Search

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic provided new challenges and opportunities for patients and healthcare providers while accelerating the trend of digital healthcare transformation. This study explores the perspectives of healthcare professionals and managers on (i) drivers to the implementation of telemedicine services and (ii) perceived benefits and challenges related to the use of telemedicine across the Italian National Health Service. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was distributed to professionals working within 308 healthcare organisations in different Italian regions. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire (June-September 2021). Responses were analysed using summary statistics and thematic analysis. Results: Key factors driving the adoption of telemedicine have been grouped into (i) organisational drivers (reduce the virus spread-80%; enhance care quality and efficiency-61%), (ii) technological drivers (ease of use-82%; efficacy and reliability-64%; compliance with data governance regulations-64%) and (iii) regulatory drivers (regulations’ semplification-84%). Nearly all respondents perceive telemedicine as useful in improving patient care (96%). The main benefits reported by respondents are shorter waiting lists, reduced Emergency Department attendance, decreased patient and clinician travel, and more frequent patient-doctor interactions. However, only five respondents believe that telemedicine services are more effective than traditional care and 66% of the healthcare professionals believe that telemedicine can’t completely substitute in-person visits due to challenges with physical examination and patient-doctor relationships. Other reported challenges include poor quality and interoperability of telemedicine platforms and scarce integration of telemedicine with traditional care services. Moreover, healthcare professionals believe that some groups of patients experience difficulties in accessing and using the technologies due to socio-cultural factors, technological and linguistic challenges and the absence of caregivers. Conclusions: Respondents believe that telemedicine can be useful to complement and augment traditional care. However, many challenges still need to be overcome to fully consider telemedicine a standard of care. Strategies that could help address these challenges include additional regulations on data governance and reimbursements, evidence-based guidelines for the use of telemedicine, greater integration of tools and processes, patient-centred training for clinicians, patient-facing material to assist patients in navigating virtual sessions, different language options, and greater involvement of caregivers in the care process.

In this paper we propose a fuzzy logic-based approach to analyze UK National Health Service (NHS) public administrative data related to pre-and post-pandemic claims filed by patients, analyzing the legal and ethical issues connected to the use of Artificial Intelligence systems, including our own, to take critical decisions having a significant impact on patients, such as employing computational intelligence to justify the management choices related to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) bed allocation. Differently from previous papers, in this work we follow an unsupervised approach and, specifically, we perform an analysis of UK hospitals by means of a computational intelligence algorithm integrating Fuzzy C-Means and swarm intelligence. The dataset that we analyse allows us to compare pre-and post-pandemic data, to analyze the ethical and legal challenges of the use of computational intelligence for critical decision-making in the health care field.

Purpose To evaluate the incremental benefits concerning the implementation of closed-system medical devices for the preparation and administration of chemotherapy agents (integrated or not with traceable workflow), within an Italian clinical practice, in which the use of such technologies is not standardized. Methodology Four Scenarios, implying different levels of technologies introduction, were analyzed, based on the presence and/or absence of closed systems and traceable workflow, in the preparation and in the administration phase. A literature review was conducted, in order to retrieve efficacy and safety measures. Economic and organizational benefits, assuming a hospitals perspective, were assessed by means of health-economics tools, considering 27,660 (±695.86) drugs on average prepared, on an annual basis, by 12 hospitals involved. The typology of medical devices and other devices/equipment used, the human resources involved, and the time spent for the preparation and administration phases were collected. Results Literature stated that the introduction of advanced technologies (CSTDs in the preparation phase, closed-system in the administration phase, both integrated by a traceable workflow) could: i) decrease surface contamination (12.24% vs 26.39%, P

Background and aims: INTERCheckWEB is one of the most outstanding digital technologies, that could be implemented at the hospital level, supporting the clinicians in the evaluation of the therapy appropriateness, reducing the potentially inappropriate prescriptions, for the improvement of the clinical decision-making process. The paper aims at investigating the relationship between clinicians' behaviors towards digital decision support system in therapy appropriateness for elderly patients in polytherapy in medical departments, defining the factors that could influence clinicians to use INTERCheckWEB, for supporting drugs' prescription. Methods: A questionnaire was administered to 70 clinicians referring to Internal Medicine wards, of four Italian hospitals. The authors assessed how perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, image, and output quality, would affect INTERCheckWeb intention to use. Inferential statistics, by means of a regression analysis, were conducted to define the main aspects useful to understand the factors impacting on such digital technology adoption in clinical practice. Results: The regression analysis reported that image, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, as well as the moderator effect of the voluntary use between the perceived usefulness and the intention to use, are the factors that most influence the use of INTERCheckWEB (adjusted R 2 = 0.870). Conclusions: Results demonstrated that clinicians would use INTERCheckWEB, when available, to identify all the information on situations that could be dangerous for the patients, thus limiting the drug-drug interactions, optimizing the overall patient's clinical pathway. Furthermore, the implementation of INTERCheckWEB could also contribute to the proper management of COVID-19 patients, since both hospitalized and symptomatic COVID-19 patients are frequently older, with comorbidities.

CONTEXTthe current increasing demand for rehabilitation among people with Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) requires the identification of home-based digital solutions alternative to conventional in-clinic interventions.OBJECTIVEthis protocol proposes to test the effectiveness of an individualized telerehabilitation platform (SIDERA^B), with respect to the traditional face-to-face rehabilitation, in ensuring the continuity of care in patients with NCDs.DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTSthis randomized, single-blind, controlled two-period crossover trial will involve about 150 outpatients with NCDs (N=40 with Chronic Heart Failure – CHF, N=60 with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease – COPD, and N=50 with Parkinson’s Disease – PD) from the rehabilitation units of IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi of Milan. Each participant will experience, consequently, two different types of interventions: rehabilitation with the SIDERA^B system (SIDERA^B – S), which allow for both tele-rehabilitation activities and tele-monitoring of vital parameters, and rehabilitation as usual (Usual Care – U) including a manual of rehabilitative exercises and self-monitoring of vital parameters.INTERVENTIONSsubjects will be randomly assigned to one of the two specified sequences of interventions: U/S/U (the USU group), and S/U (the SU group). Both groups will be assessed at the baseline (T1), after the first intervention (T2), and after the second intervention (T3), with a follow-up evaluation (T4) scheduled only for the USU group.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESa multifaceted evaluation including quality of life and clinical/functional measures will be conducted at each time-point of assessment. The primary outcome measures will be 1) change in activation of patients measured by the Patient Activation Measure scale, and 2) change in subject’s level of activity and participation measured by the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.CONCLUSIONSIDERA^B could represent a promising innovative digital solution able to support the ongoing migration of rehabilitation care from the clinic to the patient’s home, for the optimal long-term management of NCDs.Trial registrationThe SIDERA^B trial was registered in the clinicaltrials.gov database (identifier NCT04041193) on August 1, 2019.

The study aims to assess the implications of using a specific checklist in the production and review of care pathways. Care pathways have been developed to plan and standardize clinical practice, although the way they are designed remains unclear.This study was implemented through a Health Technology Assessment model, assuming the hospital perspective. The checklist consists of 7 different domains, subdivided into 14 subdomains and 77 items.After a prioritization phase, our analysis reported a better performance of the checklist in terms of safety [2.00 vs -0.04; p0.001], effectiveness [1.33 vs 0.00; p0.001], social and ethical impact [1.15 vs 0.33; p0.001], and legal perception from healthcare professionals [1.23 vs 0.25; p0.001]. The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and Budget Impact Analysis showed an advantage of the checklist (5.75% annual economic saving).A dedicated checklist may lead to potential benefits in terms of quality of care pathway processes.

Although mammography screening significantly reduces breast cancer mortality, women could present different morphological characteristics that do not allow the correct vision of their breasts and the detection of cancer, resulting in a delay of diagnosis and an increase in the risk of mortality. The present study aims at analyzing potential areas of improvement of the current screening programs and then hypothesizing alternative technologies to use within the diagnostic phase, from an economic point of view. A Budget Impact Analysis approach was implemented, considering the Italian National Healthcare Service perspective, and representing the healthcare expenditure evolution, over three years. In the Budget Impact Analysis model, two distinct phases of the screening programs were considered: (1) the screening/diagnosis phase and (2) the phase related to cancer care and treatments of patients. The results provide clinicians and policy makers with a rational method to forecast economic resources in the screening programs in a general context of limited resources. In particular, results of the Budget Impact Analysis showed that, while the introduction of the ABUS InveniaTM technology into the screening programs would lead to an increase in the screening phase expenditure, it would generate an economic advantage related to the patients treatment and care.

The present study aims at defining the economic and organizational impacts of the introduction of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) in Italy, for the management of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients in third-line therapy, defining the overall level of sustainability for both hospitals and the National Healthcare System (NHS). The analysis focused on CAR-T and Best Salvage Care (in the following BSC), assuming the Italian hospital and NHS perspectives, over a 36-month time horizon. Process mapping and activity-based costing methodologies were applied to collect the hospital costs related to the BSC and CAR-T pathways, including adverse event management. Anonymous administrative data on services provided (diagnostic and laboratory examinations, hospitalizations, outpatient procedures, and therapies) to 47 third-line patients with lymphoma, as well as any organizational investments required, were collected, in two different Italian Hospitals. The economic results showed that the BSC clinical pathway required less resources in comparison with CAR-T (excluding the cost related to the therapy) (BSC: 29,558.41 vs. CAR-T: EUR 71,220.84, −58.5%). The budget impact analysis depicts that the introduction of CAR-T would generate an increase in costs ranging from 15% to 23%, without considering treatment costs. The assessment of the organizational impact reveals that the introduction of CAR-T therapy would require additional investments equal to a minimum of EUR 15,500 to a maximum of EUR 100,897.49, from the hospital perspective. Results show new economic evidence for healthcare decision makers, to optimize the appropriateness of resource allocation. The present analysis suggests the need to introduce a specific reimbursement tariff, both at the hospital and at NHS levels, since no consensus exists, at least in the Italian setting, concerning the proper remuneration for the hospitals who guarantee this innovative pathway, assuming high risks related to timely management of adverse events.

The study aims to define the economic resources needed to manage chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), assuming the hospital perspective, based on different patient characteristics, within a 24-month time horizon.Real-world data were collected in 3 Italian hospitals. A time-driven activity-based costing approach was implemented to map and assess the pathways for CRSwNP. The following drivers were considered: diagnostic services, drugs, consumables, human resources, equipment and overhead costs based on the length of stay. Costs related to management of comorbidities and adverse events were evaluated. Three main groups of patients were identified: ineligible for surgery; having 1 intervention; having more than 1 intervention. The economic absorption of patients who continued corticosteroid treatment was analysed.Patients experiencing 1 intervention had a cost of 3,453.31 € that increased to 4,705.03 € for those who required additional surgery. The cost of intranasal corticosteroids was 649.20 €, whereas the cost of oral corticosteroids was 37.60 € per patient.The results demonstrate the strategic relevance of analytical cost definitions of the clinical pathway for CRSwNP, which can help to support decision makers in the review of internal procedures and in the definition of proper reimbursement tariffs.La stima dei costi nel percorso della CRSwNP. L’approccio del time-driven activity-based costing.Lo studio mira a definire i costi per la gestione della rinosinusite cronica con poliposi nasale (CRSwNP), assumendo la prospettiva ospedaliera, in base alle caratteristiche dei pazienti, in un orizzonte temporale di 24 mesi.Dati reali sono stati raccolti in 3 ospedali italiani con il supporto di dati gestionali di contabilità analitica. L’approccio Time-driven Activity-Based Costing è stato adottato per valorizzare i costi di: servizi diagnostici, farmaci, materiali di consumo, risorse umane, attrezzature e costi generali, in base alla durata della degenza. Inoltre, sono stati valutati i costi per la gestione delle comorbilità e degli eventi avversi. Sono stati identificati tre gruppi di pazienti: non idonei all’intervento; sottoposti a 1 intervento; sottoposti a più di 1 intervento.Per i pazienti sottoposti a 1 intervento i costi sono 3.453,31 €, che aumentano a 4.705,03 € in caso si presentino recidive. Il costo per i corticosteroidi infranasali (INCS) è pari a 649,20 € a paziente, mentre quello relativo alla somministrazione dei corticosteroidi orali (OCS) è di 37,60 €.I risultati dimostrano la rilevanza strategica della definizione analitica dei costi del percorso clinico, che può aiutare a supportare i decisori nella revisione delle procedure interne e nella definizione di tariffe di rimborso adeguate.

Objectives This study describes the clinical features and outcomes of patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) due to Enterococcus spp. and identified factors predictive of mortality. Methods This analysis is part of a prospective multicentre observational study of consecutive hospitalised patients with BSI conducted from March 2012 to December 2012 in 31 internal medicine wards in Italy. Patients with enterococcal BSI were selected from the entire cohort. Patient characteristics, therapeutic interventions and outcome were reviewed. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% interval confidences (CIs) were calculated. Results Among 533 patients with BSI, 41 (7.7%) had BSI by Enterococcus spp. (28 Enterococcus faecalis, 4 Enterococcus faecium and 3 each of Enterococcus avium, Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus gallinarum). Six BSIs (14.6%) were polymicrobial. Median (IQR) patient age was 73 (66–85.5) years. In-hospital mortality was 24.4%. Polymicrobial infection (HR = 9.100, 95% CI 1.295–63.949; P = 0.026), age (HR = 1.261, 95% CI 1.029–1.546; P = 0.025) and SOFA score (HR = 1.244, 95% CI 1.051–1.474; P = 0.011) were risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Conversely, receiving an alert from the microbiology laboratory before obtaining final antimicrobial susceptibility results was associated with survival (HR = 0.073, 95% CI 0.007–0.805; P = 0.033). Conclusion BSI due to Enterococcus spp. in elderly patients is associated with high mortality. Polymicrobial infection, age and SOFA score are factors associated with poor outcome. Conversely, early alert from the microbiology laboratory improves patient survival.

Purpose: To investigate the implications of the introduction of two hormonal therapies, abiraterone acetate + prednisone (AA+P) and enzalutamide (ENZA), for the treatment of naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the Italian setting. Methods: In 2017-2018, a Health Technology Assessment was conducted in Italy, considering the National Healthcare Service (NHS) perspective. Data were retrieved from literature evidence, economic evaluations, and qualitative questionnaires, considering the 9 EUnetHTA dimensions, and a final multi-criteria approach. Results: On the basis of mCRPC prevalence and incidence rates in Italy, the analysis considered 11,212 males eligible to either AA+P or ENZA treatments. Both drugs led to an improvement of the patients' overall survival, with respect to the standard of care, composed of docetaxel chemotherapy. However, AA+P showed a higher rate of drug-related moderate adverse events and a monitoring activities incidence superior to ENZA (+70%, p-value=0.00), which led to a major resources absorption (€ 1,056.02 vs € 316.25, p-value=0.00), whereas ENZA showed a better cost-effectiveness average value (CEV: 54,586.12 vs 57,624.15). Economic savings ranging from 1.46% to 1.61% emerged for the NHS, as well as organizational advantages, with fewer minutes required for the mCRPC management (AA+P: 815 mins vs ENZA: 500 mins). According to experts' perceptions, based on a 7-item Likert scale (ranging from -3 to +3), similar results emerged on ethical and social impact (ENZA: 1.35 vs AA+P: 1.48, p-value>0.05), and on legal dimension (ENZA: 0.67 vs AA+P: 0.67, p-value>0.05), since both drugs improved the patients' quality of life and received approval for use. High-level perceptions related to ENZA adoption emerged with regard to equity (ENZA: 0.69 vs AA+P: 0.25, p-value

(1) Background: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a congenital abnormality present in up to 25% of the general population, and it is a relevant cause of cryptogenic stroke. We applied the hospital-based HTA model (AdHopHTA) to conduct a multidimensional assessment of NobleStitch EL, an innovative suture-mediated PFO closure device. We compared it to Amplatzer PFO Occluder (APO) to provide evidence to inform technologies’ governance in hospital settings. (2) Methods: For each AdHopHTA dimension we: systematically retrieved available evidence from the literature applying the PRISMA guidelines and then analyzed original clinical and cost data of a NobleStitch EL device at San Raffaele research hospital in Milan (Italy). The economic dimension was analyzed through activity-based costing and a cost analysis. We conducted semi-structured interviews with selected healthcare professionals to explore the organizational, legal, social, and ethical impact. (3) Results: A single study was included for the NobleStitch EL, with 10 for APO. Both literature data and original data showed comparable safety. Efficacy data analysis found that the PFO closure was at 89% for NobleStitch EL vs. 89–97% for APO. APO has a better impact on the budget and minor process costs. Consulted experts reported that the organizational impact of NobleStitch EL in the short and the long run as null, albeit a better impact under the social and the ethical aspects. (4) Conclusion: We suggest that there is inadequate evidence to conclude the relative efficacy of NobleStitch EL as compared to APO. Nevertheless, this report shows a good safety profile and higher costs for NobleStitch EL, with no organizational or legal impact. Further studies in selected population are recommended.

Lucrezia Ferrario,1 Fabrizio Schettini,1 Angelo Avogaro,2 Chiara Bellia,3 Federico Bertuzzi,4 Graziella Bonetti,5 Antonio Ceriello,6 Marcello Ciaccio,3,7 Massimiliano Corsi Romanelli,8,9 Elena Dozio,9 Luca Falqui,10 Angela Girelli,11 Antonio Nicolucci,12 Gianluca Perseghin,13,14 Mario Plebani,15 Umberto Valentini,11 Martina Zaninotto,15 Silvana Castaldi,9,16 Emanuela Foglia1 1Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC, Castellanza, Italy; 2Department of Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy; 3Section of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Medicine, Department of Biopathology and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; 4Diabetology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy; 5Department of Medicine Services, Valcamonica Hospital, Esine, Italy; 6Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases, Multimedica Research Institute, Milan, Italy; 7Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; 8Service of Laboratory Medicine 1-Clinical Pathology, Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; 9Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; 10Department of Medicine, Diabetes and Endocrinology, Multimedica Research Institute, Milan, Italy; 11Diabetes Care Unit, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy; 12Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy; 13Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy; 14Department of Medicine and Rehabilitation, Unit of Metabolic Medicine, Policlinico di Monza, Monza, Italy; 15Department of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy; 16Fondazione Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Research Institute of Milano, Milano, ItalyCorrespondence: Lucrezia FerrarioCentre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management, Università Carlo Cattaneo – LIUC, Corso Matteotti 22, Castellanza, 21053, VA, ItalyTel +39 033 1572504Fax +39 033 1572513Email lferrario@liuc.itPurpose: To investigate the glycated albumin (GA) introduction implications, as an add-on strategy to traditional glycemic control (Hb1Ac and fasting plasma glucose – FPG) instruments, considering insulin-naïve individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), treated with oral therapies.Methods: A Health Technology Assessment was conducted in Italy, as a multi-dimensional approach useful to validate any innovative technology. The HTA dimensions, derived from the EUnetHTA Core Model, were deployed by means of literature evidence, health economics tools and qualitative questionnaires, filled-in by 15 professionals.Results: Literature stated that the GA introduction could lead to a higher number of individuals achieving therapeutic success after 3 months of therapy (97.0% vs 71.6% without GA). From an economic point of view, considering a projection of 1,955,447 T2DM insulin-naïve individuals, potentially treated with oral therapy, GA introduction would imply fewer individuals requiring a therapy switch (− 89.44%), with a 1.06% in costs reduction, on annual basis, thus being also the preferable solution from a cost-effectiveness perspective (cost-effectiveness value: 237.74 vs 325.53). According to experts opinions, lower perceptions on GA emerged with regard to equity aspects (0.13 vs 0.72, p-value> 0.05), whereas it would improve both individuals (2.17 vs 1.33, p-value=0.000) and caregivers quality of life (1.50 vs 0.83, p-value=0.000). Even if in the short term, GA required additional investments in training courses (− 0.80 vs 0.10, p-value = 0.036), in the long run, GA could become the preferable technology (0.30 vs 0.01, p-value=0.018) from an organisational perspective.Conclusion: Adding GA to traditional glycaemic control instruments could improve the clinical pathway of individuals with T2DM, leading to economic and organisational advantages for both hospitals and National Healthcare Systems.Keywords: glycated albumin, type 2 diabetes mellitus, T2DM, Health Technology Assessment, economic evaluation, multidimensional approach

Peripheral Venous Catheter (PVC) is a widely used device in the hospital setting and is often associated with significant adverse events that may impair treatment administration and patient health. The aim of the present study is to define the incremental benefits related to the implementation and the standardized and simultaneous use of three disposable devices for skin antisepsis, infusion, and cleaning, assuming the hospital’s point of view, from an effectiveness, efficiency, and organizational perspective. For the achievement of the above objective, real-life data were collected by means of an observational prospective study, involving two hospitals in the Liguria Region (Northern Italy). Consecutive cases were enrolled and placed into two different scenarios: 1) use of all the three disposable devices, thus representing the scenario related to the implementation of a standardized optimal procedure (Scenario 1); 2) use of only one or two disposable devices, representing the scenario related to not being in a standardized optimal procedure (Scenario 2). For the definition of effectiveness indicators, the reason for PVC removal and the PVC-related adverse events occurrence were collected for each patient enrolled. In addition, an activity-based costing analysis grounded on a process-mapping technique was conducted to define the overall economic absorption sustained by hospitals when taking in charge patients requiring a PVC. Among the 380 patients enrolled in the study, 18% were treated with the standardized optimal procedure (Scenario 1). The two Scenarios differed in terms of number of patients for whom the PCV was removed due to the end of therapy (86.8% versus 39.40%, p-value = 0.000), with a consequent decrease in the adverse events occurrence rate. The economic evaluation demonstrated the sustainability and feasibility of implementing the standardized optimal procedure specifically related to the need for lower economic resources for the hospital management of adverse events occurred (€19.60 versus €21.71, p-value = 0.0019). An organizational advantage also emerged concerning an overall lower time to execute all the PVC-related activities (4.39 versus 5.72 minutes, p-value = 0.00). Results demonstrate the feasibility in the adoption of the standardized optimal procedure for PVC management, with significant advantages not only from a clinical point of view, but also from an organizational and economic perspective, thus being able to increase the overall operational efficiency of the hospitals.

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is a widely implemented technical tool used to inform the decision-making process...

Background: INTERCheckWEB is one of the most outstanding IT innovative technology that can be implemented at hospital level, supporting the clinicians in the evaluation of the therapy appropriateness for a patient, specially reducing the potentially inappropriate prescriptions for elderly patients in polytherapy. The present paper aims at investigating the relationship between physicians and support decision system in therapy appropriateness for elderly patients in polytherapy, in order to is to assess the factors that can foster or hamper physicians in using INTERCheckWEB for drug prescription.Methods: A qualitative questionnaire based on a model broadly addressed in literature (Technology Acceptance Model – TAM2), was administered to seventy clinicians referring to Internal Medicine wards, of four Italian medium size hospitals. Based on TAM2, authors assess how perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, image and output quality, affect INTERCheckWeb intention to use. Inferential analyses were conducted to define the main aspects useful to understand the factors impacting on INTERCheckWeb adoption in clinical practice.Results: The regression analysis reported that image, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, as well as the moderator effect of the voluntary use between the perceived usefulness and the intention to use, are the factors that most influenced the use of INTERCheckWEB (Adjusted R2 = 0.870).Conclusions: The analysis has demonstrated that clinicians would effectively use INTERCheckWEB, when available, to identify all the information that could be dangerous for the patient, choosing the proper drug and preventing potential interactions and medical errors.

Background Since HIV+ treatment has become more effective, the average age of people living with HIV (PLWHIV) has increased, and consequently the incidence of developing comorbidities, making the clinical and economic management of HIV+ patients more complex. Limited literature exists regarding the management of comorbidities costs. This study is aimed at defining and comparing the total annual costs of comorbidities, in an Italian cohort of HIV and HIV/HCV patients, from the National Healthcare Service perspective. The authors hypothesised that there are higher costs, for patients with multiple comorbidities, and a greater consumption of resources for HIV/HCV co-infected patients versus HIV mono-infected patients. Methods An observational retrospective multi-centre health-economics study, enrolling HIV+ and HIV/HCV consecutive patients with at least one comorbidity, was conducted. The consecutive cases, provided by three Italian infectious diseases centres, were related to the year 2016. The enrolled patients were on a stable antiviral therapy for at least six months. Demographic and clinical information was recorded. Costs related to HIV and HCV therapies, other treatments, medical examinations, hospitalizations and outpatient visits were evaluated. Data from mono-infected and co-infected groups of patients were compared, and the statistical analysis was performed by t-tests, chi-square and ANOVA. A sub-analysis excluding HCV therapy costs, was also conducted. The hierarchical sequential linear regression model was used to explore the determinants of costs, considering the investigated comorbidities. All analyses were conducted with a significant level of 0.05. Results A total of 676 patients, 82% male, mean age 52, were identified and divided into groups (338 mono-infected HIV+ and 338 co-infected HIV/HCV patients), comparable in terms of age, gender, and demographic characteristics. A trend towards higher annual costs, for patients with multiple comorbidities was observed in HIV mono-infected patients (respectively € 8272.18 for patients without comorbidities and € 12,532.49 for patients with three or more comorbidities, p-value: 0.001). Excluding anti-HCV therapies costs, HIV/HCV co-infected patients generally required more resources, with statistically significant differences related to cardiovascular events (€10,116.58 vs €11,004.28, p-value: 0.001), and neurocognitive impairments events (€7706.43 vs €11,641.29 p- value: Conclusions This study provides a differentiated and comprehensive analysis of the healthcare resources needed by HIV and HIV/HCV patients with comorbidities and may contribute to the decision process of resources allocation, in the clinical management of different HIV+ patient populations.

Background The number of patients undergoing joint arthroplasty is increasing worldwide. An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway for hip and knee arthroplasty was introduced in an Italian high-volume research hospital in March 2018. Methods The aim of this mixed methods observational study is to perform a health technology assessment (HTA) of the ERAS pathway, considering 938 procedures performed after its implementation, by means of a hospital-based approach derived from the EUnetHTA (European Network for Health Technology Assessment) Core Model. The assessment process is based on dimensions of general relevance, safety, efficacy, effectiveness, economic and financial impact, equity, legal aspects, social and ethical impact, and organizational impact. A narrative review of the literature helped to identify general relevance, safety and efficacy factors, and a set of relevant sub-dimensions submitted to the evaluation of the professionals who use the technology through a 7-item Likert Scale. The economic and financial impact of the ERAS pathway on the hospital budget was supported by quantitative data collected from internal or national registries, employing economic modelling strategies to identify the amount of resources required to implement it. Results The relevance of technology under assessment is recognized worldwide. A number of studies show accelerated pathways to dominate conventional approaches on pain reduction, functional recovery, prevention of complications, improvements in tolerability and quality of life, including fragile or vulnerable patients. Qualitative surveys on clinical and functional outcomes confirm most of these benefits. The ERAS pathway is associated with a reduced length of stay in comparison with the Italian hospitalization average for the same procedures, despite the poor spread of the pathway within the country may generate postcode inequalities. The economic analyses show how the resources invested in training activities are largely depreciated by benefits once the technology is permanently introduced, which may generate hospital cost savings of up to 2054,123.44 € per year. Conclusions Galeazzi Hospital’s ERAS pathway for hip and knee arthroplasty results preferable to traditional approaches following most of the HTA dimensions, and offers room for further improvement. The more comparable practices are shared, the before this potential improvement can be identified and addressed.

Background: Indocyanine green fluorescence vision is an upcoming technology in surgery. It can be used in three ways: angiographic and biliary tree visualization and lymphatic spreading studies. The present paper shows the most outstanding results from an health technology assessment study design, conducted on fluorescence-guided compared with standard vision surgery. Methods: A health technology assessment approach was implemented to investigate the economic, social, ethical, and organizational implications related to the adoption of the innovative fluorescence-guided view, with a focus on minimally invasive approach. With the support of a multidisciplinary team, qualitative and quantitative data were collected, by means of literature evidence, validated questionnaires and self-reported interviews, considering the dimensions resulting from the EUnetHTA Core Model. Results: From a systematic search of literature, we retrieved the following studies: 6 on hepatic, 1 on pancreatic, 4 on biliary, 2 on bariatric, 4 on endocrine, 2 on thoracic, 11 on colorectal, 7 on urology, 11 on gynecology, 2 on gastric surgery. Fluorescence guide has shown advantages on the length of hospitalization particularly in colorectal surgery, with a reduction of the rate of leakages and re-do anastomoses, in spite of a slight increase in operating time, and is confirmed to be a safe, efficacious, and sustainable vision technology. Clinical applications are still presenting a low evidence in the literature. Conclusion: The present paper, under the patronage of Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery, based on an HTA approach, sustains the use of fluorescence-guided vision in minimally invasive surgery, in the fields of general, gynecologic, urologic, and thoracic surgery, as an efficient and economically sustainable technology.

Emanuela Foglia,1 Lucrezia Ferrario,1 Elisabetta Garagiola,1 Giuseppe Signoriello,2 Gianluca Pellino,3 Davide Croce,1,4 Silvestro Canonico3 1Centre for Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management - LIUC University, Castellanza, Italy; 2Department of Mental Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy; 3School of Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy; 4School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa Purpose: Surgical-site complications (SSCs) affect patients’ clinical pathway, prolonging their hospitalization and incrementing their management costs. The present study aimed to assess the economic and organizational implications of a portable device for negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) implementation, compared with the administration of pharmacological therapies alone for preventing surgical complications in patients undergoing general, cardiac, obstetrical–gynecological, or orthopedic surgical procedures.Patients and methods: A total of 8,566 hospital procedures, related to the year 2015 from one hospital, were evaluated considering infection risk index, occurrence rates of SSCs, drug therapies, and surgical, diagnostic, and specialist procedures and hematological exams. Activity-based costing and budget impact analyses were implemented for the economic assessment.Results: Patients developing an SSC absorbed i) 64.27% more economic resources considering the length of stay (€ 8,269±2,096 versus € 5,034±2,901, p

The aim of this study is to analyze the potential advantages of emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (FTC/TAF) introduction, creating evidence-based information to orient strategies to reduce costs, thus preserving effectiveness and appropriateness. An Health Technology Assessment (HTA) was implemented in the years 2017&ndash, 2018 comparing the dual backbones available in the Italian market: FTC/TAF, FTC/TDF (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine) and ABC/3TC (abacavir/lamivudine). From an efficacy point of view, FTC/TAF ensured a higher percentage of virologic control and a better safety impact than FTC/TDF (improving the renal and bone safety profile, as well as the lipid picture). From an economic point of view, the results revealed a 4% cost saving for the Italian National Healthcare Service NHS with FTC/TAF introduction compared with the baseline scenario. Qualitative perceptions&rsquo, results showed that FTC/TAF would decrease the burden of adverse events management, increasing the accessibility of patients to healthcare providers (FTC/TAF: 0.95, FTC/TDF: 0.10, ABC/3TC: 0.28, p-value: 0.016) and social costs (FTC/TDF: &minus, 0.23, FTC/TAF: 1.04, ABC/3TC: 0.23, p-value &lt, 0.001), improving patient quality of life (FTC/TDF: 0.31, FTC/TAF: 1.85, ABC/3TC: 0.38, 0.001). Healthcare services may consider the evidence provided by the present study as an opportunity to include HIV patients in a more adequate antiretroviral treatment arm, guaranteeing a personalized clinical pathway, thus becoming more efficient and effective over time.