Search

The prognostic relevance of diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is unknown. Hence, we sought to evaluate the impact of DTI on outcomes in MCL using 3 large datasets (1) the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Specialized Program of Research Excellence Molecular Epidemiology Resource, (2) patients enrolled in the ALL Age Asthma Cohort/CALGB 50403, and (3) a multisitecohort of patients with MCL. Patients were a priori divided into 2 groups, 0 to 14 days (short DTI) and 15 to 60 days (long DTI). The patients in whom observation was deemed appropriate were excluded. One thousand ninety-seven patients newly diagnosed with MCL and available DTI were included in the study. The majority (73%) had long DTI (n=797). Patients with short DTI had worse eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS ≥2), higher lactate dehydrogenase, bone marrow involvement, more frequent B symptoms, higher MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI ≥6.2), and were less likely to receive intensive induction therapy than long DTI group. The median progression-free survival (2.5 years vs 4.8 years, p

The International Clinical Advisory Committee reviewed advances in our understanding of the clinicopathologic and biologic features of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, B-cell prolymphocytic leukaemia, and mantle cell lymphoma since the revised 4th edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Discussions amongst pathologists, clinicians, and molecular geneticists around these diseases focussed on incorporating new knowledge into the next classification system. In this manuscript, we review these disease entities and incorporate results of these deliberations, including advances in our understanding of early lesions and transformation.

PD-1/L1 and CTLA-4 blockade immunotherapies have been approved for 13 types of cancers and are being studied in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common aggressive B-cell lymphoma. However, whether both PD-1 and CTLA-4 checkpoints are active and clinically significant in DLBCL is unknown. Whether PD-1 ligands expressed by tumor cells or by the microenvironment of DLBCL are critical for the PD-1 immune checkpoint is unclear. We performed immunophenotypic profiling for 405 patients with de novo DLBCL using a MultiOmyx immunofluorescence platform and simultaneously quantitated expression/coexpression of 13 immune markers to identify prognostic determinants. In both training and validation cohorts, results demonstrated a central role of the tumor immune microenvironment, and when its functionality was impaired by deficiency in tumor-infiltrating T cells and/or natural killer cells, high PD-1 expression (but not CTLA-4) on CD8+ T cells, or PD-L1 expression on T cells and macrophages, patients had significantly poorer survival after rituximab–CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) immunochemotherapy. In contrast, tumor-cell PD-L2 expression was associated with superior survival, as well as PD-L1+CD20+ cells proximal (indicates interaction) to PD-1+CD8+ T cells in patients with low PD-1+ percentage of CD8+ T cells. Gene-expression profiling results suggested the reversibility of T-cell exhaustion in PD-1+/PD-L1+ patients with unfavorable prognosis and implication of LILRA/B, IDO1, CHI3L1, and SOD2 upregulation in the microenvironment dysfunction with PD-L1 expression. This study comprehensively characterized the DLBCL immune landscape, deciphered the differential roles of various checkpoint components in rituximab–CHOP resistance in DLBCL patients, and suggests targets for PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and combination immunotherapies.

Supplementary Table S1. Sanger validated variants. Supplementary Table S2. Mutations in HSTL driver genes. Supplementary Table S3. Other mutations identified by exome sequencing. Supplementary Table S4. Copy number of HSTL patients and cell lines. Supplementary Table S5. Clinical and pathological characteristics of HSTL patients. Supplementary Tables S6, S7. Comparison to HSTL clinical data in the literature. Supplementary Table S8. Mutational frequencies in other lymphomas. Supplementary Table S9. HSTL mutations in other lymphoma driver genes. Supplementary Table S10. Gene set enrichment analysis of DERL2 SETD2 shRNA.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the major type of aggressive B-cell lymphoma. High-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) with MYC/BCL2 double-hit (DH) represents a distinct entity with dismal prognosis after standard immunochemotherapy in the current WHO lymphoma classification. However, whether TP53 mutation synergizes with MYC abnormalities (MYC rearrangement and/or Myc protein overexpression) contributing to HGBCL-like biology and prognosis is not well investigated. In this study, patients with DLBCL with MYC/TP53 abnormalities demonstrated poor clinical outcome, high-grade morphology, and distinct gene expression signatures. To identify more effective therapies for this distinctive DLBCL subset, novel MYC/TP53/BCL-2–targeted agents were investigated in DLBCL cells with MYC/TP53 dual alterations or HGBCL-MYC/BCL2-DH. A BET inhibitor INCB057643 effectively inhibited cell viability and induced apoptosis in DLBCL/HGBCL cells regardless of MYC/BCL2/TP53 status. Combining INCB057643 with a MDM2-p53 inhibitor DS3032b significantly enhanced the cytotoxic effects in HGBCL-DH without TP53 mutation, while combining with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax displayed potent therapeutic synergy in DLBCL/HGBCL cells with and without concurrent TP53 mutation. Reverse-phase protein arrays revealed the synergistic molecular actions by INCB057643, DS3032b and venetoclax to induce cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis and to inhibit AKT/MEK/ERK/mTOR pathways, as well as potential drug resistance mechanisms mediated by upregulation of Mcl-1 and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathways. In summary, these findings support subclassification of DLBCL/HGBCL with dual MYC/TP53 alterations, which demonstrates distinct pathobiologic features and dismal survival with standard therapy, therefore requiring additional targeted therapies.Implications:The clinical and pharmacologic studies suggest recognizing DLBCL with concomitant TP53 mutation and MYC abnormalities as a distinctive entity necessary for precision oncology practice.Visual Overview:http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/content/molcanres/19/2/249/F1.large.jpg.

Supplementary Table S1. Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with de novo DLBCL with dual MYC/TP53 aberrations Supplementary Table S2. Frequency of single or dual abnormal Myc protein, p53 protein, BCL2 protein, MYC gene, and TP53 gene in the studied patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP Supplementary Table S3. Prognostic factors by univariate analysis and multivariate analysis in DLBCL Supplementary Table S4. Gene expression signatures identified by comparing DLBCL patients with concurrent MYC-R Mut-TP53 or Mychigh Mut-TP53 alterations (double-positive) with DLBCL patients withSupplementary Table S5. Molecular, genetic and phenotypic status of 8 DLBCL/HGBCL cell lines by targeted next-generation sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and immunohistochemistry analysis none or the alterations (double-negative) Supplementary Figure S1. Morphologic and immunophenotypic features of DLBCL with MYC rearrangement (MYC-R) and TP53 mutation (Mut-TP53) dual-alterations and highgrade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) with MYC/BCL2 double-hit (DH) in representative patients. Supplementary Figure S2. Prognostic impact of p53 and Myc protein overexpression as single or double abnormalities in overall DLBCL and GCB/ABC subtypes. Supplementary Figure S3. Heatmap for gene expression signatures of MYC/TP53 dual alterations. Supplementary Figure S4. Representative figures of flow cytometric analysis indicating G2/M phase-cell cycle arrest by NCB057643 treatment for 24 hours in cells with MYC-R or Myc overexpression with Wt-TP53 (OCI-LY19) or Mut-TP53 (GR and TMD8). Supplementary Figure S5. Heatmap for significantly up- or downregulated proteins after INCB057643 treatment (5µM, 24 hours) in OCI-LY19 cells. Supplementary Figure S6. A MDM2 inhibitor DS3032b shows cytotoxic effects selectively in high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) with MYC/BCL2 double-hit (DH) and wild-type (Wt) TP53. Supplementary Figure S7. Combined DS3032b and INCB057643 treatment has no synergistic cytotoxicity in DLBCL cell lines with MYC aberrations and TP53 mutation (MutTP53). Supplementary Figure S8. INCB057643 treatment (1.25 µM) alone or in combination with ABT-199 (venetoclax, 6.25 mM) for 24 hours induced p21 expression in TMD8 cells, whereas had no effect on p53 (mutant) expression levels.

Supplementary Figures S1 to S3

Supplementary Figure S1. Sanger sequencing chromatograms. Supplementary Figure S2. Cancer cell fraction for driver genes. Supplementary Figure S3. Ideogram with chromosome 7 alterations. Supplementary Figure S4. Examples of Exome Copy Number. Supplementary Figure S5. Exploratory Kaplan-Meier plots for clinical covariates. Supplementary Figure S6. Exploratory Kaplan-Meier plots for molecular covariates. Supplementary Figure S7. Sanger and exome sequencing validation of SETD2 biallelic mutation in one HSTL case. Supplementary Figure S8. SETD2 expression in mutant vs. wildtype cases. Supplementary Figure S9. Mutual exclusivity of STAT5B, PIK3CD, and STAT3 mutations.

Cross species binding and tolerability of ABBV-085.

Figures S1-S7 show LRRC15 RNA and protein expression in cancer, and demonstrate the anti-tumor efficacy of the LRRC15-targeted ADC ABBV-085 in vitro and in vivo as a monotherapy and in combination with standard-of-care therapies.

PDF file - 57KB, Supplemental Table 1. Genes differently expressed in EBV+ DLBCL vs. EBV-negative DLBCL. A. Genes upregulated in EBV+ DLBCL; B. Genes downregulated in EBV+ DLBCL

PDF file - 3781KB, Supplemental Figure 1. Morphologic subtypes of EBV+ DLBCL. A, E, I, and M. The monomorphic subtype is composed of monotonous sheets of large transformed B-cells. B, F, J and N. The polymorphic subtype, canonical large B-cell neoplasm variant contains high density of large neoplastic cells and scattered cells with HRS-like features. C, G, K and O. The polymorphic subtype, Hodgkin-like variant shows lower density of neoplastic cells with HRS-like features. D, H, L and P. The polymorphic subtype, lymphoproliferative disorder-like variant has low density of neoplastic cells without Hodgkin lymphoma-like features. By immunohistochemistry, the monomorphic variant had a GCB phenotype, but all 3 polymorphic variants showed non-GCB phenotype.

Supplementary Data from Antibodies to TWEAK Receptor Inhibit Human Tumor Growth through Dual Mechanisms

Supplemental Table 1 shows detailed MYD88 L265P mutation frequency in B cell neoplasms. Data are summarized from all publications in PUBMED containing "MYD88 L265P".

Purpose: Targeted therapeutics have significantly changed the outcome for patients diagnosed with cancer. Still, effective therapeutic intervention does not exist for many cancers and much remains to be done. The objective of this study was to identify novel genes that potentially regulate tumor growth, to target these gene products with monoclonal antibodies, and to examine the therapeutic potential of these antibodies.Experimental Design: Using cDNA microarray analysis, we identified genes overexpressed in several solid malignancies. We generated a mouse monoclonal antibody, 19.2.1, and its humanized counterpart, PDL192, to one such target, TweakR (TWEAK receptor, Fn14, TNFRSF12A, CD266), and characterized the antitumor activities in vitro and in mouse xenograft models.Results: Both 19.2.1 (mouse IgG2a) and PDL192 (human IgG1), like TWEAK, the natural ligand of TweakR, inhibited the growth of several TweakR-expressing cancer cell lines in anchorage-dependent and anchorage-independent assays in vitro. Both antibodies showed significant antitumor activity in multiple mouse xenograft models. PDL192 and 19.2.1 also induced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) of cancer cell lines in vitro. A chimeric version of 19.2.1 containing the mouse IgG1 Fc region (19.2.1×G1) exhibited significantly less ADCC than 19.2.1. However, 19.2.1×G1 showed differential activity in vivo, with activity equivalent to 19.2.1 in one model, but significantly less efficacy than 19.2.1 in a second model. These results indicate that PDL192 and 19.2.1 mediate their antitumor effects by signaling through TweakR, resulting in reduced tumor cell proliferation, and by ADCC. Clin Cancer Res; 16(2); 497–508

Purpose: Epstein–Barr virus–positive (EBV+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the elderly is a variant of DLBCL with worse outcome that occurs most often in East-Asian countries and is uncommon in the Western hemisphere. We studied the largest cohort of EBV+ DLBCL, independent of age, treated with rituximab combined with CHOP (R-CHOP) in developed Western countries.Experimental design: A large cohort (n = 732) of patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy is included from the multicenter consortium. This study group has been studied for expression of different biomarkers by immunohistochemistry, genetic abnormalities by FISH and mutation analysis, genomic information by gene expression profiling (GEP), and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA).Results: Twenty-eight patients (4.0%) were positive for EBV with a median age of 60.5 years. No clinical characteristics distinguished patients with EBV+ DLBCL from patients with EBV-negative (EBV−) DLBCL. Genetic aberrations were rarely seen. NF-κB p50, phosphorylated STAT-3, and CD30 were more commonly expressed in EBV+ DLBCLs (P < 0.05). Significant differences in survival were not observed in patients with EBV+ DLBCL versus EBV− DLBCL. However, CD30 expression combined with EBV conferred an inferior outcome. GEP showed a unique expression signature in EBV+ DLBCL. GSEA revealed enhanced activity of the NF-κB and JAK/STAT pathways independent of molecular subtype.Conclusions: The clinical characteristics of patients with EBV+ versus EBV− DLBCL are similar and EBV infection does not predict a worse outcome. EBV+ DLBCL, however, has a unique genetic signature. CD30 expression is more common in EBV+ DLBCL and, consistent CD30 and EBV is associated with an adverse outcome. Clin Cancer Res; 20(9); 2338–49. ©2014 AACR.

Purpose: To prospectively investigate the prognostic significance of p21 and p53 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the context of the U.S. Intergroup trial comparing conventional cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy to rituximab-CHOP (R-CHOP) induction, with or without maintenance rituximab.Experimental Design: Immunohistochemical staining of 197 paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens was scored by an independent panel of experts.Results: The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21, was expressed in 55% of cases examined. In a multivariable analysis adjusting for International Prognostic Index score and BCL2 status, p21 expression was a significant, independent, favorable predictive factor for failure-free survival (relative risk, 0.3; P = 0.001) and overall survival (relative risk, 0.3; P = 0.003) for patients treated with R-CHOP. Expression of p21 was not predictive of outcome for CHOP-treated patients.Only p21-positive cases benefited from the addition of rituximab to CHOP. Among p21-positive patients, treatment with R-CHOP was associated with a higher failure-free survival rate at 5 years compared with CHOP (61% versus 24%; P = 0.01). In contrast, no significant differences were detected in failure-free survival according to treatment arm for p21-negative patients. Expression of p53, alone or in combination with p21, did not predict for outcome in univariable or multivariable analyses.Conclusions: In this study, p21 protein expression emerged as an important independent predictor of a favorable clinical outcome when rituximab was added to CHOP therapy. These data suggest that rituximab-related effects on lymphoma survival pathways may be functionally linked to p21 activity. Clin Cancer Res; 16(8); 2435–42. ©2010 AACR.

The supplementary documents include: (1) Supplementary methods for detection of MYC mutations and rearrangements, assessment of Myc expression, and functional studies. (2) Supplementary Tables S1-S8. Supplementary Table S1. Numbers of MYC mutation present in the coding sequence and the untranslated regions. Supplementary Table S2. Clinical and molecular characteristics of the DLBCL cohort with wild-type or mutated Myc or N11S single nucleotide polymorphism. Supplementary Table S3. List of Myc mutations and corresponding patient survival. Supplementary Table S4. Multivariate survival analysis. Supplementary Table S5. Molecular characteristics of patients with wild-type or mutated MYC untranslated regions. Supplementary Table S6. List of MYC 3Ã,'UTR mutations and corresponding patient survival. Supplementary Table S7. Gene profiling comparisons between wild-type and mutated MYC. Supplementary Table S8. Brief summary of major findings by this study. (3) Legends for Supplementary Figures S1-S5. Supplementary Figure S1. Survival analysis for MYC mutations in DLBCL respective to GCB/ABC subtypes, homo/heterozygosity, and MYC translocations. Supplementary Figure S2. Comparison of Myc levels and gene expression profiles between DLBCL groups. Supplementary Figure S3. Differential expression of genes between the WT-Myc and MUT-Myc groups. Supplementary Figure S4. Comparison of gene expression between the WT-Myc and MUT-Myc groups. Supplementary Figure S5. Differential expression of proteins between the WT-Myc and MUT-Myc groups.

Purpose:Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is molecularly and clinically heterogeneous, and can be subtyped according to genetic alterations, cell-of-origin, or microenvironmental signatures using high-throughput genomic data at the DNA or RNA level. Although high-throughput proteomic profiling has not been available for DLBCL subtyping, MYC/BCL2 protein double expression (DE) is an established prognostic biomarker in DLBCL. The purpose of this study is to reveal the relative prognostic roles of DLBCL genetic, phenotypic, and microenvironmental biomarkers.Experimental Design:We performed targeted next-generation sequencing; IHC for MYC, BCL2, and FN1; and fluorescent multiplex IHC for microenvironmental markers in a large cohort of DLBCL. We performed correlative and prognostic analyses within and across DLBCL genetic subtypes and MYC/BCL2 double expressors.Results:We found that MYC/BCL2 double-high-expression (DhE) had significant adverse prognostic impact within the EZB genetic subtype and LymphGen-unclassified DLBCL cases but not within MCD and ST2 genetic subtypes. Conversely, KMT2D mutations significantly stratified DhE but not non-DhE DLBCL. T-cell infiltration showed favorable prognostic effects within BN2, MCD, and DhE but unfavorable effects within ST2 and LymphGen-unclassified cases. FN1 and PD-1–high expression had significant adverse prognostic effects within multiple DLBCL genetic/phenotypic subgroups. The prognostic effects of DhE and immune biomarkers within DLBCL genetic subtypes were independent although DhE and high Ki-67 were significantly associated with lower T-cell infiltration in LymphGen-unclassified cases.Conclusions:Together, these results demonstrated independent and additive prognostic effects of phenotypic MYC/BCL2 and microenvironment biomarkers and genetic subtyping in DLBCL prognostication, important for improving DLBCL classification and identifying prognostic determinants and therapeutic targets.

Supplementary Figure from Genetic Subtyping and Phenotypic Characterization of the Immune Microenvironment and MYC/BCL2 Double Expression Reveal Heterogeneity in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Supplementary Figure Legends

Supplementary Data from Genetic Subtyping and Phenotypic Characterization of the Immune Microenvironment and MYC/BCL2 Double Expression Reveal Heterogeneity in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Next-generation sequencing has revealed cancer genomic landscapes, in which over 100 driver genes that, when altered by intragenic mutations, can promote oncogenesis. MYD88 is a driver gene found in hematologic B-cell malignancies. A missense mutation (L265P) changing leucine at position 265 to proline in MYD88 is found in ∼90% of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) cases and in significant portions of activated B-cell diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Few cancers such as WM have a single amino acid substitution in one gene like MYD88 L265P that occurs in ∼90% of cases, making WM paradigmatic for study of a single causative mutation in oncogenesis. In this review, we summarize the frequency and cancer spectrum of MYD88 L265P and its downstream effects in lymphoid cancers. Malignant B cells with MYD88 L265P are likely transformed from IgM-producing B cells either in response to T-cell–independent antigens or in response to protein antigens before class switching. We also discuss therapeutic strategies that include targeting Bruton tyrosine kinase and other kinases, interfering with the assembly of MYD88 and its interacting partners, and MYD88 L265P-specific peptide-based immunotherapy. Cancer Res; 78(10); 2457–62. ©2018 AACR.

Purpose: Activated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) regulates tumor growth, invasion, cell proliferation, angiogenesis, immune response, and survival. Data regarding expression of phosphorylated (activated) STAT3 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and the impact of phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) on prognosis are limited.Experimental Design: We evaluated expression of pSTAT3 in de novo DLBCL using immunohistochemistry, gene expression profiling (GEP), and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Results were analyzed in correlation with cell-of-origin (COO), critical lymphoma biomarkers, and genetic translocations.Results: pSTAT3 expression was observed in 16% of DLBCL and was associated with advanced stage, multiple extranodal sites of involvement, activated B-cell–like (ABC) subtype, MYC expression, and MYC/BCL2 expression. Expression of pSTAT3 predicted inferior overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with de novo DLBCL. When DLBCL cases were stratified according to COO or MYC expression, pSTAT3 expression did not predict inferior outcome, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the prognostic predictability of pSTAT3 expression was due to its association with the ABC subtype, MYC expression, and adverse clinical features. GEP demonstrated upregulation of genes, which can potentiate function of STAT3. GSEA showed the JAK–STAT pathway to be enriched in pSTAT3+ DLBCL.Conclusions: The results of this study provide a rationale for the ongoing successful clinical trials targeting the JAK–STAT pathway in DLBCL. Clin Cancer Res; 20(19); 5113–23. ©2014 AACR.

Purpose: MYC is a critical driver oncogene in many cancers, and its deregulation in the forms of translocation and overexpression has been implicated in lymphomagenesis and progression of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The MYC mutational profile and its roles in DLBCL are unknown. This study aims to determine the spectrum of MYC mutations in a large group of patients with DLBCL, and to evaluate the clinical significance of MYC mutations in patients with DLBCL treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) immunochemotherapy.Experimental Design: We identified MYC mutations in 750 patients with DLBCL using Sanger sequencing and evaluated the prognostic significance in 602 R-CHOP–treated patients.Results: The frequency of MYC mutations was 33.3% at the DNA level (mutations in either the coding sequence or the untranslated regions) and 16.1% at the protein level (nonsynonymous mutations). Most of the nonsynonymous mutations correlated with better survival outcomes; in contrast, T58 and F138 mutations (which were associated with MYC rearrangements), as well as several mutations occurred at the 3′ untranslated region, correlated with significantly worse survival outcomes. However, these mutations occurred infrequently (only in approximately 2% of DLBCL). A germline SNP encoding the Myc-N11S variant (observed in 6.5% of the study cohort) was associated with significantly better patient survival, and resulted in reduced tumorigenecity in mouse xenografts.Conclusions: Various types of MYC gene mutations are present in DLBCL and show different impact on Myc function and clinical outcomes. Unlike MYC gene translocations and overexpression, most MYC gene mutations may not have a role in driving lymphomagenesis. Clin Cancer Res; 22(14); 3593–605. ©2016 AACR.

Supplementary Figure 1. Morphology and immunophenotype of pSTAT3+ DLBCL. Supplementary Figure 2. Relationship between STAT3 mRNA and pSTAT3 expression and survival analysis based on STAT3 mRNA level. Supplementary Figure 3. Survival analyses based on pSTAT3 expression in DLBCL with MYC/BCL2 double expression and DLBCL without MYC/BCL2 double expression after COO stratification. Supplementary Figure 4. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in all DLBCL cases, DLBCL with germinal center B-cell-like phenotype (GCB) and DLBCL with activated B-cell-like phenotype (ABC). Supplementary Figure 5. Survival analyses in 3 and 4 groups based on pSTAT3 expression in lymphoma cells. Supplementary Table 1. Number of cases based on pSTAT3 expression, MYC/BCL2 double expression and COO classification Supplementary Table 2. The numbers and percentages of pSTAT3 positive DLBCL with each cutoff Supplementary Table 3. Clinical characteristics and cell-of-origin differentiation with 30% cutoff for pSTAT3 expression Supplementary Table 4. Distribution of cell-of-origin classification based on 4 groups of pSTAT3 expression in lymphoma cells. Supplementary Table 5. Distribution of cell-of-origin classification based on 3 groups of pSTAT3 expression in lymphoma cells. Supplementary Table 6. Bivariate analyses of pSTAT3 with each variable and pSTAT3.

Context.—Although CD30 testing is an established tool in the diagnostic workup of lymphomas, it is also emerging as a predictive biomarker that informs treatment. The current definition of CD30 positivity by immunohistochemistry is descriptive and based on reactivity in lymphomas that are defined by their universal strong expression of CD30, rather than any established threshold. Challenges include inconsistencies with preanalytic variables, tissue processing, pathologist readout, and with the pathologist and oncologist interpretation of reported results.Objective.—To develop and propose general best practice recommendations for reporting CD30 expression by immunohistochemistry in lymphoma biopsies to harmonize practices across institutions and facilitate assessment of its significance in clinical decision-making.Design.—Following literature review and group discussion, the panel of 14 academic hematopathologists and 2 clinical/academic hematologists/oncologists divided into 3 working groups. Each working group was tasked with assessing CD30 testing by immunohistochemistry, CD30 expression readout, or CD30 expression interpretation.Results.—Panel recommendations were reviewed and discussed. An online survey was conducted to confirm the consensus recommendations.Conclusions.—CD30 immunohistochemistry is required for all patients in whom classic Hodgkin lymphoma and any lymphoma within the spectrum of peripheral T-cell lymphoma are differential diagnostic considerations. The panel reinforced and summarized that immunohistochemistry is the preferred methodology and any degree of CD30 expression should be reported. For diagnostic purposes, the interpretation of CD30 expression should follow published guidelines. To inform therapeutic decisions, report estimated percent positive expression in tumor cells (or total cells where applicable) and record descriptively if nontumor cells are positive.

Classification of myeloid neoplasms with isolated isochromosome i(17q) [17p deletion with inherent monoallelic TP53 loss plus 17q duplication] is controversial. Most cases fall within the WHO unclassifiable myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN-U) category. The uniformly dismal outcomes warrant better understanding of this entity. We undertook a multi-institutional retrospective study of 92 adult MDS/MPN-U cases from eight institutions. Twenty-nine (32%) patients had isolated i(17q) [MDS/MPN-i(17q)]. Compared to MDS/MPN without i(17q), MDS/MPN-i(17q) patients were significantly younger, had lower platelet and absolute neutrophil counts, and higher frequency of splenomegaly and circulating blasts. MDS/MPN-i(17q) cases showed frequent bilobed neutrophils (75% vs. 23%; P = 0.03), hypolobated megakaryocytes (62% vs. 20%; P = 0.06), and a higher frequency of SETBP1 (69% vs. 5%; P = 0.002) and SRSF2 (63% vs. 5%; P = 0.006) mutations that were frequently co-existent (44% vs. 0%; P = 0.01). TP53 mutations were rare. The mutation profile of MDS/MPN-U-i(17q) was similar to other myeloid neoplasms with i(17q) including atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis, myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia, with frequent concomitant SETBP1/SRSF2 mutations observed across all the diagnostic entities. Over a median follow-up of 52 months, patients with MDS/MPN-i(17q) showed a shorter median overall survival (11 vs. 28 months; P < 0.001). The presence of i(17q) retained independent poor prognostic value in multivariable Cox-regression analysis [HR 3.686 (1.17-11.6); P = 0.026] along with splenomegaly. We suggest that MDS/MPN-i(17q) warrants recognition as a distinct subtype within the MDS/MPN-U category based on its unique clinico-biologic features and uniformly poor prognosis.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas are a heterogeneous, and usually aggressive, group of mature T-cell neoplasms with overlapping clinical, morphologic and immunologic features. A large subset of these neoplasms remains unclassifiable with current diagnostic methods ("not otherwise specified"). Genetic profiling and other molecular tools have emerged as widely applied and transformative technologies for discerning the biology of lymphomas and other hematopoietic neoplasms. Although the application of these technologies to peripheral T-cell lymphomas has lagged behind B-cell lymphomas and other cancers, molecular profiling has provided novel prognostic and diagnostic markers as well as an opportunity to understand the biologic mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of these neoplasms. Some biomarkers are more prevalent in specific T-cell lymphoma subsets and are being used currently in the diagnosis and/or risk stratification of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Other biomarkers, while promising, need to be validated in larger clinical studies. In this review, we present a summary of our current understanding of the molecular profiles of the major types of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. We particularly focus on the use of biomarkers, including those that can be detected by conventional immunohistochemical studies and those that contribute to the diagnosis, classification, or risk stratification of these neoplasms.