Search

DNA replication timing (RT), reflecting the temporal order of origin activation, is known as a robust and conserved cell-type specific process. Upon low replication stress, the slowing of replication forks induces well-documented RT delays associated to genetic instability, but it can also generate RT advances that are still uncharacterized. In order to characterize these advanced initiation events, we monitored the whole genome RT from six independent human cell lines treated with low doses of aphidicolin. We report that RT advances are cell-type-specific and involve large heterochromatin domains. Importantly, we found that some major late to early RT advances can be inherited by the unstressed next-cellular generation, which is a unique process that correlates with enhanced chromatin accessibility, as well as modified replication origin landscape and gene expression in daughter cells. Collectively, this work highlights how low replication stress may impact cellular identity by RT advances events at a subset of chromosomal domains This work was supported by “la Ligue nationale contre le cancer” (LNCC labellisation to JSH and VB and the grants RS16/75-108 and RS17/75-135 to JCC), the “Institut National du Cancer” (INCA, PLBIO2016-10493 to JSH, VB and JCC), the “Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse” to VB, the “Laboratoire d’excellence Toulouse Cancer—TOUCAN” to JSH, the “Groupement des Entreprises Françaises contre le Cancer” (GEFLUC) to JCC, the “IdEx Université de Paris” (ANR-18-IDEX-0001) to JCC, the generous legacy from Ms Suzanne Larzat to JCC, and “la Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale” to LC. MM and VP were funded by INSERM, the “Fondation Toulouse Cancer Santé” and “Pierre Fabre Research Institute” as part of the Chair of Bioinformatics in Oncology of the CRCT.

APOBEC mutagenesis, a major driver of cancer evolution, is known for targeting TpC sites in DNA. Recently, we showed that APOBEC3A (A3A) targets DNA hairpin loops. Here, we show that DNA secondary structure is in fact an orthogonal influence on A3A substrate optimality and, surprisingly, can override the TpC sequence preference. VpC (non-TpC) sites in optimal hairpins can outperform TpC sites as mutational hotspots. This expanded understanding of APOBEC mutagenesis illuminates the genomic Twin Paradox, a puzzling pattern of closely spaced mutation hotspots in cancer genomes, in which one is a canonical TpC site but the other is a VpC site, and double mutants are seen only in trans, suggesting a two-hit driver event. Our results clarify this paradox, revealing that both hotspots in these twins are optimal A3A substrates. Our findings reshape the notion of a mutation signature, highlighting the additive roles played by DNA sequence and DNA structure., The APOBEC mutation signature contributes to a significant percentage of human cancers. Here the authors via biochemical and computational analyses shed light on how DNA primary sequence and secondary structure jointly influence A3A substrate optimality.

DNA replication is well orchestrated in mammalian cells through a tight regulation of the temporal order of replication origin activation, named the replication timing, a robust and conserved process in each cell type. Upon low replication stress, the slowing of replication forks induces delayed replication of fragile regions leading to genetic instability. The impact of low replication stress on the replication timing in different cellular backgrounds has not been explored yet. Here we analysed the whole genome replication timing in a panel of 6 human cell lines under low replication stress. We first demonstrated that cancer cells were more impacted than non-tumour cells. Strikingly, we unveiled an enrichment of specific replication domains undergoing a switch from late to early replication in some cancer cells. We found that advances in replication timing correlate with heterochromatin regions poorly sensitive to DNA damage signalling while being subject to an increase of chromatin accessibility. Finally, our data indicate that, following release from replication stress conditions, replication timing advances can be inherited by the next cellular generation, suggesting a new mechanism by which cancer cells would adapt to cellular or environmental stress.; DNA replication is well orchestrated in mammalian cells through a tight regulation of the temporal order of replication origin activation, named the replication timing, a robust and conserved process in each cell type. Upon low replication stress, the slowing of replication forks induces delayed replication of fragile regions leading to genetic instability. The impact of low replication stress on the replication timing in different cellular backgrounds has not been explored yet. Here we analysed the whole genome replication timing in a panel of 6 human cell lines under low replication stress. We first demonstrated that cancer cells were more impacted than non-tumour cells. Strikingly, we unveiled an enrichment of specific replication domains undergoing a switch from late to early replication in some cancer cells. We found that advances in replication timing correlate with heterochromatin regions poorly sensitive to DNA damage signalling while being subject to an increase of chromatin accessibility. Finally, our data indicate that, following release from replication stress conditions, replication timing advances can be inherited by the next cellular generation, suggesting a new mechanism by which cancer cells would adapt to cellular or environmental stress.

Replication stress is a strong and early driving force for genomic instability and tumor development. Beside replicative DNA polymerases, an emerging group of specialized DNA polymerases is involved in the technical assistance of the replication machinery in order to prevent replicative stress and its deleterious consequences. During S-phase, altered progression of the replication fork by endogenous or exogenous impediments induces replicative stress, causing cells to reach mitosis with genomic regions not fully duplicated. Recently, specific mechanisms to resolve replication intermediates during mitosis with the aim of limiting DNA damage transmission to daughter cells have been identified. In this review, we detail the two major actions of specialized DNA polymerases that limit DNA damage transmission: the prevention of replicative stress by non-B DNA replication and the recovery of stalled replication forks.

SUMMARY Cancer cells rely on the activation of telomerase or the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) pathways for telomere maintenance and survival. ALT involves homologous recombination (HR)-dependent exchange and/or HR-associated synthesis of telomeric DNA. Utilizing proximity-dependent biotinylation (BioID), we sought to determine the proteome of telomeres in cancer cells that employ these distinct telomere elongation mechanisms. Our analysis reveals that multiple DNA repair networks converge at ALT telomeres. These include the specialized translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) proteins FANCJ-RAD18-PCNA and, most notably, DNA polymerase eta (Polη). We observe that the depletion of Polη leads to increased ALT activity and late DNA polymerase δ (Polδ)-dependent synthesis of telomeric DNA in mitosis. We propose that Polη fulfills an important role in managing replicative stress at ALT telomeres, maintaining telomere recombination at tolerable levels and stimulating DNA synthesis by Polδ., Graphical Abstract