Search

Patients with brain metastases (BMETS) need information about the prognosis and potential value of treatment options to make informed therapeutic decisions, but tools to predict survival in contemporary practice are scarce. We propose an Updated Recursive Partitioning Analysis (U-RPA) instrument to predict survival and benefit from brain-directed treatment (BDT) of contemporary patients. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with BMETS treated between 2017 and 2019. With survival as the primary endpoint, we calculated the U-RPA and generated estimates using Kaplan–Meier curves and hazard ratios. Of 862 eligible patients, 752 received BDT and 110 received best supportive care (BSC). Median overall survival with BDT and BSC was 9.3 and 1.3 months, respectively. Patients in RPA class 1, 2A, 2B and 3 who underwent BDT had median survival of 28.1, 14.7, 7.6 and 3.3 months, respectively. The median survival for patients in RPA 3 who received BDT (n = 147), WBRT (n = 79) and SRS (n = 54) was 3.3, 2.9 and 4.1 months, respectively. The U-RPA defines prognosis estimates, independent of tumor type and treatment modality, which can assist to make value-based care treatment decisions. The prognosis for patients in U-RPA class 2B and 3 remains poor, with consideration for early palliative care involvement in these cases.

To determine the feasibility and impact of neoadjuvant therapy (NT) in patients who present with advanced melanoma amenable to surgical resection.Given current effective systemic therapy for melanoma, the use of NT is being explored in patients with advanced melanoma with disease amenable to surgical resection.Prospective data from 3 institutions was obtained in patients with clinically evident Stage III/IV melanoma who underwent NT. The primary objective was to compare recurrence-free survival between patients who had pathologic complete response (pCR) to those with persistent disease.NT was offered to 45 patients, with 43 patients initiating various NT regimens including PD-1 antagonist (PD-1) therapy (N = 16), PD-1 plus ipilimumab (N = 10), BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy (N = 14), a combination of those three (N = 1), and talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) (N = 2). Thirty-two (74.1%) patients underwent surgery whereas 11 patients did not undergo surgery for these reasons: clinical CR (N = 7), progressive disease not amenable to resection (N = 3), and ongoing therapy (N = 1). 12 of 32 patients (37.5%) had pCR with these therapies: PD-1 (N = 4), PD-1 plus ipilimumab (N = 2), BRAF/MEK (N = 4), combination (N = 1), and TVEC (N = 1). At median follow-up of 16.4 months there was only 1 recurrence in the pCR group and patients with a pCR had significantly improved recurrence-free survival compared to patients without pCR (p = 0.004).Despite variability in NT regimens across institutions, NT for melanoma is feasible and associated with improved prognosis in patients who achieve a pCR. Maximizing rates of pCR could improve prognosis for patients with advanced melanoma.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibition is part of standard systemic management for many advanced malignancies. Toxicities from this treatment approach are unpredictable, though usually reversible with management per established guidelines. Some patients suffer major morbidity and treatment-related mortality from these agents in an unpredictable manner. Cardiac and neurologic complications are rare, but can result in serious clinical consequences. Methods We describe the presentation, management, and outcomes of eight sequential cases of combined cardiac and neurologic toxicities resulting in severe illness and demonstrating lack of rapid response to immunosuppression. Results Our cohort consisted of six males and two females with an average age of 73.5 years (61–89 years). There were four patients with melanoma, and one patient each with urothelial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. Four patients received combination immunotherapy and four patients received monotherapy. The median time to presentation from treatment initiation was 27 days (11–132 days). All patients had a cardiovascular and neurologic toxicity, and most had hepatitis and myositis. The cardiac signs and symptoms were the prominent initial features of the clinical presentation. Each patient was managed by a multidisciplinary team and received a range of immunosuppressive agents. All patients died as a consequence of the immune related adverse events. Conclusions The evaluation of patients with cardiac adverse events from immunotherapy, should include assessment of overlapping toxicities such as myasthenia gravis and myositis. Providers should be aware of the potential for an extended duration of disability and slow improvement for certain toxicities as these expectations may factor prominently in goals of care decisions.

Purpose: To present a rare case of multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS)-like presentation associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for metastatic choroidal melanoma. Observations: A 67-year-old non-myopic Caucasian female presented with bilateral worsening vision, flashes, and floaters after receiving two doses of ipilimumab and nivolumab for metastatic class 2 peripheral choroidal melanoma. Fundus imaging of the right eye revealed hypopigmented, extra-foveal scattered chorioretinal lesions with foveal granularity. Fluorescein angiogram and autofluorescence of the right eye demonstrated corresponding hyperfluorescent and hyperautofluorescent lesions in a wreath-like configuration. Optical coherence tomography of the right eye revealed subretinal fluid. Due to concurrent systemic side effects, checkpoint inhibitor therapy was paused and the patient was started on oral prednisone. At her one month follow up visit, her vision in her right eye returned to baseline and subretinal fluid resolved. Conclusions: This is the first reported case of a MEWDS-like chorioretinopathy after two cycles of ipilimumab/nivolumab therapy for metastatic choroidal melanoma. As immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is still an evolving field, more research is needed to characterize ocular side effect profiles of these agents.

IntroductionThe role of chemotherapy in the management of advanced melanoma is limited due to low response rates and short survival. Improved outcomes to chemotherapy administered after immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma and other solid tumors have been reported. We studied the outcomes of subjects treated at the University of Virginia (UVA) with chemotherapy following progression on prior systemic immunotherapy and compared the results with the existing literature.Materials and MethodsSubjects were identified through an institutional database of patients treated with immunotherapy at UVA. Demographic, pathologic and clinical factors were collected, along with dates of therapy, investigator-assessed best response as per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors version 1.1 and dates of death or last follow up. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and log-rank tests were used to perform time to event analysis of progression free survival and overall survival.ResultsForty-five patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria including 24 men and 21 women with a median age of 61 years. All patients had received at least one line of immunotherapy including 64.4% with prior anti-PD1 treatment. The cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens used included carboplatin with paclitaxel (55.6%), temozolomide (31.1%) and nab-paclitaxel (13.3%). The overall response rate for cytotoxic chemotherapy 22.2% and the disease control rate was 35.6%. The median progression-free survival was 1.7 months and median overall survival was 4.7 months. Nineteen (42.2%) patients survived greater than 6 months and seven (15.5%) patients survived over 12 months. Fourteen patients were able to proceed to further therapy.DiscussionOur results reveal that receipt of immunotherapy prior to chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma does not appear to improve the benefit of chemotherapy. The palliation of symptoms, maintenance of performance status and disease control may be valuable for some patients during this time of robust research and discovery for metastatic melanoma.

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury (ICPi-AKI) has emerged as an important toxicity among patients with cancer.MethodsWe collected data on 429 patients with ICPi-AKI and 429 control patients who received ICPis contemporaneously but who did not develop ICPi-AKI from 30 sites in 10 countries. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of ICPi-AKI and its recovery. A multivariable Cox model was used to estimate the effect of ICPi rechallenge versus no rechallenge on survival following ICPi-AKI.ResultsICPi-AKI occurred at a median of 16 weeks (IQR 8–32) following ICPi initiation. Lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and extrarenal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were each associated with a higher risk of ICPi-AKI. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis was the most common lesion on kidney biopsy (125/151 biopsied patients [82.7%]). Renal recovery occurred in 276 patients (64.3%) at a median of 7 weeks (IQR 3–10) following ICPi-AKI. Treatment with corticosteroids within 14 days following ICPi-AKI diagnosis was associated with higher odds of renal recovery (adjusted OR 2.64; 95% CI 1.58 to 4.41). Among patients treated with corticosteroids, early initiation of corticosteroids (within 3 days of ICPi-AKI) was associated with a higher odds of renal recovery compared with later initiation (more than 3 days following ICPi-AKI) (adjusted OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.16 to 3.79). Of 121 patients rechallenged, 20 (16.5%) developed recurrent ICPi-AKI. There was no difference in survival among patients rechallenged versus those not rechallenged following ICPi-AKI.ConclusionsPatients who developed ICPi-AKI were more likely to have impaired renal function at baseline, use a PPI, and have extrarenal irAEs. Two-thirds of patients had renal recovery following ICPi-AKI. Treatment with corticosteroids was associated with improved renal recovery.

BackgroundWe performed a clinical trial to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of a novel long peptide vaccine administered in combinations of incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) and agonists for TLR3 (polyICLC) and TLR7/8 (resiquimod). We hypothesized that T cell responses to minimal epitope peptides (MEPs) within the long peptides would be enhanced compared with prior vaccines with MEP themselves and that T cell responses would be enhanced with TLR agonists, compared with IFA alone.MethodsParticipants with resected stage IIB-IV melanoma were vaccinated with seven long melanoma peptides (LPV7) from tyrosinase, gp100, MAGE-A1, MAGE-A10, and NY-ESO-1, each containing a known MEP for CD8+ T cells, plus a tetanus helper peptide (Tet) restricted by Class II MHC. Enrollment was guided by an adaptive design to one of seven adjuvant combinations. Vaccines were administered at weeks 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 at rotating injection sites. T cell and IgG antibody (Ab) responses were measured with IFN-gamma ELIspot assay ex vivo and ELISA, respectively.ResultsFifty eligible participants were assigned to seven study groups, with highest enrollment on arm E (LPV7+Tet+IFA+polyICLC). There was one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in Group E (grade 3 injection site reaction, 6% DLT rate). All other treatment-related adverse events were grades 1–2. The CD8+ T cell immune response rate (IRR) to MEPs was 18%, less than in prior studies using MEP vaccines in IFA. The CD8+ T cell IRR trended higher for IFA-containing adjuvants (24%) than adjuvants containing only TLR agonists (6%). Overall T cell IRR to full-length LPV7 was 30%; CD4+ T cell IRR to Tet was 40%, and serum Ab IRR to LPV7 was 84%. These IRRs also trended higher for IFA-containing adjuvants (36% vs 18%, 48% vs 24%, and 97% vs 60%, respectively).ConclusionsThe LPV7 vaccine is safe with each of seven adjuvant strategies and induced T cell responses to CD8 MEPs ex vivo in a subset of patients but did not enhance IRRs compared with prior vaccines using short peptides. Immunogenicity was supported more by IFA than by TLR agonists alone and may be enhanced by polyICLC plus IFA.Trial registration numberNCT02126579.

BackgroundA vaccine containing 6 melanoma-associated peptides to stimulate helper T cells (6MHP) is safe, immunogenic, and clinically active. A phase I/II trial was designed to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of 6MHP vaccines plus programmed death 1 (PD-1) blockade.Participants and methodsParticipants with advanced melanoma received 6MHP vaccines in an incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (6 vaccines over 12 weeks). Pembrolizumab was administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Tumor biopsies at baseline and day 22 were analyzed by multiplex immunohistochemistry. Primary end points were safety (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.4.03) and immunogenicity (ex vivo interferon-γ ELISpot assay). Additional end points included changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and clinical outcomes.ResultsTwenty-two eligible participants were treated: 6 naïve to PD-1 antibody (Ab) and 16 PD-1 Ab-experienced. Median follow-up was 24.4 months. Most common treatment-related adverse events (any grade) included injection site reactions, fatigue, anemia, lymphopenia, fever, elevated aspartate aminotransferase, pruritus, and rash. Treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 3 (14%) participants, which did not cross the study safety bound. A high durable T cell response (Rsp) to 6MHP was detected in only one participant, but twofold T cell Rsps to 6MHP were detected in 7/22 (32%; 90% CI (16% to 52%)) by week 13. Objective clinical responses were observed in 23% (1 complete response, 4 partial responses), including 4/6 PD-1 Ab-naïve (67%) and 1/16 PD-1 Ab-experienced (6%). Overall survival (OS) was longer for PD-1 Ab-naïve than Ab-experienced participants (HR 6.3 (90% CI (2.1 to 28.7)). In landmark analyses at 13 weeks, OS was also longer for those with T cell Rsps (HR 6.5 (90% CI (2.1 to 29.2)) and for those with objective clinical responses. TME evaluation revealed increased densities of CD8+T cells, CD20+B cells, and Tbet+cells by day 22.ConclusionsTreatment with the 6MHP vaccine plus pembrolizumab was safe, increased intratumoral lymphocytes, and induced T cell Rsps associated with prolonged OS. The low T cell Rsp rate in PD-1 Ab-experienced participants corroborates prior murine studies that caution against delaying cancer vaccines until after PD-1 blockade. The promising objective response rate and OS in PD-1 Ab-naïve participants support consideration of a larger study in that setting.

BackgroundPeptide vaccines designed to stimulate melanoma-reactive CD4+ T cells can induce T cell and antibody (Ab) responses, associated with enhanced overall survival. We hypothesized that adding toll-like receptor 3 agonist polyICLC to an incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) would be safe and would support strong, durable CD4+ T cell and Ab responses. We also hypothesized that oral low-dose metronomic cyclophosphamide (mCy) would be safe, would reduce circulating regulatory T cells (T-regs) and would further enhance immunogenicity.Participants and methodsAn adaptive design based on toxicity and durable CD4+ T cell immune response (dRsp) was used to assign participants with resected stage IIA-IV melanoma to one of four study regimens. The regimens included a vaccine comprising six melanoma peptides restricted by Class II MHC (6MHP) in an emulsion with IFA alone (Arm A), with IFA plus systemic mCy (Arm B), with IFA+ local polyICLC (Arm C), or with IFA+ polyICLC+ mCy (Arm D). Toxicities were recorded (CTCAE V.4.03). T cell responses were measured by interferon γ ELIspot assay ex vivo. Serum Ab responses to 6MHP were measured by ELISA. Circulating T-regs were assessed by flow cytometry.ResultsForty-eight eligible participants were enrolled and treated. Early data on safety and dRsp favored enrollment on arm D. Total enrollment on Arms A-D were 3, 7, 6, and 32, respectively. Treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 1/7 (14%) participants on arm B and 2/32 (6%) on arm D. None exceeded the 25% DLT threshold for early closure to enrollment for any arm. Strong durable T cell responses to 6MHP were detected ex vivo in 0%, 29%, 67%, and 47% of participants on arms A-D, respectively. IgG Ab responses were greatest for arms C and D. Circulating T-regs frequencies were not altered by mCy.Conclusions6MHP vaccines administered with IFA, polyICLC, and mCy were well tolerated. The dRsp rate for arm D of 47% (90% CI 32 to 63) exceeded the 18% (90% CI 11 to 26) rate previously observed with 6MHP in IFA alone. Vaccination with IFA+ polyICLC (arm C) also showed promise for enhancing T cell and Ab responses.

Ipilimumab (IPI) can enhance immunity to the cancer-testis antigen NY-ESO-1. A clinical trial was designed to assess safety, immunogenicity, and clinical responses with IPI + NY-ESO-1 vaccines and effects on the tumor microenvironment (TME). Patients with measurable NY-ESO-1+ tumors were enrolled among three arms: A) IPI + NY-ESO-1 protein + poly-ICLC (pICLC) + incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA); B) IPI + NY-ESO-1 overlapping long peptides (OLP) + pICLC + IFA; and C) IPI + NY-ESO-1 OLP + pICLC. Clinical responses were assessed by irRC. T cell and Ab responses were assessed by ex vivo IFN-gamma ELIspot and ELISA. Tumor biopsies pre- and post-treatment were evaluated for immune infiltrates. Eight patients were enrolled: 5, 2, and 1 in Arms A-C, respectively. There were no DLTs. Best clinical responses were SD (4) and PD (4). T-cell and antibody (Ab) responses to NY-ESO-1 were detected in 6 (75%) and 7 (88%) patients, respectively, and were associated with SD. The breadth of Ab responses was greater for patients with SD than PD (p = .036). For five patients evaluable in the TME, treatment was associated with increases in proliferating (Ki67+) CD8+ T cells and decreases in RORγt+ CD4+ T cells. T cell densities increased for those with SD. Detection of T cell responses to NY-ESO-1 ex vivo in most patients suggests that IPI may have enhanced those responses. Proliferating intratumoral CD8+ T cells increased after vaccination plus IPI suggesting favorable impact of IPI plus NY-ESO-1 vaccines on the TME. List of Abbreviations: Ab = antibody; CTCAE = NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; DHFR/DHRP = dihydrofolate reductase; DLT = Dose-limiting toxicity; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IFA = incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (Montanide ISA-51); IFNγ = Interferon gamma; IPI = Ipilimumab; irRC = immune-related response criteria; mIFH = multispectral immunofluorescence histology; OLP = NY-ESO-1 overlapping long peptides; PBMC = peripheral blood mononuclear cells; PD = Progressive disease; pICLC = poly-ICLC (Hiltonol), a TLR3/MDA-5 agonist; RLT = Regimen-limiting Toxicity; ROI = regions of interest; RT = room temperature; SAE = serious adverse event; SD = stable disease; TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse events; TLR = toll-like receptor; TME = tumor microenvironment; TRAE = treatment-related adverse events.

BackgroundIntratumoral (IT) cancer therapies may enhance T cell activation and tumor infiltration when combined with systemic checkpoint blockade. This approach may improve treatment of advanced breast cancer, which is commonly resistant to immune therapy.MethodsA multicenter basket-style trial (NCT02643303) was performed in patients with advanced solid tumors, who received polyICLC IT 1mg x 6, then intramuscular (IM) x 3, combined with intravenous (IV) durvalumab 1500 mg q4W. Most were assigned to cohorts also receiving tremelimumab: 10 mg IT or 75 mg IV. Goals were to assess tolerability and clinical activity. Treated tumors were evaluated for immune infiltrates on days (d) 0, 15, and 29 by multiparameter immunofluorescence histology. A strong signal for clinical response was in breast cancer patients; thus, an expansion cohort was enrolled. We report analysis of that breast cancer subgroup.ResultsNineteen participants with treatment-refractory recurrent breast cancer with median 4 prior lines of therapy were enrolled and treated with IV durvalumab and IT/IM polyICLC. Seventeen also received tremelimumab (15 IT, 2 IV). Common treatment-related AEs were fatigue, injection site pain, and chills. There was one dose-limiting toxicity in a participant who received tremelimumab IV, and died with severe hyponatremia (DLT) and progressive disease. Objective clinical responses (1 complete; 4 partial (1 unconfirmed)) were observed in 5 (26%), including 2/9 patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and 3/10 with non-TNBC. Median OS was longer for those with CR, PR, or SD (not reached) vs. those with PD or not evaluable (5 months): two responders remain alive at 34+ and 40+ months. In injected tumors, there were significant increases from d0 to d29 in numbers/mm2 of CD8+ T cells, CD20+ B cells, mature dendritic cells (DC), macrophages, and CD56+ NK cells, and in CD8+ cells with antigen-experience (CD45RO), cytotoxic function (granzyme B), activation (ICOS1), or proliferation (Ki67). CD8+ cells expressing LAG3 and TIM3 increased, as did PDL1+ tumor cells and stromal cells. There were no differences in cells expressing IDO, ARG1, CD39, or CD73. Among patients with objective response, vs. all others, proportions of intratumoral CD8+ cells expressing Ki67 increased (p < 0.04).ConclusionsIT tremelimumab and polyICLC plus systemic durvalumab is safe and has clinical activity in patients with advanced TNBC and non-TNBC. The therapy enhances intratumoral immune effectors and markers of T cell function in hypothesis-generating data that warrant confirmatory studies. Clinical response was associated with longer survival and increased CD8 T cell proliferation.Trial RegistrationNCT02643303Ethics ApprovalThe study has been performed with approval of the institutional review boards of each participating institution (Roswell Park Cancer Institute: STUDY 00000121/I291016; Mount Sinai School of Medicine: IRB-17-01692; University of Virginia: IRB # 19276; Cleveland Clinic: 18-694; Toledo: 300176; Dartmouth: STUDY00031630; Emory: IRB00099445). All participants give informed consent before enrolling and participating. The study was also performed with approval from the FDA

BackgroundA multipeptide vaccine containing 6 melanoma-associated peptides to stimulate helper T cells (6MHP) is safe and immunogenic and has clinical activity. A phase I/II trial was designed to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of 6MHP vaccines plus PD1 blockade.MethodsParticipants with measurable advanced melanoma, age ≥ 18 years, and ECOG performance status 0–1 were administered 6MHP vaccine intradermally and subcutaneously in an incomplete Freund’s adjuvant on days (D) 1, 8, 15, 43, 64, and 85. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously every 3 weeks for up to two years. Biopsies of accessible tumors at baseline and D22 were analyzed by multiparameter immunofluorescence histology. Primary endpoints were safety (CTCAE 4.03) and immunogenicity (ex vivo IFNγ ELIspot assay). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME), and clinical outcomes.ResultsTwenty-two eligible participants were enrolled and treated, including 6 naïve to PD-1 Ab and 16 anti-PD-1 Ab-experienced. Median follow-up was 20 months. Treatment-related adverse events (any grade) experienced by >20% were injection site reactions, fatigue, anemia, nausea, fever, bruising, and rash. Treatment-related dose limiting toxicities (grade 3 elevated AST, skin ulcer, or uveitis) were observed in 3 (14%), which did not cross the study safety bound. Objective clinical responses were observed in 23% (1 CR, 4 PR), including 4/6 anti-PD-1 Ab-naive (67%) and one 1/16 anti-PD1 Ab-experienced (6%). Four participants (18%) had SD as best radiographic response (18%), all in the Ab-experienced cohort. T cell responses to 6MHP were detected in seven participants (32%) by week 13 and were associated with clinical response (CR/PR 80% vs. SD/PD 18%; p = 0.01). Overall survival was prolonged for anti-PD-1 Ab naïve vs experienced (p = 0.0048), for those with T cell response (p = 0.045, landmark analysis after week 13), and for those with objective response (p = 0.0148). TME evaluation in 12 participants revealed significant increases by D22 in the densities (per mm2) of CD8+ T cells (p = 0.0186), CD20+ B cells (P = 0.002), and Tbet+ cells (p = 0.034).ConclusionsIn patients with advanced melanoma, combined treatment with the 6MHP vaccine plus pembrolizumab was safe, increased intratumoral T and B cells, as well as Th1 (Tbet+) cells, and induced T cell responses that were associated with objective response and with overall survival. The promising objective response rate and overall survival in patients naive to PD1 blockade supports consideration of a larger study to assess definitive benefit in that clinical setting.AcknowledgementsWe acknowledge the support of Merck for providing pembrolizumab at no charge, and the University of Virginia Cancer Center Support grant P30 CA044579 for support of shared resource facilities.Trial RegistrationThe clinical trial Mel64 (PATHVACS) is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02515227).Ethics ApprovalThe clinical trial Mel64 (PATHVACS) was performed with IRB (#18174) and FDA approval (IND #10825) and is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02515227). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to participation in the study.

Therapeutic agents designed to stimulate the immune system are now cornerstones in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. These drugs promote lymphocyte growth and survival, which could plausibly result in clinical lymphoproliferative disorders. We report the case of a 62-year-old female with metastatic melanoma who developed primary cutaneous small/medium CD4 T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (PC-SMTCL) after treatment with vemurafenib and recombinant high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2). The patient developed a painless red papule behind the ear. A biopsy showed a dense population of CD4 lymphocytes with a T-follicular helper cell phenotype. Molecular studies confirmed the presence of a clonal population of T cells, and the process was classified as PC-SMTCL. The patient was diagnosed with metastatic melanoma approximately 3 years before the development of the cutaneous lymphoma and had been treated with vemurafenib followed by 2 courses of IL-2. The patient's last course of IL-2 was completed in April of 2013. She developed the cutaneous lymphoma behind her ear in December of 2015. An association between PC-SMTCL and vemurafenib treatment for advanced melanoma has been reported previously in one patient; however, an association between PC-SMTCL and IL-2 treatment has not been documented. The immunostimulatory properties of IL-2 or vemurafenib may be responsible for the development of PC-SMTCL in our patient. Additionally, antigenic stimulation of the immune system by melanoma itself could contribute to clonal selection of lymphocytes.

Background Cancer vaccines require adjuvants to induce effective immune responses; however, there is no consensus on optimal adjuvants. We hypothesized that toll-like receptor (TLR)3 agonist polyICLC or TLR4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS), combined with CD4 T cell activation, would support strong and durable CD8+ T cell responses, whereas addition of an incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) would reduce magnitude and persistence of immune responses. Patients and methods Participants with resected stage IIB-IV melanoma received a vaccine comprised of 12 melanoma peptides restricted by Class I MHC (12MP), plus a tetanus helper peptide (Tet). Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to cohort 1 (LPS dose-escalation) or cohort 2 (polyICLC). Each cohort included 3 subgroups (a-c), receiving 12MP + Tet + TLR agonist without IFA (0), or with IFA in vaccine one (V1), or all six vaccines (V6). Toxicities were recorded (CTCAE v4). T cell responses were measured with IFNγ ELIspot assay ex vivo or after one in vitro stimulation (IVS). Results Fifty-three eligible patients were enrolled, of which fifty-one were treated. Treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 0/33 patients in cohort 1 and in 2/18 patients in cohort 2 (11%). CD8 T cell responses to 12MP were detected ex vivo in cohort 1 (42%) and in cohort 2 (56%) and in 18, 50, and 72% for subgroups V0, V1, and V6, respectively. T cell responses to melanoma peptides were more durable and of highest magnitude for IFA V6. Conclusions LPS and polyICLC are safe and effective vaccine adjuvants when combined with IFA. Contrary to the central hypothesis, IFA enhanced T cell responses to peptide vaccines when added to TLR agonists. Future studies will aim to understand mechanisms underlying the favorable effects with IFA. Trial registration The clinical trial Mel58 was performed with IRB (#15781) and FDA approval and is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov on April 25, 2012 (NCT01585350). Patients provided written informed consent to participate. Enrollment started on June 24, 2012. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-019-0625-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BackgroundPhosphorylated peptides presented by MHC molecules represent a new class of neoantigens expressed on cancer cells and recognized by CD8 T-cells. These peptides are promising targets for cancer immunotherapy. Previous work identified an HLA-A*0201-restricted phosphopeptide from insulin receptor substrate 2 (pIRS2) as one such target. The purpose of this study was to characterize a second phosphopeptide, from breast cancer antiestrogen resistance 3 (BCAR3), and to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of a novel immunotherapic vaccine comprising either or both of these phosphorylated peptides.MethodsPhosphorylated BCAR3 protein was evaluated in melanoma and breast cancer cell lines by Western blot, and recognition by T-cells specific for HLA-A*0201-restricted phosphorylated BCAR3 peptide (pBCAR3126-134) was determined by51Cr release assay and intracellular cytokine staining. Human tumor explants were also evaluated by mass spectrometry for presentation of pIRS2 and pBCAR3 peptides. For the clinical trial, participants with resected stage IIA–IV melanoma were vaccinated 6 times over 12 weeks with one or both peptides in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant and Hiltonol (poly-ICLC). Adverse events (AEs) were coded based on National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) V.4.03, with provision for early study termination if dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rates exceeded 33%. The enrollment target was 12 participants evaluable for immune response to each peptide. T-cell responses were assessed by interferon-γ ELISpot assay.ResultspBCAR3 peptides were immunogenic in vivo in mice, and in vitro in normal human donors, and T-cells specific for pBCAR3126-134controlled outgrowth of a tumor xenograft. The pIRS21097-1105peptide was identified by mass spectrometry from human hepatocellular carcinoma tumors. In the clinical trial, 15 participants were enrolled. All had grade 1 or 2 treatment-related AEs, but there were no grade 3–4 AEs, DLTs or deaths on study. T-cell responses were induced to the pIRS21097-1105peptide in 5/12 patients (42%, 90% CI 18% to 68%) and to the pBCAR3126-134peptide in 2/12 patients (17%, 90% CI 3% to 44%).ConclusionThis study supports the safety and immunogenicity of vaccines containing the cancer-associated phosphopeptides pBCAR3126-134and pIRS21097-1105, and the data support continued development of immune therapy targeting phosphopeptides. Future studies will define ways to further enhance the magnitude and durability of phosphopeptide-specific immune responses.Trial registration numberNCT01846143

Purpose: PD-1/L1 axis–directed therapies produce clinical responses in a subset of patients; therefore, biomarkers of response are needed. We hypothesized that quantifying key immunosuppression mechanisms within the tumor microenvironment by multiparameter algorithms would identify strong predictors of anti–PD-1 response. Experimental Design: Pretreatment tumor biopsies from 166 patients treated with anti–PD-1 across 10 academic cancer centers were fluorescently stained with multiple markers in discovery (n = 24) and validation (n = 142) cohorts. Biomarker-positive cells and their colocalization were spatially profiled in pathologist-selected tumor regions using novel Automated Quantitative Analysis algorithms. Selected biomarker signatures, PD-1/PD-L1 interaction score, and IDO-1/HLA-DR coexpression were evaluated for anti–PD-1 treatment outcomes. Results: In the discovery cohort, PD-1/PD-L1 interaction score and/or IDO-1/HLA-DR coexpression was strongly associated with anti–PD-1 response (P = 0.0005). In contrast, individual biomarkers (PD-1, PD-L1, IDO-1, HLA-DR) were not associated with response or survival. This finding was replicated in an independent validation cohort: patients with high PD-1/PD-L1 and/or IDO-1/HLA-DR were more likely to respond (P = 0.0096). These patients also experienced significantly improved progression-free survival (HR = 0.36; P = 0.0004) and overall survival (HR = 0.39; P = 0.0011). In the combined cohort, 80% of patients exhibiting higher levels of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction scores and IDO-1/HLA-DR responded to PD-1 blockers (P = 0.000004). In contrast, PD-L1 expression was not predictive of survival. Conclusions: Quantitative spatial profiling of key tumor-immune suppression pathways by novel digital pathology algorithms could help more reliably select melanoma patients for PD-1 monotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 24(21); 5250–60. ©2018 AACR.

Intramedullary spinal cord metastasis is an increasingly common diagnosis in patients with cancer largely owing to new imaging techniques and the increase lifespan of patients with malignant tumors. The diagnosis confers significant morbidity and a poor prognosis. Mainstay palliative treatment options include corticosteroids, fractionated radiotherapy and surgery in select cases. In the modern era of immunotherapy for the treatment of several tumor types, the efficacy of these agents against parenchymal CNS tumors remains unanswered. Here, we report a case of regression of an intramedullary spinal cord metastasis with a checkpoint inhibitor.

The majority of breast cancers developing in BRCA1 mutation carriers are triple negative breast cancers (TNBC), an aggressive subtype that accounts for 15–20 % of sporadic breast cancer. We compare the clinical outcome and sites of relapse of TNBC in BRCA1 mutation carriers and non-carriers who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Women with stage I–III TNBC who had BRCA1 testing within 36 months of diagnosis and received adjuvant chemotherapy were identified from clinical databases at two academic institutions. Sites of relapse, freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were determined. RCA1 carriers (n = 89) were significantly younger at diagnosis (P

Introduction Inherited susceptibility to lung cancer is understudied. Never smokers are an important subgroup of patients enriched for tumors harboring oncogene aberrations in the EGFR and ALK genes. We aimed to better characterize the incidence of family history of lung cancer among never smokers with NSCLC. Methods Clinicopathologic data, tumor genotype, family history of cancer, and specifically family history of lung cancer from 230 consecutive never smokers was retrospectively compiled and analyzed. Results In our cohort, the median age was 56 years, 67% were women, 75% were white, 59% had advanced NSCLC and 87% had adenocarcinoma histology. In these tumors, 98/230 (42%) had an EGFR mutation, 17/155 (11%) had KRAS mutations and 27/127 (21%) had an ALK translocation. Family history of any cancer was common (57%) and specific family history of lung cancer was present in 42/230 cases (18%). The percentage of cases with family history of lung cancer was higher in the EGFR mutated versus EGFR wild-type NSCLCs. Out of the cases with a family history of any cancer, 22/53 (41.5%) EGFR mutated, 1/5 (20%) KRAS mutated and 3/19 (15.5%) ALK translocated cohorts had a family history of lung cancer. The ratio of family history of lung cancer to family history of cancer was significantly higher in the EGFR mutated cohort when compared to the ALK translocated plus KRAS mutated cohorts ( p = 0.039). Conclusions Family history of lung cancer is common in never smokers with NSCLC, and there seems to be a particular link in families in which the proband has an EGFR mutated tumor when compared to ALK translocated or KRAS mutated tumors. Further study of families with EGFR -mutated NSCLC may yield insights into the pathogenesis of this tumor type.

To estimate the 15-year survival following a diagnosis of stage I breast cancer among women who carry a BRCA1 mutation and to determine predictors of mortality, including the use of chemotherapy. Patients were 379 women with stage I breast cancer for whom a BRCA1 mutation had been identified, in herself or in a close family member. Patients were followed for up to 15 years from the initial diagnosis of breast cancer. Survival rates were estimated for women by age, tumor size (≤ 1 cm; > 1 cm), ER status (±), and by chemotherapy (yes/no). 42 women died of breast cancer in the follow-up period (11.2 %). Survival rates were similar for women with cancers of size 0-1.0 cm and size 1.1-2.0 cm. Of the 267 women in the study who used chemotherapy, 21 had died (7.9 %) compared to 21 deaths among 112 women who did not receive chemotherapy (18.8 %; p = 0.002). The 15-year survival was 89.4 % for women who received chemotherapy and was 73.1 % for women who did not receive chemotherapy (p = 0.08; log rank). The adjusted hazard ratio for death following a diagnosis of stage I breast cancer associated with chemotherapy was 0.53 (95 % CI 0.28-1.07; p value 0.06) after adjusting for age of diagnosis, tumor size, and estrogen receptor status. This was statistically significant only among women with ER-negative breast cancers (HR = 0.28; 95 % CI 0.10-0.79; p = 0.02). BRCA1 positive women who are treated for stage I breast cancer with chemotherapy have better survival than those who do not receive chemotherapy. The difference cannot be explained by other prognostic factors. All women with invasive breast cancer and a BRCA1 mutation should be considered to be candidates for chemotherapy.

New therapies and advances in molecular biology provide opportunities for progress in the management of patients with advanced estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. The near universal exposure of patients with early stage disease to endocrine therapy poses challenges of resistance when disease recurs. Analysis of tumor tissue at the time of recurrence, and after subsequent endocrine therapy where possible, is critical to understanding the most productive strategies for development and ultimately for individual patients.

e15171Background: We designed a first-in-human clinical trial to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of LPV7, administered in vaccine adjuvant combinations of incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) and ...

e21009 Background: The combination of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab is standard initial therapy in patients with advanced melanoma based on trials involving treatment-naïve patients. The benefit in those previously managed with checkpoint monotherapy is not well defined. Methods: We identified metastatic melanoma patients from our Immunotherapy database managed with combination Ipilimumab/Nivolumab after progression on prior checkpoint monotherapy. Baseline clinical factors, treatment history, combination therapy outcome by RECIST v1.1 and toxicity data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Given the small sample size and limited numbers of deaths, it is too early to look for preliminary associations between outcomes and clinicopathologic factors. Results: We identified 19 patients treated with combination Ipilimumab/Nivolumab after progression on prior checkpoint monotherapy. The cohort included 15 men and 4 women with an average age of 63 years. Thirteen patients had M1c disease, and 7 had a BRAF mutation. Patients had received up to four lines of prior immunotherapy including 9 treated with both prior anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 monotherapy. Seven patients completed all four doses of combination therapy with 6 proceeding onto maintenance nivolumab. Eight patients stopped treatment due to toxicity and 4 due to progressive disease. Thirteen patients had clinically significant toxicity, with rash, colitis, hepatitis, and hypophysitis reported most frequently. There were no treatment-related deaths. Overall, 2/19 patients (10.5%, 95% CI [1.3% to 33.1%]) had an objective response (CR+PR) and 9/19 patients (47.4%, 95% CI [24.5% to 71.1%]) had disease control (CR+PR+SD). Four of the patients had stable disease for over 6 months. Six of the 19 patients went on to receive subsequent treatment. Median follow-up for patients still alive was 7 months (range 1 to 20 months) and median survival was not reached. Six-month survival was 68.5% (95% CI [39.3% to 85.8%]) Conclusions: The combination of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab can result in melanoma control in patients with progression on prior checkpoint monotherapy with an expected toxicity profile.

9517 Background: Although PD-1/L1 axis directed therapies induce durable responses in some mm patients (pts), biomarkers of response remain elusive. We hypothesized that quantifying key immune suppression mechanisms within the tumor microenvironment would provide superior predictors of response to anti-PD-1 compared with single marker assessment. Methods: Pre-treatment tumor biopsies from 124 mm pts treated with anti-PD-1 at 7 academic centers were fluorescently stained with multiple immune markers in discovery (n = 24) and validation (n = 100) cohorts. Selected biomarker signatures, PD-1/PD-L1 interaction score (proportion of PD-1+ cells co-localized with PD-L1) and IDO1/HLA-DR co-expression were evaluated for anti-PD-1 treatment response and survival. Slides were imaged using Vectra; biomarker positive cells and their co-localization were objectively quantified in pathologist-selected regions using novel Automated Quantitative Analysis (AQUA) algorithms. Results: In the discovery cohort, high levels of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction score and/or IDO1/HLA-DR coexpression was strongly positively associated with response to anti-PD-1 (p = 0.0005). In contrast, other individual biomarkers (PD-1, PD-L1, CD8) were not associated with response or survival (p > 0.10). This finding was replicated in the validation cohort: pts with high PD-1/PD-L1 and/or IDO1/HLA-DR were more likely to respond to treatment (p = 0.009). These pts also experienced a three-fold increase in progression free survival (hazards ratio (HR) = 0.33; p = 0.003) and overall survival (HR = 0.34; p = 0.004). Multivariate analyses revealed that these findings were independent of BRAF mutation, stage, LDH and prior therapy. In the combined cohort (n = 124), 80% of responding pts had higher levels of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction scores and/or IDO1/HLA-DR. In contrast, PD-L1 expression alone (≥1% or ≥50%) was not predictive of PFS or OS (p > 0.1). Conclusions: This novel multiplexed method profiling key tumor-immune suppression pathways identified mm pts likely to respond to anti-PD-1 therapy. This method could help stratify patients for PD-1 monotherapy and be useful in guiding future clinical trials.

Thymic carcinoma is an uncommon malignant neoplasm arising from the epithelial cells of the thymus. Despite aggressive local treatment, patients with thymic carcinoma tend to relapse at distant sites; including: regional lymph nodes, bone, liver and lung. Brain metastases are seldom seen in cases of thymic malignancies. Herein we report a case of thymic carcinoma complicated by brain metastases.

After breast-conserving surgery for an initial breast cancer, the incidence of lymphatic drainage to sites other than the ipsilateral axilla, such as the contralateral axilla, increases significantly at the time of a second primary ipsilateral breast cancer. Given the likelihood of altered lymphatic drainage, and in the absence of distant metastatic sites, consideration should be given to treating patients with a second primary ipsilateral breast cancer and contralateral axillary lymph node involvement with curative intent. This clinical issue may become more common as the incidence of second primary ipsilateral breast cancer would be expected to increase due to widespread adoption of breast-conserving surgery, improved prognosis for patients with an initial early-stage breast cancer, and highly sensitive screening modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging.

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) are heterogeneous cancers. In 2004, the identification of epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) somatic mutations provided the first glimpse of a clinically relevant NSCLC oncogene. Approximately 70% of NSCLCs with EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletions or the exon 21 L858R) attain responses to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib, with improved response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and in some reports overall survival (OS) when compared with EGFR wildtype (WT) cases. Three randomized trials of gefitinib versus chemotherapy (IPASS, WJTOG3405, NEJ002) in stage IV NSCLC have consistently demonstrated better RR and PFS (hazard ratios of 0.48 [IPASS], 0.49 [WJTOG3405] and 0.30 [NEJ002]) for EGFR-mutated NSCLCs treated with gefitinib. Novel irreversible EGFR TKIs (afatinib, XL647, PF00299804) show similar activity in EGFR-mutated patients. A translocation involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK) gene with EML4, identified in 2007, is the most recent oncogene found in NSCLC. Crizotinib (PF02341066), an ALK TKI, has shown impressive activity against ALK translocated NSCLC in an expanded cohort of a phase I trial (NCT00585195). Over 80 patients have been treated and the RR is ∼60% with the 6-month PFS rate exceeding 70%. A registration phase III trial of crizotinib versus second-line chemotherapy (pemetrexed/docetaxel) is underway (PROFILE 1007, NCT00932893). KRAS, EGFR mutations and ALK translocations are mutually exclusive and few EGFR WT NSCLCs respond to EGFR TKIs. The promising results of EGFR and ALK TKIs in molecular subgroups of NSCLCs herald a new age of drug and clinical trial development for patients with NSCLC.

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) are heterogeneous cancers. In 2004, the identification of epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) somatic mutations provided the first glimpse of a clinically relevant NSCLC oncogene. Approximately 70% of NSCLCs with EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletions or the exon 21 L858R) attain responses to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib, with improved response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and in some reports overall survival (OS) when compared with EGFR wildtype (WT) cases. Three randomized trials of gefitinib versus chemotherapy (IPASS, WJTOG3405, NEJ002) in stage IV NSCLC have consistently demonstrated better RR and PFS (hazard ratios of 0.48 [IPASS], 0.49 [WJTOG3405] and 0.30 [NEJ002]) for EGFR -mutated NSCLCs treated with gefitinib. Novel irreversible EGFR TKIs (afatinib, XL647, PF00299804) show similar activity in EGFR -mutated patients. A translocation involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK) gene with EML4 , identified in 2007, is the most recent oncogene found in NSCLC. Crizotinib (PF02341066), an ALK TKI, has shown impressive activity against ALK translocated NSCLC in an expanded cohort of a phase I trial (NCT00585195). Over 80 patients have been treated and the RR is ∼60% with the 6-month PFS rate exceeding 70%. A registration phase III trial of crizotinib versus second-line chemotherapy (pemetrexed/docetaxel) is underway (PROFILE 1007, NCT00932893). KRAS , EGFR mutations and ALK translocations are mutually exclusive and few EGFR WT NSCLCs respond to EGFR TKIs. The promising results of EGFR and ALK TKIs in molecular subgroups of NSCLCs herald a new age of drug and clinical trial development for patients with NSCLC.

Background Chronic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is associated with an increased incidence of Non-Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (non-AIDS) defining cancers. To date, only a limited number of cases of bladder cancer have been linked with HIV infection. We sought to describe the clinical characteristics of HIV-associated bladder cancer. Methods A retrospective study was performed involving HIV-positive patients with bladder cancer, combining cases from multiple institutions with published case reports. Data regarding patient demographics, HIV status, clinical presentation, pathology, cancer treatment, and outcome were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Eleven patients were identified with a median age of 55 years (range, 33 - 67). The median CD4+ count at cancer diagnosis was 280 cells/mm3 (range, 106 - 572 cells/mm3). Six patients (55%) had a known risk factor for bladder cancer, and nine (82%) presented with hematuria. Ten patients had transitional cell carcinoma, and most had superficial disease at presentation. Treatment included mainly transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by a combination of local and systemic therapies. One patient received intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guèrin (BCG) without complication. Several patients (55%) were alive following therapy, although many (64%) suffered from local relapse and metastatic disease. Conclusion Bladder cancer is part of the growing list of cancers that may be encountered in patients living longer with chronic HIV-infection. Our patients presented at a younger age and with only mild immunosuppression, however, they experienced an expected course for their bladder cancer. Hematuria in an HIV-infected patient warrants a complete evaluation.

Objective The spectrum of diseases associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has changed dramatically following the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Non–AIDSdefining cancers, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), are being recognized increasingly in this population. Our aim was to describe the risk factors, clinical findings, pathology, and response to therapy of RCC in patients infected with HIV. Patients and Methods We identified 9 men with HIV infection who developed RCC. Data regarding their HIV status, RCC risk factors, clinical presentation, and pathology were collected. A detailed retrospective chart review focusing on the course of their malignancy, response to therapy, and outcome was performed. Results Renal cell carcinoma was diagnosed in patients with a median age of 48 years, and most had a history of tobacco use. No association between HIV-related immunosuppression (mean CD4 count, 301 cells/mm 3 ) and the development, clinical presentation, pathology, or behavior of RCC was identified. Long-term survival correlated with early nephrectomy, and the use of interleukin-2 therapy for advanced RCC was not additive. A total of 5 patients died, 1 from a pulmonary embolism and 4 from disseminated RCC. Conclusion Renal cell carcinoma should be included in the expanding array of non–AIDS-defining malignancies that develop during the course of HIV infection. Acknowledging the inherent limitations of our small study, these data show that the clinical presentation and behavior of RCC in patients with HIV appear similar to that of the HIV-negative population and that chronic immunosuppression plays a lesser role than age and exposure to risk factors in this setting.

Fusion inhibitors are novel antiretroviral agents, administered as subcutaneous injections, approved for use in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients. HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for Staphylococcus aureus colonization, specifically with methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA), and subsequent systemic infection. We present the cases of 2 patients without a history of MRSA infection in whom a series of severe S aureus infections developed after fusion inhibitor therapy.

7579 Background: Inherited susceptibility to lung cancer is an understudied subject, however it has been described among never smokers (

Chronic HIV infection has been associated with an increased incidence of non AIDS-defining cancers. To date, only a limited number of cases of bladder cancer have been reported in association with HIV infection. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate a series of HIV-associated bladder cancer cases.

Introduction: LUEs affect 6 million individuals annually in the US, with high morbidity and cost. Normal wound healing requires coagulation, inflammatory responses, angiogenesis, scar formation, and epithelialization. LUEs arise when any of these pathways fail. Aberrant thrombus formation, exacerbated and/or precipitated by inflammation, results in microvascular ischemia and subsequent skin ulceration. HHcy is associated with either inherited (MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms) or acquired thrombophilia. HHcy accelerates atherosclerosis, but its role in venous hypercoagulability has not been as well established. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 20 consecutive patients (pts) with refractory LEUs and HHcy identified after comprehensive hypercoagulable evaluations. Therapeutic normalization of HHcy was based on supplemental folic acid 1 mg/d, vitamin B6 150 mg/d. The target Hcy level was < 8 μmole/L. Local wound care included frequent dressing changes, silvadene, debridement, whirlpool treatment, skin grafting, compression stockings, and unna boots, and had already been initiated in these pts months previously with little benefit to wound healing of LUEs. Results: The median age of this cohort was 58 y with 12 females and 8 males. There was predominant Caucasian ethnicity with 17 whites, 2 African Americans, and 1 Asian. Forty per cent (8/20) were heterozygous for the C677T MTHFR gene polymorphism, and 70% (14/20) had at least one other additional hypercoagulable risk factor, including circulating antiphospholipid antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, anti-β-2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies, or anti-cardiolipin antibodies. 2 pts developed their LEUs while on coumadin for their hypercoagulable state. Relevant past medical history included hypertension (10 pts), DM (6), peripheral vascular disease (8), dyslipedemia (5), venous insufficiency (9), obesity (3), prior DVT or PE (3), current DVT (1); sickle cell trait (1) and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (1). Median number of ulcers/pt was 1 (range 1–8). Median plasma/serum Hcy level was 15.6 μmole/L (range 11.2–42.3). Forty per cent (13/33) LEUs healed completely. 7 pts whose LEUs were unchanged after 1–2 months of vitamin supplementation received prophylactic doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (Lovenox 40 mg/kg sq/d); 3 of those 7 (43%) experienced complete resolution of their LEUs within weeks. For the overall cohort, reduced LEU dimensions were observed as early as 6 weeks after vitamin intervention. In the remaining 20 a 63.3% reduction in ulcer size (by bi-dimentional measurement) was observed. 4 LEUs healed completely with only folic acid and vitamin B6. Failure was associated with documented vasculitis (1) and elevated lipoprotein a (1). In 15 pts reduced Hcy levels correlated with LUE improvement or complete resolution. Conclusion: HHcy increases the risk of LUEs. Other associated hypercoagulable risk factors may contribute to refractory or poor healing responses. Normalizing HHcy may contribute to improved stasis ulcer healing. LMWH may provide additional beneficial effects. Individuals with refractory LUEs should be evaluated for HHcy and hypercoagulability, and should be considered for long term folate and vitamin B6 supplementation to lower the Hcy levels, perhaps with adjunctive LMWH. Prospective studies are necessary to elucidate the relative importance of each of these therapies.