Search

Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) determined an improvement of responses and overall survival (OS) in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients, some patients still fail the achievement of important milestones.In this review, we focus on the need of appropriate molecular and mutational monitoring during TKI treatment with new laboratory tools and on new compounds developed to counteract the unmet clinical need in CP-CML.The appropriate identification of BCR::ABL1 dependent and independent mechanisms of resistance with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) can allow to improve the therapeutic strategies and prevent the onset of a failure to treatment. New compounds have been recently approved or are still in investigational trials to improve the response in some critical forms of resistance and/or intolerance to available TKIs.

Background: The outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in chronic phase has changed after the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The life expectancy is actually similar to that of the general population. Although outstanding results were achieved, about 20-30% of patients failed to achieve molecular milestones or experienced a severe toxicity and needed to switch to a second line. Objective: The aim of this review is to report on possible future management in CML, from dose optimization to avoid long-term off-target events to new agents for the treatment of resistant and/or intolerant patients. Methods: Broad research on Medline, Embase and archives from EHA and ASH congresses was performed. Results: New TKIs have been developed to counteract resistance and/or intolerance in the setting of T315I mutated patients. The benefits of ponatinib dose optimization have been recently reported in the OPTIC trial. New trials to test the dose optimization are ongoing. Conclusion: Reduction of the standard dose could be performed to reduce the specific TKI toxicity. Selective TKIs could be prescribed in the future as third line treatment.

JAK2 inhibitors have changed the therapeutic strategies for the management of primary and secondary myelofibrosis. Ruxolitinib, the first available agent, improved disease-related symptoms, spleen volume, and overall survival compared to conventional chemotherapy. It has been revealed that after 3 years of treatment, about 50% of patients discontinued ruxolitinib for resistance and/or intolerance and should be candidate to a second line of treatment.Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been tested in this setting, but all these new drugs do not significantly impact on disease progression. Novel agents are in developments that target on different pathways, alone or in combination with JAK2 inhibitors.In this review, we summarize all the clinical efficacy and safety data of these drugs providing a vision of the possible future.

Ruxolitinib is approved for polycythemia vera (PV) patients after failure to previous cytoreductive therapy, based on durable results observed in phase 3 trials. We report a multicenter retrospective study demonstrating the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in real-life setting. Eighty-three patients were evaluated. Median follow-up was 24.5 months (IQR 14.0-29.3). At a 3-month response assessment, ruxolitinib provided significant benefit in reducing hematocrit (HCT) level (p 0.001), phlebotomy requirement (p 0.001), leucocytes (p = 0.044), and disease-related symptoms (p 0.001). The exposure-adjusted rates (per 100 patient-years) of infectious complications, thromboembolic events, and secondary malignancies were 6.9, 3, and 3.7, respectively. Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) were the most frequent (40%) SM type. Lymphoproliferative disorders were not detected. Five (6%) patients permanently discontinued ruxolitinib treatment and four (5%) evolved in myelofibrosis (MF), but none in acute leukemia. The rate of MF evolution per 100 patient-years of exposure was 2.8. In our experience, ruxolitinib confirmed its efficacy and safety outside of clinical trials.

BACKGROUND Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is uncommon among subjects aged ≥ 70 years and the better therapeutic strategy represents an unmet clinical need. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prompted us to explore our real-life data on a retrospective cohort of 45 older APL patients (≥ 70 years) consecutively diagnosed at eight different hematologic institutions in Latium, Italy, from July 1991 to May 2019. RESULTS Two patients (4.4%) died from early hemorrhagic complications before treatment could begin. Twenty-two patients (51.1%) (Group A) were enrolled or treated according to standard clinical protocols, while 21 (48.8%) (Group B) received an ATRA-based personalized approach due to poor performance status. Morphologic complete remission (CR) after induction therapy was achieved in 33 patients (76.7%) with 100% of patients in Group A and 52.3% in Group B (p

The clinical scenario for chronic myeloid leukemia patients rapidly changed after the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Second-generation TKIs as frontline treatment increased the rate of deep molecular responses without increasing the rate of overall survival. About 20% of patients experience resistance to these agents, needing alternative treatments. Here, we reviewed the possible mechanisms of resistance, available treatment, and new drugs developed to counteract and overcome resistance.Results of novel TKIs have been recently reported, especially for the setting of T315I mutated patients, such as olverembatinib and asciminib, or for patients who developed resistance due to other mutations, such as vodobatinib. Most of new TKIs are selected among compounds tested selective on ABL, therefore without possible off-target effects in the long term. New potential treatments are on the horizon in the field of CML, able to rescue patients treated firstly with one or more second-generation TKIs. Results of ongoing trials and real-world evidence dataset will help us to identify the appropriate timing of intervention and to select appropriate candidate to these drugs.

Introduction: The outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in chronic phase has changed after the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The life expectancy is actually simila...

Unmet needs remain in the treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in later lines. Sequential use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is associated with decreased overall survival and emergence of new mutations, particularly the T315I mutation. Among the new drugs developed to overcome resistance and intolerance, the STAMP inhibitor asciminib (which specifically targets the ABL myristoyl pocket) is the first example of a drug that works by allosteric inhibition. This review focuses on its mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic, efficacy, and toxicity, as well as how this drug will change the therapeutic approach for CML patients not eligible to receive other available drugs.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the backbone of treatment for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients (CP-CML), have changed the long-term outcome of the disease. Nonetheless, over 20% of patients fail front-line therapy due to intolerance or resistance. A head-to-head comparison of dasatinib and nilotinib as second-line treatment outside of sponsored clinical trials has not been reported. We retrospectively analyzed 131 CP-CML patients who, after front-line imatinib failure, switched to a second-line therapy with nilotinib (59, 45%) or dasatinib (72, 55%). Median duration of second-line treatment was 33 months (range 2-100). The reason for switching therapy was resistance in 83.2% and intolerance in 16.8% of patients. The overall survival of the entire cohort at 7 years was 78.9%, while it was 72% and 85.6% for patients treated with dasatinib and nilotinib, respectively (p=0.287). With regard to efficacy after 12 months of treatment, 108 patients were evaluable for molecular response: 47% achieved a major molecular response and 18.2% a deep molecular response with dasatinib, compared to 38% and 16.2% with nilotinib (p=ns). We observed 35% of grade 3-4 adverse events, more frequently in the dasatinib group (47%) compared to the nilotinib group (22%), without affecting molecular responses. Our study suggests that, in the real-life setting, dasatinib and nilotinib used as second-line treatment in CP-CML are equally effective, with high molecular response rates and an acceptable tolerability.

Polycythemia vera is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by an increased red blood cell mass, risk of thromboembolic events, and of transformation into secondary myelofibrosis and acute leukemia. The goal of treatment is to reduce the risk of fatal cardiovascular events reducing the hematocrit level with phlebotomies and low-dose aspirin. In high-risk patients (age60 years or previous thromboembolic events) cytoreductive therapy is indicated. In this setting, resistance and/or intolerance is common.Authors searched Medline, Embase, archives from the EHA and the ASH annual congresses from 2014 onward about ruxolitinib treatment in PV patients. Two trials (RESPONSE and RESPONSE2) have documented the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib. The drug is able to persistently control the hematocrit level and symptoms (due to increased cytokine levels, increased viscosity, and increased splenomegaly), to reduce WBC counts and the rate of thromboembolic events, to increase the quality of life.Although ruxolitinib has entered into the clinical practice, the real-life incidence of resistant/intolerant patients, the long-term safety, and the activity on thromboembolic events (associated or not to a reduction of the molecular burden) remains to be conclusively determined. More information extrapolated by registries are required to shed light on the missing information.

Prognostic role of chromosomal translocations (CT) in myelodysplasia (MDS) was retrospectively analyzed in 77 patients from GROM-L registry. Forty (51.9%) balanced, 28 (36.4%) unbalanced and 9 (11.7%) concomitant balanced and unbalanced CT were identified. Five-year overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 34.5% (CI 95% 22.5-46.5). Five-year OS of patients with unbalanced CT was significantly shorter than that of patients carrying balanced CT [22.3% (CI 95% 4.0-40.6) vs 44.0% (CI 95% 26.7-61.3) (

Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have drastically changed the outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. However, a subset of patients experienced resistance and/or intolera...

The outcome of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients treated with 5-azacitidine (5-AZA) in the real-life setting remains largely unknown. We evaluated 110 MDS patients (IPSS intermediate 2/high) treated outside of clinical trials at a single institution between September 2003 and January 2017. Median duration of therapy was 9.5 cycles. The overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort was 66.1% at 1 year and 38.3% at 2 years. No differences in terms of OS were observed with regard to gender (p = 0.622) and age at baseline ( 65 years, 65-75, and 75 years, p = 0.075). According to the IPSS-R, the very high-risk group had an inferior 2-year OS (17%) compared with intermediate-group patients (64%, p 0.001). Transfusion independency at baseline was identified as a favorable prognostic factor on 1-year (66.8%) and 2-year OS (43.4%) (p 0.001). After four cycles, the persistence of bone marrow blasts 10% identified patients with a worse outcome, with a 2-year OS of 9.4% (p = 0.002). The occurrence of an infection during the first four cycles impacted on the 2-year OS (31.6% vs 58.3% in patients without infections, p = 0.032). Patients receiving at least 24 cycles of the drug have a 5-year OS of 38.2%. This analysis allowed to identify features at baseline or during treatment with 5-AZA associated with a different 2-year OS.

Imatinib, the first BCR/ABL kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), has changed the long-term outcome of patients affected by this disease. The aim of our analysis was to report, after a median follow-up of 10.2 years (range 5.8-14.8), the long-term outcome, efficacy, and safety of imatinib treatment (frontline and after interferon failure) in a single institution cohort of 459 patients with CML in chronic phase treated outside of clinical trials. The 10-year overall survival of the whole cohort was 77.1%, while the 10-year probability of dying due to CML and other causes was 7.8% and 16%, respectively. The prognostic value of the BCR-ABL1 ratio at 3 months (⩽ 10%) and of complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response at 1 year was confirmed also in the real-life practice. The EUTOS long-term survival score better stratified the baseline risk of dying of CML compared with other risk scores. Two hundred thirty-six (51.4%) patients achieved a deep molecular response during imatinib treatment after a median time of 4.57 years, and 95 (20.6%) had a stable deep molecular response maintained for at least 2 consecutive years. Imatinib was associated with a low rate of serious cardiovascular events and second neoplasia. This 10-year real-life follow-up study shows that imatinib maintains efficacy over time and that long-term administration of imatinib is not associated with notable cumulative or late toxic effects.

Introduction: The current treatment landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is challenging for several reasons, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data may be of critical importance to help physicians and patients make more informed decisions.Areas covered: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed to identify the most recent studies (between April 2016 and June 2020) assessing the impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) on adult CML patients' HRQOL. Studies assessing treatment discontinuation were also considered. For each study, we evaluated characteristics of CML patients included, treatment information and basic HRQOL data, including questionnaires used, and summary findings.Expert opinion: Valuable information can be gleaned from recent CML studies including a HRQOL assessment; however, major gaps remain in our knowledge. These include, for example, a better understanding of the impact of second- and third-generation TKIs on patients' HRQOL compared to imatinib therapy. Also, the benefits of TKI treatment discontinuation, in terms of symptom burden and HRQOL, are yet to be fully elucidated. More research efforts are needed in this area to generate high-quality evidence that can facilitate decision-making.

We report the long-term outcome of 139 patients treated with imatinib in late chronic phase after IFN failure. Median follow-up was 16.6 years and the estimated 18-year OS was 64.8%. 18-year EFS and PFS were 69% and 64.4%, respectively. Fifty (36%) patients stopped imatinib, 72% received a second line. b2a2 transcript was associated with a significantly inferior 18-year OS (

Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which target BCR-ABL1 kinase activity, have significantly prolonged the overall survival of patients affected by chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and changed drastically the outcome. Evidences from several studies suggest that in patients who have achieved a sustained, stable and deep molecular response, TKI treatment can be safely discontinued with a close subsequent monitoring. Thus, a stable deep molecular response (DMR) has become a feasible treatment goal in CML. Areas covered: In this review, the main findings extrapolated from sponsored and real-life evidences regarding TKI discontinuation were discussed, through a broad research on Medline, Embase and archives from EHA and ASH congresses (including words such as discontinuation, treatment-free remission, TFR, etc). Moreover, suggestions emerged from international guidelines about treatment-free remission (TFR) are presented. Expert opinion: With the growing availability of clinical trials and real-life data on TFR, in recent years the possibility of offering to CML patients a safe, informed and shorter path to TFR, through the achievement of a stable deep molecular response (DMR), has become an increasing option. However, many controversial aspects remain regarding treatment choices and timings, predictive factors, patient communication and optimal strategies aimed at achieving a successful TFR.

Recommendations for dyslipidemia management aimed at reducing arterial occlusive events (AOEs) have been recently published. So far, no data have been reported on the management of dyslipidemia in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with nilotinib. We investigated 369 CML adult patients, stratified according to the new Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) scoring system. Plasma levels of cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and triglycerides were measured prior to the start of nilotinib and after 3, 6, and 12months. The 5-year cumulative incidence of AOEs was 15.9%. Patients with cholesterol levels > 200mg/dL and LDL > 70mg/dL 3months after treatment showed a significantly higher incidence of AOEs (21.9 ± 4.6% vs 6.2 ± 2.5, P= 0.003). Patients belonging to the high and very high SCORE risk group showed a significant increase of AOEs (34.4 ± 6% vs 10 ± 2.1%, P< 0.001). In multivariate analysis, both high cholesterol and LDL levels and a high and very high SCORE risk remained significantly associated with the risk of AOEs (P= 0.008; HR = 3.5; 95% CI = 1.4–8.7 and P < 0.001; HR = 4.4; 95% CI = 2–9.8, respectively). Overall, 78 patients (21.1%) presented dyslipidemia at the time of CML diagnosis and 88 (23.3%) after starting nilotinib, but only 26 of them (29.5%) were treated with statins. Low LDL and cholesterol plasma levels are associated with a significant lower risk of AOEs in CML patients treated with nilotinib in the real life.

In the last decades, the chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapeutic landscape has changed dramatically with the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with 10-year survival rates improving to up to 80%. Long-lasting TKI treatment, in particular with second-generation TKIs, has enabled clinicians to manage the onset of several side effects and other co-morbidities, such as atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism (VTE). We retrospectively evaluated nine CML patients treated with TKIs between 2017 and 2020 who experienced atrial fibrillation or VTE and received concomitant administration of TKIs and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) outside clinical trials, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination. Median age was 66 years at CML diagnosis (range 52–73 years) and 69 years at the time of starting DOACs. A female predominance was observed. The median follow-up of concomitant DOAC and TKI administration was 8.5 months; edoxaban was administered in six patients and apixaban in two patients, and one patient received rivaroxaban. Regarding CML treatment, four patients received imatinib, two patients bosutinib, and three nilotinib. In eight patients DOACs were started for atrial fibrillation and in one patient for VTE. In none of the patients treated with the combination were additional symptomatic thrombotic adverse events or major bleedings reported. In this small case series, the use of DOACs in CML patients seemed feasible. Additional data on long-term outcomes including a larger cohort of CML patients treated with DOACs are, however, needed.

NA

Predictive factors of response to hypomethylating agents (HMA) in elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients remain unclear in the real-life setting and no direct comparison between azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) has been carried out. We retrospectively evaluated 110 AML patients treated with HMA (78 AZA, 32 DEC) as first-line therapy outside of clinical trials. Median age was 75 years (range 58-87). The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 8.0 months (95% CI 6.1-10), without significant differences among the subgroups: AZA 8.8 months vs DEC 6.3 months (p = 0.291). HMA treatment yielded an overall response rate (ORR) of 40% (AZA 37% vs DEC 47%, p = 0.237). A stable disease (SD) after 4 HMA cycles was not associated with a worse survival outcome compared with an early optimal response. Factors independently associated with a better OS were transfusion independence during treatment (p = 0.049), achievement of an optimal response to treatment (p < 0.001), and a baseline hemoglobin level ≥ 9.25 (p = 0.018). A bone marrow (BM) blast count ≥ 30% (p < 0.001) and a therapy-related AML (p = 0.008) remain poor survival predictors. Of the available biologic features, an adverse risk category according to the ELN classification was significantly associated with a shorter survival over the intermediate risk category (p = 0.034). Disease progression remains the primary cause of death. Infectious complications were more severe (p = 0.036) and occurred earlier (p = 0.006) in the DEC group compared with that of the AZA group. In conclusion, clinical prognostic factors associated to response and survival have been identified without significant associations concerning overall outcomes between the two HMAs.

Acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) represents a modern success of precision medicine. However, fatalities occurring within the first 30 days of induction treatment, in particular intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), remain the main causes of death. We studied the clinico-biological characteristics of 13 patients with APL who experienced ICH. Compared to 85 patients without this complication, patients with ICH were older and more frequently had high-risk APL. Moreover, positivity for the 'swirl' sign at neuroradiological imaging and hydrocephalus were predictors of a fatal outcome, together with lower fibrinogen, prolonged international normalized ratio (INR) and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels.

Hypertension is a commonly reported comorbidity in patients diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and its management represents a challenge in patients treated with 2nd- or 3rd-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), considering their additional cardiovascular (CV) toxicity. The renin angiotensin system (RAS) contributes to hypertension genesis and plays an important role in atherosclerosis development, proliferation, and differentiation of myeloid hematopoietic cells. We analyzed a cohort of 192 patients with hypertension at CML diagnosis, who were treated with 2nd- or 3rd-generation TKIs, and evaluated the efficacy of RAS inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs)) in the prevention of arterial occlusive events (AOEs), as compared with other drug classes. The 5-year cumulative incidence of AOEs was 32.7 ± 4.2%. Patients with SCORE ≥ 5% (high-very-high) showed a significantly higher incidence of AOEs (33.7 ± 7.6% vs 13.6 ± 4.8%, p = 0.006). The AOE incidence was significantly lower in patients treated with RAS inhibitors (14.8 ± 4.2% vs 44 ± 1%, p < 0.001, HR = 0.283). The difference in the low and intermediate Sokal risk group was confirmed but not in the high-risk group, where a lower RAS expression has been reported. Our data suggest that RAS inhibitors may represent an optimal treatment in patients with hypertension and CML, treated with 2nd or 3rdG TKIs.

Since July 2017, different generic imatinib formulations have been introduced in Italy for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). We analyzed 168 chronic phase CML patients treated with branded imatinib for a median of 12 years (range 1-16) at a single institution who switched to a single generic formulation in order to assess the safety and impact on molecular response. The Sokal risk was low/intermediate/high in 63%, 33%, and 4% of patients, respectively. The median duration of generic imatinib treatment was 19 months (range 4-22). Twenty-seven percent of patients were in MMR and 73% were in deep molecular responses (MR4-4.5) at the time of the switch. After 12 months of treatment with generic imatinib, 140 patients were evaluable for response: 23.6% and 76.4% were respectively in MMR and in deep molecular response. When the degree of response was compared with the best molecular response observed with branded imatinib, it was found that 84% of patients maintained the response previously achieved, 6% improved it, and 10% of patients had a molecular fluctuation from the previous deep molecular response to MMR. Only 1 patient lost the MMR and no patient switched to another TKI for inefficacy. In terms of safety, 20% of patients reported new or worsening side effects, but only 2 patients returned to branded imatinib for toxicity. Our data show that the switch to generic imatinib in patients who have been previously treated with branded imatinib appears to maintain efficacy, although a proportion of patients experience new or worsening side effects.

No abstract available.

Not available.

Background Role of erythropoietin (EPO) in the treatment of late anemia in patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) is still undefined. Methods Fifty CML patients treated at 14 institutions with frontline imatinib for at least 12 months and in stable complete cytogenetic response who developed a late chronic anemia treated with EPO were retrospectively evaluated. Results Median time from imatinib start to EPO treatment was 42.2 months [interquartile range (IQR) 20.8-91.9]. Median Hb value at EPO starting time was 9.9 g/dL (IQR 8.9-10.3): Eleven patients (22.0%) were transfusion dependent. Alpha-EPO (40 000 UI weekly) was employed in 37 patients, beta-EPO (30 000 UI weekly) in 9 patients, zeta-EPO (40 000 UI weekly) in 2 patients, and darbepoetin (150 mcg/weekly) in the remaining 2 patients. On the whole, 41 patients (82.0%) achieved an erythroid response, defined as a stable (>3 months) improvement >1.5 g/dL of Hb level, and 9 patients (18.0%) indeed resulted resistant. Among responding patients, 10 relapsed after a median time from EPO start of 20.7 months (IQR 10.8-63.7). No EPO-related toxicity was observed. Conclusions Results of EPO treatment for late chronic anemia during long-lasting imatinib therapy are encouraging, with a high rate of response.

Despite the fact that, in the last years, life expectancy of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients has reached that of the normal population, a significant proportion of CML patients is likely to fail treatment with first- or second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Failure to first-line treatment is commonly due to molecular resistance or unbearable toxicity. New specific compounds are tested in this setting to fulfill this unmet clinical need in CML; of these, asciminib has shown efficacy based on allosteric inhibition which allows to overcome resistance and off-target toxicity. This review aims to cover how asciminib will change the therapeutic scenario of CML, highlighting its mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and toxicity. Asciminib will be a possible option as third-line therapy for patients carrying resistant mutations, such as T315I, and/or not eligible for treatment with other TKIs.