The relationship between neuroanatomy and behaviour in humans has been of scientific interest for over a century. Early discovery of language-related neuroanatomical asymmetries and the unique capability of the left hemisphere to organise linguistic information are what began the burgeoning field of neuropsychology (Eggert, 1977; Geschwind & Levitsky, 1968; Goodglass & Quadfasel, 1954; Wada & Rasmussen, 1960). The left hemisphere’s capacity for the storage and processing of language has been associated with specific volumetric and indirect cortical measures of the posterior temporal region. The region of the pars triangularis, pars opercularis, and planum temporale are larger in the left compared to the right hemisphere (Foundas et al., 1996; Geschwind & Levitsky, 1968; Penhune, Zatorre, MacDonald, & Evans, 1996). Structures such as Heschl’s gyrus, which is more pronounced in the left than the right hemisphere, and the Sylvian fissure, which is longer in the left than the right hemisphere, are also evidence of the distinct anatomy of this language-dominant cerebral hemisphere (Campain & Minckler, 1976; Leonard, Puranik, Kuldau, & Lombardino, 1998; Rubens, Mahowald, & Hutton, 1976; Yeni-Komshian & Benson, 1976). Asymmetries of the planum temporale and sulci in the temporal region have been reported in the human brain as early as 29 weeks of gestation. Chi, Dooling, and Gilles (1977a, b) reported that in over half of their subjects (foetuses between 10 and 44 weeks gestation) the left planum temporale was larger than the right. It was also reported that the right central sulcus, the right superior temporal gyrus, and the right superior frontal gyrus appear one to two weeks before those on the left hemisphere of the fetal brain (Chi et al., 1977a, b). The temporal course of cerebral development that creates these hemispheric asymmetries, which reportedly occurs within the last trimester, seems to follow a consistent pattern in humans (Chi et al., 1977a, b). Until recently, it was assumed that neuroanatomical asymmetries were traits unique to humans and directly associated with language acquisition. Brain asymmetries in non-human primates were reported more than 100 years after lateralisation in humans was discovered when Groves and Humphrey (1973) observed a leftward asymmetry in the length of the skull for a sample of mountain gorillas. Yeni-Komshian and Benson (1976) were the first to report neuroanatomical asymmetries by directly measuring the sulci of the non-human primate brain. The length and direction of lateral fissures have been used as a quantitative measure for inferring three-dimensional asymmetry in cerebral size and shape of both human and non-human primates. Formalin-fixed brain specimens are often used to measure lateral morphological asymmetries, such as sulci and petalia. Yeni-Komshian and Benson (1976) reported that the length of the Sylvian fissure (SF), which was measured from the brains of 25 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and 25 rhesus monkeys (Maccaca mulatta), was longer in the left than right hemisphere for 80% of the chimpanzee sample, but only 44% of the rhesus sample. In contrast, when Heilbroner and Holloway (1988) measured the length of the SF in 96 formalin-preserved brains of five species of Old and New World monkeys, four species displayed significant left population-level asymmetry (rhesus monkeys, Macaca mulatta; long-tail monkeys, Macaca fascicularis; cotton-top tamarins, Saguinus oedipus; and marmosets, Callithrix jacchus). The sample of squirrel monkeys (Saimieri sciureus) did not display any asymmetry in the SF (Heilbroner & Holloway, 1988). Furthermore, when petalia asymmetries of 17 chimpanzee brain specimens were scored from photographs, 11 subjects had a wider left than right occipital petalia and 6 had a wider right occipital region (LeMay, 1976). Latex casts of the braincase (endocasts) have also been used to measure lateral surface asymmetries of the brain. Holloway and DeLa Coste-Lareymondie (1982) ordinally scored (leftward, rightward, or no asymmetry) the frontal and occipital petalia from the endocasts of gorillas (Gorilla gorilla), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Petalia asymmetries in the occipital pole were reported for 91 of 135 great apes, with 65 having a left hemisphere bias (Holloway & DeLa Coste-Lareymondie, 1982). Asymmetries in the frontal pole were reported for 65 of 135 great apes, with 53 exhibiting a right hemisphere bias (Holloway & DeLa Coste-Lareymondie, 1982). The occurrence of a combined right frontal and left occipital petalia asymmetry was reported in only 34 of 135 of the great apes (Holloway & DeLa Coste-Lareymondie, 1982). Another study reported that when measuring the central sulcus, rectus principal, and lateral orbital sulcus of 335 rhesus monkey endocasts, an elongated and rightward orbital and dorsolateral frontal lobe was present (Falk et al., 1990). To date, the evidence of neuroanatomical asymmetries in sulci and petalia is relatively consistent among samples of great apes, while the evidence in Old and New World monkeys is inconsistent (see Table 1 for a review of the relevant literature on neuroanatomical asymmetries in non-human primates). This issue is important because the differences in neuroanatomical asymmetries may reflect phylogenetic discontinuity in the brain organisation of primates. Differences in methodology, however, preclude any direct comparison. For example, difficulty locating the median border of smaller brains, poor casting of the occipital region in endocasts (Falk, 1987; LeMay, Billig, & Geschwind, 1982), and difficulty identifying sulcal endpoints due to shrinkage caused by chemical preservation (Heilbroner & Holloway, 1988; Falk, 1986) may influence measurement of asymmetries in some species and not others. With the development of imaging technologies, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), procedural differences can be minimised as a potential confounding source of between-species variation in morphological asymmetries (Hopkins & Marino, 2000; Hopkins, Marino, Rilling, & MacGregor, 1998; Hopkins & Rilling, 2000; Rilling & Insel, 1998). TABLE 1 Studies that investigated neuroanatomical asymmetries in nonhuman primates The primary focus of this study was to investigate the applicability of the Lateralised Neuroembryologic Gradient Hypothesis (LNGH) proposed in human studies to explain left-occipital and right-frontal volumetric asymmetries found in non-human primates. This hypothesis suggests that the brain develops in an anterior–posterior, ventral–dorsal and right–left direction (Best, 1988), which allegedly accounts for rightward frontal and leftward occipital asymmetries. To test the applicability of the LNGH in non-human primates, we adopted the procedures developed for human subjects to measure right and left cerebral volumetric asymmetries for the frontal and occipital regions (Weinberger, Luchins, Morihisa, & Wyatt, 1981). In addition, volumetric measures of the planum temporale were used from a previous study of the same sample of apes to correlate with the cerebral volume measures (Hopkins et al., 1998). Specifically, Hopkins et al. (1998) reported that, with the use of MRI, great apes show a population-level leftward asymmetry in the volume of the planum temporale, a finding consistent with other studies that used non-human primate cadaver specimens (Gannon, Holloway, Broadfield, & Braun, 1998). If the torquing of the developing brain results in a rightward frontal and leftward occipital pattern of asymmetry, it is predicted that this pattern will correlate with a resulting leftward planum temporale asymmetry. This hypothesis was tested by correlating PT volume with cerebral volume from each of the regions of interest.