Search

In Italy during the first pandemic wave of SARS-CoV-2 the activity of fertility centers was stopped, with the exception of fertility preservation in oncological patients. We adopted telehealth and we evaluated whether it could help in the management of infertile couples at a fertility center.A longitudinal study performed at a public fertility center. Telehealth was offered to 72 couples referred to our center for a first consultation from March 17th to May 31st, 2020. Percentage of patients who performed the first assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycle or intrauterine insemination (IUI) within 6 months from the first visit and drop-out rate were analyzed during COVID-19 pandemic and compared to historical controls (couples admitted to our center in 2017-2019).Eighty-five (61/72) percent of couples accepted telehealth. Time to first treatment after online consultation in telehealth group (4.5 (1.8) months) was significantly shorter (p = 0.033) respect to time to first treatment after face-to-face visit of historical controls (7.5 (6.9) months). After telehealth consultation, we observed a significant reduction (p = 0.002) of drop-out rate from 39% in historical controls to 17% of telehealth group. Telehealth significantly diminished the drop-out rate also during the COVID-19 pandemic respect to 73% after traditional face-to-face visits (p = 0.0005), with a time to first treatment of 3.7 (2.1) months in couples who refused telehealth.Telehealth could be a useful tool to facilitate the path of patients in a fertility center.

Beneficial effects of hyaluronic acid (HA)-based selection of spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are still controversial, and further studies are needed to categorize patients that might benefit from such a method.We investigated whether HA sperm selection improved ICSI outcome of couples with previous ICSI cycle failure.In this retrospective study, we prospectively collected data of (i) Group 1: 96 couples who performed one failed ICSI cycle ("1st procedure," n = 96) followed by another ICSI cycle ("2nd procedure," n = 101); ii) Group 2: 87 couples who performed one failed ICSI cycle (n = 87) followed by an HA-ICSI cycle (n = 104). Differences between procedures and groups were measured by paired and independent statistical tests, respectively. A generalized linear mixed model analyzed the effect of procedure on the outcomes and the interaction between procedures and groups.Injection of HA-bound sperm significantly improved cleavage rate with respect to standard ICSI (p = 0.026). No evolutive pregnancies were obtained in the 1st ICSI attempts. The 2nd ICSI cycles resulted in successfully seven pregnancies. In HA-ICSI cycles, the better quality of embryos with respect to ICSI (p = 0.034) increased the choice of day 5 embryo transfer (p = 0.030), which resulted in successfully 28 pregnancies. No differences were observed in clinical outcomes of the two ICSI procedures in Group 1, while pregnancy and implantation rates were significantly higher in HA-ICSI with respect to ICSI cycles (p = 0.001, p 0.0001, respectively). No negative perinatal outcomes were recorded.In couples where previous 1st ICSI failed, selection of HA-bound spermatozoa significantly improved clinical outcomes with respect to further standard ICSI.This study identified couples with previous ICSI cycles failure as a category of infertile patients that really may benefit from HA sperm selection before ICSI.

Some 30% to 80% of male sub-fertility may be associated with oxidative stress that damages spermatozoa and can decrease success of in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques. This multicenter, longitudinal, prospective study aimed to investigate whether oral antioxidant supplementation improved the reproductive competence of men who had had low fertilization rates in their previous intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles without azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia or any identifiable andrological disease. Seventy-seven men from couples who had an ICSI attempt with unexplained &lt, 60% fertilization rate took an antioxidant mix of myo-inositol, alpha-lipoic acid, folic acid, coenzyme Q10, zinc, selenium, and vitamins B2, B6, and B12. Semen parameters were analyzed before (T0) and after 90 days (T90) of treatment, and outcomes of the paired T0 and T90 cycles were compared. After the treatment there was an increase in sperm concentration (p = 0.027), total motile sperm count (p = 0.003), progressive motility (p &lt, 0.0001), and a decreasing trend of DNA-fragmented spermatozoa. Embryological outcomes (fertilization, embryo quality, blastocyst development) were significantly higher in T90 than T0 cycles. No T0 cycle resulted in an evolutive pregnancy. Conversely, in T90 cycles 29 singleton clinical pregnancies were obtained. No negative neonatal outcomes were recorded in newborns after antioxidant treatment. Diet supplementation of men who have had low fertilization rates in their previous ICSI cycles with a combination of myo-inositol, alpha-lipoic acid, folic acid, coenzyme Q10, zinc, selenium, betaine, and vitamins may improve semen reproductive potential and ICSI clinical outcome.

Simple Summary Sperm cryopreservation before gonadotoxic iatrogenic treatments is the only method currently available to preserve fertility in men with cancer. The aims of this study were to report our 15 years of experience, the clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive treatments as well as neonatal characteristics of babies born. We retrospectively reviewed 682 oncological patients who were referred to our center from 2004 to 2019 for fertility preservation. Data regarding cancer diagnosis, age, and the use of frozen semen were analyzed. The cumulative live-birth delivery rate per couple was 35%. No stillbirths, as well as no malformations in the babies born, were recorded. These successful findings demonstrated that pregnancy could be safely achieved using frozen-thawed sperm of cancer survivors who cryopreserved before gonadotoxic therapies. Abstract Cancer treatments frequently impair the reproductive ability of patients by damaging spermatogenesis. International guidelines recommend semen cryopreservation to preserve the fertility of oncological adult males and pubertal boys. However, due to the low usage rate of banked samples, not a lot of data on assisted reproductive treatments (ART) success rates in this population and follow-up data for children born are available in the literature. The aims of this study were to report our 15 years of experience, the clinical outcomes of ART as well as neonatal characteristics of babies born. We retrospectively reviewed 682 oncological patients who were referred to our center from 2004 to 2019 for fertility preservation. Over the years, only 26 patients (4%) returned to use their sperm by ART. They were survivors of leukemia and lymphomas (52%), testicular cancer (20%), and other malignant diseases (28%). These couples performed 45 cycles: 34 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) plus 11 frozen embryo transfers. A total of 13 children were born, with 35% of the cumulative live-birth delivery rate per couple. No stillbirths or malformations were recorded. These successful findings demonstrated that pregnancy could be safely achieved using frozen-thawed sperm of cancer survivors who cryopreserved before gonadotoxic therapies.

BACKGROUND: The recent report of SARS-CoV-2 presence in semen samples of six patients, including two subjects who were recovering from the clinical disease, re-opened the discussion on possible male genital tract infection, virus shedding in semen, sexual transmission and safety of fertility treatments during the pandemic period. OBJECTIVES: To explore current data and hypothesis on the possible sites of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the male reproduction system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the current literature to describe: a) the evidences on angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (AC2E) and transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) expression in the testes, accessory glands (including prostate) and the urinary tract; b) other coronaviruses' (SARS and MERS) ability to infect these sites. RESULTS: The co-expression of both ACE2 and TMPRSS2 genes was reported in spermatogonial stem cells, elongated spermatids, in at least a small percentage of prostate hillock cells and in renal tubular cells. Testicular damage was described in autopsies of SARS patients, without evidence of the virus in the specimens. Prostate is a known infection site for MERS-CoV. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in urines. DISCUSSION: There are still al lot of open questions on the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the male reproductive tract. The presence of receptors is not a proof that the testis provides a site for viral infection and it is still unknown if SARS-CoV-2 is capable to pass the blood-testis barrier. The possibility of a prostate involvement has not been investigated yet: we have no data, but theoretically it cannot be excluded. Moreover, the RNA detected in semen could have been just a residual of urinary shedding. CONCLUSION: Opening our prospective beyond the testis could be the key to better understand the possibility of a semen-related viral transmission as well as COVID19 short and long-term effects on male reproductive function.