The development of assessment criteria for biological effects techniques was initiated at WKIMON III. Progress over the past year was reviewed. The development of the Fish Disease Index had progressed very well; some changes were made to the response ranges for reproduction in eelpout and for bioassays. An immediate requirement for further work related to the establishment of assessment criteria for EROD, and WKIMON recommended that an ad hoc workshop be held for 3 days in Oostende, Belgium, in late September/early October 2008. The OSPAR Background Documents for some of the biological effects technique (fish disease, bile metabolites, EROD) require updating because the present ones are either incomplete or contain outdated information. The methods used to establish the response ranges needed as assessment criteria of the biological effects techniques differ considerably and some were regarded as either inadequate or as supported by too few data. In addition, it was felt that general guidelines for deriving assessment criteria should be developed to ensure there was some degree of consistency and harmony to the process. In particular, there is a need to define the boundaries between the three levels of “Background Response Range”, the “Elevated Response Range” and the “High Effect Range”; these may be regarded as the EAC equivalent boundaries for contaminants i.e. below, between and above. In this respect one important task for each biological effect will be to define what constitutes a “significant high level of response” or “harm” to the organism. This is a longer‐term goal and should be continued by WKIMON or its equivalent in the future. In this respect a number of tasks were identified to address the above issues and to progress further development of assessment criteria. The compilation of Background Documents on Biological Effects Techniques for Monitoring was provided by the OSPAR secretariat for the WKIMON IV meeting. The current status of each document was reviewed concurrently with the review on progress with the development of assessment criteria. It was recommended that a new Background Document on intersex in fish is needed and for completeness the compilation of Background Documents should include TBT‐induced imposex in whelks. The compiled Background Document was thought to be thorough and complete. Some slight updating of references to take account of the most recent publications is needed but not urgent. Specific comment was given on each of the background documents:‐reproduction in eelpout, EROD, PAH bile metabolites, DNA adducts, bioassays, lysosomal stability, fish disease index and scope for growth. It was noted that a Technical Annex for oestrogenic effects was being progressed. Current methods for integrated assessments that the group were aware of were discussed, for example the FullMonti, REGNS and US EPA approaches. After discussion a new approach was suggested along the lines discussed by MON for integrating groups of chemical contaminants. The new approach used different endpoints of biological effects in fish, mussels and gastropods into a Generic Assessment Framework, which can be used as a “Traffic light” for environmental assessments. It was concluded that further refinement and development was required and in addition, the integration of the generic assessment framework with contaminants needed further discussion and development. A draft technical annex to support the integrated chemical‐biological effect approach was considered. This included preliminary considerations on survey and statistical design but further work was needed on this. Information was collated for use as a basis for further development of a technical annex and this included: an overview of selected methods for integrated fish monitoring; overview of selected methods for integrated bivalve monitoring; overview of methods and species for integrated gastropod/organotin monitoring; environmental parameters for inclusion in monitoring programmes (water); environmental parameters for inclusion in monitoring programmes (sediment); draft integrated guidelines for mussels: and sampling and analysis strategies for integrated fish and bivalve monitoring. A draft technical annex on recommended packages of chemical and biological methods for monitoring on a determinant basis was prepared and included packages on metals, PCBs, polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and furans, PAH and alkylated PAH, organotins, BFRs and PFOS. A practical workshop (ICON) was proposed at WKIMON III with the aim of demonstrating the core components of the WKIMON integrated chemical biological effect methods and guidelines. Much of the programme was initially being funded from the Norwegian oil industry and Research Council but this support was no longer available. As a result a revised programme was suggested with a reduced number of stations and species than were included in the original proposal for ICON. In addition, the revised ICON should also look at existing good data sets, and select a data set for analysis as a case study that might be suitable for inclusion as box text in QSR2010. The status of WKIMON (convened as a workshop) is no longer tenable within the OSPAR or ICES system. It was agreed that the work being undertaken by the WKIMON group would take up to three years to complete. It was proposed that a new group be formed within the ICES/OSPAR setup, perhaps a joint Study Group, to complete the outstanding work. Tasks for the group were identified and recommendation put forward for consideration by ICES/OSPAR.