Recent developments in antiretroviral therapy have led to substantial advances in the management of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients. However, it is becoming evident that potent antiretrovirals do not seem to be sufficiently efficient either in targeting the pool of cells that supports low levels of virus replication (44) or in eliminating latently infected T cells (50). Additional strategies including immune-based interventions are now believed to be essential for the long-term control and eradication of HIV infection (44, 60). Recently, structured treatment interruptions have been suggested as a means of enhancing immune control of the virus after early treatment of acute infection (54). Nevertheless, the efficacy of this approach in producing clinical benefit and in restoring durable virus-specific T-cell responses in chronically infected patients has not been observed (10, 24). Furthermore, viral rebound after cessation of therapy has revealed the existence of HIV reservoirs, other than latently infected CD4+ T cells, that prompt the rapid emergence of plasma viremia (15). Taken together, these recent findings underscore the necessity to develop new strategies aimed at controlling virus replication in multiple populations of reservoir cells. Based on the considerable immune dysfunction caused by HIV-1 infection in cells implicated in innate and acquired immunity (37, 58, 75), it is rather obvious that immunotherapeutic strategies should address both compartments of the immune system. The use of a variety of HIV-specific and nonspecific immunotherapeutic agents has been aimed to enhance the control of HIV-1 replication in different cell populations, to restore the functionality of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), to increase CD4+ cell counts and lymphocyte responses, and to potentiate immune mechanisms known to contribute to a higher resistance against infections (16, 20, 33, 42, 45, 56). Today, limited success has been achieved and the link between immunological effects and clinical benefit has yet to be demonstrated. In an effort to identify clinically acceptable immunomodulators with potential application in the immunotherapy of HIV disease, we have previously evaluated the capacity of Murabutide, a safe synthetic muramyl dipeptide (MDP) derivative, to activate APCs and to suppress viral replication (17). Independent of its ability to induce HIV-suppressive β-chemokines and in the absence of a direct effect on viral enzymes, this immunomodulator was found to regulate cellular pathways in macrophages and in dendritic cells, leading to potent inhibition of proviral DNA integration and of virus transcription. Unlike most other exogenous immunomodulators, Murabutide is apyrogenic, does not induce inflammatory responses, and is well tolerated by humans (5, 13, 68, 76). Furthermore, this molecule maintains a capacity to enhance resistance against viral infections and to potentiate the antiviral and antitumor activities of therapeutic cytokines (6, 7, 14). The clinical tolerance and the immunopharmacological profile of Murabutide may justify its clinical evaluation for the nonspecific immunotherapy of HIV disease. However, prior to seriously considering the use of this immunomodulator in HIV-infected subjects, the potential effects on CD4 lymphocyte activation and on virus replication in this cell population need to be addressed. Moreover, it would be highly reassuring to observe a virus-inhibiting activity in vitro translated into a therapeutic effect in an in vivo model. The biological effects of immunomodulators of bacterial origin, including muramyl peptides, peptidoglycans, and lipopolysaccharide, have been associated mostly with the activation of APCs and the induction of cytokine and chemokine release (4, 32, 71). However, it is becoming evident that some of these compounds may act on other cell types, including lymphocytes (38, 69), and can regulate the expression of multiple cellular genes other than those of cytokines (67, 71). To address whether Murabutide could target HIV-1-infected lymphocytes, we first evaluated its activity, in vitro, on CD8-depleted phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-activated lymphocytes from HIV-1 patients and then profiled the in vivo effects of Murabutide on viral replication in HIV-infected severe combined immunodeficiency mice reconstituted with human peripheral blood leukocytes (hu-PBL-SCID mice). We demonstrate, in both tested models, a potent virus-suppressive activity of the immunomodulator in lymphocytes. Moreover, we provide data to show that this activity is equally evident on R5 and X4 virus isolates, is targeting proviral DNA integration and virus transcription, and is devoid of inhibitory effects on cellular proliferation. Finally, our findings correlate the virus-suppressive effects of Murabutide with a capacity to regulate the expression of cellular genes, including c-Myc, that are necessary for the completion of different steps in the virus life cycle.