes is verified for unaged backsheet in (c). Highlights • The DC breakdown voltage >8 kV suggests a margin for electrical insulation and thickness exists. • Artificial UV weathering reduced the breakdown voltage of 6/36 contemporary backsheets by >20%. • The breakdown voltage of 26/28 legacy backsheet materials extracted from veteran modules is >8 kV. • The artificial weathering of sheet specimens was found to result in unrepresentative damage. Abstract The ability of designated electrically insulating materials in a module, including the backsheet, to act as insulators is a key safety requirement for photovoltaic technology. The recently developed test standards IEC TS 62788-2 (including a method for direct-current breakdown-voltage) and IEC TS 62788-7-2 (for ultraviolet [UV] weathering) are examined for the first time together in this study. Thirty-six contemporary backsheets were compared using the breakdown-voltage test, before and after UV weathering, according to the recent A3 test condition. Twenty-eight backsheets, extracted from a variety of veteran photovoltaic modules, were also examined using the breakdown test. Additional characterizations were performed to interpret the breakdown-voltage results, including: surface and cross-sectional optical microscopy failure analysis; cross-sectional scanning electron (SEM) microscopy with EDS energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) failure analysis; Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) to identify the base resin and its chemical integrity; and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to identify phase transitions that might adversely affect degradation during weathering. The electrical insulation for the backsheets is discussed relative to: the industry safety requirement; features observed to facilitate the degradation of insulation; the validity of the artificial UV weathering test; the validity of the sheet geometry used for specimens in this study; and the validity of subsequent mechanical testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]