Search

Knowledge of the pathogenic mechanisms of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is certainly a priority for the scientific community. Two main elements are involved in the biology of the most severe forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): the direct cytopathic effect of the virus against the host tissues, and a dysfunction of the immune system, characterized by the exhaustion of T lymphocytes. The exhaustion of T cells in COVID-19 is poorly understand, but some data could suggest a possible role of PD-1/PD-L1 axis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible role of PD-L1 expression in the pulmonary tissue in subjects affected by COVID-19. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the pulmonary tissue, and its exact location, was indagated by in situ hybridization; the expression of PD-L1 and CD8 in the same tissue was indagated by immunohistochemistry. Overall, PD-L1 resulted diffusely expressed in 70% of the cases, and an intense expression was observed in 43.5% of cases. Diffuse and intense presence of SARS-CoV-2 by in situ hybridization significantly correlated with an intense PD-L1 expression, and with expression of PD-L1 by pneumocytes. PD-L1 is overexpressed in the pulmonary tissue of subjects died from COVID-19, and mainly in subjects with a high viral load. These data suggest a possible role of PD-L1 in the immune system exhaustion at the basis of the severe forms of the disease.

BackgroundThe management of cytological samples can significantly impact diagnostic interpretation. Cell blocks (CB) are a popular method due to their ability to provide additional morphological information and be used for immunocytochemistry and molecular tests. Recently, a new CB technique called the synthetic matrix CytoMatrix (CM) has been introduced, which can gather and hold cytological material within its three-dimensional structure. MethodsIn this study, 40 cytological samples from patients with melanoma metastases were analyzed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CM compared to another CB method used in the laboratory. The researchers assessed the morphological adequacy of the two techniques, as well as their performance in immunocytochemical analysis and molecular. ResultsThis study showed that CM was quicker and equally effective compared to the other method, with the laboratory technician having less of an impact on the CM approach across all passages. Additionally, all CMs were adequate, whereas the other method was adequate in 90% of cases. Immunocytochemistry confirmed the diagnosis of melanoma metastases in all cases, and all 40 CMs and 36 of the other method were adequate for fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. ConclusionCM is a low-time-consuming technology that is unaffected by technicians during all setup phases, making it simpler to standardize the procedure. Moreover, a low loss of diagnostic cells ensures greater benefits for morphological analysis, immunocytochemistry, and molecular testing. Overall, the study highlights the potential of CM as a valuable technique for managing cytological samples.