Search

Context: Restoration fractures and displacement are the two main causes of failure after the rehabilitation of severely worn primary anterior teeth. Aims: Compare the effect of three post types on the fracture and push-out bond strength. Methods and Materials: Sixty undamaged maxillary anterior primary teeth were allocated into three groups according to post type: (I) Tetric N Ceram composite post, (II) prefabricated glass fiber post, and (III) high viscous glass ionomer post. Each group was further subdivided into two sub-groups depending on the test used: fracture resistance test and push-out bond strength test. The all specimens were mounted in acrylic resin blocks and tested using a universal testing machine. The fracture and failure mode were determined by a stereomicroscope inspection of all the specimens. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Bonferroni post hoc test (P < 0.05). Results: There was a statistically significant difference between fracture resistance and push-out bond strength values for the experimental groups (P < 0.05). The most significant fracture resistance value was in Group II and core/post fracture (restorable fracture) was the most obvious fracture in the three groups with the highest percentage in Group I. The most significant push-out bond strength value was in Group I and adhesive failure between dentin and luting cement/post was the most common type in the groups. Conclusions: The fracture resistance and push-out bond strength were affected by the type of post (P = 0.000). Prefabricated glass fiber posts showed the highest fracture resistance in this study. However, Tetric N Ceram composite posts had the most restorable fracture. Tetric N Ceram composite posts had the highest bond strength with adhesive failure mode. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]