1. Development and Comparison of Two Multiresidue Methods for the Analysis of 17 Mycotoxins in Cereals by Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry
- Author
-
Eric Gremaud, Pascal Mottier, Walburga Seefelder, Jean-Marie Oberson, Patricia Tella, and Aurélien Desmarchelier
- Subjects
Ochratoxin A ,Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization ,Electrospray ,Aflatoxin ,Chromatography ,Chemistry ,Food Contamination ,General Chemistry ,Mycotoxins ,Quechers ,Mass spectrometry ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Diacetoxyscirpenol ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Certified reference materials ,Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry ,Edible Grain ,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences ,Chromatography, Liquid - Abstract
Two multiresidue methods based on different extraction procedures have been developed and compared for the liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry analysis of 17 mycotoxins including ochratoxin A, aflatoxins (B(1), B(2), G(1), and G(2)), zearalenone, fumonisins (B(1) and B(2)), T-2 toxin, HT-2 toxin, nivalenol, deoxynivalenol, 3- and 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol, fusarenon-X, diacetoxyscirpenol, and neosolaniol in cereal-based commodities. The extraction procedures considered were a QuEChERS-like method and one using accelerated solvent extraction (ASE). Both extraction procedures gave similar performances in terms of linearity (r(2) > 0.98) and precision (both RSD(r) and RSD(iR) < 20%). Trueness was evaluated through participation in four proficiency tests and by the analysis of two certified reference materials and one quality control material. Satisfactory Z scores (|Z| < 2) and trueness values (73-130%) were obtained by the proposed procedures. Limits of quantification were similar by both methods and were within the 1.0-2.0 microg/kg range for aflatoxins, 0.5 microg/kg for ochratoxin A, and the 5-100 microg/kg range for all other mycotoxins tested. The QuEChERS-like method was found to be easier to handle and allowed a higher sample throughput as compared to the ASE method.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF