1. Feral horses and pronghorn: a test of the forage maturation hypothesis in an arid shrubland.
- Author
-
Hennig, Jacob D., Beck, Jeffrey L., and Scasta, J. Derek
- Subjects
- *
WILD horses , *HABITAT selection , *HORSES , *GAS wells , *OIL wells , *DIGESTIVE organs , *BODY size - Abstract
Ecologists strive for laws that explain interactions between organisms. Myriad hypotheses have been fundamental in increasing our understanding of plant–herbivore interactions, including the forage maturation hypothesis (FMH). The FMH has recently been extended to include contingencies of body size and digestive system: selection for greater energy potential should be negatively correlated with body mass and selection for proximity to surface water should be greater for hindgut fermenters compared to foregut fermenters or ruminants. While these general trends hold at a broad scale, intrapopulation variability still exists. For feral species that did not coevolve within their current ecological context, variability in habitat selection among populations may be greater. Consequently, understanding habitat selection of each population is imperative to properly inform management. For the case of feral horses, Equus ferus caballus , a large-bodied hindgut fermenter, understanding how they compare in habitat selection to sympatric species is of particular interest due to habitat alteration and potential competition. Across much of their range in western North America, horses are sympatric with the smaller-bodied ruminant pronghorn, Antilocapra americana. The two species overlap in space use, but we lack information on how each species selects resources within areas of overlap. Accordingly, we compared habitat selection between these two species during the growing season to understand how each responded to predictions of the FMH and to better guide potential management actions. Horses followed FMH predictions by selecting proximity to surface water and greater forage biomass. Meanwhile, pronghorn did not follow predictions of the FMH; pronghorn selected greater forage biomass but did not select greater energy potential. Both species selected greater herbaceous cover, flatter slopes and farther distances from oil and gas well pads. Our analysis reveals a high degree of selection overlap and underscores the importance of conducting population level studies to best understand how herbivores interact with the unique environments they inhabit. • We compared habitat selection of feral horses and pronghorn in an arid shrubland. • We assessed responses to predictions of the forage maturation hypothesis (FMH). • Feral horses selected proximity to surface water, following FMH predictions. • Pronghorn did not select greater energy potential, deviating from FMH predictions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF