1. Biomechanical Comparison of Hook Plate vs Headless Compression Screw Fixation of Large Fifth Metatarsal Base Avulsion Fractures.
- Author
-
Bean BA, Smyth NA, Abbasi P, Parks BG, and Hembree WC
- Subjects
- Biomechanical Phenomena, Bone Plates, Bone Screws, Epiphyses physiology, Humans, Pressure, Fractures, Avulsion surgery, Fractures, Bone surgery, Metatarsal Bones surgery
- Abstract
Background: Debate exists on the optimum fixation construct for large avulsion fractures of the fifth metatarsal base. We compared the biomechanical strength of 2 headless compression screws vs a hook plate for fixation of these fractures., Methods: Large avulsion fractures were simulated on 10 matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens. Specimens were assigned to receive two 2.5-mm headless compression screws or an anatomic fifth metatarsal hook plate, then cyclically loaded through the plantar fascia and metatarsal base. Specimens underwent 100 cycles at 50%, 75%, and 100% physiological load for a total of 300 cycles., Results: The hook plate group demonstrated a significantly higher number of cycles to failure compared with the screw group (270.7 ± 66.0 [range 100-300] cycles vs 178.6 ± 95.7 [range 24-300] cycles, respectively; P = .039). Seven of 10 hook plate specimens remained intact at the maximum 300 cycles compared with 2 of 10 screw specimens. Nine of 10 plate specimens survived at least 1 cycle at 100% physiologic load compared with 5 of 10 screw specimens., Conclusion: A hook plate construct was biomechanically superior to a headless compression screw construct for fixation of large avulsion fractures of the fifth metatarsal base., Clinical Relevance: Whether using hook plates or headless compression screws, surgeons should consider protecting patient weight-bearing after fixation of fifth metatarsal base large avulsion fracture until bony union has occurred.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF