Search

Background travellers’ diarrhoea (TD) is frequently reported with incidence up to 40% in high-risk destinations. Previous studies showed that the number of loose stools alone is inadequate to holistically predict the severity of TD. To improve the prediction of prognosis and to optimize treatments, a simple risk-based clinical severity classification has been developed. Methods pooled baseline data of signs and symptoms and number of loose stools from 1098 subjects enrolled in two double-blind Phase 3 trials of rifamycin-SV were analyzed with correlation, multiple correspondence analyses, prognostic factor criteria, and Contal and O’Quigley method to generate a TD severity classification (mild, moderate and severe). The relative importance of this classification on resolution of TD was assessed by Cox proportional model hazard model on the time to last unformed stool (TLUS). Results the analysis showed that TLUS were longer for the severe [hazard ratio (HR) 0.24; P Conclusions this newly developed TD clinical severity classification demonstrated strong prognostic value and clinical utility by combining patients’ multiple signs and symptoms of enteric infection and number of loose stools to provide a holistic assessment of TD. By expanding on the current classification by incorporating patient reported outcomes in addition to TLUS, a classification like the one developed, may help optimize patient selection for future clinical studies.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic pruritic inflammatory dermatitis that affects approximately 16.5 million (7.3%) adults in the US, of which around 6.6 million (40%) have moderate-to-severe disease. The current standard of care includes topical treatments supplemented with corticosteroids with and without immunosuppressants. Patients with AD inadequately controlled by topical treatments and immunosuppressants are often treated with biologics and/or JAK inhibitors. Some patients do not have an adequate clinical response or are unable to tolerate these treatments prompting the need for novel therapies. Mast cells (MCs) and eosinophils (eos) are implicated in the pathogenesis of AD. Sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin (Siglec)-8 is expressed selectively on MCs and eos; engagement with an antibody results in broad inhibition of MC activation and eos depletion. Lirentelimab (AK002) is a humanized, nonfucosylated IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to Siglec-8. Preclinical data demonstrates that lirentelimab can broadly inhibit multiple modes of mast cell stimulation that drive AD pathogenesis. Lirentelimab, administered every 4 weeks as an infusion (IV), has been tested in over 600 healthy volunteers and patients with inflammatory and allergic diseases; in those with concomitant AD, improvements in AD were observed. Overall, lirentelimab IV has been well-tolerated; the most common AE being infusion-related reactions (IRRs) typically associated with the initial infusions. In a phase 1 study, a subcutaneous (SC) formulation of lirentelimab was well-tolerated with no IRRs. The results of these studies provide a strong rationale for conducting this phase 2 proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lirentelimab SC in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis inadequately controlled by topical treatments (NCT05155085, ‘ATLAS’). Adults (18–80 years) are eligible for screening if they have had chronic AD presented for ≥ 3 years with moderate-to-severe symptoms defined as Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥ 16, involvement of ≥ 10% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥ 3, documented recent history of inadequate response to treatment with medications such as topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, or PDE4 inhibitors (crisaborole) and biologic-naïve or biologic-exposed (secondary loss of response, intolerance or lack of access). The complete list of inclusion/exclusion criteria will be presented. 130 patients will be randomized 1 : 1 to receive either seven SC injections of 300 mg lirentelimab or a placebo every 2 weeks and then followed for 12 weeks after the last dose. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve EASI-75 at week 14 (2 weeks after the last dose) compared with baseline. All patients who receive study medication will be included in the safety analysis. Secondary endpoints include a percent change in EASI at week 14 from baseline and a proportion of patients with IGA of 0 or 1 and a 2-point improvement at week 14 compared to baseline. Patients who complete the study (day 99 visit of double-blind period) will be given the option to enroll in an open-label extension (OLE) for seven doses of 300 mg lirentelimab SC for 12 weeks. Qualified participants will receive medication, lab tests and medical care related to the study at no cost. This study is currently enrolling in the USA and Germany. Please visit clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05155085) or email atlas.info@allakos.com to learn more about this study.

N/A

Background & Aims Few treatments have demonstrated efficacy and safety for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeat treatment with the nonsystemic antibiotic rifaximin. Methods The trial included adults with IBS-D, mean abdominal pain and bloating scores of 3 or more, and loose stool, located at 270 centers in the United States and Europe from February 2012 through June 2014. Those responding to a 2-week course of open-label rifaximin 550 mg 3 times daily, who then relapsed during an observation phase (up to 18 weeks), were randomly assigned to groups given repeat treatments of rifaximin 550 mg or placebo 3 times daily for 2 weeks. The primary end point was percentage of responders after first repeat treatment, defined as a decrease in abdominal pain of ≥30% from baseline and a decrease in frequency of loose stools of ≥50% from baseline, for 2 or more weeks during a 4-week post-treatment period. Results Of 1074 patients (44.1%) who responded to open-label rifaximin, 382 (35.6%) did not relapse and 692 (64.4%) did; of these, 636 were randomly assigned to receive repeat treatment with rifaximin (n = 328) or placebo (n = 308). The percentage of responders was significantly greater with rifaximin than placebo (38.1% vs 31.5%; P = .03). The percentage of responders for abdominal pain (50.6% vs 42.2%; P = .018) was significantly greater with rifaximin than placebo, but not stool consistency (51.8% vs 50.0%; P = .42). Significant improvements were also noted for prevention of recurrence, durable response, and bowel movement urgency. Adverse event rates were low and similar between groups. Conclusions In a phase 3 study of patients with relapsing symptoms of IBS-D, repeat rifaximin treatment was efficacious and well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01543178.

A capsule formulation of mesalamine granules (MG) was developed for once-daily dosing and better compliance. The study aim was to evaluate MG efficacy and tolerability in maintaining ulcerative colitis (UC) remission.Pooled analysis of 2 identical phase 3, randomized, double-blind trials of once-daily MG 1.5 g or placebo for up to 6 months. The primary endpoint was percentage of patients remaining relapse-free at month 6 versus placebo. Relapse was defined as revised Sutherland Disease Activity Index (SDAI) rectal bleeding score ≥1 and mucosal appearance score ≥2, UC flare, or UC-related adverse event (AE).Data were pooled for patients receiving MG (n = 373) and placebo (n = 189). Significantly more patients were relapse-free at 6 months with MG (79.4%) than placebo (62.4%; P0.001) and across subgroups based on select demographic and baseline characteristics (P0.05). Secondary outcome measures including rectal bleeding, physician rating of disease activity, stool frequency, total SDAI score, and relapse-free duration favored MG (P0.01). Common AEs with MG and placebo, respectively, were headache (10.9% and 7.6%), diarrhea (7.9% and 7.0%), and abdominal pain (6.3% and 6.5%).Once-daily MG was more efficacious than and as well tolerated as placebo in maintaining UC remission. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00744016 and NCT00767728.

Background Subcutaneous methylnaltrexone is efficacious and well tolerated in inducing bowel movements in patients with advanced illness and opioid-induced constipation (OIC); factors determining optimal responsiveness to OIC treatment, however, have not been elucidated. This post hoc responder analysis examined the influence of demographic and baseline characteristics on methylnaltrexone efficacy and tolerability in this population. Methods Data were pooled from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies of subcutaneous methylnaltrexone (0.15 and 0.30 mg/kg) [ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: Study 301 – NCT00401362; Study 302 – NCT00402038]. Subgroup analyses of the primary outcome, percentage of patients with rescue medication-free bowel movements (RFBM) within 4 hours of first dose, were conducted for age, sex, primary diagnosis, baseline constipation-related distress score, and baseline oral morphine equivalent dose. Results More than 50% of 165 patients treated with either methylnaltrexone dose experienced a RFBM within 4 hours vs. 14.6% of 123 placebo-treated patients (P

Background and Aims: Safety and efficacy of budesonide multimatrix, an oral extended-release second-generation corticosteroid designed for targeted delivery throughout the colon, were examined for induction of remission in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis refractory to baseline mesalamine therapy. Methods: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial evaluated efficacy and safety of budesonide multimatrix for induction of remission [ulcerative colitis disease activity index score ≥ 4 and ≤ 10] in 510 adults randomised to once-daily oral budesonide multimatrix 9 mg or placebo for 8 weeks. Patients continued baseline treatment with oral mesalamine ≥ 2.4 g/day. Results: Combined clinical and endoscopic remission at Week 8 was achieved by 13.0% and 7.5% of patients receiving budesonide multimatrix [n = 230] or placebo [n = 228], respectively, in the modified intention-to-treat population [p = 0.049]. Clinical remission [ulcerative colitis disease activity index rectal bleeding and stool frequency subscale scores of 0] was similar in both groups [p = 0.70]. More patients receiving budesonide multimatrix vs placebo achieved endoscopic remission [ulcerative colitis disease activity index mucosal appearance subscale score of 0; 20.0% vs 12.3%; p = 0.02] and histological healing [27.0% vs 17.5%; p = 0.02]. Adverse event rates were similar [budesonide multimatrix, 31.8%; placebo, 27.1%]. Mean morning cortisol concentrations decreased at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 with budesonide multimatrix but remained within the normal range. Conclusion: Budesonide multimatrix was safe and efficacious for inducing clinical and endoscopic remission for mild to moderate ulcerative colitis refractory to oral mesalamine therapy.

Summary Background Mesalazine (mesalamine) granules (MG) were shown to be effective for the maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis (UC) in two double-blind placebo-controlled trials. Aim To evaluate the efficacy of once-daily MG for maintenance of remission in patients with UC who switched from other 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) formulations. Methods Data from two independent multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-month trials evaluating patients with UC in remission were combined for analysis of a subpopulation of patients who switched from other 5-ASA formulations to MG 1.5 g or placebo upon randomisation. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who remained relapse-free at Month 6 or end of treatment. Relapse was defined as a Sutherland Disease Activity Index (SDAI) rectal bleeding score ≥1 and mucosal appearance score ≥2, a UC flare or medication used to treat a UC flare. Results Of the 487 patients who received 5-ASA maintenance therapy at enrolment, 322 were in the MG group and 165 were in the placebo group. The percentage of patients who remained relapse-free (based on Sutherland Disease Activity Index scores) after 6 months was significantly higher with MG than placebo (78.3% vs. 58.8%, P

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34: 853–861 Summary Background Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a brain disorder that often results from cirrhosis due to viral hepatitis, metabolic and alcohol-related liver disease, and is characterised by cognitive, psychiatric and motor impairments. Recurrent bouts of overt HE negatively impact daily functioning and quality of life. Aim To evaluate the effect of rifaximin on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in cirrhotic patients with HE. Methods Patients with cirrhosis in remission from HE (Conn score = 0 or 1) and a documented history of recurrent HE episodes (≥2 within 6 months of screening) were randomised to rifaximin 550 mg twice daily (N = 101) or placebo (N = 118) for 6 months. Concomitant lactulose was permitted during the study. The Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) was administered every 4 weeks, and time for occurrence of HE breakthrough was recorded. A longitudinal analysis using time-weighted averages of the CLDQ scores normalised by days on study therapy was used to evaluate the effect of treatment on HRQL, and between HE outcomes (HE recurrence, yes/no) irrespective of treatment. Results The time-weighted averages of the overall CLDQ score and each domain score were significantly higher in the rifaximin group vs. placebo (P-values ranged from 0.0087 to 0.0436); and were significantly lower in patients who experienced HE breakthrough compared to those who remained in remission (P-values were

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 990–999 Summary Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic relapsing and remitting idiopathic inflammatory bowel disorder. Aim To evaluate once-daily mesalamine (mesalazine) granules (MG) for maintenance of remission of UC. Methods Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients (n = 209 MG, n = 96 placebo) with UC in remission [revised Sutherland Disease Activity Index (SDAI) rectal bleeding = 0, mucosal appearance

Subcutaneous methylnaltrexone is efficacious and well tolerated for opioid-induced constipation (OIC) but may theoretically disrupt opioid-mediated analgesia.Opioid use, pain intensity, and opioid withdrawal (Objective Opioid Withdrawal Scale [OOWS] and Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale [SOWS] scores) were reported in a randomized, double-blind trial with an open-label extension (RCT) and an open-label trial (OLT) evaluating safety in adults with chronic noncancer pain. In the RCT, patients taking ≥50 mg of oral morphine equivalents daily with3 rescue-free bowel movements weekly received methyl naltrexone 12 mg once daily (n=150), every other day (n=148), or placebo (n=162) for 4 weeks, followed by open-label methylnaltrexone 12 mg (as needed [prn]; n=364) for 8 weeks. In the OLT, patients (n=1,034) on stable opioid doses with OIC received methylnaltrexone 12 mg prn for up to 48 weeks.Minimal fluctuations of median morphine equivalent dose from baseline (BL) were observed in the RCT double-blind period (BL, 154.8-161.0 mg/d; range, 137.1-168.0 mg/d), RCT open-label period (BL, 156.3-174.6; range, 144.0-180.0) and OLT (BL, 120 mg/d; range, 117.3-121.1 mg/d). No significant change from BL in pain intensity score occurred in any group at weeks 2 or 4 (both P≥0.1) of the RCT double-blind period, and scores remained stable during the open-label period and in the OLT (mean change, -0.2 to 0.1). Changes from BL in OOWS and SOWS scores during the double-blind period were not significantly impacted by methylnaltrexone exposure at weeks 2 or 4 (P0.05 for all).Methylnaltrexone did not affect opioid-mediated analgesia in patients with chronic noncancer pain and OIC.

Background Hepatic encephalopathy is a chronically debilitating complication of hepatic cirrhosis. The efficacy of rifaximin, a minimally absorbed antibiotic, is well documented in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy, but its efficacy for prevention of the disease has not been established. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 299 patients who were in remission from recurrent hepatic encephalopathy resulting from chronic liver disease to receive either rifaximin, at a dose of 550 mg twice daily (140 patients), or placebo (159 patients) for 6 months. The primary efficacy end point was the time to the first breakthrough episode of hepatic encephalopathy. The key secondary end point was the time to the first hospitalization involving hepatic encephalopathy. Results Rifaximin significantly reduced the risk of an episode of hepatic encephalopathy, as compared with placebo, over a 6-month period (hazard ratio with rifaximin, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 0.64; P

Background Budesonide foam, a rectally administered, second-generation corticosteroid with extensive hepatic first-pass metabolism, is efficacious for the treatment of mild-to-moderate ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. Aim The aim of this study was to comprehensively assess the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of budesonide foam. Methods Data from five phase III studies were pooled to further evaluate safety, including an open-label study (once-daily treatment for 8 weeks), an active-comparator study (once-daily treatment for 4 weeks), and two placebo-controlled studies and an open-label extension study (twice-daily treatment for 2 weeks, then once daily for 4 weeks). Data from the placebo-controlled studies and two phase I studies (i.e., patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis and healthy volunteers) were pooled to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of budesonide foam. Results A similar percentage of patients reported adverse events in the budesonide foam and placebo groups, with the majority of adverse events being mild or moderate in intensity (93.3 vs 96.0 %, respectively). Adverse events occurred in 41.4 and 36.3 % of patients receiving budesonide foam and placebo, respectively. Mean morning cortisol concentrations remained within the normal range for up to 8 weeks of treatment; there were no clinically relevant effects of budesonide foam on the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis. Population pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated low systemic exposure after budesonide foam administration. Conclusions This integrated analysis demonstrated that budesonide foam for the induction of remission of distal ulcerative colitis is safe overall, with no clinically relevant effects on the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis.

Goals To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesalamine granules 1.5 g once daily for maintenance of ulcerative colitis (UC) remission. Background Mesalamine is a first-line treatment for induction and maintenance of UC remission. Study A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients with a history of mild to moderate UC, currently in remission, who received mesalamine granules once daily for 6 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage of patients maintaining UC remission at 6 months. Results A significantly greater percentage of patients receiving mesalamine granules versus placebo were in remission at 6 months (79.9% vs. 66.7%; P=0.03). A greater percentage of patients receiving mesalamine granules maintained a revised Sutherland Disease Activity Index (SDAI)≤2 with no individual component of revised SDAI>1 and rectal bleeding=0 at 6 months (72.0% vs. 58.1%; P=0.04). No significant differences between groups were observed for change from baseline to 6 months for total SDAI score or its components (ie, stool frequency, rectal bleeding, mucosal appearance, physician's rating of disease). Mesalamine granules treatment resulted in a significantly longer remission duration versus placebo (P=0.02) and decreased patients' risk of relapse by 43% (hazard ratio=0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.93; P=0.02). Mesalamine granules were well tolerated, and adverse events related to hepatic, renal, and pancreatic function-potential concerns with long-term treatment-occurred at a rate similar to placebo. Conclusions Once-daily mesalamine granules are efficacious and safe for the maintenance of UC remission.

Background Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who achieve remission with corticosteroids often relapse after tapering or discontinuation; alternative treatments limiting steroid exposure and UC relapse would be beneficial. It remains uncertain whether patients with corticosteroid-induced remission experience benefit with mesalamine granules (MG), a locally acting aminosalicylate extended-release capsule formulation for maintenance of UC remission in adults. Aims Efficacy and safety of MG 1.5 g once daily was evaluated in patients with UC in corticosteroid-induced remission. Methods Data from patients with previous corticosteroid use to achieve baseline UC remission were analyzed from two 6-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and a 24-month open-label extension (OLE). Six-month relapse-free rates were assessed using the revised Sutherland Disease Activity Index. UC-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded during the 30 months. Results Included were 158 steroid-treated patients in UC remission (MG, n = 105; placebo, n = 53) and 74/105 MG-treated patients who continued MG in the OLE. A significantly larger percentage of patients remained relapse-free at 6 months with MG (77.1 %) versus placebo (54.7 %; P = 0.006), with a 55 % reduction in relapse risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45; 95 % CI 0.25–0.79). There was a similar (49.2 %) reduction in risk of UC-related AEs at 6 months (HR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.31–0.84; P = 0.009) that was sustained during the OLE. Conclusions MG 1.5 g once daily administered for maintenance of corticosteroid-induced remission was associated with low risk of relapse and UC-related AEs. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00744016, NCT00767728, and NCT00326209.

SummaryBackground The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a measure of disease activity based on symptoms, signs and a laboratory test. The US Food and Drug Administration has indicated that patient reported outcomes (PROs) should be the primary outcome in randomised controlled trials for Crohn's disease (CD). Aim As no validated PRO exists for CD, to investigate whether CDAI diary card items could be modified for this purpose. Methods Data from a trial of rifaximin-extended intestinal release were used to identify cut-points for stool frequency, pain and general well-being using receiver operating characteristic curves with CDAI

Background Ulcerative colitis (UC), a chronic, relapsing, and remitting inflammatory bowel disease, requires long-term treatment to maintain remission. In this study, the long-term safety and tolerability of mesalamine granules (MG) therapy was evaluated in the maintenance of UC remission. Previous prospective studies evaluating different oral mesalamine formulations have not exceeded a duration of 14 months. Methods A phase 3, multicenter, 24-month, open-label extension study evaluating MG 1.5 g once daily in patients who achieved previous remission from mild to moderate UC was performed. Eligible patients had successfully participated in 1 of 2 previous 6-month double-blind, placebo-controlled trials or were new patients in remission. Safety assessments included monitoring of adverse events (AEs) and clinical laboratory tests. Risk of UC recurrence was assessed by the occurrence of UC-related AEs. Results Of the 393 patients enrolled (280 from the double-blind studies; 113 new patients), 388 were included in the safety population. The most common AEs included nasopharyngitis (13.9%), headache (11.6%), and diarrhea (10.8%), and the incidence of these events was generally lower in the MG group versus historical placebo group from the double-blind studies. Pancreatic, renal, and hepatic AEs occurred in 23 patients (5.9%). The risk of UC-related AEs was low and was maintained for 24 months during the open-label study. Conclusions Once-daily MG has a favorable safety profile for the maintenance of remission for up to 2 years in patients with UC.

Rifaximin therapy reduced risk of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) recurrence and HE-related hospitalisations during a 6-month, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (RCT) and a 24-month open-label maintenance (OLM) study. However, the impact of crossover from placebo to rifaximin therapy is unclear.To study the impact of crossing over from placebo to rifaximin treatment on breakthrough HE and hospitalisation rates using a within-subjects design.Adults with cirrhosis and history of overt HE episodes, currently in HE remission, received placebo during the RCT and crossed over to rifaximin 550 mg twice daily during the OLM study. Rate of breakthrough overt HE episodes, hospitalisations and incidence and rate of adverse events (AEs) were analysed during RCT and first 6 months of OLM.Of 82 patients randomised to placebo in the RCT who crossed over to the OLM study, 39 experienced an HE episode during the RCT compared with 14 during the OLM study (P 0.0001). Significantly lower rates of HE events were observed with rifaximin treatment compared with placebo treatment (P 0.0001). Rates of HE-related hospitalisation were numerically lower during rifaximin treatment compared with placebo treatment, although not significant. Rates of most common AEs, serious AEs and infection-related AEs were similar between the two treatments.This analysis confirms the repeatability of results from the RCT on safety and efficacy of rifaximin 550 mg twice daily in reducing the risk of hepatic encephalopathy recurrence, and suggests these findings are translatable outside of a rigorous, controlled trial setting.

HIV-associated diarrhea remains a significant concern with limited treatment options.To determine the optimal dose, efficacy, and safety of crofelemer for noninfectious diarrhea.This randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial used a 2-stage design. Both stages included 2-week screening, 4-week placebo-controlled treatment, and 20-week placebo-free (open-label) extension phases. In stage I, 196 HIV-seropositive patients with chronic diarrhea were randomized to crofelemer 125 mg, 250 mg, or 500 mg or placebo twice daily. Using a prospective analysis, the 125-mg twice-daily dose was selected for stage II. In stage II, 180 new patients were randomized to crofelemer 125 mg twice daily or placebo for 4 weeks. Primary efficacy analysis was the percentage of patients (stages I/II combined) who achieved clinical response (defined as ≤2 watery stools/week during ≥2 of 4 weeks). During the placebo-free extension phase, response (≤2 watery stools) was assessed weekly.Significantly more patients receiving crofelemer 125 mg achieved clinical response versus placebo (17.6% vs 8.0%; one-sided, P = .01). Crofelemer 125 mg resulted in a greater change from baseline in number of daily watery bowel movements (P = .04) and daily stool consistency score (P = .02) versus placebo. During the placebo-free extension phase, percentages of weekly responders ranged from 40% to 56% at weeks 11 to 24. Crofelemer was minimally absorbed, well tolerated, did not negatively impact clinical immune parameters, and had a safety profile comparable to placebo.In HIV-seropositive patients taking stable antiretroviral therapy, crofelemer provided significant improvement in diarrhea with a favorable safety profile.

BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that gut flora may play an important role in the pathophysiology of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We evaluated rifaximin, a minimally absorbed antibiotic, as treatment for IBS. METHODS In two identically designed, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (TARGET 1 and TARGET 2), patients who had IBS without constipation were randomly assigned to either rifaximin at a dose of 550 mg or placebo, three times daily for 2 weeks, and were followed for an additional 10 weeks. The primary end point, the proportion of patients who had adequate relief of global IBS symptoms, and the key secondary end point, the proportion of patients who had adequate relief of IBS-related bloating, were assessed weekly. Adequate relief was defined as self-reported relief of symptoms for at least 2 of the first 4 weeks after treatment. Other secondary end points included the percentage of patients who had a response to treatment as assessed by daily self-ratings of global IBS symptoms and individual symptoms of bloating, abdominal pain, and stool consistency during the 4 weeks after treatment and during the entire 3 months of the study. RESULTS Significantly more patients in the rifaximin group than in the placebo group had adequate relief of global IBS symptoms during the first 4 weeks after treatment (40.8% vs. 31.2%, P=0.01, in TARGET 1; 40.6% vs. 32.2%, P=0.03, in TARGET 2; 40.7% vs. 31.7%, P

Background Because bacterial pathogens are the primary cause of travelers' diarrhea (TD), antibiotic prophylaxis is effective in TD prevention. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the nonsystemic antibiotic rifaximin in preventing TD in US travelers to Mexico. Methods Healthy adult students traveling to Mexico received rifaximin 600 mg/d or placebo for 14 days and were followed for 7 days post‐treatment. Stool pattern and gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded in daily diary entries. The primary end point was prevention of TD during 14 days of treatment measured by time to first unformed stool. Results A total of 210 individuals received rifaximin ( n = 106) or placebo ( n = 104) and were included in the safety population. Median age was 21 years (range, 18–75 y), and the majority of participants were female (65%). Efficacy analyses were conducted in a modified intent‐to‐treat population of 201 patients who received rifaximin ( n = 99) or placebo ( n = 102). Rifaximin prophylaxis reduced risk of developing TD versus placebo ( p < 0.0001). A smaller percentage of individuals who received rifaximin versus placebo developed all‐cause TD (20% vs 48%, respectively; p < 0.0001) or TD requiring antibiotic therapy (14% vs 32%, respectively; p = 0.003). More individuals in the rifaximin group (76%) completed treatment without developing TD versus those in the placebo group (51%; p = 0.0004). Rifaximin provided a 58% protection rate against TD and was associated with fewer adverse events than placebo. Conclusions Prophylactic treatment with rifaximin 600 mg/d for 14 days safely and effectively reduced the risk of developing TD in US travelers to Mexico. Rifaximin chemoprevention should be considered for TD in appropriate individuals traveling to high‐risk regions.

Objectives : A multicenter, double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of balsalazide in pediatric patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients and methods : Sixty-eight patients, 5 to 17 years of age, with mild-to-moderate active UC based on the modified Sutherland UC activity index (MUCAI) were randomized to receive oral balsalazide 2.25 or 6.75 g/day for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical improvement (reduction of the MUCAI score by > or =3 points from baseline). Clinical remission (MUCAI score of 0 or 1 for stool frequency) and histological improvement after 8 weeks were also assessed. Pharmacokinetic parameters for balsalazide, 5-aminosalicylic acid, and N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid were determined at 2 weeks. Adverse events and laboratory changes were monitored throughout the study. Results : Clinical improvement was achieved by 45% and 37% of patients and clinical remission by 12% and 9% of patients receiving 6.75 and 2.25 g/day, respectively. Improvement in histologic grade was achieved by 8 of 16 (50%) and 3 of 10 (30%) patients receiving 6.75 and 2.25 g/day, respectively. No significant differences were seen in efficacy. Pharmacokinetics in 12 patients were characterized by large interpatient variability and low systemic exposure. Adverse events were similar between the treatment groups, the most common being headache and abdominal pain. No clinically significant changes were observed in laboratory values, including those indicative of hepatic or renal toxicity. Conclusions : Balsalazide is well tolerated and improves the signs and symptoms of mild-to-moderate active UC in pediatric patients 5 to 17 years of age.

Lynn R Webster,1 Darren M Brenner,2 Andrew C Barrett,3 Craig Paterson,3 Enoch Bortey,3 William P Forbes3 1PRA Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 3Salix, a Division of Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC, Bridgewater, NJ, USA Background: Subcutaneous methylnaltrexone is efficacious and well tolerated for opioid-induced constipation (OIC) but may theoretically disrupt opioid-mediated analgesia. Methods: Opioid use, pain intensity, and opioid withdrawal (Objective Opioid Withdrawal Scale [OOWS] and Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale [SOWS] scores) were reported in a randomized, double-blind trial with an open-label extension (RCT) and an open-label trial (OLT) evaluating safety in adults with chronic noncancer pain. In the RCT, patients taking ≥50 mg of oral morphine equivalents daily with 0.05 for all). Conclusion: Methylnaltrexone did not affect opioid-mediated analgesia in patients with chronic noncancer pain and OIC. Keywords: Relistor, mu-opioid receptor, antagonist, opioids, tolerance, withdrawal

the primary endpoint significantly favored RFX (33%) vs. PBO (25%, p=0.02). Regarding demographic characteristics, the RFX repeat treatment effect was evident in subjects 30 kg/m2 (Δ=5%, p=0.3035) (Figure). By race, the magnitude of the treatment effect was pronounced in white subjects (Δ=12%), but similar in non-white subjects (Δ=0.1%). A treatment by race interaction analysis yielded a p-value of 0.2440, an indication that race was not an effect modifier. Regarding baseline disease characteristics, the treatment effect was apparent in subjects with severe (Δ=10%, p=0.1564) and non-severe IBS (Δ= 10%, p=0.0185), and consistent across IBS symptom duration. Similar subpopulation results were observed for AP and SC when examined separately. Conclusions: Rifaximin response in subjects with IBS-D was significantly greater than placebo for the primary endpoint for all subgroups except non-white subjects where the sample size was quite small. These findings support the generalizability of the primary endpoint results.

the primary endpoint significantly favored RFX (33%) vs. PBO (25%, p=0.02). Regarding demographic characteristics, the RFX repeat treatment effect was evident in subjects 30 kg/m2 (Δ=5%, p=0.3035) (Figure). By race, the magnitude of the treatment effect was pronounced in white subjects (Δ=12%), but similar in non-white subjects (Δ=0.1%). A treatment by race interaction analysis yielded a p-value of 0.2440, an indication that race was not an effect modifier. Regarding baseline disease characteristics, the treatment effect was apparent in subjects with severe (Δ=10%, p=0.1564) and non-severe IBS (Δ= 10%, p=0.0185), and consistent across IBS symptom duration. Similar subpopulation results were observed for AP and SC when examined separately. Conclusions: Rifaximin response in subjects with IBS-D was significantly greater than placebo for the primary endpoint for all subgroups except non-white subjects where the sample size was quite small. These findings support the generalizability of the primary endpoint results.

of these patients had fasting FGF19 measured. Alanine transaminase (ALT) and appearance of fatty liver on imaging (ultrasound, CT or MR) were retrospectively added to the database. Where multiple investigations had been performed, the test nearest to the date of the SeHCAT test was recorded. Patients with known chronic liver disease or alcohol abuse were excluded from the final analysis. Results: Of 578 SeHCAT values on the database, 303 (52%) were positive with a value 31IU/L (36% v 21%, p 31IU/L (21% v 7%, p 31IU/L (43% v 22%, p 31IU/L (23% v 7%, p 40 IU/L (40% vs 12%, p

of these patients had fasting FGF19 measured. Alanine transaminase (ALT) and appearance of fatty liver on imaging (ultrasound, CT or MR) were retrospectively added to the database. Where multiple investigations had been performed, the test nearest to the date of the SeHCAT test was recorded. Patients with known chronic liver disease or alcohol abuse were excluded from the final analysis. Results: Of 578 SeHCAT values on the database, 303 (52%) were positive with a value 31IU/L (36% v 21%, p 31IU/L (21% v 7%, p 31IU/L (43% v 22%, p 31IU/L (23% v 7%, p 40 IU/L (40% vs 12%, p

of life, little is known about their satisfaction with clinical management, or with associated drug treatment. Knowing the perception and satisfaction that patients have about the management of their disease, it will allow designing strategies aimed to improve patients’ quality of life and promoting adherence and treatment effectiveness. The aim of this study is to understand perceptions, attitudes, experiences, and satisfaction with clinical management of UC patients, particularly in aspects related to treatment. Methods: A discussion group was performed with eight UC patients in remission who had not received biologics or corticosteroids during the previous year. The heterogeneity was ensured by selecting different UC profiles using the following variables: severity, time since onset, follow-up level of care, currently on treatment, managed by a UC care unit, patients belonging to any patient association and gender. Following qualitative methodology a descriptive-interpretative content analysis was performed to detect emerging categories, building an explanatory framework. Results: The most frequent mentions are related to diagnostic process, follow-up and treatment. Diagnostic delay was detected due to lack of clinical suspicion from primary care (PC) and delayed diagnostic tests. Patients prefer to receive care on demand, channeled through remote care, which helps to resolve questions about UC, issues with treatment, or when a relapse occurs, and minimizes visits to the hospital. Patients with moderate UC diagnosis perceive some training lacks in PC physicians about management of symptoms, although, in general, they declare their satisfaction with follow-up both in PC and specialist care. When forced to go to the emergency room, they are quite dissatisfied with management, due to the delay in providing symptoms resolution, mainly related to inadequate knowledge of UC management. To avoid this, patients suggest the possibility of receiving care on demand from a specialist in UC. In relation to treatment, patients expect it to be effective, reducing symptoms. Secondly, treatment should be safe, minimizing short and long-term side effects. Regarding to treatment characteristics that patients would like to improve, they mention a reduction in the number of doses and tablets per day, and an increased number of tablets per box. Conclusions: These results suggest the importance of developing strategies to facilitate care on demand, remote care, and to investigate on effective and safe treatments to improve patients’ quality of life. P176 Patient reported outcome measures derived from the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index: Correlation between PRO2 and PRO3 scores and CDAI-defined clinical thresholds R. Khanna1, G. D’Haens1,2, B.G. Feagan1,3, W.J. Sandborn1,4, M.K. Vandervoort1, G. Zou1, R.L. Rolleri5, E. Bortey5, B.G. Levesque1,4 *. 1Robarts Clinical Trials Inc., Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, 2University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3Western University, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, London Ontario, Canada, 4University of California, San Diego, Division of Gastroenterology, La Jolla, United States, 5Salix Pharmaceuticals Inc., Clinical Development, Raleigh North Carolina, United States