Search

Abstract Background Oropharyngeal carcinomas are characterized by an increasing incidence and a relatively good prognosis. Nonetheless, a considerable number of patients develops metachronous distant metastases; identification of these patients is an urgent medical need. Methods This is a retrospective multicenter evaluation of 431 patients. All patients underwent [18F]-FDG positron emission tomography (PET). The cohort was split into an explorative group (n = 366) and a validation group (n = 65). Lesions were manually delineated in the explorative group and automatically delineated by a convolutional neuronal network (CNN) in the validation group. Quantitative PET parameters standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated for primary tumors (prim) and tumor plus lymphnodes (all). Association of parameters with freedom from distant metastases (FFDM) and overall survival (OS) was tested by cox regression analyses. Results In the explorative group, univariate analyses revealed an association of metric MTVprim (p = 0.022), MTVall (p

Abstract Objectives Deep learning-based auto-segmentation of head and neck cancer (HNC) tumors is expected to have better reproducibility than manual delineation. Positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) are commonly used in tumor segmentation. However, current methods still face challenges in handling whole-body scans where a manual selection of a bounding box may be required. Moreover, different institutions might still apply different guidelines for tumor delineation. This study aimed at exploring the auto-localization and segmentation of HNC tumors from entire PET/CT scans and investigating the transferability of trained baseline models to external real world cohorts. Methods We employed 2D Retina Unet to find HNC tumors from whole-body PET/CT and utilized a regular Unet to segment the union of the tumor and involved lymph nodes. In comparison, 2D/3D Retina Unets were also implemented to localize and segment the same target in an end-to-end manner. The segmentation performance was evaluated via Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance 95th percentile (HD95). Delineated PET/CT scans from the HECKTOR challenge were used to train the baseline models by 5-fold cross-validation. Another 271 delineated PET/CTs from three different institutions (MAASTRO, CRO, BERLIN) were used for external testing. Finally, facility-specific transfer learning was applied to investigate the improvement of segmentation performance against baseline models. Results Encouraging localization results were observed, achieving a maximum omnidirectional tumor center difference lower than 6.8 cm for external testing. The three baseline models yielded similar averaged cross-validation (CV) results with a DSC in a range of 0.71–0.75, while the averaged CV HD95 was 8.6, 10.7 and 9.8 mm for the regular Unet, 2D and 3D Retina Unets, respectively. More than a 10% drop in DSC and a 40% increase in HD95 were observed if the baseline models were tested on the three external cohorts directly. After the facility-specific training, an improvement in external testing was observed for all models. The regular Unet had the best DSC (0.70) for the MAASTRO cohort, and the best HD95 (7.8 and 7.9 mm) in the MAASTRO and CRO cohorts. The 2D Retina Unet had the best DSC (0.76 and 0.67) for the CRO and BERLIN cohorts, and the best HD95 (12.4 mm) for the BERLIN cohort. Conclusion The regular Unet outperformed the other two baseline models in CV and most external testing cohorts. Facility-specific transfer learning can potentially improve HNC segmentation performance for individual institutions, where the 2D Retina Unets could achieve comparable or even better results than the regular Unet.

PurposeMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy enables adaptive treatment plans based on daily anatomical changes and accurate organ visualization. However, the bias field artifact can compromise image quality, affecting diagnostic accuracy and quantitative analyses. This study aims to assess the impact of bias field correction on 0.35 T pelvis MRIs by evaluating clinical anatomy visualization and generative adversarial network (GAN) auto-segmentation performance.Materials and methods3D simulation MRIs from 60 prostate cancer patients treated on MR-Linac (0.35 T) were collected and preprocessed with the N4ITK algorithm for bias field correction. A 3D GAN architecture was trained, validated, and tested on 40, 10, and 10 patients, respectively, to auto-segment the organs at risk (OARs) rectum and bladder. The GAN was trained and evaluated either with the original or the bias-corrected MRIs. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95th) were computed for the segmented volumes of each patient. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test assessed the statistical difference of the metrics within OARs, both with and without bias field correction. Five radiation oncologists blindly scored 22 randomly chosen patients in terms of overall image quality and visibility of boundaries (prostate, rectum, bladder, seminal vesicles) of the original and bias-corrected MRIs. Bennett’s S score and Fleiss’ kappa were used to assess the pairwise interrater agreement and the interrater agreement among all the observers, respectively.ResultsIn the test set, the GAN trained and evaluated on original and bias-corrected MRIs showed DSC/HD95th of 0.92/5.63 mm and 0.92/5.91 mm for the bladder and 0.84/10.61 mm and 0.83/9.71 mm for the rectum. No statistical differences in the distribution of the evaluation metrics were found neither for the bladder (DSC: p = 0.07; HD95th: p = 0.35) nor for the rectum (DSC: p = 0.32; HD95th: p = 0.63). From the clinical visual grading assessment, the bias-corrected MRI resulted mostly in either no change or an improvement of the image quality and visualization of the organs’ boundaries compared with the original MRI.ConclusionThe bias field correction did not improve the anatomy visualization from a clinical point of view and the OARs’ auto-segmentation outputs generated by the GAN.

Background and purpose:In radiotherapy, dose calculations based on 4D cone beam CTs (4DCBCTs) require image intensity corrections. This retrospective study compared the dose calculation accuracy of a deep learning, projection-based scatter correction workflow (ScatterNet), to slower workflows: conventional 4D projection-based scatter correction (CBCTcor) and a deformable image registration (DIR)-based method (4DvCT).Materials and methods:For 26 lung cancer patients, planning CTs (pCTs), 4DCTs and CBCT projections were available. ScatterNet was trained with pairs of raw and corrected CBCT projections. Corrected projections from ScatterNet and the conventional workflow were reconstructed using MA-ROOSTER, yielding 4DCBCTSN and 4DCBCTcor. The 4DvCT was generated by 4DCT to 4DCBCT DIR, as part of the 4DCBCTcor workflow. Robust intensity modulated proton therapy treatment plans were created on free-breathing pCTs. 4DCBCTSN was compared to 4DCBCTcor and the 4DvCT in terms of image quality and dose calculation accuracy (dose-volume-histogram parameters and 3%/3mm gamma analysis).Results:4DCBCTSN resulted in an average mean absolute error of 87HU and 102HU when compared to 4DCBCTcor and 4DvCT respectively. High agreement was observed in targets with median dose differences of 0.4Gy (4DCBCTSN-4DCBCTcor) and 0.3Gy (4DCBCTSN-4DvCT). The gamma analysis showed high average 3%/3mm pass rates of 96% for both 4DCBCTSN vs. 4DCBCTcor and 4DCBCTSN vs. 4DvCT.Conclusions:Accurate 4D dose calculations are feasible for lung cancer patients using ScatterNet for 4DCBCT correction. Average scatter correction times could be reduced from 10min (4DCBCTcor) to 3.9s, showing the clinical suitability of the proposed deep learning-based method.

Abstract Introduction Online MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a relatively novel advancement in the field of radiation oncology, ensuring superior soft-tissue visualisation, allowing for online plan adaptation to anatomical and functional interfractional changes and improved motion management. Platinum-based chemoradiation followed by durvalumab is the recommended treatment for stage IIB(N1)/III NSCLC. However, this is only the case for patients with favourable risk factors and sufficient pulmonary function and reserve. Methods Herein, we present a technical report on tumour motion and breathing curve analyses of the first patient with node-positive stage IIB NSCLC and severely compromised pulmonary function and reserve [total lung capacity (TLC) 8.78L/132% predicted, residual volume (RV) 6.35L/271% predicted, vital capacity (VC) max 2.43L/58% predicted, FEV1 1.19L/38% predicted, DLCO-SB corrected for hemoglobin 2.76 mmol/min/kPa/30% predicted] treated in a prospective observational study with moderately hypofractionated MRgRT to a total dose of 48.0 Gy/16 daily fractions on the MRIdian system (Viewray Inc, Oakwood, USA). Results Radiotherapy was well tolerated with no relevant toxicity. First follow-up imaging at 3 months post-radiotherapy showed a partial remission. The distinctive features of this case are the patient’s severely compromised pulmonary function and the first online MR-guided accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy treatment for primary node-positive NSCLC. Conclusions This technical report describes the first patient treated in a prospective observational study evaluating the feasibility of this relatively novel technology in stage IIB(N1)/III disease, proposing a clinical pathway for the management of high-risk patients.

Abstract Deep learning models based on medical images play an increasingly important role for cancer outcome prediction. The standard approach involves usage of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to automatically extract relevant features from the patient’s image and perform a binary classification of the occurrence of a given clinical endpoint. In this work, a 2D-CNN and a 3D-CNN for the binary classification of distant metastasis (DM) occurrence in head and neck cancer patients were extended to perform time-to-event analysis. The newly built CNNs incorporate censoring information and output DM-free probability curves as a function of time for every patient. In total, 1037 patients were used to build and assess the performance of the time-to-event model. Training and validation was based on 294 patients also used in a previous benchmark classification study while for testing 743 patients from three independent cohorts were used. The best network could reproduce the good results from 3-fold cross validation [Harrell’s concordance indices (HCIs) of 0.78, 0.74 and 0.80] in two out of three testing cohorts (HCIs of 0.88, 0.67 and 0.77). Additionally, the capability of the models for patient stratification into high and low-risk groups was investigated, the CNNs being able to significantly stratify all three testing cohorts. Results suggest that image-based deep learning models show good reliability for DM time-to-event analysis and could be used for treatment personalisation.

Purpose18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is utilized for staging and treatment planning of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Some older publications on the prognostic relevance showed inconclusive results, most probably due to small study sizes. This study evaluates the prognostic and potentially predictive value of FDG-PET in a large multi-center analysis.MethodsOriginal analysis of individual FDG-PET and patient data from 16 international centers (8 institutional datasets, 8 public repositories) with 1104 patients. All patients received curative intent radiotherapy/chemoradiation (CRT) and pre-treatment FDG-PET imaging. Primary tumors were semi-automatically delineated for calculation of SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Cox regression analyses were performed for event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), loco-regional control (LRC) and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM).ResultsFDG-PET parameters were associated with patient outcome in the whole cohort regarding clinical endpoints (EFS, OS, LRC, FFDM), in uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Several previously published cut-off values were successfully validated. Subgroup analyses identified tumor- and human papillomavirus (HPV) specific parameters. In HPV positive oropharynx cancer (OPC) SUVmax was well suited to identify patients with excellent LRC for organ preservation. Patients with SUVmax of 14 or less were unlikely to develop loco-regional recurrence after definitive CRT. In contrast FDG PET parameters deliver only limited prognostic information in laryngeal cancer.ConclusionFDG-PET parameters bear considerable prognostic value in HNSCC and potential predictive value in subgroups of patients, especially regarding treatment de-intensification and organ-preservation. The potential predictive value needs further validation in appropriate control groups. Further research on advanced imaging approaches including radiomics or artificial intelligence methods should implement the identified cut-off values as benchmark routine imaging parameters.

This study retrospectively analyzed the performance of artificial neural networks (ANN) to predict overall survival (OS) or locoregional failure (LRF) in HNSCC patients undergoing radiotherapy, based on 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT and clinical covariates. We compared predictions relying on three different sets of features, extracted from 230 patients. Specifically, (i) an automated feature selection method independent of expert rating was compared with (ii) clinical variables with proven influence on OS or LRF and (iii) clinical data plus expert-selected SUV metrics. The three sets were given as input to an artificial neural network for outcome prediction, evaluated by Harrell’s concordance index (HCI) and by testing stratification capability. For OS and LRF, the best performance was achieved with expert-based PET-features (0.71 HCI) and clinical variables (0.70 HCI), respectively. For OS stratification, all three feature sets were significant, whereas for LRF only expert-based PET-features successfully classified low vs. high-risk patients. Based on 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT features, stratification into risk groups using ANN for OS and LRF is possible. Differences in the results for different feature sets confirm the relevance of feature selection, and the key importance of expert knowledge vs. automated selection.