Search

Background A minority of phase III trials in gastrointestinal oncology are positive. We assessed the association between their outcome and the level and characteristics of preexisting evidence. Methods EMBASE, PubMed, and proceedings from international meetings were searched for phase III gastrointestinal cancer trials (gastroesophageal, hepatocellular, biliary tract, pancreatic, small bowel, colorectal, anal, stromal, and neuroendocrine) between January 2000 and June 2020. Trials investigating anticancer drugs for advanced disease, with superiority design and standard treatments as control were eligible. The highest level of preexisting evidence was retrieved from the main study report. Results A total of 193 phase III trials were included, and 69 (35.8%) met their primary endpoint. Positivity rates were as follows: gastroesophageal 37%, colorectal 48%, pancreatic 17.1%, hepatocellular 20%, neuroendocrine 75%, and both biliary tract and GIST 60%. No information about preexisting evidence was found for 44 trials (22.8%). For the remaining 149, preexisting evidence consisted of phase II studies in 123 cases (82.6%) and phase I studies in 26 cases (17.4%). The probability of success was 34.1%, 35.8%, and 35.7%, respectively (P = .934). No parameter from prior studies predicted the outcome of phase III trials except β < .2 (P = .048). A numerically increased success rate was observed for phase III trials preceded by positive phase II studies (41.9% vs 18.5%, P = .2). Conclusions There does not appear to be an association between level of prior evidence and success of phase III gastrointestinal cancer trials. These data, along with the high phase III failure rate, highlight the need to improve the drug development process in this setting.

Purpose Well-differentiated lung neuroendocrine tumors (Lu-NET) are classified as typical (TC) and atypical (AC) carcinoids, based on mitotic counts and necrosis. However, prognostic factors, other than tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage and the histopathological diagnosis, are still lacking. The current study is aimed to identify potential prognostic factors to better stratify lung NET, thus, improving patients’ treatment strategy and follow-up. Methods A multicentric retrospective study, including 300 Lung NET, all surgically removed, from Italian and Spanish Institutions. Results Median age 61 years (13-86), 37.7% were males, 25.0% were AC, 42.0% were located in the lung left parenchyma, 80.3% presented a TNM stage I-II. Mitotic count was ≥2 per 10 high power field (HPF) in 24.7%, necrosis in 13.0%. Median overall survival (OS) was 46.1 months (0.6-323), median progression free survival (PFS) was 36.0 months (0.3-323). Female sex correlated with a more indolent disease (T1; N0; lower Ki67; lower mitotic count and the absence of necrosis). Left-sided primary tumors were associated with higher mitotic count and necrosis. At Cox multivariate regression model, age, left-sided tumors and nodal (N) positive status resulted independent negative prognostic factors for OS and PFS. Conclusions This study confirms the prognostic relevance of TNM stage and diagnosis to stratify LuNET. However, the current analysis suggests a wider spectrum of clinical and pathological prognostic factors, including age and primary tumor’s location. These parameters could help clinicians to personalize the management of Lu-NET.

Background While circulating tumour (ct)DNA is an indicator of minimal residual disease and negative prognostic factor in stage II-III colon cancer, no study has ever analysed the value of this biomarker in colon cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We sought to fill this gap by using prospectively collected plasma samples from 80 stage III colon cancer patients, receiving one cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFOX followed by surgery +/- adjuvant FOLFOX in the PePiTA trial. Material and Methods Samples were collected at baseline, 2 weeks and surgery. NPY and WIF1 were selected as universal methylation markers for ctDNA, and analysed with ddPCR technology. ROC curves were applied for cut-off points, and outcome measures included 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 6-year overall survival (OS). Results After a median follow-up of 52.5 months, baseline circulating-free (cf) DNA was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR 3.35, 95% CI: 1.15-9.77, p = .03), and a trend towards a similar association was observed for relative cfDNA changes between baseline and surgery (HR 2.57, 95% CI: 0.94-7.05, p = .07). Among 60 ctDNA assessable patients, 25 (42%) had detectable ctDNA at baseline. While detection of ctDNA at any pre-operative timepoint was not associated with outcome, patients with ctDNA increase (change of the worst trending methylation marker >= 11%, or mean ctDNA change of NPY and WIF1 >= 0%) between baseline and surgery showed a trend towards worse 5-year DFS (HR 3.66, 95% CI: 0.81-16.44, p = .09). Conclusion This is the first study of ctDNA in the neoadjuvant setting of early-stage colon cancer. Results are hypothesis-generating and should be confirmed in larger series.

383 Background: The clinical role of germline testing (GT) for prostate cancer (PC) is rapidly increasing due to the growing implications of precision medicine in metastatic disease, where genetic results can address eligibility for novel targeted treatments. Thus, ESMO and NCCN guidelines recommend GT for all metastatic PC individuals, whereas American testing criteria are more broad and include family history and other tumor features, such as high-risk disease, or intraductal or cribriform histology. Methods: We have retrospectively collected and analyzed clinical and genetic features of men with PC who underwent single-gene or multi-gene GT at some Swiss Institutions with expertise in hereditary cancers from July 2018 until October 2022. All patients (pts) have given written informed consent for research. Results: 109 men with PC underwent GT and received pre- and post-test counseling. Of these, 54 (50%) were metastatic, 34 (31%) had high-risk localized disease according to NCCN criteria, 7 (6%) presented cribriform or intraductal histology. A significant family history, as defined by current NCCN guidelines, was found in 79 (72%). 67 (61%) had no pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants; 25 (23%) had a variant of unknown significance (VUS); 17 (16%) were found to have a P/LP variant in the following genes: BRCA2 (8), ATM (4), BRIP1 (1), FANCA (1), NBN (1), POT1 (1), TP53 (1). Among these 17 pts, the median age at diagnosis was 66 (45-80), 10 had metastatic disease, 5 had high-risk localized disease, 14 had a family history and 5 had a personal history of another cancer. Only 6 pts were

SCOPUS: le.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Luteinized thecoma (thecomatosis) with sclerosing peritonitis (LTSP) is a very uncommon syndrome, characterized by the presence of single or bilateral ovarian thecomas and peritoneal fibrotic lesions. The disease occurs in young women and it can lead to peritoneal fibrosis and bowel obstruction. The pathogenesis of this syndrome remains still largely unknown. Surgery represents the cornerstone of treatment, but resection alone does not always allow a complete disease control. Attempts at medical treatments have been reported in recent years, but a real standard therapy has not yet been defined.We performed a systematic review of literature, collecting all the papers that reported cases of LTSP, since its first description in 1994. We found that, in these 25 years, less than 50 cases have been described in literature.Along with the established role of surgery, adjuvant treatment with hormonal agents, in particular in estrogen receptor expression, seems to be a promising approach. However, more efforts must be carried out to describe treatment and outcome of new cases, improving knowledge about this rare condition.

Introduction: Decision making in refractory colorectal cancer (rCRC) is challenging, with limited data available to predict patient outcome. We conducted a study to assess the pace of cancer progression as a potential prognostic and decision tool. Methods: CORIOLAN was a prospective, single-center, single-arm trial recruiting refractory CRC patients with an ECOG performance status of &le, 1 and an estimated life expectancy of &ge, 12 weeks. 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) scan and blood sample collection were carried out at baseline and after 2 weeks with no cancer treatment given between these timepoints. The primary objective was to evaluate the association between pace of cancer progression as defined by changes of the whole-body metabolically active tumor volume (WB-MATV) and overall survival (OS). Exploratory objectives included evaluation of the prognostic value of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Results: 47 eligible patients who had received a median number of 5 (range 2&ndash, 8) prior treatments were enrolled. At the time of analysis, 45 deaths had occurred, with 26% of patients dying within 12 weeks. The median OS was 6.3 months (range 0.4&ndash, 14.3). The median relative delta between WB-MATV at baseline and 2 weeks was +21%. Changes of WB-MATV, however, failed to predict OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.3, p = 0.383). Similarly, no association was observed between changes of any of the circulating biomarkers investigated and prognosis. By contrast, high WB-MATV (4.2 versus 9.4 months, HR 3.1, p = 0.003), high CEA (4.4 versus 7.0 months, HR 1.9, p = 0.053), high cfDNA (4.7 versus 7.0 months, HR 2.2, p = 0.015) and high CTC count (3.3 versus 7.5 months, HR 6.5, p &lt, 0.001) at baseline were associated with worse OS. Conclusions: In this study, approximately 1 out of 4 refractory CRC patients who were judged to have a life expectancy &gt, 12 weeks actually died within 12 weeks. Baseline assessment of WB-MATV, cfDNA, CTCs and CEA, but not early change evaluation of the same, may help to refine patient prognostication and guide management decisions.

High-throughput sequencing technologies are increasingly used in research but limited data are available on the feasibility and value of these when routinely adopted in clinical practice.We analyzed all consecutive cancer patients for whom genomic testing by a 48-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel (Truseq Amplicon Cancer Panel, Illumina) was requested as part of standard care in one of the largest Belgian cancer networks between 2014 and 2019. Feasibility of NGS was assessed in all study patients, while the impact of NGS on the decision making was analyzed in the group of gastrointestinal cancer patients.Tumor samples from 1064 patients with varying tumor types were tested, the number of NGS requests increasing over time (Our findings confirm that NGS is feasible in the clinical setting with acceptably low failure rates and rapid turnaround time. In gastrointestinal cancers, however, NGS-based multiple-gene testing adds very little to standard targeted sequencing, and in routine practice the clinical impact of NGS panels including genes which are not routinely recommended by international guidelines remains limited.

Breast carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation, also known as neuroendocrine breast carcinoma (NEBC), includes a heterogeneous group of rare tumors, which account for 2–5% of all invasive breast carcinomas. Because of their low incidence, most of the current limited knowledge of these tumors derives from anecdotal case reports or small retrospective series. The diagnosis of NEBC is based on the presence of morphological features similar to gastrointestinal and lung NETs and neuroendocrine markers. NEBCs are usually hormone receptors positive and HER2 negative, but despite this luminal phenotype, most recent studies suggested that NEBC could be associated with worse prognosis compared to invasive breast cancer without neuroendocrine differentiation. Due to its rarity and lack of randomized data, there is little evidence to guide the choice of treatment, so NEBC is currently treated as any invasive breast carcinoma not-otherwise specified. Recently, attempts to molecularly characterize NEBC have been made, in order to provide new targets for a more personalized treatment of this uncommon entity.

Background Although data from preclinical and clinical studies provide a strong rationale for combining capecitabine with anti-angiogenic agents, clinical development of this fluoropyrimidine in combination with aflibercept has lagged behind other treatments. We conducted a nonrandomized, noncomparative, 2-arm, phase I trial to address this unmet need. Patients and Methods Patients with chemorefractory gastrointestinal and breast cancer were sequentially recruited into a continuous (Arm A, starting dose 1100 mg/m2/day) or intermittent (Arm B, 2 weeks on/1 week off, starting dose 1700 mg/m2/day) capecitabine dosing arm. Aflibercept was administered at a flat dose of 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks in both arms. A classical 3 + 3, dose-escalation design was used. The primary objective was to establish the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and recommended dose for phase II trials. Results Thirty-eight eligible patients were recruited of whom 33 were assessable for DLTs (15 in arm A and 18 in arm B). Fourteen had colorectal cancer, 8 gastric cancer, and 11 breast cancer. DLTs included grade 2 hand-foot syndrome, grade 2 anorexia considered unacceptable by the patient, and grade 3 hypertension. The recommended dose for phase II trials for capecitabine was established at 1300 mg/m2/day in Arm A and 2500 mg/m2/day in Arm B with treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurring in 47% and 50% of patients, respectively. Among 26 assessable patients, the objective response rate was 15.4% in Arm A and 7.7% in Arm B. Conclusion Combining capecitabine with aflibercept is feasible and associated with a manageable safety profile and some anti-tumor activity in patients with chemorefractory gastrointestinal and breast cancer.

Background Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) include malignancies with different origins, clinical presentations and prognosis. Synchronous or metachronous ocular metastases from NET are extremely rare. The diagnostic algorithm and the management of this entity has not been established. The aim of our study was to characterize this subgroup. Methods We performed an electronic search in PubMed Library databases for articles about ocular metastases from NET published from 1966 to August 2019. Results We identified 21 manuscripts with a total of 64 cases. The primary origin of the tumor was lung in 28 (43.7%) cases, ileum in 14, unknown in 8, colon in 3, rectum, esophagus, thymus, testicle and liver in 1 case each, and not reported in 6. The histopathological confirmation of NET metastasis was available in 25 cases (39%). The most common sites of intraocular lesions was the uvea in 30 (46.8%) cases, followed by the orbit in 27. Most of the patients (n = 44, 68.7%) presented eye symptoms. Locoregional interventions were performed in 40 patients (62.5%): 15 cases underwent surgery, 19 had external beam radiotherapy, 5 had brachytherapy, and 1 patient received laser photocoagulation. These treatments ensured the local control in 28 of the 40 (70%) cases treated with a locoregional approach. Conclusions Ocular metastases from NETs are exceptionally rare, and originate more frequently from foregut primary tumors (lung, esophageal, and thymic NETs). The most common ocular site of secondary lesions is the uvea, likely due to its high vascularization. Locoregional approaches appear to be effective in terms of local disease control.

Objectives We previously reported that quality of life (QoL) is not included among trial endpoints and QoL results are underreported in a significant proportion of phase III oncology trials. Here we describe QoL adoption, reporting and methodology of QoL analysis in lung cancer trials. Materials and methods We selected all primary publications of lung cancer phase III trials assessing anticancer drugs published between 2012 and 2018 by 11 major journals. Results 122 publications were included. In 39 (32.0%) publications, QoL was not listed among endpoints: in 10/17 (58.8%) early stage/locally advanced NSCLC, in 15/54 (27.8%) first-line of advanced NSCLC; in 10/41 (24.4%) second and further lines of advanced NSCLC, in 4/10 (40.0%) SCLC. Proportion of trials not including QoL was similar over time: 32.9% publications in 2012–2015 vs. 30.6% in 2016–2018. Out of 83 trials including QoL among endpoints, QoL results were absent in 36 primary publications (43.4%). Proportion of trials without QoL results in primary publication increased over time (30.6% 2012–2015 vs. 61.8% 2016–2018, p = 0.005). Overall, QoL data were not available in 75/122 (61.5%) primary publications, due to the absent endpoint or unpublished results. QoL data were lacking in 48/68 (70.6%) publications of trials with overall survival as primary endpoint, 27/54 (50.0%) with other primary endpoints and 28/54 (51.9%) publications with a positive result. For trials including QoL among endpoints but lacking QoL results in primary publication, probability of secondary publication was 6.3%, 30.1% and 49.8% after 1, 2 and 3 years respectively, without evidence of improvement comparing 2012–2015 vs. 2016–2018. Conclusion QoL is not assessed or published in many phase III lung cancer trials, a setting where QoL value should be highly considered, due to high symptom burden and generally limited life expectancy. Timely inclusion of results in primary publications is worsening in recent years.

Introduction Circulating tumour (ct)DNA is an indicator of minimal residual disease and negative prognostic factor in stage II-III CC treated with surgery +/- adjuvant chemotherapy. No study, however, has ever analysed the prognostic value of this biomarker in CC patients (pts) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of baseline and early, on-treatment changes of cfDNA and ctDNA in stage II-III CC pts who were treated with one cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy followed by surgery +/- adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy in the PePiTA trial. Methods PePITA was a multicentre, single-arm, prospective phase II trial aiming to test in vivo tumour chemosensitivity as assessd by metabolic response using 18F-FDG PET/CT scan of early stage CC and to evaluate its association with survival outcome (NCT00994864). Plasma samples were prospectively collected at baseline and 2 weeks (ie, after one cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy). cfDNA was isolated with the QIAmp circulating nucleic acid kit (Qiagen), and quantified with the Qubit fluorometer (Life-Technologies). cfDNA samples were bisulfite converted using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold™ Kit (Zymo Research), with NPY and WIF1 being selected as universal methylation markers for ctDNA and analysed with digital droplet (dd)PCR technology. Data from ddPCR were processed with the QuantaSoft V1.6 software (BioRad). The primary outcome measure was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses, Kaplan-Meier method, cox proportional hazards models and log-rank tests were used. Statistical analyses were carried out with the SPSS for MacOS version 25.0 (SPSS Inc). Results 80 pts were included (ypStage I-II 56%, ypStage III 44%). After a median follow-up of 52.5 months, 3-year DFS was 80% (95%CI 71.2-90.8) and 5-year OS 84% (95%CI 75.2-94.9). Pts with high (≥1.2 ng/µl) baseline cfDNA level had worse 3-year DFS (48% vs 80%; HR 2.72, 95%CI 1.02-7.25; p=0.036) and 5-year OS (71% vs 90%; HR 5.36, 95%CI 1.14-25.28; p=0.017) than those with low baseline cfDNA level. In a multivariable analysis (including sex, ypStage and CEA), baseline cfDNA was the only factor showing a trend towards statistical significance (HR DFS 2.6, 95%CI 0.96-7.01; p=0.059; HR OS 4.65, 95%CI 0.97-22.32; p=0.055). Early changes of cfDNA (Δ ≥11%) after one cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy failed to predict survival (HR DFS 1.08, 95%CI 0.42-2.81; p=0.873; HR OS 0.68, 95%CI 0.19-2.39; p=0.543). ctDNA analyses are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions For the first time, we have shown that baseline cfDNA may predict survival outcome in early stage CC pts treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pending confirmation in larger series, testing for cfDNA at baseline could help select high-risk pts who may benefit from neoadjuvant, FOXTROT-like, treatment strategies. Citation Format: Giacomo Bregni, Elena Trevisi, Chiara Senti, Andrea Pretta, Caroline Vandeputte, Pashalina Kehagias, Elena Acedo Reina, Amélie Deleporte, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Philippe Vergauwe, Marc Van den Eynde, Guido Deboever, Jos Janssens, Gauthier Demolin, Stephane Holbrechts, Marylene Clausse, Thierry De Grez, Marc Peeters, Lionel D'Hondt, Karen Geboes, Tatiana Besse-Hammer, Alexis Buggenhout, Françoise Rothé, Patrick Flamen, Alain Hendlisz, Francesco Sclafani. Prognostic value of baseline and early changes of circulating cell-free (cf)DNA in the neoadjuvant setting of early stage colon cancer (CC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 28.

Introduction: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumours, with a variety of primary origins and variable aggressiveness. NENs with an atypical primary origin, such as breast and retroperitoneal NENs, are extremely rare. As a consequence, an established diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in this particular subgroup is lacking. The combination of capecitabine and temozolomide, called CAPTEM regimen, has produced promising response rates in patients with grade 1 or 2 neuroendocrine tumours of multiple origins. Case presentation: The first is a case of a 68-year-old woman with a metastatic primary breast neuroendocrine tumour, treated with cisplatin plus etoposide as first line, followed by CAV scheme (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine), and subsequently treated, in third line with the CAPTEM regimen, obtaining radiological response and good tolerance. The second is the case of a 66-year-old woman affected by a metastatic primitive retroperitoneal NET G2. The patient progressed after a somatostatin analogue-based first line, whereas the CAPTEM regimen led to a partial and durable response with a favourable safety profile. Conclusions: CAPTEM chemotherapy has been shown to be an active and safe therapeutic option in advanced, metastatic G1/2 atypical primary NENs.

Quality of life (QoL) is a relevant end point and a topic of growing interest by both scientific community and regulatory authorities. Our aim was to review QoL prevalence as an end point in cancer phase III trials published in major journals and to evaluate QoL reporting deficiencies in terms of under-reporting and delay of publication. All issues published between 2012 and 2016 by 11 major journals were hand-searched for primary publications of phase III trials in adult patients with solid tumors. Information about end points was derived from paper and study protocol, when available. Secondary QoL publications were searched in PubMed. In total, 446 publications were eligible. In 210 (47.1%), QoL was not included among end points. QoL was not an end point in 40.1% of trials in the advanced/metastatic setting, 39.7% of profit trials and 53.6% of non-profit trials. Out of 231 primary publications of trials with QoL as secondary or exploratory end point, QoL results were available in 143 (61.9%). QoL results were absent in 37.6% of publications in the advanced/metastatic setting, in 37.1% of profit trials and 39.3% of non-profit trials. Proportion of trials not including QoL as end point or with missing QoL results was relevant in all tumor types and for all treatment types. Overall, 70 secondary QoL publications were found: for trials without QoL results in the primary publication, probability of secondary publication was 12.5%, 30.9% and 40.3% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Proportion of trials not reporting QoL results was similar in trials with positive results (36.5%) and with negative results (39.4%), but the probability of secondary publication was higher in positive trials. QoL is not included among end points in a relevant proportion of recently published phase III trials in solid tumors. In addition, QoL results are subject to significant under-reporting and delay in publication.

Background In this study, our aim was to describe quality of life (QoL) prevalence and heterogeneity in QoL reporting in colorectal cancer phase III trials. Methods We included all phase III trials evaluating anticancer drugs in colorectal cancer patients published between 2012 and 2018 by 11 major journals. Results Out of the 67 publications identified, in 41 (61.2 %) QoL was not listed among endpoints. Out of 26 primary publications of trials including QoL among endpoints, QoL results were not reported in 10 (38.5 %). Overall, no QoL data were available in 51/67 (76.1 %) primary publications. In particular, in the metastatic setting, QoL data were not available in 12/18 (66.7 %) trials with primary endpoint overall survival, and in 20/29 (69.0 %) trials with other primary endpoints. Conclusions QoL was absent in a high proportion of recently published phase III trials in colorectal cancer, even in trials of second or further lines, where attention to QoL should be particularly high.

219 Background: We previously reported that QoL is not included among endpoints and QoL results are significantly underreported in a high proportion of recently published phase III trials in oncology. In this study our aim was to describe QoL prevalence and heterogeneity in QoL reporting in prostate cancer (PC) phase III trials. Methods: Whole database included all primary publications (P) of phase III trials evaluating anticancer drugs published between 2012 and 2016 by 11 major journals. For this analysis, we extracted the subset of PC trials. We analyzed QoL inclusion among endpoints, presence of QoL results and methodology of QoL analysis. Results: 35 P were identified (21 in castration-resistant [CRPC], 9 in advanced hormone sensitive [aHSPC], incl. both metastatic and biochemical relapsed, and 5 in earlier stages). In 13 (37.1%) QoL was not listed among study endpoints: 7/21 (33.3%) in CRPC, 3/9 (33.3%) in aHSPC, and 3/5 (60%) in earlier stages. Out of 22 primary P of trials including QoL among endpoints, QoL results were not reported in 9 (40.9%). Overall, no QoL data were available in 22/35 (62.9%) primary P (61.9% in CRPC, 44.4% in aHSPC and 100% in earlier disease). QoL data were not available in 15/25 (60%) trials with overall survival (OS) as primary endpoint, and in 7/10 (70%) trials with other primary endpoints. QoL data were not available in 7/16 (43.8%) trials with a positive result (25% in CRPC, 40% in aHSPC, 100% in earlier stages). In 18 trials with available QoL results (incl. secondary publications), most common QoL tools were FACT-P (11, 61.1%) and EORTC QLQ-C30 (6, 33.3%). Common methods of analysis were mean changes (6, 33.3%), mean scores over time (6, 33.3%), time to deterioration (6, 33.3%) and proportion of responders (3, 16.7%). QoL analysis was focused on the impact of toxicity in 10 cases (mostly in earlier stages), and on disease symptoms in 10 cases (mostly in CRPC). Conclusions: QoL is absent in a high proportion of recently published phase III trials in PC, although presence of QoL results is better in positive trials, especially in CRPC. Methodology of QoL analysis is heterogeneous in terms of type of instruments, analysis and presentation of results.

e18719Background: QoL assessment is relevant to evaluate benefit/risk ratio of cancer therapies and it is formally included in ASCO and ESMO scales of treatment value. However, its use as an endpoi...

e16012 Background: Decision making in rCRC patients (pts) who have exhausted all available therapies is challenging. Clinical trials, treatment re-challenge and best supportive care are possible options. There are limited data, however, to predict pt outcome and guide treatment choices. Methods: CORIOLAN was a prospective, single-centre, single-arm trial. Eligible pts had to have an ECOG PS of ≤1, a life expectancy of ≥12 weeks (wks) and had to have received prior standard chemotherapy and targeted agents. No cancer treatment was allowed within 4 wks prior to study entry. 18F-FDG PET scan and blood sample collection were carried out at baseline and after 2 wks. No treatment was given between these timepoints, while further management was left to the treating physician. The primary objective was to evaluate the association between tumour metabolic progression index as defined by changes of the whole-body metabolically active tumour volume (WB-MATV) and OS. Exploratory objectives included evaluation of the prognostic value of circulating biomarkers such as cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumour cells (CTCs, CellTracks Analyzer II, CellSearch) and CEA. Validated cut-off values, Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazards model and logrank tests were used (R version 3.5.1). Results: From 2012 to 2018, 47 eligible pts were enrolled. Median age: 65 years (38-82). ECOG PS 1: 64%. Males: 53%. Left-sided tumours: 71%. Metastases: lung (83%), liver (66%), lymph-nodes (45%), peritoneum (30%), bone (21%). Known RAS/BRAF mutations: 57%/0%. Median number of prior treatments: 5 (2-8). At the time of analysis, 45 deaths had occurred, with 26% of pts dying within 12 wks. The median relative delta between WB-MATV at baseline and after 2 wks was +21%. Changes of WB-MATV, however, failed to predict OS (p≥0.383). Similarly, no association was observed between changes of any of the circulating biomarkers investigated and prognosis. By contrast, low WB-MATV (9.4 vs 4.2 months, HR 0.65, p = 0.003), low cfDNA (7.0 vs 4.7 months, HR 0.58, p = 0.015), low CTC count (7.5 vs 3.3 months, HR 0.67, p < 0.001) and low CEA (7.0 vs 4.4 months, HR 0.58, p = 0.053) at baseline were associated with longer OS. Conclusions: This study confirms the inaccuracy of life expectancy estimation for rCRC pts based on a physician judgement largely relying on conventional criteria. Baseline assessment of WB-MATV, cfDNA, CTCs and CEA, but not early change evaluation of the same, may help to refine pt prognostication and guide management decisions. Clinical trial information: NCT01591590 .