Search

Neural tube defects (NTDs) are common and disabling congenital malformations that remain a public health challenge despite prevention efforts. In 2000, The Israeli Ministry of Health published recommendations on daily folic acid (FA) supplementation for women of reproductive age and established a national NTD registry. This study aims to evaluate the long-term impact of the FA supplementation policy on NTD rates in Israel and the need for further intervention. In this descriptive report, we present the rate of NTD-affected pregnancies recorded in the registry between 2000 and 2012, their subtype (anencephaly, spina bifida or other), outcome (live birth, stillbirth or pregnancy termination), ethnic group (Jewish, Bedouin and non-Bedouin Muslim) and years of maternal education. The final analysis included 2374 NTD cases reported between 2000 and 2012, compared with 1,668,073 live births. During this period NTD rates decreased from 20.3 to 11.2 cases per 10,000 live births, a 45% reduction. Reductions were seen in rates of spina bifida, anencephaly and encephalocele. NTD rates decreased in all pregnancy outcomes and in all ethnic groups, though rates among Bedouins remain high. Women with higher levels of education tended to have lower NTD rates, and were more prone to choose termination of an affected pregnancy. Following the institution of FA supplementation in Israel, a substantial reduction was seen in NTD rates. Nonetheless, Israeli NTD rates remain higher than in other developed countries. FA interventions should continue to be vigorously implemented, especially in vulnerable populations. The global success of mandatory fortification of grain strongly advocates its consideration in Israel.

BRCA genes are associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. Guidelines worldwide currently recommend BRCA genetic testing in asymptomatic individuals only if they belong to "high-risk" families. However, population screening for BRCA1/2 may be the logical next step in populations with a high prevalence of founder mutations, such as Ashkenazi Jews. This study aimed to explore (i) the impact of a positive BRCA genetic test result on individuals who have neither a personal history nor a familial history of cancer and (ii) their attitudes toward the concept of population screening.Semistructured in-depth interviews were carried out with 14 Ashkenazi Jewish women who were asymptomatic BRCA carriers and who belonged to families with low prevalence of cancer.Three main findings emerged: (i) having no family history of cancer was a source of optimism but also confusion; (ii) engaging in intensified medical surveillance and undergoing preventive procedures was perceived as health-promoting but also tended to induce a sense of physical and psychological vulnerability; and (iii) there was overall support for BRCA population screening, with some reservations.Women belonging to low-cancer-prevalence families within a "high-risk" ethnic community view BRCA genetic testing positively despite the difficulties entailed, because it allows prevention or early detection of cancer. However, implementing a BRCA population screening program should be carried out with proper pre- and post-testing preparation and support for the individuals undergoing testing.

In the Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population of Israel, 11% of breast cancer and 40% of ovarian cancer are due to three inherited founder mutations in the cancer predisposition genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. For carriers of these mutations, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy significantly reduces morbidity and mortality. Population screening for these mutations among AJ women may be justifiable if accurate estimates of cancer risk for mutation carriers can be obtained. We therefore undertook to determine risks of breast and ovarian cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers ascertained irrespective of personal or family history of cancer. Families harboring mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were ascertained by identifying mutation carriers among healthy AJ males recruited from health screening centers and outpatient clinics. Female relatives of the carriers were then enrolled and genotyped. Among the female relatives with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, cumulative risk of developing either breast or ovarian cancer by age 60 and 80, respectively, were 0.60 (± 0.07) and 0.83 (± 0.07) for BRCA1 carriers and 0.33 (± 0.09) and 0.76 (± 0.13) for BRCA2 carriers. Risks were higher in recent vs. earlier birth cohorts (P = 0.006). High cancer risks in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers identified through healthy males provide an evidence base for initiating a general screening program in the AJ population. General screening would identify many carriers who are not evaluated by genetic testing based on family history criteria. Such a program could serve as a model to investigate implementation and outcomes of population screening for genetic predisposition to cancer in other populations.