Search

The GPR15 receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), which is activated by an endogenous peptide GPR15L(25–81) and a C-terminal peptide fragment GPR15L(71–81). GPR15 signals through the Gi/o pathway to decrease intracellular cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate (cAMP). However, the activation profiles of the GPR15 receptor within Gi/o subtypes have not been examined. Moreover, whether the receptor can also couple to Gs, Gq/11 and G12/13 is unclear. Here, GPR15L(25–81) and GPR15L(71–81) are used as pharmacological tool compounds to delineate the GPR15 receptor-mediated Gα protein signalling using a G protein activation assay and second messenger assay conducted on living cells. The results show that the GPR15 receptor preferentially couples to Gi/o rather than other pathways in both assays. Within the Gi/o family, the GPR15 receptor activates all the subtypes (Gi1, Gi2, Gi3, GoA, GoB and Gz). The Emax and activation rates of Gi1, Gi2, Gi3, GoA and GoB are similar, whilst the Emax of Gz is smaller and the activation rate is significantly slower. The potencies of both peptides toward each Gi/o subtype have been determined. Furthermore, the GPR15 receptor signals through Gi/o to inhibit cAMP accumulation, which could be blocked by the application of the Gi/o inhibitor pertussis toxin.

GPR15 is a G protein-coupled receptor involved in immune disorders such as human immunodeficiency virus-induced enteropathy, multiple sclerosis, and colitis. Yet, the important endocytosis mechanism of GPR15 remained unclear. This study determined the participation of endocytic machinery proteins, including G alpha proteins, G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), protein kinase C, arrestins, clathrin, caveolin, and dynamin in GPR15 internalization. The results demonstrate that GPR15 internalization is moderately dependent on GRKs and clathrin, and highly dependent on caveolin and dynamin. Moreover, a bystander arrestin recruitment assay showed that GPR15 recruits arrestin-3 to the cell membrane upon agonist stimulation, although GPR15 internalizes in an arrestin-independent manner. Overall, our study provides novel insights into beta-arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization mechanisms for the recently deorphanized GPR15.

The chemotactic G protein–coupled receptor GPR183 and its most potent endogenous oxysterol ligand 7α,25-dihydroxycholesterol (7α,25-OHC) are important for immune cell positioning in secondary lymphoid tissues. This receptor-ligand pair is associated with various diseases, in some cases contributing favorably and in other cases adversely, making GPR183 an attractive target for therapeutic intervention. We investigated the mechanisms underlying GPR183 internalization and the role of internalization in the main biological function of the receptor, chemotaxis. We found that the C terminus of the receptor was important for ligand-induced internalization but less so for constitutive (ligand-independent) internalization. β-arrestin potentiated ligand-induced internalization but was not required for ligand-induced or constitutive internalization. Caveolin and dynamin were the main mediators of both constitutive and ligand-induced receptor internalization in a mechanism independent of G protein activation. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis also contributed to constitutive GPR183 internalization in a β-arrestin–independent manner, suggesting the existence of different pools of surface-localized GPR183. Chemotaxis mediated by GPR183 depended on receptor desensitization by β-arrestins but could be uncoupled from internalization, highlighting an important biological role for the recruitment of β-arrestin to GPR183. The role of distinct pathways in internalization and chemotaxis may aid in the development of GPR183-targeting drugs for specific disease contexts.

Agonist-induced endocytosis is a key regulatory mechanism for controlling the responsiveness of the cell by changing the density of cell surface receptors. In addition to the role of endocytosis in signal termination, endocytosed G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been found to signal from intracellular compartments of the cell. Arrestins are generally believed to be the master regulators of GPCR endocytosis by binding to both phosphorylated receptors and adaptor protein 2 (AP-2) or clathrin, thus recruiting receptors to clathrin-coated pits to facilitate the internalization process. However, many other functions have been described for arrestins that do not relate to their role in terminating signaling. Additionally, there are now more than 30 examples of GPCRs that internalize independently of arrestins. Here we review the methods, pharmacological tools, and cellular backgrounds used to determine the role of arrestins in receptor internalization, highlighting their advantages and caveats. We also summarize key examples of arrestin-independent GPCR endocytosis in the literature and their suggested alternative endocytosis pathway (e.g., the caveolae-dependent and fast endophilin-mediated endocytosis pathways). Finally, we consider the possible function of arrestins recruited to GPCRs that are endocytosed independently of arrestins, including the catalytic arrestin activation paradigm. Technological improvements in recent years have advanced the field further, and, combined with the important implications of endocytosis on drug responses, this makes endocytosis an obvious parameter to include in molecular pharmacological characterization of ligand-GPCR interactions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) endocytosis is an important means to terminate receptor signaling, and arrestins play a central role in the widely accepted classical paradigm of GPCR endocytosis. In contrast to the canonical arrestin-mediated internalization, an increasing number of GPCRs are found to be endocytosed via alternate pathways, and the process appears more diverse than the previously defined "one pathway fits all."

The internalization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can be regulated by PKC. However, most tools available to study the contribution of PKC isozymes have considerable limitations, including a lack of selectivity. In this study, we generated and characterized human embryonic kidney 293A (HEK293A) cell lines devoid of conventional or novel PKC isozymes (ΔcPKC and ΔnPKC) and employ these to investigate the contribution of PKC isozymes in the internalization of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu

G protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of drug targets. Upon activation GPCRs signal primarily via a diverse set of heterotrimeric G proteins. Most GPCRs can couple to several different G protein subtypes. However, how drugs act at GPCRs contributing to selectivity of G protein recognition is poorly understood. Here, we examined the G protein selectivity profile of the dopamine D(2) receptor (D(2)), a GPCR targeted by antipsychotic drugs. We show that D(2) discriminates between 6 individual members of the G(i/o) family and its profile of functional selectivity is remarkably different across its ligands which all engaged D(2) with a distinct G protein coupling pattern. Using structural modeling, receptor mutagenesis and pharmacological evaluation, we identified residues in the D(2) binding pocket that shape these ligand-directed biases. We further provide pharmacogenomic evidence that natural variants in D(2) differentially impact its G protein biases in response to different ligands.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are exemplar models for understanding G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) allostery, possessing a “common” allosteric site in an extracellular vestibule (ECV) for synthetic modulators including gallamine, strychnine, and brucine. In addition, there is intriguing evidence of endogenous peptides/proteins that may target this region at the M2 mAChR. A common feature of synthetic and endogenous M2 mAChR negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) is their cationic nature. Using a structure-based approach, we previously designed a mutant M2 mAChR (N410K+T423K) to specifically abrogate binding of ECV cationic modulators (Dror et al., 2013). Herein, we used this “allosteric site-impaired” receptor to investigate allosteric interactions of synthetic modulators as well as basic peptides (poly-l-arginine, endogenously produced protamine, and major basic protein). Using [3H]N-methylscopolamine equilibrium and kinetic binding and functional assays of guanosine 5′-O-[γ-thio]triphosphate [35S] binding and extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 phosphorylation, we found modest effects of the mutations on potencies of orthosteric antagonists and an increase in the affinity of the cognate agonist, acetylcholine, likely reflecting the effect of the mutations on the access/egress of these ligands into the orthosteric pocket. More importantly, we noted a significant abrogation in affinity for all synthetic or peptidic modulators at the mutant mAChR, validating their allosteric nature. Collectively, these findings provide evidence for a hitherto-unappreciated role of endogenous cationic peptides interacting allosterically at the M2 mAChR and identify the allosteric site-impaired GPCR as a tool for validating NAM activity as well as a potential candidate for future chemogenetic strategies to understand the physiology of endogenous allosteric substances.

A major hurdle of new drug development is the lack of therapeutic specificity leading to unbearable side effects, this thesis aims to overcome the problem by examining novel methods of targeting a key biological protein in the human body.

Family of Free Fatty Acid Receptors (FFARs), specific G protein-coupled receptors comprises of four members: FFAR1-4, where each responds to different chain length of fatty acids (FAs). Over the years, FFARs have become attractive pharmacological targets in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular diseases and asthma; recent studies also point to their role in inflammation. It is now well-established that activation of FFAR1 and FFAR4 by long and medium chain FAs may lead to reduction of inflammatory state; FFAR2 and FFAR3 are activated by short chain FAs, but only FFAR2 was shown to alleviate inflammation, mostly by neutrophil inhibition. All FFARs have thus been proposed as targets in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Here we discuss current knowledge and future directions in FFAR research related to IBD.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are exemplar models for understanding G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) allostery, possessing a "common" allosteric site in an extracellular vestibule (ECV) for synthetic modulators including gallamine, strychnine, and brucine. In addition, there is intriguing evidence of endogenous peptides/proteins that may target this region at the M

Significance The orthosteric binding sites of the five muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) subtypes are highly conserved, making the development of selective antagonists challenging. The allosteric sites of these receptors are more variable, allowing one to imagine allosteric modulators that confer subtype selectivity, which would reduce the major off-target effects of muscarinic antagonists. Accordingly, a large library docking campaign was prosecuted seeking unique positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) for antagonists, ultimately revealing a PAM that substantially potentiates antagonist binding leading to subtype selectivity at the M2 mAChR. This study supports the feasibility of discovering PAMs that can convert an armamentarium of potent but nonselective G-protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) antagonist drugs into subtype-selective reagents., Subtype-selective antagonists for muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) have long been elusive, owing to the highly conserved orthosteric binding site. However, allosteric sites of these receptors are less conserved, motivating the search for allosteric ligands that modulate agonists or antagonists to confer subtype selectivity. Accordingly, a 4.6 million-molecule library was docked against the structure of the prototypical M2 mAChR, seeking molecules that specifically stabilized antagonist binding. This led us to identify a positive allosteric modulator (PAM) that potentiated the antagonist N-methyl scopolamine (NMS). Structure-based optimization led to compound ’628, which enhanced binding of NMS, and the drug scopolamine itself, with a cooperativity factor (α) of 5.5 and a KB of 1.1 μM, while sparing the endogenous agonist acetylcholine. NMR spectral changes determined for methionine residues reflected changes in the allosteric network. Moreover, ’628 slowed the dissociation rate of NMS from the M2 mAChR by 50-fold, an effect not observed at the other four mAChR subtypes. The specific PAM effect of ’628 on NMS antagonism was conserved in functional assays, including agonist stimulation of [35S]GTPγS binding and ERK 1/2 phosphorylation. Importantly, the selective allostery between ’628 and NMS was retained in membranes from adult rat hypothalamus and in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes, supporting the physiological relevance of this PAM/antagonist approach. This study supports the feasibility of discovering PAMs that confer subtype selectivity to antagonists; molecules like ’628 can convert an armamentarium of potent but nonselective GPCR antagonist drugs into subtype-selective reagents, thus reducing their off-target effects.

Subtype-selective antagonists for muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) have long been elusive, owing to the highly conserved orthosteric binding site. However, allosteric sites of these receptors are less conserved, motivating the search for allosteric ligands that modulate agonists or antagonists to confer subtype selectivity. Accordingly, a 4.6 million-molecule library was docked against the structure of the prototypical M2 mAChR, seeking molecules that specifically stabilized antagonist binding. This led us to identify a positive allosteric modulator (PAM) that potentiated the antagonist N-methyl scopolamine (NMS). Structure-based optimization led to compound '628, which enhanced binding of NMS, and the drug scopolamine itself, with a cooperativity factor (α) of 5.5 and a KB of 1.1 μM, while sparing the endogenous agonist acetylcholine. NMR spectral changes determined for methionine residues reflected changes in the allosteric network. Moreover, '628 slowed the dissociation rate of NMS from the M2 mAChR by 50-fold, an effect not observed at the other four mAChR subtypes. The specific PAM effect of '628 on NMS antagonism was conserved in functional assays, including agonist stimulation of [35S]GTPγS binding and ERK 1/2 phosphorylation. Importantly, the selective allostery between '628 and NMS was retained in membranes from adult rat hypothalamus and in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes, supporting the physiological relevance of this PAM/antagonist approach. This study supports the feasibility of discovering PAMs that confer subtype selectivity to antagonists; molecules like '628 can convert an armamentarium of potent but nonselective GPCR antagonist drugs into subtype-selective reagents, thus reducing their off-target effects.

Design of ligands that provide receptor selectivity has emerged as a new paradigm for drug discovery of G protein-coupled receptors, and may, for certain families of receptors, only be achieved via identification of chemically diverse allosteric modulators. Here, the extracellular vestibule of the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) is targeted for structure-based design of allosteric modulators. Accelerated molecular dynamics (aMD) simulations were performed to construct structural ensembles that account for the receptor flexibility. Compounds obtained from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) were docked to the receptor ensembles. Retrospective docking of known ligands showed that combining aMD simulations with Glide induced fit docking (IFD) provided much-improved enrichment factors, compared with the Glide virtual screening workflow. Glide IFD was thus applied in receptor ensemble docking, and 38 top-ranked NCI compounds were selected for experimental testing. In [(3)H]N-methylscopolamine radioligand dissociation assays, approximately half of the 38 lead compounds altered the radioligand dissociation rate, a hallmark of allosteric behavior. In further competition binding experiments, we identified 12 compounds with affinity of ≤30 μM. With final functional experiments on six selected compounds, we confirmed four of them as new negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) and one as positive allosteric modulator of agonist-mediated response at the M2 mAChR. Two of the NAMs showed subtype selectivity without significant effect at the M1 and M3 mAChRs. This study demonstrates an unprecedented successful structure-based approach to identify chemically diverse and selective GPCR allosteric modulators with outstanding potential for further structure-activity relationship studies.