Search

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a chronic neurodevelopmental disorder. Due to lack of response to the medication and significant side effects of the treatment with stimulants, alternative medications should be considered. The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy of agomelatine in treatment of ADHD.Fifty-four outpatients, children 6-15 years old, with diagnosis of ADHD according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnostic criteria participated in a 6-week, parallel, double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Fifty patients completed 6 weeks of treatment with either ritalin (methylphenidate hydrochloride [MPH]) (20 mg/day in participants below 30 kg and 30 mg/day in patients with weight ≥30 kg) or agomelatine (15 mg/day in patients with weight ≥30 kg and 25 mg/day in patients with weight ≥45 kg). Participants were assessed using Parent and Teacher ADHD Rating Scale-IV at baseline and at weeks 3 and 6.General linear model repeated measures showed no significant differences between the two groups on Parent and Teacher Rating Scale scores (F = 1.13, df = 1.26, p = 0.305, and F = 0.95, df = 1.25, p = 0.353, respectively). Changes in Teacher and Parent ADHD Rating Scale scores from baseline to the study end were not significantly different between the agomelatine group (9.28 ± 8.72 and 24.12 ± 7.04, respectively) and the MPH group (6.64 ± 11.04 and 25.76 ± 7.82, respectively) (p = 0.46 and p = 0.44, respectively). There was a trend for less insomnia in the agomelatine group versus MPH-treated group (4% vs. 24%, p = 0.09).A treatment course of 6 weeks with agomelatine demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile in children and adolescents with ADHD. Nonetheless, larger controlled studies with longer treatment periods are necessary.

Although olfaction dysfunction is now considered as an established clinical marker of prodromal Parkinson disease (PD), little is known about the neural underpinnings of olfaction dysfunction in the prodromal phase of PD. The aim of this study was to examine the microstructural association of olfaction in prodromal PD compared to early stage drug-naive PD patients. Diffusion MRI connectometry was conducted on 18 early PD and 17 prodromal PD patients to investigate the differences in group in terms of altered connectivity, i.e., integrity of white matter tracts, and subsequently to study the correlation of University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) score to white matter integrity in each group using a multiple regression model considering age, sex, RBD, and MoCA, as covariates. Individuals with prodromal PD had significantly higher quantitative anisotropy (QA) comparing with PD patients in bilateral middle cerebellar peduncles and right arcuate fasciculus. Multiple regression analysis in prodromal PD demonstrated positive association between UPSIT score and connectivity in left and right subgenual cingulum, right inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, left corticospinal tract, left parietopontine, left corticothalamic tract, and the body and the splenium of corpus callosum. These results indicate that PD and prodromal PD patients, which were matched for sex, UPSIT, and MoCA scores, have different white matter fiber architecture. Thus, it is postulated that olfaction dysfunction in prodromal and early clinical phases of PD may involve distinct pathogenesis. Increased network connectivity in prodromal and early PD may suggest the neural compensation.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cilostazol, a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase III, as an adjunctive to risperidone in alleviating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Methods Eighty-four in-patients with diagnosis of chronic schizophrenia participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial and underwent 8 weeks of treatment with either cilostazol (50 mg twice a day) or placebo as an adjuvant to risperidone. Participants were assessed using the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8. The primary outcome measure of the trial was to evaluate the efficacy of cilostazol compared to placebo in improving the PANSS negative subscale score. Result General linear model repeated measures demonstrated significant effect for time × treatment interaction on negative subscale scores (p

SummaryWhat is known and objective Current treatments for depressive disorders are far from optimum. This study was planned to evaluate possible antidepressant effects and safety of memantine, a selective N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, in humans. Methods Sixty-six outpatients with the diagnosis of moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder, based on DSM-V diagnostic criteria, were recruited to participate in a parallel, randomized, controlled trial. Sixty-two participants completed 6 weeks of treatment with either memantine (20 mg/day) plus sertraline (200 mg/day) or placebo plus sertraline (200 mg/day). Patients were evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) at baseline and at weeks 2, 4 and 6. Comparison of treatment efficacy in improving depressive symptoms between the two groups was the principal outcome measure. Results and discussion A repeated-measures analysis demonstrated significant time × treatment interaction on HDRS score [F (2·09, 125·67) = 5·09, P = 0·007]. Significantly greater improvement was seen at all three follow-up sessions as well as significantly greater response rates at weeks 4 and 6 (P = 0·018 and P

Recent evidences suggest that glutamatergic dysregulation implicated in neural plasticity and cellular resilience may contribute to the pathophysiology of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Riluzole, which exerts its effect by targeting glutamate neurotransmission, has shown antidepressant effect in recent preclinical, observational and open label studies. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of riluzole in patients with MDD. Sixty-four inpatients with diagnosis of moderate to severe major depressive disorder participated in a parallel, randomized, controlled trial, and sixty patients underwent 6 weeks treatment with either riluzole (50 mg/bid) plus citalopram (40 mg/day) or placebo plus citalopram (40 mg/day). All participants were inpatients for the whole duration of the study. Patients were assessed using Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS) at baseline and weeks 2, 4 and 6. The primary outcome measure was to assess the efficacy of riluzole compared to placebo in improving the depressive symptoms. General linear model repeated measures demonstrated significant effect for time × treatment interaction on HDRS [F (1.86, 107.82) = 8.63, p < 0.001]. Significantly greater improvement was observed in HDRS scores in the riluzole group compared to the placebo group from baseline HDRS score at weeks 2, 4 and 6 (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.002, respectively). Significantly greater response with greater speed to treatment was observed in the riluzole group than the placebo group. No serious adverse event occurred. This study showed a favorable safety and efficacy profile in patients with major depressive disorder. Larger controlled studies with longer treatment periods are needed to investigate long term safety, efficacy and optimal dosing.