Search

BACKGROUND. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency decreases the ability of red blood cells (RBCs) to withstand oxidative stress. Refrigerated storage of RBCs induces oxidative stress. We hypothesized that G6PD-deficient donor RBCs would have inferior storage quality for transfusion as compared with G6PD-normal RBCs. METHODS. Male volunteers were screened for G6PD deficiency; 27 control and 10 G6PD-deficient volunteers each donated 1 RBC unit. After 42 days of refrigerated storage, autologous 51-chromium 24-hour posttransfusion RBC recovery (PTR) studies were performed. Metabolomics analyses of these RBC units were also performed. RESULTS. The mean 24-hour PTR for G6PD-deficient subjects was 78.5% [+ or -] 8.4% (mean [+ or -] SD), which was significantly lower than that for G6PD-normal RBCs (85.3% [+ or -] 3.2%; P = 0.0009). None of the G6PD-normal volunteers (0/27) and 3 G6PD-deficient volunteers (3/10) had PTR results below 75%, a key FDA acceptability criterion for stored donor RBCs. As expected, fresh G6PD-deficient RBCs demonstrated defects in the oxidative phase of the pentose phosphate pathway. During refrigerated storage, G6PD-deficient RBCs demonstrated increased glycolysis, impaired glutathione homeostasis, and increased purine oxidation, as compared with G6PD-normal RBCs. In addition, there were significant correlations between PTR and specific metabolites in these pathways. CONCLUSION. Based on current FDA criteria, RBCs from G6PD-deficient donors would not meet the requirements for storage quality. Metabolomics assessment identified markers of PTR and G6PD deficiency (e.g., pyruvate/lactate ratios), along with potential compensatory pathways that could be leveraged to ameliorate the metabolic needs of G6PD-deficient RBCs. TRIAL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04081272. FUNDING. The Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation grant 71590, the National Blood Foundation, NIH grant UL1 TR000040, the Webb-Waring Early Career Award 2017 by the Boettcher Foundation, and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants R01HL14644 and R01HL148151., Introduction Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is one of the most common therapeutic interventions for hospitalized patients (1). In particular, chronic transfusions are essential for patients with sickle cell disease [...]

BACKGROUND. Although convalescent plasma has been widely used to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), data from randomized controlled trials that support its efficacy are limited. METHODS. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial among adults hospitalized with severe and critical COVID-19 at 5 sites in New York City (USA) and Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive a single transfusion of either convalescent plasma or normal control plasma. The primary outcome was clinical status at 28 days following randomization, measured using an ordinal scale and analyzed using a proportional odds model in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS. Of 223 participants enrolled, 150 were randomized to receive convalescent plasma and 73 to receive normal control plasma. At 28 days, no significant improvement in the clinical scale was observed in participants randomized to convalescent plasma (OR 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-2.68, P = 0.180). However, 28-day mortality was significantly lower in participants randomized to convalescent plasma versus control plasma (19/150 [12.6%] versus 18/73 [24.6%], OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.91, P = 0.034). The median titer of anti-SARS- CoV-2 neutralizing antibody in infused convalescent plasma units was 1:160 (IQR 1:80-1:320). In a subset of nasopharyngeal swab samples from Brazil that underwent genomic sequencing, no evidence of neutralization-escape mutants was detected. CONCLUSION. In adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19, use of convalescent plasma was not associated with significant improvement in day 28 clinical status. However, convalescent plasma was associated with significantly improved survival. A possible explanation is that survivors remained hospitalized at their baseline clinical status. TRIAL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04359810. FUNDING. Amazon Foundation, Skoll Foundation., Introduction As of April 19, 2021, over 141 million cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) had been reported worldwide (1). Available data [...]

BACKGROUND. Some countries have limited the maximum allowable storage duration for red cells to 5 weeks before transfusion. In the US, red blood cells can be stored for up to 6 weeks, but randomized trials have not assessed the effects of this final week of storage on clinical outcomes. METHODS. Sixty healthy adult volunteers were randomized to a single standard, autologous, leukoreduced, packed red cell transfusion after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 weeks of storage (n = 10 per group). 51-Chromium posttransfusion red cell recovery studies were performed and laboratory parameters measured before and at defined times after transfusion. RESULTS. Extravascular hemolysis after transfusion progressively increased with increasing storage time (P < 0.001 for linear trend in the AUC of serum indirect bilirubin and iron levels). Longer storage duration was associated with decreasing posttransfusion red cell recovery (P = 0.002), decreasing elevations in hematocrit (P = 0.02), and increasing serum ferritin (P < 0.0001). After 6 weeks of refrigerated storage, transfusion was followed by increases in AUC for serum iron (P < 0.01), transferrin saturation (P < 0.001), and nontransferrin-bound iron (P < 0.001) as compared with transfusion after 1 to 5 weeks of storage. CONCLUSIONS. After 6 weeks of refrigerated storage, transfusion of autologous red cells to healthy human volunteers increased extravascular hemolysis, saturated serum transferrin, and produced circulating nontransferrin-bound iron. These outcomes, associated with increased risks of harm, provide evidence that the maximal allowable red cell storage duration should be reduced to the minimum sustainable by the blood supply, with 35 days as an attainable goal. REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02087514. FUNDING. NIH grant HL115557 and UL1 TR000040., Introduction Red blood cell transfusion, the most common procedure performed on hospitalized patients (1), is an indispensable component of modern medicine. Establishing an adequate blood supply depends on the ability [...]

Purpose The association between extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use and the development of thrombocytopenia is widely presumed yet weakly demonstrated. We hypothesized that longer duration of ECMO support would be independently associated with worsened thrombocytopenia. Methods We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of 100 adults who received ECMO for acute respiratory failure. We used generalized estimating equations to test the association between days on ECMO and daily percentage of platelets compared to the first post-cannulation platelet count. We constructed a multivariable logistic regression model with backwards stepwise elimination to identify clinical predictors of severe thrombocytopenia ([less than or equal to]50,000/[mu]L) while on ECMO. Results Days on ECMO was not associated with a decrease in platelet count in the unadjusted analysis ([beta] -0.85, 95 % CI -2.05 to 0.36), nor after considering and controlling for days hospitalized prior to ECMO, APACHE II score, platelet transfusions, and potential thrombocytopenia-inducing medications ([beta] -0.83, 95 % CI -1.9 to 0.25). Twenty-two subjects (22 %) developed severe thrombocytopenia. The APACHE II score and platelet count at the time of cannulation predicted the development of severe thrombocytopenia. The odds of developing severe thrombocytopenia increased 35 % for every 5-point increase in APACHE II score (OR 1.35, 95 % CI 0.94-1.94) and increased 35 % for every 25,000/[mu]L platelets below a mean at cannulation of 188,000/[mu]L (OR 1.35, 95 % CI 1.10-1.64). Conclusions Duration of ECMO is not associated with the development of thrombocytopenia. The severity of critical illness and platelet count at the time of cannulation predict the development of severe thrombocytopenia while receiving ECMO for respiratory failure. Future studies should validate these findings, especially in cohorts with more venoarterial ECMO patients, and should characterize the association between thrombocytopenia and bleeding events while on ECMO., Author(s): Darryl Abrams [sup.1], Matthew R. Baldwin [sup.1], Matthew Champion [sup.2], Cara Agerstrand [sup.1], Andrew Eisenberger [sup.3], Matthew Bacchetta [sup.4], Daniel Brodie [sup.1] Author Affiliations: (1) grid.21729.3f, 0000000419368729, Division of [...]

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) frequently occurs in patients with cancer, and particularly those with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Therapeutic anticoagulation with either low‐molecular‐weight heparin or a direct oral anticoagulant is clearly beneficial in patients who develop a VTE. However, whether thromboprophylaxis improves patient outcomes remains unclear. Studies assessing this risk show a 10%–25% risk of VTE, with reduction to 5%–10% with thromboprophylaxis but no impact on survival. To aid in the risk stratification of patients, several tools have been developed to identify those at highest risk for a VTE event. However, the clinical application of these risk stratification models has been limited, and most patients, even those at the highest risk, will never have a VTE event. New oral anticoagulants have greatly improved the feasibility of prophylaxis but do show increased risk of bleeding in patients with the underlying gastrointestinal dysfunction frequently found in patients with pancreatic cancer. Recently, several completed clinical trials shed new light on this complicated risk versus benefit decision. Here, we present this recent evidence and discuss important considerations for the clinician in determining whether to initiate thromboprophylaxis in patients with PDAC. Implications for Practice: Given the high risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), whether to initiate prophylactic anticoagulation is a complex clinical decision. This review discusses recent evidence regarding the risk stratification and treatment options for thromboprophylaxis in patients with PDAC, with the goal of providing practicing clinicians with updates on recent developments in the field. This article also highlights important considerations for individualizing the treatment approach for a given patient given the lack of general consensus of uniform recommendations for this patient population. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) frequently occurs in patients with cancer, especially pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Several tools have been developed to identify those at highest risk for a VTE event; however, whether thromboprophylaxis improves patient outcomes remains unclear. This article presents evidence and important considerations for the clinician in determining whether to initiate thromboprophylaxis in patients with PDAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]