Search

Treatment of titanyl sulfate in about 60 mM sulfuric acid with NaL(OEt) (L(OEt) (-)=[(eta(5)-C(5)H(5))Co{P(O)(OEt)(2)}(3)](-)) afforded the mu-sulfato complex [(L(OEt)Ti)(2)(mu-O)(2)(mu-SO(4))] (2). In more concentrated sulfuric acid (>1 M), the same reaction yielded the di-mu-sulfato complex [(L(OEt)Ti)(2)(mu-O)(mu-SO(4))(2)] (3). Reaction of 2 with HOTf (OTf=triflate, CF(3)SO(3)) gave the tris(triflato) complex [L(OEt)Ti(OTf)(3)] (4), whereas treatment of 2 with Ag(OTf) in CH(2)Cl(2) afforded the sulfato-capped trinuclear complex [{(L(OEt))(3)Ti(3)(mu-O)(3)}(mu(3)-SO(4)){Ag(OTf)}][OTf] (5), in which the Ag(OTf) moiety binds to a mu-oxo group in the Ti(3)(mu-O)(3) core. Reaction of 2 in H(2)O with Ba(NO(3))(2) afforded the tetranuclear complex (L(OEt))(4)Ti(4)(mu-O)(6) (6). Treatment of 2 with [{Rh(cod)Cl}(2)] (cod=1,5-cyclooctadiene), [Re(CO)(5)Cl], and [Ru(tBu(2)bpy)(PPh(3))(2)Cl(2)] (tBu(2)bpy=4,4'-di-tert-butyl-2,2'-dipyridyl) in the presence of Ag(OTf) afforded the heterometallic complexes [(L(OEt))(2)Ti(2)(O)(2)(SO(4)){Rh(cod)}(2)][OTf](2) (7), [(L(OEt))(2)Ti(O)(2)(SO(4)){Re(CO)(3)}][OTf] (8), and [{(L(OEt))(2)Ti(2)(mu-O)}(mu(3)-SO(4))(mu-O)(2){Ru(PPh(3))(tBu(2)bpy)}][OTf](2) (9), respectively. Complex 9 is paramagnetic with a measured magnetic moment of about 2.4 mu(B). Treatment of zirconyl nitrate with NaL(OEt) in 3.5 M sulfuric acid afforded [(L(OEt))(2)Zr(NO(3))][L(OEt)Zr(SO(4))(NO(3))] (10). Reaction of ZrCl(4) in 1.8 M sulfuric acid with NaL(OEt) in the presence Na(2)SO(4) gave the mu-sulfato-bridged complex [L(OEt)Zr(SO(4))(H(2)O)](2)(mu-SO(4)) (11). Treatment of 11 with triflic acid afforded [(L(OEt))(2)Zr][OTf](2) (12), whereas reaction of 11 with Ag(OTf) afforded a mixture of 12 and trinuclear [{L(OEt)Zr(SO(4))(H(2)O)}(3)(mu(3)-SO(4))][OTf] (13). The Zr(IV) triflato complex [L(OEt)Zr(OTf)(3)] (14) was prepared by reaction of L(OEt)ZrF(3) with Me(3)SiOTf. Complexes 4 and 14 can catalyze the Diels-Alder reaction of 1,3-cyclohexadiene with acrolein in good selectivity. Complexes 2-5, 9-11, and 13 have been characterized by X-ray crystallography.

Treatment of [Ti(O-i-Pr)(2)Cl(2)] with NaL(OEt) (L(OEt)(-) = [CpCo[P(O)(OEt)(2)](3)](-), Cp = eta(5)-C(5)H(5)) afforded [L(OEt)Ti(O-i-Pr)(2)Cl] that reacted with HCl in ether to give [L(OEt)TiCl(3)] (1). The average Ti-O and Ti-Cl distances in 1 are 1.975 and 2.293 A, respectively. Reaction of titanyl sulfate with NaL(OEt) in water followed by addition of HBF(4) afforded [L(OEt)TiF(3)] (2), the Ti-O and Ti-F distances of which are 2.020(2) and 1.792(2) A, respectively. The Zr(IV) analogue [L(OEt)ZrF(3)] (3) was prepared similarly from zirconyl nitrate, NaL(Oet), and HBF(4) in water. The Zr-O and average Zr-F distances in 3 are 2.139(2) and 1.938(2) A, respectively. Treatment of 1 with tetrachlorocatechol (H(2)Cl(4)cat) afforded [L(OEt)Ti(Cl(4)cat)Cl] (4). The average Ti-O(P), Ti-O(C), and Ti-Cl distances in 4 are 1.972, 1.926, and 2.334 A, respectively. Hydrolysis of 4 in the presence of Et(3)N yielded the mu-oxo dimer [(L(OEt))(2)Ti(2)(Cl(4)cat)(2)(mu-O)] (5). The average Ti-O(P), Ti-O(C), and Ti-O(Ti) distances in 5 are 2.027, 1.926, and 1.7977(9) A. Treatment of 1 with 1,1'-binaphthol (BINOLH(2)) in the presence of Et(3)N afforded [(L(OEt))(2)Ti(2)(mu-O)(2)(mu-BINOL)] x 2BINOLH(2) (6.2BINOLH(2)). Complex 1 is capable of catalyzing ring opening of epoxides with Me(3)SiN(3) under solvent-free conditions presumably via a Ti-azide intermediate.

Treatment of [Ru(CO)2Cl2]x with NaLOEt (LOEt−=[Co(η5-C5H5){P(O)(OEt)2}3]−) afforded [LOEtRu(CO)2Cl] (1), which reacted with AgBF4 in acetone–H2O to give [LOEtRu(CO)2(H2O)][BF4] (2). Reaction of [LOEtRu(CHCHPh)(CO)(PPh3)] with HCl gave [LOEtRuCl(CO)(PPh3)] (3), which has been characterized by X-ray crystallography. The RuC, RuP, RuCl and average RuO distances in 3 are 1.993(7), 2.2811(13), 2.376(2) and 2.137 A, respectively. Interaction of [LOEtRu(PPh3)2Cl] with CS2 and PR3 in the presence of [NH4][PF6] afforded the ruthenium(II) phosphoniodithiocarboxylate species [LOEtRu(PPh3)(η2-S2CPR3)][PF6] (R=Ph (4) or cyclohexyl (5)). Oxidation of 4 with AgBF4 yielded the ruthenium(III) complex [LOEtRu(PPh3)(η2-S2CPPh3)][BF4][PF6] (6), which has been characterized by X-ray crystallography. The RuP, average RuO and average RuS distances in 6 are 2.3978(10), 2.078 and 2.2910 A, respectively. The ruthenium(II) thiocarbonyl complex [LOEtRu(CS)Cl(PPh3)] (7) was prepared from NaLOEt and [Ru(CS)Cl2(PPh3)2]2. The RuCl, RuP, RuC and average RuO distances in 7 are 2.3681(10), 2.3043(9), 1.823(4), and 2.140 A, respectively. Treatment of 7 with AgBF4 in acetone–H2O afforded [LOEtRu(CS)(PPh3)(H2O)][BF4] (8). On the basis of the Ru(III/II) formal potential, CS was found to be a stronger π acid ligand than CO.

Interaction of [ReNCl3(PPh3)2] or [ReOCl2(PPh3)3] with NaLOEt (LOEt = [Co(η5-C5H5){PO(OEt)2}3]) afforded [ReLOEtN(PPh3)Cl] 1 and [ReLOEtOCl2] 2, respectively. Reaction of 1 with AgBF4 gave the nitridorhenium(VI) complex [ReLOEtN(PPh3)Cl]BF41·BF4, which has a μeff of 1.8 μB. Treatment of 1 with MeOSO2CF3, PhCH2Br or [Ph3C]BF4 afforded the respective organoimido species [ReLOEt(NMe)(PPh3)Cl][CF3SO3] 3, [ReLOEt(NCH2Ph)(PPh3)Cl]Br 4, and [ReLOEt(NCPh3)(PPh3)Cl] 5. Reaction of 1 with [Au(PPh3)(CF3SO3)], [Ru(Et2dtc)(PPh3)2(CO)(CF3SO3)], or [ReMeO3] yielded the bimetallic nitrido complexes [Au(PPh3){NReLOEt(PPh3)Cl}][CF3SO3] 6, [Ru(Et2dtc)(PPh3)(H2O)(CO){NReLOEt(PPh3)Cl}][CF3SO3] 7 or [ReMeO3{NReLOEt(PPh3)Cl}] 8, respectively. Treatment of [NBu4n][OsNCl4] with NaLOEt gave [OsLOEtNCl2] 9. The average Os–O, Os–Cl and Os–N distances in 9 are 2.066, 2.289 and 2.58(1) A, respectively. Reaction of 9 with PPh3 afforded the osmium(IV) phosphoran iminate species [OsLOEt(NPPh3)Cl2] 10, which has a μeff of 2.0 μB. The average Os–O, Os–Cl and Os–N distances in 10 are 2.099, 2.342, 1.893(5) A, respectively, the Os–N–P angle being 137.5(3)°. The formal potentials of the LOEt–Re and –Os complexes have been determined by cyclic voltammetry. On the basis of the ReVI–ReV formal potential, the π-donor strength was found to decrease in the order N3− > [NAu(PPh3)]2− > NMe2−.

Reaction of NaLOEt (LOEt = (η5-C5H5)Co{P(O)(OEt)2}3) with Ru(PPh3)3Cl2, Ru(DMSO)4Cl2 (DMSO = dimethyl sulfoxide), and Ru(PPh3)2(CO)Cl(CHCHPh) afforded LOEtRu(PPh3)2Cl (1), LOEtRu(DMSO)2Cl (2), and LOEtRu(PPh3)(CO)(CHCHPh) (3), respectively. The structures of complexes 1 and 2 have been established by X-ray crystallography. The mean Ru−O, Ru−P, and Ru−Cl bond distances in 1 are 2.183, 2.267, and 2.393(3) A, respectively. The mean Ru−O, Ru−S, and Ru−Cl distances in 2 are 2.118, 2.188, and 2.362(2) A, respectively. Treatment of 3 with HBF4 yielded the olefin complex [LOEtRu(PPh3)(CO)(η2-PhCHCH2)]BF4 (4). Reaction of complex 1 with PhC⋮CH in the presence of NH4PF6 gave the vinylidene complex [LOEtRu(PPh3)2(CCHPh)](PF6) (6). The mean Ru−O, Ru−P, and Ru−C distances in 6 are 2.127, 2.344, and 1.80(2) A, respectively. Deprotonation of 6 with NaOH gave the acetylide complex LOEtRu(PPh3)2(C⋮CPh) (7). Reaction of complex 1 with 3-butyn-1-ol in the presence of NH4PF6 afforded the cyclic carbene The mean Ru−O, Ru−P, a...

Dicationic Pd(II) complexes with chiral pyridine bis(oxazoline) ligands are catalysts for kinetic resolution of racemic styrene tosylazirdines. Treatment of styrene tosylaziridine with 0.5 equivalents of alcohol in the presence of the chiral Pd catalyst affords β-alkoxy tosylamide with ee up to 71%.

Interaction of LOEt(PPh3)2RuCl (LOEt = (η5-C5H5)Co{P(OEt)2O}3] with Me3SiC⋮CH and 2-phenyl-3-butyn-2-ol in the presence of NH4PF6 in MeOH/THF afforded the structurally characterized methoxycarbene ...

Treatment of titanyl sulfate in dilute sulfuric acid with 1 equiv of NaL(OEt) (L(OEt)(-) = [(eta(5)-C(5)H(5))Co{P(O)(OEt)(2)](3)](-)) in the presence of Na(3)PO(4) and Na(4)P(2)O(7) led to isolation of [(L(OEt)Ti)(3)(mu-O)(3)(mu(3-)PO(4))] (1) and [(L(OEt)Ti)(2)(mu-O)(mu-P(2)O(7))] (2), respectively. The structure of 1 consists of a Ti(3)O(3) core capped by a mu(3)-phosphato group. In 2, the [P(2)O(7)](4-) ligands binds to the two Ti's in a mu:eta(2),eta(2) fashion. Treatment of titanyl sulfate in dilute sulfuric acid with NaL(OEt) and 1.5 equiv of Na(2)Cr(2)O(7) gave [(L(OEt)Ti)(2)(mu-CrO(4))(3)] (3) that contains two L(OEt)Ti(3+) fragments bridged by three mu-CrO(4)(2-)-O,O' ligands. Complex 3 can act as a 6-electron oxidant and oxidize benzyl alcohol to give ca. 3 equiv of benzaldehyde. Treatment of [L(OEt)Ti(OTf)(3)] (OTf(-) = triflate) with [n-Bu(4)N][ReO(4)] afforded [[L(OEt)Ti(ReO(4))(2)](2)(mu-O)] (4). Treatment of [L(OEt)MF(3)] (M = Ti and Zr) with 3 equiv of [ReO(3)(OSiMe(3))] afforded [L(OEt)Ti(ReO(4))(3)] (5) and [L(OEt)Zr(ReO(4))(3)(H(2)O)] (6), respectively. Treatment of [L(OEt)MF(3)] with 2 equiv of [ReO(3)(OSiMe(3))] afforded [L(OEt)Ti(ReO(4))(2)F] (7) and [[L(OEt)Zr(ReO(4))(2)](2)(mu-F)(2)] (8), respectively, which reacted with Me(3)SiOTf to give [L(OEt)M(ReO(4))(2)(OTf)] (M = Ti (9), Zr (10)). Hydrolysis of [L(OEt)Zr(OTf)(3)] (11) with Na(2)WO(4).xH(2)O and wet CH(2)Cl(2) afforded the hydroxo-bridged complexes [[L(OEt)Zr(H(2)O)](3)(mu-OH)(3)(mu(3)-O)][OTf](4) (12) and [[L(OEt)Zr(H(2)O)(2)](2)(mu-OH)(2)][OTf](4) (13), respectively. The solid-state structures of 1-3, 6, and 11-13 have been established by X-ray crystallography. The L(OEt)Ti(IV) complexes can catalyze oxidation of methyl p-tolyl sulfide with tert-butyl hydroperoxide. The bimetallic Ti/ Re complexes 5 and 9 were found to be more active catalysts for the sulfide oxidation than other Ti(IV) complexes presumably because Re alkylperoxo species are involved as the reactive intermediates.

Interaction of PdCl(2)(MeCN)(2) with 2 equiv of (S(P))-(t)BuPhP(O)H (1H) followed by treatment with Et(3)N gave [Pd((1)(2)H)](2)(micro-Cl)(2) (2). Reaction of 2 with Na[S(2)CNEt(2)] or K[N(PPh(2)S)(2)] afforded Pd[(1)(2)H](S(2)CNEt(2)) (3) or Pd[(1)(2)H)[N(PPh(2)S)(2)] (4), respectively. Treatment of 3 with V(O)(acac)(2) (acac = acetylacetonate) and CuSO(4) in the presence of Et(3)N afforded bimetallic complexes V(O)[Pd(1)(2)(S(2)CNEt(2))](2) (5) or Cu[Pd(1)(2)(S(2)CNEt(2))](2) (6), respectively. X-ray crystallography established the S(P) configuration for the phosphinous acid ligands in 3 and 6, indicating that 1H binds to Pd(II) with retention of configuration at phosphorus. The geometry around Cu in 6 is approximately square planar with the average Cu-O distance of 1.915(3) A. Treatment of 2 with HBF(4) gave the BF(2)-capped compound [Pd((1)(2)BF(2))](2)(micro-Cl)(2) (7). The solid-state structure of 7 containing a PdP(2)O(2)B metallacycle has been determined. Chloride abstraction of 7 with AgBF(4) in acetone/water afforded the aqua compound [Pd((1)(2)BF(2))(H(2)O)(2)][BF(4)] (8) that reacted with [NH(4)](2)[WS(4)] to give [Pd((1)(2)BF(2))(2)](2)[micro-WS(4)] (9). The average Pd-S and W-S distances in 9 are 2.385(3) and 2.189(3) A, respectively. Treatment of [(eta(6)-p-cymene)RuCl(2)](2) with 1H afforded the phosphinous acid adduct (eta(6)-p-cymene)RuCl(2)(1H) (10). Reduction of [CpRuCl(2)](x)() (Cp = eta(5)-C(5)Me(5)) with Zn followed by treatment with 1H resulted in the formation of the Zn(II) phosphinate complex [(CpRu(eta(6)-C(6)H(5)))(t)BuPO(2))](2)(ZnCl(2))(2) (11) that contains a Zn(2)O(4)P(2) eight-membered ring.

Treatment of 2-(methylsulfinyl)benzaldehyde (1) with ethylenediamine or (1R,2R)-(-)-1,2-diaminocyclohexane afforded N,N'-bis[2-(methylsulfinyl)benzylidene]ethylenediamine (L(1)) or (1R,2R)-N,N'-bis[2-(methylsulfinyl)benzylidene]-1,2-cyclohexanedia mine (L(2)), respectively. Lithiation of 2-bromobenzaldehyde diethylacetal with n-BuLi/TMEDA followed by reaction with (1R,2S,5R)-(-)-menthyl-(S)-p-toluenesulfinate afforded 2-(S)-(p-tolylsulfinyl)benzaldehyde diethyl acetal (2). Deprotection of 2 with pyridinium tosylate followed by condensation with ethylenediamine, (1R,2R)-(-)-diaminocyclohexane, or (S,S)-(+)-diaminocyclohexane afforded N,N'-bis[2-(S)-(p-tolylsulfinyl)benzylidene]ethylenediamine (L(3)), (1R,2R)-N,N'-bis[2-(S)-(p-tolylsulfinyl)benzylidene]-1,2-cyclohexanediamine ((R,R)-L(4)), or (S,S)-N,N'-bis[2-(S)-(p-tolylsulfinyl)benzylidene]-1,2-cyclohexanediamine ((S,S)-L(4)), respectively. Treatment of [Ru(PPh(3))(3)Cl(2)] with L afforded trans-[Ru(L)Cl(2)] [L = L(1) (3), L(2) (4), L(3) (5), (R,R)-L(4) ((R,R)-6), (S,S)-L(4) ((S,S)-6)]. The X-ray structures of (S(S),R(S))-4, (R,R)-6, and (S,S)-6 have been determined. The average Ru-N, Ru-S, and Ru-Cl distances in (S(S),R(S))-4 are 2.063, 2.2301, and 2.4039 A, respectively. The corresponding distances in (R,R)-6 are 2.071, 2.256, and 2.411 A, and those in (S,S)-6, 2.058, 2.2275, and 2.3831 A. Compound 3 exhibited a reversible Ru(III/II) couple at 0.56 V vs Cp(2)Fe(+/0) in CH(2)Cl(2). Treatment of 3 with AgNO(3) in water afforded the aqua compound trans-[Ru(L(1))Cl(H(2)O)][PF(6)] (7), which has been characterized by X-ray crystallography. The Ru-Cl, Ru-O, average Ru-N, and average Ru-S distances in 7 are 2.3733(6), 2.1469(16), 2.071, and 2.2442 A, respectively. Treatment of 3 with AgNO(3) followed by reaction with PPh(3) afforded [Ru(L(1))(PPh(3))(2)][PF(6)](2) (8). Treatment of [Os(PPh(3))(3)Cl(2)] with L(1) resulted in deoxygenation of one sulfoxide group of L(1) and formation of [Os(L(5))Cl(2)(PPh(3))] (9) (L(5) = N-[2-(methylsulfinyl)benzylidene]-N'-[2-(methylthio)benzylididene]ethylenediamine), which has been characterized by X-ray crystallography. The average Os-S(O), Os-N(trans to P), Os-N(trans to S), Os-P, and Os-Cl distances are 2.1931, 2.085, 2.175, 2.3641, and 2.4266 A, respectively.

The crystal structure of [CuCl 2 (C 12 H 17 N 3 )], containing a five-coordinate Cu II atom with distorted trigonal-bipyramidal coordination, is reported. The absolute configuration (1R,2R) has been verified.