1. Evaluation of ceftolozane-tazobactam susceptibility on a French nationwide collection of Enterobacterales
- Author
-
Agnès B. Jousset, Sandrine Bernabeu, Cécile Emeraud, Rémy A. Bonnin, Alexandra Lomont, Jean Ralph Zahar, Audrey Merens, Christophe Isnard, Nathalie Soismier, Eric Farfour, Vincent Fihman, Nicolas Yin, Olivier Barraud, Hervé Jacquier, Anne-Gaëlle Ranc, Frédéric Laurent, Stéphane Corvec, Louise Ruffier d'Epenoux, Emmanuelle Bille, Nicolas Degand, Chloé Plouzeau, Thomas Guillard, Vincent Cattoir, Asaf Mizrahi, Antoine Grillon, Frédéric Janvier, Cécile Le Brun, Marlène Amara, Mathilda Bastide, Alban Lemonnier, and Laurent Dortet
- Subjects
Ceftolozane-tazobactam ,ESBL ,Carbapenemase ,Enterobacterales ,Epidemiology ,France ,Microbiology ,QR1-502 - Abstract
ABSTRACT: Objectives: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) proved its efficacy for the treatment of infections caused by non-carbapenemase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. Here, we aimed to provide susceptibility data on a large series of Enterobacterales since the revision of EUCAST categorization breakpoints in 2020. Methods: First, C/T susceptibility was determined on characterized Enterobacterales resistant to third generation cephalosporins (3GCs) (extended spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL] production or different levels of AmpC overexpression) (n = 213) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) (n = 259), including 170 carbapenemase producers (CPE). Then, 1632 consecutive clinical Enterobacterales responsible for infection were prospectively collected in 23 French hospitals. C/T susceptibility was determined by E-test® (biomérieux) and broth microdilution (BMD) (Sensititre™, Thermo Scientific) to perform method comparison. Results: Within the collection isolates, 88% of 3GC resistant strains were susceptible to C/T, with important variation depending on the resistance mechanism: 93% vs. 13% susceptibility for CTX-M and SHV-ESBL producers, respectively. Only 20% of the CRE were susceptible to C/T. Among CPE, 80% of OXA-48-like producers were susceptible to C/T, whereas all metallo-β-lactamase producers were resistant. The prospective study revealed that 95.6% of clinical isolates were susceptible to C/T. Method comparison performed on these 1632 clinical isolates demonstrated 99% of categorization agreement between MIC to C/T determined by E-test® in comparison with the BMD (reference) and only 74% of essential agreement. Conclusion: Overall, C/T showed good activity against wild-type Enterobacterales, AmpC producers, and ESBL-producing Escherichia coli but is less active against ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, and CRE. E-test® led to an underestimation of the MICs in comparison to the BMD reference.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF